Motivation And Job Characteristics Model In Organizational Behavior: A Literature Review

Motivation and Job Characteristics Model

Motivation, as well as job characteristic model in most cases, refers to theory that enables an individual to improve performance of worker and job satisfaction using job redesign. The model states that if an individual does this successfully, then they can develop the conditions for different workers to thrive in their operations (Yazdanfar & Jafari, 2017). By succeeding, it means that worker will be motivated, perform to the spirited level and be satisfied by their duties. Motivation together with job characteristic model remains to be one of the most influential attempts that are useful in designing different jobs with increased motivational properties. The model in organizational behavior offers the ideas of implementing different principles for enriching jobs in settings of an organization. According to Blanz (2017), the originality version of motivation together with job satisfaction model work about different core dimensions that result in psychological states. It is clear that idea of job particular theory concentrate on approaches to planning job for it to tend in motivating an individual. In the past decade, jobs had been systematized as well as simplified with the aim of increasing productivity and maximizing production of an individual or organization. Kahya (2018) reported that motivation and job characteristics model came about because the intended helped in increasing systematization which has never materialized because of cases of dissatisfaction among workers that was on the rise. Therefore, the primary target of this paper is to examine literature review by use of different journal article in addressing motivational and job characteristics model in organizational behavior.

Hackman along with Oldham (1975) proposed the model of motivation and job satisfaction that is commonly utilized as the framework to examine how specific characteristic of job influence the outcomes of employment such as job satisfaction. The model states that there consist of five different core characteristics of situation that influence three important psychological states that in turn affect outcomes of work (Lin, Yeh, & Lin, 2010). The 5 core characteristic of work can be put together to form potential motivation gain for the work that can be applied as index of how probably work is to influence the attitude and behavior of workers. In setting the course for the advanced point of view on outline of job, Meyerding (2015) had attempted to explore the effect of qualities of employment on specialist mentalities. The investigator built up the reasonable system that he got from work of Nese & Troisi (2014) and furthermore the traditional model of detailing of the hypothesis of desires. Several surveyors had demonstrated that model of motivation and job characteristics are useful in operations of organizations. For instance, survey of Österberg & Rydstedt (2018) illustrates that job satisfaction degree is commonly established by different mixture of jobs, personal, together with service traits. Therefore leading to more assortments inside the activity or pivoting the worker for various occupations to enhance the fulfillment of employment and improving their execution. Therefore, motivation and job satisfaction characteristics model are consequently universal with uniting every analysis of investigators (Uppal, 2017). Accordingly, this theory is widely utilized to evaluate and look at way of life of workers in different countries.

Core Dimensions of Work and Psychological States

Based on this model, Hackman and Oldman (1975) developed it to focus on appropriate designing of employment tasks so that the theory can motivate an individual when they work in different organizations. Motivation together with job characteristics model refers to aimed traits of various works, especially extent to which multiple tasks are planned to be capable of enhancing the internal motivation of employment and job satisfaction of job incumbents. The model has different core dimensions that lead to three important psychological situations that further effect in results that relate to operate in businesses. As supported by Kim (2016), these dimensions incorporate expertise assortment, character of undertaking, and criticalness of assignment, input, and self-sufficiency. The measurements of this hypothesis dependably affect various basic mental states that incorporate seriousness, obligation regarding results, and information of genuine results (Dhanraj & Parumasur, 2014). The theory then influences the outcomes of work such as satisfaction of job, motivation of work, and absenteeism among other factors. As per this hypothesis, plan of any activity has immense impact on inspiration execution of work, and employment fulfillment. It fills in as the system utilized by various administration with objective of identifying how certain job traits influence the result of the jobs (W., 2016). The use of this model in the present society has helped in specifying different situations were diverse specialists, or individual can be within persuaded to present their jobs productively.

In present times, motivation and job characteristics model has been under the concept that deals with designing of work or job design. Here, the emphasis has been on ideas that can shape the role to satisfy the needs of both the individual and an organization (Abdel-Ghany, 2013). Furthermore, as the title of the theory imply the motivation and job characteristic model and more particularly the job diagnostic surveys were well intended to improve as well as evaluate work done by others. The major function of the model is to analyze present job operations and assess different impacts of changes in job on workers for outcome that include ideas such as motivation, productivity, as well as satisfaction. The model centers around crafted by the activity itself rather than various plan of occupation centered points of view. The model is distinguished as one the central worker inspiration speculations inside activities of general associations (Mani, 2013). The fundamentals of this model are that the characteristics of the movement prompt basic mental states that quick individual together with work results with each progression being directed by a person’s requirement for development.

Skill variety

It is a degree that the job needs an individual to utilize numerous high levels of talents in conducting operations. Skill variety involves the process of using the number of varied skills together with talents of an individual. In this way, it pursues that the individual will be expected to make the assortment of gifts and aptitudes (Rakhi & Kumar, 2015). The area of expertise assortment solicits the number from gifts and talents that the activity needs of the individual that will work on it all the time. A brisk giveaway may b either need to evaluate if the activity is dull and dreary or on the off chance that it requests that the specialist do the quantity of changing activities or undertakings. For instance, an individual like those that work in a car wash whose duty comprise directing clients into automatic car wash illustrates little variety of ability level. Muku (2013) records that, an individual who works in a car wash act as cashier, managing inventory of chemicals used in washing and maintaining equipment of car wash always demonstrates high variety of skill. Therefore, the theory states that the job that has more range and then needs more skills together with talents results in the instance where worker feel that they are doing more meaningful work.

Impact of the Model on Job Outcomes

It alludes to how much different tasks of the job are identifiable and have visible results. Motivation and job characteristics theory state that if the worker understands what is needed to be attained, understands when every task is done, and are capable of seeing the results of what they are achieving at the end, then they will feel that they are performing a meaningful response. The dimension of the theory is just the degree to which an individual is responsible for finishing an identifiable bit of obligation from begins to fulfillment (Oldman, 2015). For example, a website specialist that outlines segments of a web address will have low character of assignment in light of the fact that work blends in with other work of site masters. Finally, it will be outrageous for any one individual to ensure various obligations concerning the result (Hardie, Daw, & Gaddis, 2017). However, webmaster that is responsible for designing the entire website has high identity of task that they perform in any organization.

Task identity involves the process if being capable of working on the entire process of work, instead of just on pieces and bits of work. In this manner, it is basic to survey whether the assignment or employment has the unmistakably portrayed starting, center, and end of tasks (Wnuk, 2017). In this measurement, laborers of different associations tend to find simply more criticalness in their undertakings when they can perceive the whole and unmistakable outcomes toward the finish of work cycle or the day. The use of appropriate variety of an individual’s skills and talent might lead to boring, or overwhelming, or few experiences in the workstations.  Most job holders can experience more usefulness in jobs that need different set of skills and abilities than when the jobs are routine and elementary (Hackman & Oldham, 1975). Workers experience more meaningfulness in their operations when they are involved in the full process of services rather than having a responsibility for a section of work.

It refers to condition whether an individual’s job substantially impacts work, health, or well-being of other people. The dimension comprises of idea of identifying undertaking as adding to something more broadly to a specific get-together or society over and past self (Hussein, 2018). For example, the model recommends that an individual turns out to be more spurred if they are adding to the entire reward of the firm inconsistently or if they are responsible for looking at someone or making something that might be beneficial to another individual. Conversely, an individual might be less motivated if they are only involved in the process of making a faceless owner to acquire more health or making some items that are regarded to e pointless such as gifts that corporate create to give away. Therefore, task importance remains to be measured to which job or an employment opportunity has the substantial influence on the lives of different individuals (Ren & Wang, 2014). It affects people of all races whether they are individuals in the immediate corporation or the global society at large.

Organizational Productivity

Chores together with job are essential if they can influence lives of different individuals. The dimension states that management of organization should not just focus on people within the organization, but even on individuals around or outside its operations. For several individuals, an occupation holds furthermore importance in case it can help with upgrading the colossal combination of various individuals whether rationally, physically, or deep down (Vanny & Moon, 2015). Understanding that their action and their execution in assignment thereof can have constructive effect on others helps in rousing individuals further to enhance the circumstance. What’s more, individuals who put great stock on embraced significance are always excited for checking whether the action that they are doing matters to different people in operations of organization. For such people, which means comes through getting acknowledgment by other individuals. For instance, a janitor that has the responsibility of cleaning the floor at a place of business may discover the activity low in noteworthiness, as believing is not the major undertaking (Schenk, 2014). Be that as it may, janitor in charge of cleaning the floors at the doctor’s facility may see their capacity as fundamental in helping patients show signs of improvement anyway when they sense that their commitments are basic, workers tend to sense that they are affecting their condition and suppositions of propelled confidence. Therefore, task significance looks at great impact and influence that a job has on development and advancement of individuals (Oldham & Hackman, 2010). Jobs in every organizational setting are more satisfying if individuals believe that they make the difference and are adding real value to coworkers, the corporation, together with the entire community.

It is degree to that provider of job achieves significant discretion, freedom, with independence to plan out activities of work and determine the right procedure in the job. For different jobs with greater level of autonomy, the results of the work depend on the effort of workers, decisions, and initiatives rather than on focusing on different commands from manager or manual procedures of job (Dorsey, 2015). In such instances, the holders of job experience greater personal responsibility for their failure and achievements at work in various organizations. Furthermore, some researchers state that autonomy refers to the degree of employee freedom in completing their roles. It is sense to which employee has choice of choosing how to go about doing particular duties and the degree to which they can select how to plan their daily operations (Balducci, Schaufeli, & Fraccaroli, 2011). Autonomy enables different workers to encounter obligation regarding consequences of the work that they are assigned to perform in any organizational setting.

Autonomy ensures that an individual has the freedom of deciding on how they can perform their duties and responsibilities assigned to them by management of an organization. For instance, a teacher who is expected to pursue a foreordained course book, tending to a given once-over of issues using a particular summary of activities of class, has low self-administration. Subsequently, an instructor who is permitted to pick a perusing material, plan the substance clearly, and utilize any critical materials while passing on addresses has more necessary level of independence (Bal Tastan, 2014). Be that as it may, self-rule builds inspiration at working environment, but it posses other merits in an organization setting. Therefore, idea of giving autonomy at work remain to be useful to their operations and success of the company since autonomous workers are allowed to choose how to play out their obligations and in this way they can be more inventive (Hayati & Caniago, 2012). These laborers are additionally less inclined to embrace saying this isn’t my activity way to deal with their work setting and rather be proactive and additionally imaginative.

Implications for Management

It is the extent to which every employee has understanding of outcomes. It is a comprehensive and particular data concerning success of their performance of job. The dimension of the motivation and job characteristics model states that when employees receive actionable, clear data concerning their performance of work, they have the best overall understanding of the influence of their work activities and what particular actions they have to focus on taking to enhance their productivity in operations (Oldham & Hackman, 2010). The dimension helps people to figure out how powerful they are found in their occupation environment. Criticism at any occupation setting may originate from different persons, for example, peers, directors, subordinates, and customers, or it might arise from the activity itself. In this dimension, the theory states that more feedbacks result to improve understanding for the workers concerning the outcomes of their work. If the worker is offered positive feedback concerning the work they are performing, then their self-esteem will be boosted, and they will be motivated to maintain performing what they play best (Veltman, 2018). If the worker receives negative feedbacks quickly then, this offers the workers the great chance of making appropriate adjustments together with corrections to their work before any major results are experienced.

The degree needed to conduct different activities of work is necessary by offers the individual with clear as well as direct data concerning the effectiveness of their performance. It is evident that as much as possible, workers are always willing and have the urge of being kept on top of it on their execution of the action (Östbring, Eriksson, & Lindgren, 2017). Not only will such idea keep worker informed of their r advancement as representatives, however it additionally stays to be one methodology for the specialists to support their certainty and execution. If every one of the five attributes are joined or lumped together, administration of association can have the capacity to think of the single figure or record that can go about as the pointer of the overall inspiring prospect of the activity under assessment or overhauling. Such record will indispensably show probability or odds of the action influencing the practices together with mentalities of specialist. The figure or file is alluded to as MPS or the rousing potential scores (Ali et al., 2014). The model illustrates that intrinsic rewards for employees are obtained by individual when they learn that they have performed effectively on the task that they care about during operations. The more these psychological states are present, the greater the performance, motivation, and satisfaction of workers. The motivation and job model is depicted in graphical format as illustrated below.

It is evident from the flowchart that the connections between the fulfillment of employment and the outcomes are directed by the individual quality towards their growth in needs. It, therefore, means that the individual with high development need is more probably to experience the states of psychological when their duties are enriched such that the scope of their job is expanded (Ullah, Mughal, & Jehangir, 2018). In most cases, individual tend to react more positively to the mental states when they are available.

Conclusion

According to the study conducted by Faturochman, the primary methodology for the coveted results to emerge or show up is for a man to encounter every one of the three distinctive mental states. However, the main way to deal with experience of states is to have the center attributes of occupation. According to Vanhove & Gordon (2013), these three important psychological states in motivation and job characteristics model include experienced meaningfulness of work, learning of results, and experienced duty regarding results.  Consequently, Hackman together with Oldman (2010) also mentioned idea of motivation that will be high among persons who are capable of experiencing these states of psychology.

This state alludes to how much the worker is capable of seeing his or her job as having the result that is important and valuable to the organization, worker, and the surrounding setting. The surrounding setting includes the area affected by different dimensions of the model for instance variety of skill, significance of task, with identity of task (Panicker, 2018). This statement illustrates that people need to feel that, when they are working, they are performing something valuable. These individuals tend to feel that their operations, in and of itself, is important. It means that individuals within the operations of organization have to feel that what they are performing is generally of value or worthwhile. Individual needs to hold some vital or significance, particularly concerning the framework or the arrangement of various qualities that the individual level puts stock in or acknowledges (Hessels, Brixy, Naude, & Gries, 2014). By taking a gander at the introduction of the figure on the model, an individual can without much of a stretch see that there exist an association between weightiness of work and the initial three center qualities of employment. In rundown, the specialist will be fit for discovering all the more importance in their activity if aptitude assortment, assignment character, together with undertaking hugeness is in presence.

It alludes to how much the other representative feels capable furthermore, in charge of the consequences of their work. The sort of mental state does not merely center on any duty. With regards to inspiration and occupation attributes demonstrate, it influences people to discuss moral obligation (Chen & Liu, 2013). An individual needs to feel responsible for the consequences of their work that they are performing. It represents how opportunity and self-sufficiency are offered in the execution of a person’s activity. Here, the specialist will then use this opportunity of acting in settling on choices on the best way. The idea can assist in playing out the activity that contain rolling out various improvements simultaneously, choice on booking, and applying specific rule that an individual regards right and helpful to the achievement assignment, in any case, together with opportunity and in addition self-sufficiency is the awareness of other’s expectations (Kim, 2015). Contingent upon the thoughts of settling on choices by specialists, they might be responsible for the outcomes whether it is the failure of success.

It is how much the employer maintains the awareness of the effectiveness of their work that is affected by freedom. It is the given that understanding outcomes of an individual’s job will assist their track nor monitor their effectiveness in their job. Ideas in this state help people in evaluating their performance of job (Van den Broeck, De Cuyper, De Witte, & Vansteenkiste, 2010). However, possessing knowledge of outcomes is important for various reasons. For instance, it is useful in ensuring that every employee remains to know about progress or disappointment of their obligations and in the process enable the laborer to gain from their slip-ups. The third mental state helps in allowing the specialist to interface on the enthusiastic level with the focused on clients or end clients of their or yields (Johnson & Jiang, 2012). Also, this importance of model allows workers to find more meaning in their work.

There are different defenders of the model proposed by various conceivable business-related issues. Results are adopted from earlier works by different more previous literature work authors, the personal and employment outcomes of the initial hypothesis (McCahill, 2018). Some of these work-related outcomes comprise of spiritual work inspiration, work fulfillment, execution quality, non-attendance, and cases of employee turnover. 

Here, the worker may infer inspiration to play out their work from outside sources. As per the report by Aloysius (2011), the fitting sort of incentive would stay to be inborn inspiration that falls into place without a hitch or inside in the specialist.

In straightforward terms, work fulfillment alludes to the level of happiness of the specialist with their activity. In understanding to work by Asik-Dizdar & Esen  (2016), they gave the intricate definition by alluding work fulfillment as a multi-dimensional mental reaction to a person’s activity and these reactions could either be compelling, conduct, or psychological.

This sort of result centers on the general nature of how the function was finished or performed. It looks if the work was effective, efficient and examining if the targets were well achieved (Maturana, 2014). It also concentrates on examination if standards of quality in operations were adhered to within an organization.

It is evident in the operations of many organizations that a profoundly energetic boss will enroll instances of low non-appearance. For the most part, representatives who feel that they are exhausted with their duties at work or not tested at all would fail to have the eagerness that tends to push specialist to wake to go to pace of work every morning (Siluyanova, 2014). These representatives that wake up mid tend not to anticipate the work day ahead, and subsequently, they are all term not perform their work effectively. In any case, it abandons expressing that non-appearance is one of the main reasons that lead to instances of low productivity in workplace.

It illustrates that in any case, the corporation that registers the instances of high turnover rate in staff implies that there exist s issues about how administration of HR assets. It very well may be that the occurrences of poor occupation configuration do no inspire distinctive specialists to remain in one job for long within the corporation (Gaither & Nadkarni, 2011). Therefore, there is needed to look for other jobs in different organization to improve operations of people in the employment sectors.

By combining all of the above core job traits, the theory of job characteristics comes up with the comparison that shows the potential for the particular task to motivating. The equation referred to as the Potential Motivation Score (MPS). The theory was produced by Hackman together with Oldham as a normative approach of enriching job (Bednarska, 2015). The model specifies five core dimensions of situation that might lead to important psychological states among individual worker. The equation is useful in assessing the motivational potential of specific employment and thereby suggesting the type of jobs to be redesign in any organization. In order to perform such functions, score of motivational potential is calculated from the questionnaire that comprises of different components of motivation and job characteristics model (Schulz, Chowdhury, & Van de Voort, 2013). The score remains to be the index based on the following formula such as skill variety (range of performed task), task identity (capacity to finish the total employment from initiation to culmination), and hugeness of assignment (impact of the activity on other individuals). Therefore, Motivational potential Score (MPS) is given by (aptitude assortment in addition to undertaking assortment in addition to errand criticalness) separated via (Autonomy duplicate by Feedback).

That is

The major conclusion that an individual can draw from equation of the model is that the feedback with autonomy matter more to motivation than any one of skill variety, identity, and significance of task. In essence, what the equation of MPS tries to say that the only way for the worker to experience all three states of psychology is for the job to score highly on each of the five characteristics of job (Hackman & Oldham, 1975). Hence, low score on either input or self-governance will considerably decrease the MPS of occupation. These factors reduce MPS because they both experience responsibility and understanding of outcomes that must be present for personal and outcomes of work to be high, and two characteristics of job produce the corresponding two states of psychology. However, low score on one of the three states of psychology expected to foster experienced meaningfulness might not necessarily compromise the MPS of job (Behson, 2010). It does not compromise the score because the absence of any one of those three attributes can be compensated for the substantial presence of other individuals. Nearly all jobholders are required to respond positively to jobs high in line with motivating potential when they score high on all three of the individual conditions.

Hackman with Oldham (1975) taken a gander at added substance, relapse, and multiplicative mixes of the center of the five attributes of occupation they found no critical contrasts in the results. They chose their strategy similar to no preferable or more regrettable over some other. The examination researched the count of MPS as the added substance score to check whether any distinction exists in the midst of the two procedures. Yazdanfar & Jafari (2017) separated among three of the strategies and felt the added substance display to be prevalent although results that they acquired in utilizing each of the three techniques for computing the MPS to be normal. Uppal (2017) used this contention as help for his suggestion of unidemensionality of attributes of occupation.

Ren & Wang (2014) alongside Nese & Troisi (2014) condemned different surveyors for following technique proposed by Hackman and Oldham, however, did not exhibit that the decision of Hackman and Oldham was sub-par or better than some other strategy for figuring the “spurring potential score.” The model of relapse was sub-par utilized by Hardie, Daw, & Gaddis (2017) as they felt it performed better. Dhanraj & Parumasur (2014) called attention to that the connection coefficient that exists between variable with composite factors shaped by a few factors. Furthermore, MPS is merely the target proportion of the odds for self-bearing, individual achievement, and discovering that may exist in the activity. It quantified development and required quality that demonstrates the ability of specialists to exploit these progressions. Bal Tastan (2014) felt that the mental development progression needs of individuals are essential in deciding how energetically individuals will react to work high in inspiring potential. A few people have potent urges for individual learning, achievements, and creating themselves past where they are as of now in yet other need such premiums. Kahya (2018) upheld the theory that quality of development want has more impact on occupation advancement than generals’ sociological or mental foundation.

The model is used fundamentally within existing organizations, focusing on people who are employed within the firm. However, the concept of the model is still new to the sector of organizational behavior. The model is used in understanding the job traits of organization. Maturana (2014) is one of the few entrepreneurship surveyors to utilize the model of incentive together with job characteristics to understand aspects of employment in different organizations. His analysis focused on one result measures that are satisfaction. The result of Maturana’s examination found that the differences of mean of job satisfaction together with four job traits did differ significantly amid entrepreneurs and managers. One target of the present article is to create upon the foundation laid by Maturana (2014) by further extending the use of motivation and Job Characteristics Model to organization operations through examination of the extra outcome measures of motivation.

It is easy to use the model through process of tweaking the design of the existing jobs on members of an organization. An individual can design situations such that the holders of job experience greater satisfaction of job and deliver quality outcomes. People can use the model to combine their activities to increase skill variety and improve identity of task they are assigned to attain (Hutabarat, 2015). For example, it helps in making a person to ultimately be responsible for recruiting for the vacancy instead for just sourcing of active profiles for the same. It is used in assigning high or more significant duties to individuals so that they feel connected to as well as accountable for best results. The model helps organization in getting its workers to see how their performance is contributing to the division, organization, and department performance (Meyerding, 2015). Besides, this theory increases participation of organization’s team members in the process of arriving at a decision and delegating more responsibility to increase autonomy. It also remains a useful theory as it opens different channels of communication to improve the quality and frequency of feedback (Bailey & Madden, 2016). Therefore, following the core principals of the theory, organizations are capable of sharing input that they receive from their clients and other stakeholders with their team members.

There are several ways that management and key stakeholders of an organization can put the model into correct usage. They can use the model to design the new responsibilities and to redesign the existing role when the satisfaction of worker or their productivity is low (Österberg & Rydstedt, 2018). Additionally, some conventional approaches to consider when trying implementing the model of job characteristics comprise of the push tasks as low as possible, diversifying assigned duties, assigning different operations to groups, and engaging workers with customers among other activities. By pushing activities of organization as far down its management as possible help in the creation of autonomy of task. In turn, this approach leads to the feeling of responsibility for that task for the worker. Additionally, giving the worker varied tasks to do help management in maintaining their job to vary and exciting as it needs the number of skills for operations (Ozmusula, 2017). The organization also contributes to increasing understanding by different workers as to how their duties contribute to the whole activities when they are assigned various tasks.

The model help in assigning work to different groups. The model also leads to process of increasing teamwork. Besides, this model helps in engaging workers with customers around different markets.  The connection of workers with customers to helps them in understanding the effect of their operations as well as encouraging accountability and showing workers how they can operate together (Vanny & Moon, 2015). Therefore, from all these applications, motivation and Job Characteristics Model remains as a device that enables an individual to understand how the attributes of an individual’s job contribute to their motivation to perform any assigned task. Individuals can use the tool to create the advanced roles that are both rewarding and motivating or to rectify the existing function when the worker is not performing to the prospect standard, or their motivation is low.

Organizations have the mandate of employing several theoretical approaches in the event of designing their jobs. Come of these theoretical approaches according to Oldham & Hackman (2010) include Taylorism, approach of Socio-Technical System, model of Core Characteristics, and theory of Psychological Empowerment. Every approach emphasizes various aspects that need to be considered ineffective process of job design.

This approach refers to the scientific management that forms the foundation for designing job systematically. According to Fredrick Taylor, the developer of this theory, the theory works to develop the science for each position within operations of organization following different principles. Some of these principles comprise of development of a standard approach for every task and support workers in their actions (Lin, Yeh, & Lin, 2010). Other laws in this theory are needed to develop idea that aims at successful selection and hiring of proper workers. It also aims at offering practical training for workers in different organizational settings.

The approach is based on the evolution of individual work to different work done by groups. The plan has different guiding principles in job redesign. Some of these guiding principles include the design of organization to fit its goals. It ensures that workers are actively involved in the process of designing organization structure (Kahya, 2018). It also focuses on controlling variances in production or services must be undertaken as close to their source as possible. It has the guiding principle of supporting systems that as to fit in with the organizational design and design has to allow for the high quality working culture.

A few analysts have invested an immense measure of energy theorizing on the idea of the distinctive directing models of occupation attributes in official conduct. These analysts have been attempting different arbitrators diverse to choose in the model. None of these surveyors have met with enduring achievement or been received by different specialists. Varieties in crafted by these analysts incorporate Gaither & Nadkarni (2011) directed impact of the work area about country setting or town. Moreover, Chen & Liu (2013) took a gander at the curvilinear connection between extent of employment and the necessary conditions of brain science. Aloysius (2011) in his work included the 6th center attributes of freedom of undertaking that was additionally isolated into started reliance of errand and relationship of get assignment. Aloysius in his work focused on altering the primary mental states by separating between old wander of a person in practice and experienced duty of a person’s work. Additionally, he got gentle help of this option to the first model; however, these varieties have not been wholly tried or embraced by some other agent.

The model was analyzed in points of interest by different analysts for its initiation. Ali et al., (2014)  led broad exploratory examinations in setting of an association to offer firm proof that specialist were reacting to administrative desires that outcome from change. Such discoveries provide reason to feel ambiguous about the whole motivational premise of the activity show particularly the easygoing connection between results together with employment qualities. Blanz (2017) countered effects with the longitudinal overview by utilization of employment trademark display and got firm help for the causal relations between the center qualities and achievements as characterized by the model.

Hutabarat (2015) recognized that Hackman together with Oldham (1975) maneuvered together into the firm model a considerable lot of the perspectives that had been coursing among behaviorists of association. In more extensive view, focuses on plan of occupation bolster’s hypothesis of Hackman that particular sorts of employment attributes are identified with conduct of laborers and their states of mind (BrintzenhofeSzoc & Gilbert, 2017). Different scientists have felt that the hypothesis of inspiration and occupation attributes covered the theory of Sociotechnical frameworks and that the two need to consolidate as the ideal hypothetical establishment for change. Kahya (2018) found that diverse normal for employment from the two models was remarkable in various kinds of advances. The thought by this specialist of consolidating the activity trademark hypothesis with an alternate theory that considered work condition was communicated last by Gaither & Nadkarni (2011).

It might resemble that the model of employment attributes was composed with the point of assessing and besides changing specific occupations inside the hierarchical setting without thinking about the interrelation of that unit with different areas inside the association. Hackman together with Oldham (1975) perceived this and although they endeavored to address this reality in the proposals for executions, brought about being skeptical concerning the utilization of model since procedure of employment enhancement has regularly been inconsistent with innovation of association, working, and control frameworks. The engineers of the model had felt that their hypothesis considered work outlined in the authoritative setting and recognizing that adjustments in a single area of the association required changes in hierarchical framework (Kim, 2015). Moreover, procedure of thinking little of the trouble in directing changes in the work itself or how much changes in plan of function adjusted the frameworks of encompassing of association (Herbold, 2014). The adjusted surrounding has in a single time prompted disappointment in usage of occupation trademark demonstrated.

Conclusion

From the above analysis of literature work on motivation and job characteristic model, it is evident that the model was developed by different researchers to join the best areas of the behaviorist way to deal with occupation outline. Hackman together with Oldham built up the methodology that concentrated on fitting the work to the individual representative and took into contemplations the necessities of each laborer alongside the profitability points of the association. The literature of the model likewise bolsters the utilization of the model and that its examination has been centered mostly in industry and innovative use. In most cases, a few surveyors have supported the model; however, others have encountered issues with the utilization of model. Hackman together with Oldham in their work felt that few problems that emerge have resulted because of wrong use of the model. For example, executing work update before the need was analyzed or illustrated. Furthermore, there has been the need to incorporate the model of inspiration and employment qualities with the social data to prepare ways to deal with work to help in the process of highlighting the relationship between worker and organization

References

Abdel-Ghany, M. (2013). Measuring Job Characteristics Of Agricultural Extension Centers’ Personnel In Assiut Governorate Using Hackman And Oldham’s Model. Arab Universities Journal Of Agricultural Sciences, 21(2), 133-141. doi: 10.21608/ajs.2013.14814

Ali, S., Said, N., Yunus, N., Kader, S., Latif, D., & Munap, R. (2014). Hackman and Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model to Job Satisfaction. Procedia – Social And Behavioral Sciences, 129, 46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.646

Aloysius, S. (2011). The Moderating Effect of Employees’ Growth Need Strength on the Relationship between Job Characteristics and Job Satisfaction. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2186300

Asik-Dizdar, O., & Esen, A. (2016). Sensemaking at work: meaningful work experience for individuals and organizations. International Journal Of Organizational Analysis, 24(1), 2-17. doi: 10.1108/ijoa-12-2013-0728

Bailey, C., & Madden, A. (2016). Time reclaimed: temporality and the experience of meaningful work. Work, Employment And Society, 31(1), 3-18. doi: 10.1177/0950017015604100

Bal Tastan, S. (2014). Predicting Psychological Strain with Job Demands and Organizational Injustice through the Implications of Job Demand-Control Model and Fairness Theory. Postmodern Openings, 5(4), 111-143. doi: 10.18662/po/2014.0504.09

Balducci, C., Schaufeli, W., & Fraccaroli, F. (2011). The job demands–resources model and counterproductive work behaviour: The role of job-related affect. European Journal Of Work And Organizational Psychology, 20(4), 467-496. doi: 10.1080/13594321003669061

Bednarska, M. (2015). Moderators of Job Characteristics – Job Satisfaction Relationship in the Tourism Industry. Ekonomiczne Problemy Turystyki, 31, 9-24. doi: 10.18276/ept.2015.3.31-01

Behson, S. (2010). Using Relative Weights To Reanalyze Settled Areas Of Organizational Behavior Research: The Job Characteristics Model And Organizational Justice. International Journal Of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 14(5). doi: 10.19030/ijmis.v14i5.12

Blanz, M. (2017). Employees’ Job Satisfaction: A Test of the Job Characteristics Model Among Social Work Practitioners. Journal Of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 14(1), 35-50. doi: 10.1080/23761407.2017.1288187

BrintzenhofeSzoc, K., & Gilbert, C. (2017). Social workers have an obligation to all patients regarding confidentiality … however, for some patients, the obligation is greater. Social Work In Health Care, 56(9), 779-793. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2017.1343216

Chen, W., & Liu, L. (2013). Critical Review of Psychological Studies on Imitation. Advances In Psychological Science, 21(10), 1833-1843. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1042.2013.01833

Dhanraj, D., & Parumasur, S. (2014). Employee Perceptions Of Job Characteristics And Challenges Of Job Rotation. Corporate Ownership And Control, 12(1). doi: 10.22495/cocv12i1c8p6

Dorsey, D. (2015). Welfare, Autonomy, and the Autonomy Fallacy. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96(2), 141-164. doi: 10.1111/papq.12069

Gaither, C., & Nadkarni, A. (2011). Interpersonal interactions, job demands and work-related outcomes in pharmacy. International Journal Of Pharmacy Practice, 20(2), 80-89. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2011.00165.x

Hackman, J., & Oldham, G. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170. doi: 10.1037/h0076546

Hardie, J., Daw, J., & Gaddis, S. (2017). Job Characteristics, Job Preferences, and Physical and Mental Health in Later Life. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2940909

Hayati, K., & Caniago, I. (2012). Islamic Work Ethic: The Role of Intrinsic Motivation, Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Job Performance. Procedia – Social And Behavioral Sciences, 65, 1102-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.148

Herbold, D. (2014). A Repeated Principal-Agent Model with On-the-Job Search. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2479325

Hessels, J., Brixy, U., Naude, W., & Gries, T. (2014). Skill Variety, Innovation and New Business Formation. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2381886

Hussein, A. (2018). Test of Hackman and Oldham’s Job Characteristics Model at General Media Sector. International Journal Of Academic Research In Business And Social Sciences, 8(1). doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i1/3813

Hutabarat, W. (2015). Investigation of Teacher Job-Performance Model: Organizational Culture, Work Motivation and Job-Satisfaction. Asian Social Science, 11(18). doi: 10.5539/ass.v11n18p295

Johnson, M., & Jiang, L. (2016). Reaping the benefits of meaningful work: The mediating versus moderating role of work engagement. Stress And Health, 33(3), 288-297. doi: 10.1002/smi.2710

Kahya, E. (2018). A wage model consisted of job evaluation, employee characteristics and job performance. Pamukkale University Journal Of Engineering Sciences, 24(4), 720-729. doi: 10.5505/pajes.2017.92609

Kim Jin-Mo. (2015). The Causal Relationship among Organizational Commitment, Organizational Socialization, Job Characteristics, and Proactive Behavior of New Employees in Large corporations. Journal Ofagricultural Education And Human Resource Development, 47(3), 83-116. doi: 10.23840/agehrd.2015.47.3.83

Kim, ji-hyeon. (2016). Effect of job characteristics and job environment of modelists on the job commitment and job satisfaction. Journal Of Korea Design Forum, null(51), 51-65. doi: 10.21326/ksdt.2016..51.005

Lin, B., Yeh, Y., & Lin, W. (2010). Job design and the psychological status of Taiwanese pharmacists on job outcomes: an application of the job characteristics model. International Journal Of Public Policy, 5(2/3), 272. doi: 10.1504/ijpp.2010.030608

Mani, B. (2013). The Human Capital Model and Federal Employees’ Pay: Gender, Veteran Status, and Occupation. Gender Issues, 30(1-4), 15-38. doi: 10.1007/s12147-013-9113-7

Maturana, B. (2014). Where Is the ‘Problem’ in Design Studio: Purpose and Significance of the Design Task. International Journal Of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR, 8(3), 32. doi: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i3.466

McCahill, C. (2018). Non-work accessibility and related outcomes. Research In Transportation Business & Management. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.07.002

Meyerding, S. (2015). Job characteristics and job satisfaction: A test of Warr’s vitamin model in German horticulture. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 18(2), 86-107. doi: 10.1037/mgr0000029

Muku, A. (2013). Job Characteristics Model of Hackman and Oldham in Garment Sector in Bangladesh: A Case Study in Savar Area in Dhaka District. International Journal Of Economics, Finance And Management Sciences, 1(4), 188. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20130104.12

Nese, A., & Troisi, R. (2014). Individual Preferences and Job Characteristics: An Analysis of Cooperative Credit Banks. LABOUR, 28(2), 233-249. doi: 10.1111/labr.12026

Oldham, G., & Hackman, J. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 463-479. doi: 10.1002/job.678

Oldman, C. (2015). Voices – Nurse-led general practice is an exciting model of care, says Crystal Oldman. Nursing Standard, 30(16), 24-24. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.16.24.s25

Östbring, L., Eriksson, R., & Lindgren, U. (2017). Labour mobility and organisational proximity: routines as supporting mechanisms for variety, skill integration and productivity. Industry And Innovation, 24(8), 775-794. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2017.1295362

Österberg, J., & Rydstedt, L. (2018). Job satisfaction among Swedish soldiers: Applying the Job Characteristics Model to newly recruited military personnel. Military Psychology, 30(4), 302-310. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2018.1425585

Ozmusula, M. (2017). To What Extent Do the School and School Principal Variables Predict the Principal Job Satisfaction?. New Trends And Issues Proceedings On Humanities And Social Sciences, 3(3), 275-281. doi: 10.18844/gjhss.v3i3.1570

Panicker, S. (2018). Economic Growth and FDI Organizational Motivation of Global FDI. Journal Of Advances And Scholarly Researches In Allied Education, 15(6), 150-152. doi: 10.29070/15/57738

Rakhi, & Kumar, A. (2015). Exploring the Interrelationship Among Organizational Climate, Employee Motivation and Job Satisfaction: A Review of Literature. OPUS: HR Journal, 6(2). doi: 10.21863/opus/2015.6.2.010

Ren, Y., & Wang, L. (2014). The Significance of Task Significance in Online Marketplaces for Work. Academy Of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 11604. doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2014.11604abstract

Schenk, P. (2014). Inspiration and Ideation: Drawing in a Digital Age. Design Issues, 30(2), 42-55. doi: 10.1162/desi_a_00261

Schulz, E., Chowdhury, S., & Van de Voort, D. (2013). Firm Productivity Moderated Link Between Human Capital and Compensation: The Significance of Task-Specific Human Capital. Human Resource Management, 52(3), 423-439. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21537

Siluyanova, I. (2014). M.Y. Mudrov on issues “of Piety and moral Qualities of the physician”. History Of Medicine/Ru, 1(2). doi: 10.17720/2409-5834.v1.2.2014.25s

Ullah, I., Mughal, Y., & Jehangir, M. (2018). Job Characteristic Model and Relationship with Employee Performance. International Journal Of Information Systems And Social Change, 9(4), 45-57. doi: 10.4018/ijissc.2018100104

Uppal, N. (2017). Uncovering curvilinearity in the organizational tenure-job performance relationship. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1552-1570. doi: 10.1108/pr-11-2015-0302

Van den Broeck, A., De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the Job Demands–Resources model. European Journal Of Work And Organizational Psychology, 19(6), 735-759. doi: 10.1080/13594320903223839

Vanhove, A., & Gordon, R. (2013). Weight discrimination in the workplace: a meta-analytic examination of the relationship between weight and work-related outcomes. Journal Of Applied Social Psychology, 44(1), 12-22. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12193

Vanny, P., & Moon, J. (2015). Physiological and Psychological Effects of Testosterone on Sport Performance: A Critical Review of Literature. The Sport Journal. doi: 10.17682/sportjournal/2015.024

Veltman, A. (2018). What Makes Work Meaningful?. The Philosophers’ Magazine, (81), 78-83. doi: 10.5840/tpm20188152

W., M. (2016). Role of Job Characteristics, Job Promotion and Disciplinary Work In Improving Employee Loyalty Through Job Satisfaction In Department of Public Work in East Java Province. Archives Of Business Research, 4(2). doi: 10.14738/abr.42.1864

Wnuk, M. (2017). Organizational Conditioning of Job Satisfaction. A Model of Job Satisfaction. Contemporary Economics, 11(1), 31-44. doi: 10.5709/ce.1897-9254.227

Yazdanfar, M., & Jafari, M. (2017). Relationship Between Job Characteristics Model and Learning Organization: A Case Study of a Ceramic and Tile Company of Maybod City, Iran. AMBIENT SCIENCE, 03 & 04(Sp1, Sp2 & 01). doi: 10.21276/ambi.2016.03.sp1.ra03