Summary of the Research Article
What Is The New Trends In Global Business Environment?
The research article “Workspaces That Move People” written by Waber, Magnolfi & Lindsay (2014) is selected to attain the key aims and objectives of the study. In addition to this, based on the facts of the selected research article, a detailed summary of the core article would be given. Moreover, the research questions as well as key words associated with the article would be address to conduct a mini literature review.
Today, it is more fundamental and important for the business firms to create hierarchical work environment imaginatively and viably. They ought to plan authoritative work environment that could persuade and urge the hierarchical individuals to satisfy their key destinations and objectives. It is because an imaginative and dynamic work environment could help an organization in enhancing representatives general works profitability (Kaplan, 2017). Interestingly, if an organization does not have an appropriate, particular, dynamic and imaginative authoritative work environment, it might make a considerable measure of issues/difficulties and influence the achievement and execution of both representatives and organization. In this study, to achieve the research objectives and address the research problem, the information/data is gathered by the creators from the successful associations and interchanges with the supervisors. In addition, data is also gathered about the organization by utilizing primary method of data collection in the review (Wilson, 2004).
The examination article compresses that, Telenor is a Norwegian telecom organization that had embraced and included hot desking that antagonistically influenced representatives and organization’s efficiency. The review led on the Pharmaceuticals Company demonstrates that, business people ought to convey and communicate with their group keeping in mind the end goal to satisfy hierarchical and singular objectives and destinations. For example, the sales employees had raised correspondence and connection with their group/colleagues by more than 10%. The aggregate offers of the organization had expanded by 10%. This announcement unmistakably shows the significance and parts of open correspondence and associations in enhancing the deal and benefit of the organization (Haynes, 2016).
Additionally, it is found that, the organization had concentrate on putting the cash during the time spent upgrade of organization office through tear out the espresso stations and manufacture. For example, the overhaul of office helped the organization in achieving the deals at$200 million that is 20% expansion in the aggregate offer of the organization. Moreover, it is found that, the working environment office ought to be described with very system, multipurpose space, open, viable dispersion of data to improve the work efficiency of the representatives. This proposes to the organizations that they ought to be more centered around building and upgrading of office to rouse and empower the workers towards the authoritative objectives and destinations. By and large, the exploration had condensed the esteem and criticalness of powerful plan work environment in the accomplishment of business firms (Kamerman, & Kahn, 2010).
Research Questions
The key questions related to the sleeted article are listed as below:
- What is the role of appropriate office space or innovative/friendly workplace in the employee engagement and improving their performance at the workplace?
- Is an innovative workplace helps the employee to attain their goals and long term organizational objectives?
- How office space could bring innovation and creativity at the workplace?
- How the effective and appropriate communication could affect the growth and success of employees and companies? (Akabas, & Kurzman, 2006).
- Is open communication is responsible factor for the employee satisfaction?
- How the different factors (availability of appropriate private space, hot desking, reserved of sets) may affect the motivation level of organizational people?
- What are the major strategies to avoid workplace related issues in the originations?
The main key words identified from the research article are presented below:
- Employee Motivation
- Harmonization
- Interaction
- Employee engagement
- Appropriate Communication
- Inspiration
- Hot Desking
- Motivation level
- Friendly workplace or office space
- Workplace Performance
- Designing of organizational workspace and workplace
The main research questions address the key role of giving legitimate workspace in the creating systems and engagement in the satisfying of authoritative vital vision and mission. This question is associated with the finding of Pauwels, Clarysse, Wright and Van Hove (2016), in which the creators had examined the effect of office space in upgrading the correspondences among the workers of the associations. In the article, the writers have talked about that; organizations ought to concentrate on giving particular office space to their kin so that might speak with alternate as a group. Besides, open office space is assume enter parts in making open correspondence, upgrading information, and creating systems, and building joint effort in the working environment. This technique is helps the business firms to enhance working environment execution and make upper hands (Promes, 2016).
Giving open office space is not just about more space, it is about offering adaptability, solace and opportunity to their workers. In this way, to produce particular business openings, organizations ought to inspire and support their workers by offering open office space office. Jeyasingham (2014) discovered comparatively as Pauwels, Clarysse, Wright and Van Hove (2016) and examined that, different sorts of correspondence methods are received by the organizations to persuade the worker as well as enhance compensation, and engagement at the working environment. Thus, through open space, organizations can enhance two ways correspondence handle and accomplish their future objectives and create business openings. For instance, open space urge representatives to work legitimately and achieve key targets according to the organization’s tenets and gauges.
The next research question has an immediate connection with the examination article given by Lee and Lee (2016). In this study, the authoers had proposed the component and advantages of imaginative working environment. For case, it is clarified that, open workspace is critical to deliver innovative thoughts at the working environment and enhancing the general execution (Lee and Lee, 2016). Then again, the expressions of Fuzi, Clifton and Loudon (2014) are like Lee and Lee (2016), in which they expressed that, by offering particular space, an organization might bring advancement, improvement and inventiveness at the work environment in a powerful and legitimate way. In addition, a creative and dynamic work culture and authoritative structure could be kept up with the assistance of open office space. In the discoveries of their review, the creators had recommended that, open space is mindful variables that bring advancement, changes and improvement inside the business procedure and frameworks viably (Fuzi, Clifton and Loudon, 2014). Moreover, organizations are required appropriate space to their representatives with a specific end goal to inspire and empower them for the work.
Keywords
Candido, Thomas and de Dear (2016) found that, absence of accessibility of appropriate space at the working environment may make a ton of issues in the front of organizations. For instance, the work profitability of the representatives could be reduction with the quick impact. Thus, the organizations ought to embrace work area imparting systems to arrangement to the issues (Morrison and Macky, 2017). Moreover, private space ought to be given to the representatives so that general efficiency can be moved forward. Along these lines, a few sorts of techniques and strategies are recommended identified with open workspace to enhance the profitability (Kim, Candido, Thomas and de Dear, 2016). This exploration distinguished the representative profitability is identified with spatial components, for example, office format, space effectiveness, work area game plan, a pre-designated work area, and protection in work environment. Morrison and Macky (2017) discovered like Kim, Candido, Thomas and de Dear (2016) and clarified that, flexi-work area, save work area, and adequate office space are the most profitable apparatuses to enhance efficiency and achieve the center objectives of the associations.
It is tended to by De Been and Beijer (2014) that open and adaptable work space plays a ton of critical parts in enhancing the profitability, work fulfillment rate and representatives inspiration. They might work in the mind boggling business circumstance, if organizations give legitimate and open work environment space. Open communication and group building abilities could be enhanced by an organization by giving legitimate office space to their representatives. For instance, office space propels the representatives to work in various groups and convenient accomplish their everyday objectives viably (De Been and Beijer, 2014). In the meantime, it is examined that, the perspectives of Hills and Levy (2014) are like De Been and Beijer (2014). For case, they have talked about that, a creative hierarchical culture assume enter part in improving the aptitudes, information and capacity to work in more intricate circumstance. It additionally enhance work fulfillment rate and diminish representatives push adequately (Hills and Levy, 2014).
Conclusion
Overall, it can be concluded that, business firms should try to motivate and encourage their employees by satisfying their basic needs and wants. Moreover, proper, innovative and friendly workplace could improve the individual and organizational performance effectively.
References
Akabas, S.H., & Kurzman, P.A. (2006). Work and the Workplace: A Resource for Innovative Policy and Practice. USA: Columbia University Press.
De Been, I., & Beijer, M. (2014) The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. Journal of Facilities Management, 12(2), 142-157.
Fuzi, A., Clifton, N., & Loudon, G. (2014). New in-house organizational spaces that support creativity and innovation: the co-working space. R & D Management Conference 2014, 1-8.
Haynes, K. (2016). Overcoming Challenges to Gender Equality in the Workplace: Leadership and Innovation. USA: Greenleaf Publishing.
Hills, R., & Levy, D. (2014). Workspace design and fit-out: what knowledge workers value. Property Management, 32(5), 415-432.
Jeyasingham, D. (2014). Open spaces, supple bodies? Considering the impact of agile working on social work office practices. Child & Family Social Work, 21(2).
Kamerman, S.B., & Kahn, A.J. (2010). The Responsive Workplace: Employers and a Changing Labor Force. USA: Columbia University Press.
Kaplan, S. (2017). The Invisible Advantage: How to Create a Culture of Innovation. USA: Greenleaf Book Group.
Kim, J., Candido, C., Thomas, L., & de Dear, R. (2016).Desk ownership in the workplace: The effect of non-territorial working on employee workplace satisfaction, perceived productivity and health. Building and Environment, 103, 203-214.
Lee, Y. S., & Lee, Y. S. (2016). Creative workplace characteristics and innovative start-up companies. Facilities, 34(7/8), 413-432.
Morrison, R. L., & Macky, K. A. (2017). The demands and resources arising from shared office spaces. Applied Ergonomics, 60, 103-115.
Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016) Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13-24.
Promes, M. (2016). Change Management and Organizational Learning in a New Working Environment: A longitudinal and mixed methods research design. USA: Herbert Utz Verlag.
Waber, B., Magnolfi, J., & Lindsay, G. (2014). Workspaces that move people. Harvard Business Review, 92(10), 68-77.
Wilson (2004). Innovative Reward Systems For The Changing Workplace, 2/E. USA: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.