Analysis of Organizational Culture in Google Company
Discuss about the Organizational Behavior for Journal of Business Management.
The company selected for this study is Google Inc., an American-based multinational firm majoring in internet related products and services. Some of them include online advertising technologies, software, search, and cloud computing. Since its incorporation in 1998, Google has set their mission “to consolidate the whole globe’s information and make it universally obtainable and useful.” This paper serves various purposes. It demarcates various corporate strategies employed by Google Inc. in its quest to meet its set goals and purpose. Besides, the organization or the corporate culture of this firm will be examined in deep as well as its action plan. Despite the tremendous success of Google, there are various pitfalls worth shading light on. This means that there is need for some recommendations which the Company requires in order to augment its productivity both in the short and in the long run. That will comprise the general scope of this report. All said and done, this paper has some limitations or shortcomings which could not be controlled. First of all, the content research was conducted within a very short period which was not enough to research on various relevant aspect of Google Inc. Also, only secondary sources such as peer reviewed journal articles have been used and this must have left out other imperative information which could only be collected from primary sources such as internal questionnaires.
Cameron and Quinn, (2011) defines organizational culture as the code of conduct of people in a given organizational setting and the implications they bestow on the actions. Some of the components of organizational culture include vision, values, norms, systems, working language, habits, and beliefs. Organizational culture normally influences on the way individuals and groups within a firm interact with one another, with their stakeholders and with clients (Schein, 2010). Google endeavors to operate based on well-defined principles which may be traced back to its initiators. This company was perhaps the first in the world to give users first priority and this can be reflected in their mission statement: “To organize the world’s information and to make it universally accessible and useful” (Cookson, 2009). Unlike its competitors who concentrate on marketing their sites, Google exposed the search engine only bearing its logo. Since its inception, this firm has always focused on surging their users’ experience hence its incomparable success within a short span (Jones, 2007).
Corporate strategies in Google Company
Another value Google Inc. takes to heart is its determination to keep their employees happy. It has created a favorable work environment which attracts, incentivizes, and maintains the best professionals in the field (Bryant, 2011). In 2007 and 2010 Google was ranked number 1 and 4 Best Place to Work For” by Fortune magazine and this is not surprise considering how Google handles its employees (Kuntze and Matulich, 2010). Apart from using various incentives to motivate their employees, Google encourages their workers to be innovative and risk takers. The management inspires them to move quickly and do too much rather than become too cautious and do too little. In order to promote news ideas and innovativeness, the company allows every engineer to utilize 20% of their time at work working on their own ideas. This attitude explains why Google for many years has remained ahead of its competitors like Yahoo and Microsoft (Battelle, 2011).
Organizational culture of Google can as well be reflected in their decision-making. Here, decisions are not made by senior staff members and then executed top down. Instead, all decisions in this company are made in teams. Small teams in certain departments attack their unique problems independently and employees influence one another through data and rational persuasion (Tsai, 2011).
Corporate strategies are concerned with how a company like Google creates value in various business ventures (Esty and Winston, 2009). The Company’s generic strategy of differentiation is based on Porter’s model and it strategically involving a wide market scope. Google Inc. provides services and products to almost everybody in the world. Its generic differentiation strategy also encompasses developing particular outstanding abilities that increases the company’s competitive edge. Owing to its aforementioned innovativeness, Google has set itself apart in the technology industry through the uniqueness of its products and services. The surging variety of products such as Google Class, Google Fiber, and Google Search is a clear manifestation of innovativeness under the differentiation generic strategy in Google Company. This means that the firm will maintain its competitive edge way ahead of its competitors like Bing and Yahoo based on uniqueness (Battelle, 2011).
Market penetration, market development, and product development are some of the key Google’s intensive growth strategies. In the US, the company already has a leadership rank and in its quest to expand its client base, Google aims at venturing outside the US. It continues to strive for a huge share of the global advertising market especially in countries like China where it competes directly with other online advertising firms and giant search engines. In addition, Google makes use of market development intensive strategy to grow. With the US, for instance, the company uses this strategy for its Fiber product and aims at reaching as many states as possible in future. The intensive strategy of product development is implemented through Google’s innovation. New products such as driverless car, Google Glass are being developed. Through these three main intensive strategies, Google Inc. continues to expand its boundaries and develop its global presence (Kett, 2011).
Action plan in Google Company
Every person running either a small or huge business has some dreams where he intends to take his business in a specific period of time. But for these dreams to become a reality, they must be converted into an action plan or strategic plan with goals and objectives (Fort and Schipani, 2007). These goals, as Lawlor, (2012) say should be SMART that is Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Timely. Google Inc. has set its SMART framework in the following manner. This action plan framework is used by other successful firms such as Intel, Twitter, and LinkedIn
Google is renowned for its ability to set specific goals in various aspects of its business. Apart from this, these goals are reported at a measurable number. For instance, the company has targeted to increase its sales by a certain percentage and that goal should be tracked with quarterly or weekly sales reports. Google Inc. normally convinces its employees that the set goals and objectives are attainable. Also all goals targeted to be achieved are always relevant and conform to the business model and demographics of the firm’s product users. Each goal set in the Google Inc. normally has some timelines. For example, increasing sales by a certain percentage is set within a given deadline say six months or full fiscal year. In order to complete its action plan, Google decides how to achieve the goal, what resources are needed, who is responsible, and how the progress will be tracked. According to Google Inc. these action plans are vehicles which transform dreams into reality (Prather, 2005).
Just like any other big corporation with so many employees, there are several pitfalls or hiccups here and there which might hinder its transformation if not well evaded. This company, for instance has been persistent with old world measures for current world outcomes. For quite a long time, Google, despite the tremendous technological changes in the contemporary business world, has not taken time to change its definitions of success and failure. In the current world, the objective is to minimize costs, embrace complexity, accelerate innovation, deliver client value better, and decentralize decision-making and do other things better than their competitors. Further, the company emphasizes on pushing change out where the change management officers are impelled to push down change by elbow greasing and brute force. Arasti, (2011) says that instructing employees to conform to a new world order and anticipating that the change will last is a well-treated pathway to a drastic failure in business. Instead, this company should consider generating pull for change. This could involve demonstrating value early, nurturing change champions at various echelons, and co-creating specific practices and procedures with wide expectations. Majority of individuals do not go against a change when they feel they are the ones who initiated it. Quite more often than not, Google Inc. has been losing its focus on their products user while undergoing a change. It is a common knowledge that customers constitute an important benchmark of determining success rate in business and thus any transformation program which does not positively impact on them will lead to failure.
Pitfalls in Google Company
Right now, Google Company is the leading search engine in the whole world with a market share of approximately 65%. Preserving this competitive edge in the industry necessitates Google to come up with groundbreaking competitive plans against its competing companies.
The first suggested approach for Google Inc. to uphold its competitive edge in the search engine industry is to struggle continuously to be a high-tech leader by continuous innovation and improvement. The search engine sector as Buganza and Della Valle, (2010) points out is technology shrewdness and vital players endeavor to originate products which can continuously satisfy the fluctuating needs of users. Nevertheless, if Google can be able to rank itself as a hi-tech leader instead of being a follower, it can be capacitated enough to remain ahead of its rivals in terms of invention and modernization. The company can achieve this by emphasizing more on strategic novelty and industrializing its technology infrastructure. The second strategic commendation for this company to sustain its competitive edge is by diversifying its products. Product diversification portfolio in the search engine sector shall be contributory in making sure that Google attains a broader market share in the global arena. With a differentiated product assortment, Google Inc. shall continue to enlarge its client base. In addition, it should develop a Human Resource strategy that concentrates on attracting and retaining only the top talent in Information Technology.
Conclusion
Google Company is unquestionably among the most powerful corporations in the world. This American transnational internet giant is as well one of the main modelers of the digital information era. It has brought numerous inventions through its various services and products related to the Internet and technology that has transformed the way individuals make use of the web by encouraging the easy distribution of information as well as the formation of content. The Google Company is undeniably a story of American commercial success. Apparently, comprehending how Google has emerged one of the largest businesses in the globe necessitates gratitude of its general business strategy. An appropriate recommendation for Google Company is to concentrate its determinations, particularly on product development and diversification. Severally, the corporation has been criticized for taking on outwardly incongruent product development determinations in various markets and sectors. Through its concentrated development plans and generic approach, Google’s extensive diversity of products aids in maintaining its supremacy in the global arena. Nevertheless, to expand its premeditated alignment, Google can primarily emphasis on ensuring the viability of its present products before getting on the development of any novel product.
Arasti, Z., 2011. An empirical study on the causes of business failure in Iranian context. African journal of business management, 5(17), p.7488.
Battelle, J., 2011. The search: How Google and its rivals rewrote the rules of business and transformed our culture. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Battelle, J., 2011. The search: How Google and its rivals rewrote the rules of business and transformed our culture. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Bryant, A., 2011. Google’s quest to build a better boss. New York Times, 12.
Buganza, T. and Della Valle, E., 2010. The search engine industry. In Search Computing (pp. 45-71). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Cameron, K.S. and Quinn, R.E., 2011. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. John Wiley & Sons.
Cookson, P.W., 2009. What would Socrates say. Educational Leadership, 67(1), pp.8-14.
Esty, D. and Winston, A., 2009. Green to gold: How smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. John Wiley & Sons.
Fort, T.L. and Schipani, C.A., 2007. An action plan for the role of business in fostering peace. American Business Law Journal, 44(2), pp.359-377.
Jones, M.T., 2007. Google’s geospatial organizing principle. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 27(4).
Kett, H., 2011. A business model approach for service engineering in the internet of services. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 2(4), pp.1-8.
Kuntze, R. and Matulich, E., 2010. Google: Searching for value. Journal of Case Research in Business and Economics, 2, p.1.
Lawlor, K.B., 2012. Smart goals: How the application of smart goals can contribute to achievement of student learning outcomes. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 39.
Prather, C.W., 2005. The dumb thing about SMART goals for innovation. Research Technology Management, 48(5), p.14.
Schein, E.H., 2010. Organizational culture and leadership(Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
Tsai, Y., 2011. Relationship between organizational culture, leadership behavior and job satisfaction. BMC health services research, 11(1), p.98.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
