Celebrities are not public property
Discuss about the Network Management in Organization for Privacy and Personality.
Human Right convention provides check over the fact that everyone has the right to privacy along with right to free expression. Celebrity is an honor and it is normally considered to be reward for success. Various kind of businessman and personality can easily earn it by wit or intelligence Privacy is generally inclusive of personal intimacies, sanctity of family life. It also focusses on safeguard of individual autonomy along with recognizing of individual control to various aspects of life [2]. Unlike private citizen, celebrities also need to attract media for promoting their work. It can be about their upcoming movies or Netflix series. The whole topic is about the fact that celebrities should not have privacy often comes down due to the fact that celebrities are rich and famous. In the coming pages of the essay an idea has been provided regrading various kinds of protection in large number of cases for celebrity like confidentiality, libel, privacy statutes and lastly self-regulation of the press.
Large number of celebrities have recently provided reports related to complain of about the fact how media disturbs their public life. In the year of 2014, 28% of people confessed the fact that they were much interested about life event of various celebrities. Confidentiality is nothing but a list of action which can be easily used for protection of personal information [5]. Confidentiality does not protect personal information because of the fact that is personal. The information is only protected before the person disclosing it the particular disclosing the information is subjected to a particular kind of obligation of various confidence which is arising as a result of confidence which arise out of relationship. Some rare cases of confidentiality are seen which consist of personal kind of information. Public domain is known to be a defense case in which issues of confidentiality arises [7]. In addition to various kinds of public domain public interest is also considered to be never defined in a way. There are some kinds of difficult in which laws of confidentiality is seen. Now the thing is clear about the fact about working of confidentiality when provided information is true or untrue.
The law which focus on protection of personal information is mainly evoked by various kinds of personalities. Libel does not ensure about the fact of disclosing of personal information because of the fact that is personal [9]. It does not require any kind of relationship between the claiming and defending. In libel there is no kind of defense related to publication. In so there two kinds of catches which can be used for protection of personal information. The first catch is about the fact that publication can be considered to be false. Or a situation can be seen in which information published is true but the defended might not be able to prove it true [9]. The overriding law generally a law which can be used for justification of publication. If anyhow publication is found to be true, then it does not matter regarding the fact how the private kind of information is humiliating [5]. Subject to any kind of confidentiality or no kind of publication of personal kind of ownership is found to be true.
Intellectual property law
When common kind of laws are provided absolute priority about the truth about the status. Major kind of technology is seen by the development of modern kind of technology like telecommunication and computer. The broadcast Act of 1996 generally unwarranted use of privacy can be easily avoided. Evolution of computer gave rise to another kind of status. Personal information on various kinds of computers gave rise to various kinds of data protection act 1984. Legislation of data protection is considered to be comprehensive kind of privacy code. It generally covers all the vital kind of information which is kept in computers and any other kind of structured files [11]. The ultimate effect of legislation of data protection is introducing of new statutory which can be again used for unfair use of various kinds of personal information. In various kinds of data protection legislation there are limited amount of defense of public domain. It is mainly used when in information has been easily made publicly by making use of results which is taken by steps taken by the person.
Various celebrities are no way considered to be public spectacle and they have the right of retaining of their privacy. Major time of people are more curious about their life. The curiosity is much extended about their relationship and life of various celebrities. Intellectual property laws are being provided in best course for providing option which is available to a celebrity for protection of his rights [8]. Many times it is seen that a film character name is used for promoting products of a company in an authorized way. Those obtain names are used for in merchandising many times which become a problem for large number of celebrities. At present trademarks are used widely for protecting the names of the movies, names and lastly characters from any kind of unauthorized commercial exploitation of merchandising. Commercial use can be done by the help of licensing [4]. Various movies and character name are protected by help of copyright. Various kinds of laws are used for ensured for having fame which is inherited through this kind of law and can also help the family members and upcoming generation of celebrities to easily draw benefits from it.
In a recent interview Clara Lago stated that she did not receive any kind of privacy as journalist were very much interested in his life. Celebrity photographers are also known as paparazzi waited outside the home of the celebrity so that they get good photo of them along with story for publication [9]. Many presses round to globe hire detective for easily finding out the information of famous people. Major celebrities around the globe are famous because of the fact that their job puts them in eye of public. This is inclusive of royalty, actors and sportsperson [13]. What various celebrities round the globe do is their own person life is their own business no person from outside should interfere in it. They should have time to relax just like normal people just like people with normal jobs. If celebrities are chased by paparazzi, then it can easily create an incident for running out somewhere for a while and also looks for escaping.
Publicity keep the celebrity in spotlight
In some of the cases it is seen that celebrities took up the choice of being famous and giving up privacy is not a part of their job. They generally make a lot of money and comes up privilege lifestyle because of the fact they are considered to be a public eye. They make use of press for their own advantage like promotion of films, songs and lastly TV shows [11]. The fact is also considered some of the stars are not famous without the help of magazine, TV talking about them. Famous people round the globe need press and press depend on celebrities for selling of their magazine. TV audience is considered to be two-way relationship which can be easily benefited.
There are many reason behind the fact that celebrities should have right to privacy like they should be allowed for relaxing with family and friends. It is expected that celebrities should be known for their work like acting or singing not because of their private live [12]. Various things like bad hair day or what they wear should not be taken into account. Being followed by large number of photographers can be considered to be scary in many cases and can easily put anybody in wrong position.
Now there are three reason behind the fact that celebrities do not have right to privacy like amazing kind of lifestyle and sharing of their personal live [10]. Celebrities can easily make use of press when they need. It is not ethical to draw the attention of celebrity as per the need. Only bodies like newspaper and magazine are responsible for understanding the needs of people that is celebrity gossip.
From the above pages it can be concluded that this essay is all about importance of privacy in the life of Celebrity. |An idea has been provided regarding how media disturbs various kinds of public life of celebrity. After an analysis has been done regarding confidentiality which is used for protection of personal information. Interview with Clara logo has been done where she said that she does not have any kind of privacy in her life. An idea has been provided regarding intellectual for various celebrities. In the above pages of the essay it has been justified that celebrities are not public property. In the above paragraph three reason has been provided regarding the fact that privacy is considered to be an important part. After that three reason has been provided why celebrities does not need privacy.
References
[1] Marwick, A.E. Scandal or sex crime? Gendered privacy and the celebrity nude photo leaks. Ethics and Information Technology, 19(3), pp.177-191, 2017.
[2] Post, R.C. Rereading Warren and Brandeis: Privacy, property, and appropriation. In Privacy (pp. 125-158). Routledge, 2017.
[3] Garrow, D.J. Liberty and sexuality: The right to privacy and the making of Roe v. Wade. Open Road Media, 2015.
[4] Benn, S.I. Privacy, freedom, and respect for persons. In Privacy and personality (pp. 1-26). Routledge, 2017.
[5] Dogan, S.L. Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum: Publicity as a Legal Right, , 2014.
[6] Tushnet, R. Raising Walls Against Overlapping Rights: Preemption and the Right of Publicity. Notre Dame L. Rev., 92, p.1539, 2016.
[7] Fallon, R. Celebgate: Two methodological approaches to the 2014 celebrity photo hacks. In International Conference on Internet Science (pp. 49-60). Springer, Cham, 2015, May.
[8] Stewart, D.R.C. and Littau, J. Up, Periscope: Mobile streaming video technologies, privacy in public, and the right to record. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), pp.312-331, 2016.
[9] Stern, M.J. and Stern, N. A New Test to Reconcile the Right of Publicity with Core First Amendment Values. J. Intell. Prop. L., 23, p.93, 2015.
[10] Peck, N. Drawing back the curtain: a post-Leveson examination of celebrity, privacy and press intrusion (Doctoral dissertation, City, University of London), 2017.
[11] Brock, G., The right to be forgotten: Privacy and the media in the digital age. IB Tauris, 2016.
[12] Giroux, H.A. Selfie culture in the age of corporate and state surveillance. Third Text, 29(3), pp.155-164. 2015
[13] Marôpo, L. and Jorge, A. At the heart of celebrity: celebrities’ children and their rights in the media. Comunicación y Sociedad, 27(4), p.17, 2014.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
