The impact of social status on negotiation outcomes
It’s important to remember that talks between people of different social statuses yield different outcomes than agreements between equals. Personal, business and international discussions can all be impacted by how talks are conducted. Typically, negotiators presume that their interests are opposed. Many aspects might influence the concept of conflict, including power dynamics and interpersonal dynamics. At the same time, it’s absurd to suppose that we never engage in debates with parties who are either stronger or weaker than us. When it comes to negotiation dynamics, it’s especially important to remember that power is relative. Even while wealth is the most obvious source of power, a person’s ability to maintain good relationships, be seen as an expert and make mutually beneficial deals all contribute to their power base. BATNA, or your best option in the event of an agreement that cannot be reached, is often your most potent tool in negotiations. The ability to walk away from an unpleasant transaction is something you earn by creating an excellent external alternative. As an alternative, those who find themselves in a precarious situation during negotiations may find it advantageous to join forces with others in the same boat and bargain as a group (Mejía-Arauz et al., 2018, p. 120). For this reason, you should carefully assess the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy before implementing it. However, you can create win-win scenarios when you can put aside the mechanics of bargaining and look at the possibility that your goals are compatible with those of your counterpart. This paper will discuss the dynamics that form and direct the results of the process of negotiation as well as reflect on my experiences of progression of negotiation activities.
As a starting point, consider the fact that successful negotiators take action. When a negotiator has authority, whether it comes from a strong BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement), a significant role, or a strong sense of confidence, they are more likely to act pro-actively—reminding people of a moment when they were confident increases their likelihood of negotiating a received offer rather than accepting it in its current form (Sriyanto et al. 2019, p. 119). In the event of job offers, this can result in significant long-term financial advantages.
According to research, negotiations with greater bargaining power are more likely than those with lesser bargaining power to make the first offer. According to one study, negotiators were three times more likely to make the first offer if they had a valid alternative to a negotiated agreement. Making the first offer gave the buyer a substantial advantage (see anchoring in negotiations). They are also better negotiators, less inclined to give up in the face of adversity or setback, and more likely to aim for more ambitious goals (Gomoll et al., 2018, p. 318). As long as they have something to gain, high-level negotiators are unwilling to accept a deadlock. As a result of this aggression, the great negotiator gets financial rewards, but they can also identify mutually beneficial tradeoffs that all sides can benefit from.
Factors influencing the concept of conflict in negotiations
In addition, Power Negotiators are risk-takers and innovators. According to popular notions, those who hold positions of authority tend to have deeply ingrained ways of thinking. While this may be true when someone holds a position for an extended time, psychological power causes people to become more imaginative in situations like negotiation. We found that psychological power helps people develop new methods of approaching difficulties and reduces the likelihood that they will accept the other party’s proposal (Malizia and Jameson, 2018, p. 310). As a result of this loss of power, optimism and risk-taking behavior may ensue. Powerful people were less concerned about potential threats than other negotiators when we gave them the option of pursuing a riskier course of action.
Both positive and negative repercussions can be derived from this propensity. An important part of providing value and increasing pie size in integrative negotiation is the powerful’s willingness to share their preferences and aspirations. Arrogance and self-defeating threats and ultimatums are also more likely to be used by the powerful, who are more prone to reprisal. Because power heightens a person’s inclination to bluff, it might cause a negotiation to become more competitive, leading to missed opportunities. A high-powered negotiator who is more concerned with the potential advantages than the risk of detection may find deception alluring.
Based on the situation’s intensity, you should adjust your approach accordingly. Is it a job offer, or are you attempting to select between Chinese and Mexican restaurants? But the fundamentals remain constant. There are two sides to each negotiation, and you need to know what your goals are and what sacrifices you’re ready to make. When negotiating, think about what the other side wants and what is important to them. If you’re dealing with a bully, your best course is to walk away. A take-it-or-leave-it posture is not a negotiation point. Practice negotiating with someone who has done it before (Ay et al., 2019, p. 730). On the other hand, you should have complete faith in your coping ability. Conduct fundamental research to learn about previous precedents in the type of bargaining you would be performing. If you’re thinking about negotiating a lease with a landlord, find out how much similar flats in the area are renting for. If you’re in the market for a new job, you’ll want to be prepared for wage negotiations by knowing the going rate for the position you’re interested in applying for. That can serve as a solid starting point.
Negotiating from a position of fear is a common blunder made by newcomers. They avoid requests such as B. Compensation raise or set pay to avoid missing out on a possibility. Through dealing with the circumstance, you can gain insight into your options: can you accept it, reject it, or find a middle ground? Is there a pricing range in which to bargain? After completing your research, you will get the courage to face your concerns. Another common misstep is failing to consider your objectives and motivations for undertaking a task. As a result, many negotiators are wary about negotiating on an equal footing with government officials. Negotiating might get more difficult if you practice too much. The first step toward a win-win situation is to ask what you require. You’ll see why when you think about the famous Getting to Yes story about two sisters who both wanted oranges. The basic solution was to chop the orange in half without commenting on the sister’s specific requirements. Both sisters enjoyed the fruit to bake, but one preferred the peel to eat. Communication that emphasizes self-awareness might help you keep your focus on what matters most to you (Ramirez Marin et al., 2019, p. 150). Bargaining is not a zero-sum game, as many people believe. It’s perfectly acceptable to ask for what you want if the other side wins—having a convincing “walk away” alternative handy when striking up a conversation. Plan B should be in place if you and the company you are interviewing with cannot agree. Don’t feel compelled to accept bad deals when negotiating.
The importance of understanding power dynamics in negotiation
Teachers need to understand how to negotiate with students to remain calm, focused, and in control of their classrooms on difficult days. Clear standards, protocols, and expectations should be established at the beginning of each semester to avoid misunderstandings. However, excellent negotiating skills may come in if these situations arise. “When you’re upset in class, I get it. I’m here to help if you need it. Let me know what is creating the greatest headaches for you.” Knowing your students and having a course outline handy are both essential. Inquire if there is anything you don’t understand from the course syllabus. Assist youngsters in determining how to respond to a problem, move on, and be successful (Kiruthika et al., 2020, p. 1260). You can better listen to and help the learner if you give them some authority over the situation. When taught correctly, the skill of negotiating can benefit students in all aspects of their lives, including their future employment and academic pursuits. Jeff Cochran, a negotiation guru, believes that trust is one of the most important skills in negotiations. As a result, individuals are less ready to compromise when apprehensive or nervous. It’s possible to help your children become better negotiators and social rivals by instilling self-assurance. In addition, even the most incompetent negotiators can appear stronger and more competent with little self-confidence. It is not only a great way to build your students’ self-confidence, but it may also help them form good relationships and friendships. In negotiations, the goal is to guarantee that participants aren’t self-centered and can see the perspectives of others. The Strengthscape team thinks that “being a skillful negotiator enhances relationships since (both sides) may agree on each other without damaging one other.” Negotiations are essential for a more solid connection and a more contented existence for each person.
Developing the ability to bargain in the early stages of a student’s life can aid them in friendships and romantic relationships. The earlier kids learn to bargain, the more time they need to practice and enhance this skill. For Gina Beri, an education expert, childhood should be when children learn the difficult tasks they will have to do as adults, but with supervision and support. There are fewer risks when you’re a kid to learn more dramatically and safely.
Extra desserts and task swapping Negotiating lower salaries and terms of real estate transactions are considerably less harmful than negotiating bigger compensation and real estate transactions. Negotiations are typically defined as self-serving actions. Wall Street CEOs and business people are portrayed negotiating to acquire what they want. However, the cornerstone of the negotiation is to investigate causes and comprehend what the other person wants. In negotiations, the most powerful thing you can do is understand why the other person wants to trade,” says business consultant David Finkel (Dueggeli et al., 2021, p. 395). He recommends that negotiators begin discussions by eliciting a shared understanding through open-ended inquiries. This can be accomplished in the classroom by discussing the students’ desires and the reasons behind them. Negotiation expert David Waktel states, “The purpose of the negotiations is to assess whether or not we can advance our interests through the agreement. In other words, “I’m interested in what I want, not what another person wants.”
The role of BATNA in negotiations
According to Wachtel, many students cannot explain why they want something. It’s possible, though, that by focusing on the “why,” the team may come up with answers that differ from the original question’s “what.” Consider Roger Fisher and William Ury’s Getting to Yes exercise to learn about the importance of listening to and focusing on the other party’s needs. Two children in this narrative covet an orange. Over time, they come to an arrangement where they each eat a slice of orange. Its possible one kid would have said he was thirsty and wanted orange juice, while the other would have said he wanted to bake the peel together. Because demand for skin and juice is so high, this answer doubles the amount of skin and juice delivered to each child. Developing the ability to bargain in the early stages of a student’s life can aid them in friendships and romantic relationships. The more time students need to practice and develop their negotiating skills, the earlier they learn the skill. For Gina Beri, an education expert, childhood should be when children learn the difficult tasks they will have to do as adults, but with supervision and support. There are fewer risks when you’re a kid to learn more dramatically and safely.
Desserts and task-shifting are included in the deal. Lower compensation and terms of real estate deals are considerably less risky than higher pay and terms of real estate transactions. It’s common to see negotiations as a self-serving activity. CEOs and executives from Wall Street are depicted negotiating over the acquisition of their desired object. Negotiation is based on understanding the other party’s motivations and goals (Tayia, 2019, p. 1337). In negotiations, the most powerful thing you can do is understand why the other person wants to trade,” says business consultant David Finkel. He recommends that negotiators begin discussions by eliciting a shared understanding through open-ended inquiries. This can be accomplished in the classroom by having a discussion about the students’ desires and the reasons behind them. Negotiation expert David Waktel states, “The purpose of the negotiations is to assess whether or not we can advance our interests through the agreement. In other words, “I’m interested in what I want, not what another person wants.”
Conclusion
In conclusion, many students cannot explain why they want something. It’s possible, though, that by focusing on the “why,” the team may come up with answers that differ from the original question’s “what.” Consider Roger Fisher and William Ury’s getting to yes exercise to learn about the importance of listening to and focusing on the other party’s needs. Two children in this narrative covet an orange. Over time, they come to an arrangement where they each eat a slice of orange. It’s possible one kid would have said he was thirsty and wanted orange juice, while the other would have said he wanted to bake the peel together. Because demand for skin and juice is so high, this answer doubles the amount of skin and juice delivered to each child.
References
Ay, S.Ç., Keskin, H.K. and Akilli, M., 2019. Examining the Effects of Negotiation and Peer Mediation on Students’ Conflict Resolution and Problem-Solving Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), pp.717-730.
Dueggeli, A., Kassis, M. and Kassis, W., 2021. Navigation and Negotiation towards School Success at Upper Secondary School: The Interplay of Structural and Procedural Risk and Protective Factors for Resilience Pathways. Education Sciences, 11(8), p.395.
Gomoll, A., Šabanovi?, S., Tolar, E., Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Francisco, M. and Lawlor, O., 2018. Between the social and the technical: Negotiation of human-centered robotics design in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(3), pp.309-324.
Hernandez-Arenaz, I. and Iriberri, N., 2019. A review of gender differences in negotiation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance.
Kiruthika, U., Somasundaram, T.S. and Raja, S., 2020. Lifecycle model of a negotiation agent: A survey of automated negotiation techniques. Group Decision and Negotiation, 29(6), pp.1239-1262.
Malizia, D.A. and Jameson, J.K., 2018. Hidden in plain view: The impact of mediation on the mediator and implications for conflict resolution education. Conflict resolution quarterly, 35(3), pp.301-318.
Mayeza, E. and Bhana, D., 2021. Boys and bullying in primary school: Young masculinities and the negotiation of power. South African Journal of Education, 41(1).
Mejía-Arauz, R., Rogoff, B., Dayton, A. and Henne-Ochoa, R., 2018. Collaboration or negotiation: Two ways of interacting suggest how shared thinking develops. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, pp.117-123.
Ramirez Marin, J., Olekalns, M. and Adair, W., 2019. Normatively speaking: do cultural norms influence negotiation, conflict management, and communication?. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 12(2), pp.146-160.
Sriyanto, S., Murniawaty, I. and Na’imah, T., 2019. Negotiation Competencies Based on Assertiveness and Self Efficacy for Vocational High School Students. Dinamika Pendidikan, 14(1), pp.116-126.
Tayia, A., 2019. Transboundary water conflict resolution mechanisms: substitutes or complements. Water, 11(7), p.1337.
Trinidad, J.E., 2022. Meaning-Making, Negotiation, and Change: Reviewing the Organization and Ecology of School Accountability.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
