Assessment Title: Negotiation and Conflict Report
The project of Queensland Health was planned for easing the development of the supportive and effective implication of the payroll management system combining the support and development of the processes. It would also help in easing the simplification of the information forming the major influence for the formation of the effective and improved information processing. The payroll system would be evolved for the utilization of the operations and improving the formation of the processes.
The Queensland health payroll system would adopt the Turner and Cochrane Four Quadrant Perspective Theory for the execution of the Governance and decision making in the project.
The project development would be based for the successful implication process so that the alignment of the processing would be effectively deployed for the easing of the processes and development. The use of the Forward Strategy would be helpful for easing the execution of the project in a simplified process.
The Queensland health payroll system would adopt the Organizational Learning Process Strategy for the execution of the Governance and decision making in the project.
The project would involve the execution of the operations and defining of the successful alignment of the processing. The governance and decision making would be effectively executed by the support of the organizational learning process. The effective decision would be implied for successfully forming the simplification of the activities. The implication would be effectively implied for supporting the improved operation development.
The Queensland health payroll system would adopt the learning process development for the execution of the people and change management in the project.
The learning process development would be effectively implied for alignment process development. The characteristics would be effectively deployed for successfully employed for easing the management of the processing for executing the management of the functions.
The Queensland health payroll system would adopt the identity perspective for the execution of the funding activities in the project.
The alignment of the funding processing would be effectively deployed aligning the support and development using the identity perspective. The project would endure the alignment of the project function alignment in the project. The support and development using the alignment of the funding would be executed by the support of the technology development.
For Project 1 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.
The owner would be highly responsible for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the owner is the key stakeholder of the project.
The owner would have to face the management issues from the project as the project would have to be successfully managed and executed well. On the other hand the problem of change requirements and the modification of the processes are the problem faced due to the owner.
The designer would have low responsibility for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the designer is the minimum responsibility stakeholder of the project.
The designer would have the problem of change implication and payment issues with the project. On the other hand, the major issues of the designer would be the development of design issues and quality issues.
Task Description
The contractor would have low responsibility for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the contractor is the external stakeholder of the project.
Payment issue is the primary disagreement that the contractors have from the project. On the other hand the project may have quality issues with the contractor and their services.
For Project 2 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.
The owner would be highly responsible for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the owner is the key stakeholder of the project.
The owner would have to face the management issues from the project as the project would have to be successfully managed and executed well. On the other hand the problem of change requirements and the modification of the processes are the problem faced due to the owner.
The designer would have low responsibility for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the designer is the minimum responsibility stakeholder of the project.
The designer would have the problem of change implication and payment issues with the project. On the other hand, the major issues of the designer would be the development of design issues and quality issues.
The contractor would have low responsibility for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the contractor is the external stakeholder of the project.
Payment issue is the primary disagreement that the contractors have from the project. On the other hand the project may have quality issues with the contractor and their services.
For Project 3 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.
The owner would be highly responsible for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the owner is the key stakeholder of the project.
The owner would have to face the management issues from the project as the project would have to be successfully managed and executed well. On the other hand the problem of change requirements and the modification of the processes are the problem faced due to the owner.
The designer would have low responsibility for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the designer is the minimum responsibility stakeholder of the project.
The designer would have the problem of change implication and payment issues with the project. On the other hand, the major issues of the designer would be the development of design issues and quality issues.
The contractor would have low responsibility for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the contractor is the external stakeholder of the project.
Payment issue is the primary disagreement that the contractors have from the project. On the other hand the project may have quality issues with the contractor and their services.
Assignment Overview
For Project 4 the negotiating position and conflicts in relationships of the participants of this project are described below.
The owner would be highly responsible for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the owner is the key stakeholder of the project.
The owner would have to face the management issues from the project as the project would have to be successfully managed and executed well. On the other hand the problem of change requirements and the modification of the processes are the problem faced due to the owner.
The designer would have low responsibility for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the designer is the minimum responsibility stakeholder of the project.
The designer would have the problem of change implication and payment issues with the project. On the other hand, the major issues of the designer would be the development of design issues and quality issues.
The contractor would have low responsibility for the forward strategy development in the project of the Queensland Health Payroll system as the contractor is the external stakeholder of the project.
Payment issue is the primary disagreement that the contractors have from the project. On the other hand the project may have quality issues with the contractor and their services.
The behavioural approach project negotiation management strategy would be used for the forward approach (Project 1) of the project of the Queensland Health Payroll Project. It would allow the effective management of the processes involving for the execution of the forward strategy developed for the project development. It would help in successfully completion of the project activities defining the implication of the formation process.
The structural approach project negotiation management strategy would be used for the project governance and decision making approach (Project 2) of the project of the Queensland Health Payroll Project. It would allow the effective management of the processes involving for the execution of the project governance and decision making strategy developed for the project development. It would help in successfully completion of the project activities defining the implication of the formation process.
The integrative approach project negotiation management strategy would be used for the people and change approach (Project 3) of the project of the Queensland Health Payroll Project. It would allow the effective management of the processes involving for the execution of the people and change strategy developed for the project development. It would help in successfully completion of the project activities defining the implication of the formation process.
The behavioural approach project negotiation management strategy would be used for the funding development (Project 4) of the project of the Queensland Health Payroll Project. It would allow the effective management of the processes involving for the execution of the funding development developed for the project development. It would help in successfully completion of the project activities defining the implication of the formation process.
The integrated project negotiation method would be used for the negotiation (Project 1) of the project of the Queensland Health Payroll Project. It would allow the effective management of the processes involving for the execution of the forward strategy developed for the project development. It would help in successfully completion of the project activities defining the implication of the formation process.
Task
The fixed pie negotiation method would be used for the negotiation (Project 2) of the project of the Queensland Health Payroll Project. It would allow the effective management of the processes involving for the execution of the governance and decision-making strategy developed for the project development. It would help in successfully completion of the project activities defining the implication of the formation process.
The staged project negotiation method would be used for the negotiation (Project 3) of the project of the Queensland Health Payroll Project. It would allow the effective management of the processes involving for the execution of the people and change developed for the project development. It would help in successfully completion of the project activities defining the implication of the formation process.
The integrated project negotiation method would be used for the negotiation (Project 4) of the project of the Queensland Health Payroll Project. It would allow the effective management of the processes involving for the execution of the funding development strategy developed for the project development. It would help in successfully completion of the project activities defining the implication of the formation process.
The framework agreement strategy would be used for the execution of the forward strategy of payroll project (Project 1) as the preferred form of procurement. The execution of the project would be considered for the development of the implication management process for the payroll system development project.
The management contracting strategy would be used for the execution of the project governance and decision making strategy of payroll project (Project 2) as the preferred form of procurement. The execution of the project would be considered for the development of the implication management process for the payroll system development project.
The design and contract strategy would be used for the execution of the people and change management strategy of payroll project (Project 3) as the preferred form of procurement. The execution of the project would be considered for the development of the implication management process for the payroll system development project.
The framework agreement strategy would be used for the execution of the funding development strategy of payroll project (Project 4) as the preferred form of procurement. The execution of the project would be considered for the development of the implication management process for the payroll system development project.
Fernandes, G., Ward, S. and Araújo, M., 2015. Improving and embedding project management practice in organisations—A qualitative study. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), pp.1052-1067.
Holloway, J., 2016. What stakeholder management should learn from sales and marketing. Further Advances in Project Management: Guided Exploration in Unfamiliar Landscapes (1st. Ed). New York: Gower Book, p.236.
Kerzner, H. and Kerzner, H.R., 2017. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Kerzner, H., 2018. Project management best practices: Achieving global excellence. John Wiley & Sons.
Larson, E.W., Gray, C.F., Danlin, U., Honig, B. and Bacarini, D., 2014. Project management: The managerial process (Vol. 6). Grandview Heights, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.
Lock, D., 2017. The essentials of project management. Routledge.
Marchewka, J.T., 2014. Information technology project management. John Wiley & Sons.
Meredith, J.R., Mantel, S.J., Shafer, S.M. and Sutton, M.M., 2014. Project management in practice. Wiley.
Mir, F.A. and Pinnington, A.H., 2014. Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International journal of project management, 32(2), pp.202-217.
Nicholas, J.M. and Steyn, H., 2017. Project management for engineering, business and technology. Routledge.
Ojiako, U., Chipulu, M., Marshall, A., Ashleigh, M.J. and Williams, T., 2015. Project management learning: A comparative study between engineering students’ experiences in South Africa and the United Kingdom. Project Management Journal, 46(4), pp.47-62.
Turner, J.R., 2014. Handbook of project-based management(Vol. 92). New York, NY: McGraw-hill.
Turner, R., 2016. Gower handbook of project management. Routledge.
Verzuh, E., 2015. The fast forward MBA in project management. John Wiley & Sons.
Walker, A., 2015. Project management in construction. John Wiley & Sons.
Zheng, X., Le, Y., Chan, A.P., Hu, Y. and Li, Y., 2016. Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research. International journal of project management, 34(7), pp.1214-1225.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
