Overview of Change Management
Change management in an in organization helps to ease the organizational transitions. It assists the employees to comprehend, makes commitment, accept as well as embrace changes in the present business environment. Change management is also considered as the formal way of making communication with the employees. In present study, the key concept of change management, Organizational change program of Lakeland Wonders as communicated by Cheryl to the other stakeholders/managers are discussed. In addition, the change program communicated by Cheryl is also explained in the present study. The cultural aspects and stakeholders’ roles are analyzed in the present study. Leadership and change agent analysis are described related to the case study selected in the present study. The paper will analyze the organizational change imposed in Lakeland Wonders. The organization has currently adopted a specific change management that has been brought by CEO of the organization, Cheryl Hailstrom.
Smollan (2015) stated that change management is considered as the procedure, tools as well as techniques in order to manage the side of people for achieving the required business findings (Grosser et al., 2016). Change management corporates the tools of an organization that can be used for helping individuals to make successful personal transitions that have results in adopting and realizing the change. In other words, organizational change management is one of the frameworks to manage the effect of the business procedure where changes in the organizational structure as well as making cultural changes within the organization.
A systematic approach to organizational change management gains advantages when the change needs people throughout an enterprise in order to learn new behaviors as well as skills. Thus, formal setting of expectations and employment of the tools can be helpful to enhance communication as well as proactive seeking methods to minimize misinformation, where the stakeholders are likely to purchase a change and remain committed to the change in the discomforts related to it.
The organization Lakeland Wonders generates high quality toys. The organization has applied a specific change management that focuses on the process of offshore manufacturing (De Massis, Wang & Chua, 2018). In this perspective, before making any planning for the project, the organization has made an extensive assessment of the facilities, manufacturing capabilities as well as labor management.
There are several theories related to organizational change management such as life cycle theories, evolutionary theories, dialectical theories as well as teleological theories. The theory can adapt the organic development to the context of the organization. As per the life cycle theories, developmental model can be helpful to occur at the time of developing the procedure. There are several stages like those that development stage can be helpful for the procedure (Vakola, 2014). Scenario model can assume previous sequences of developing different phases where it is important to modify multiple phases where managers can make decisions. There is any pre-established rate of change in the process of evolutionary models.
Change Management in Lakeland Wonders
The metamorphosis model can be helpful for development of the theories as well as evolutionary theories. It has been postulated for making changes that occur during making structure of the organization. In the process of development, theories are considered as the key for successful internal restructuring. On the other hand, it is important to undergo soft as well as incremental changes in the organization. The metamorphosis models are classified as a particular case of evolutionary model. Hence, it is important to make the division that could be composed as per the productive mechanism and regulated through natural, logical as well as institutional norms. The theories can focus sequentially of the well-defined as well as unavoidable stages. There are posterior states that depend on the group of outputs that are framed in the cycle stages. The theories can describe the change from multi-entity perspective as well as in-terms of the degree of making determinism and theoretical currents with population ecology (Vakola, 2014). Hence, it is important to use the theories and models that can be helpful to apply organizational change management in the organization.
Most of organizations like to initiate a management system as well as strategy, which could be helpful to maintain capability of the organization along with strength and competitiveness (Van der Voet & Vermeeren, 2017). It is essential that management team as well as the organization need to open mind for the changes encountered for coping as well as adapting the latest process of development, which are occurring within as well as outside of the environment. Hence, it becomes important to discuss as well as assess the large-planned organizational change that can assist Lakeland Wonders achieving the mission and surviving with competition.
It cannot be denied that only continuous change of world lead people to adopt the change in the business arena (Stouten et al., 2018). In this way, Lakeland Wonders has no exception in this perspective. The reason behind this process of change has brought enhancement in specific aspects. Consequently, change is adopted through multiple work organizations for several causes that are known as change management (Zhao et al., 2016). The organizations as well as businesses are making integration with the change into the work systems that makes the organization competitive as well as more efficient.
Due to the issues as well as target development that can be distinguished by CEO of the organization, Cheryl Hailstrom, decided for change of management in the organization. Cheryl Hailstrom liked to employ change management for obtaining the facilities, maintaining the units, manufacturing procedures as well as human resources management (Cordery et al., 2015). The primary objective of the organization is using the change management across the enterprise for improvement of the target market through venturing to offshore manufacturing as well as satisfying the clients.
Theories of Organizational Change Management
On the other hand, CEO of the organization being new, needs to be aware of culture of the organization.. However, she likes to use autocratic, threatening as well as coercive leadership as it is wanted to follow the way that she wants without getting involved for making successful change in the management (Hansen & Clausen, 2017). In addition, it is required to focus the critical implications that is undergone with the procedure. Cheryl Hailstrom need to provide the employees adequate time for mastering the skills as well as proficiency of the organization from maintenance, communication services in the organization.
In order to analyse the change program communicated by Cheryl, SWOT analysis can be helpful. The strengths of the organization are 94 years old company with CEO proven record of accomplishment. On the other hand, weakness of the organization is family organization, labour relations and any change of desire (Wincek et al., 2015). On the contrary, the opportunities of the organization are bull’s eye offer as well as cheap labour market outside of the organization. However, market dynamics, union pressure and growing costs are the major threats of the organization.
In order to amend the changes, there are several types of changes faced such as fundamental changes like broad and core. The proactive changes are anticipated. These fundamental as well as proactive changes are planned changes. On the contrary, the unplanned changes are incremental and reactive changes such as limited and localised. The reactive changes are unanticipated those are unplanned change. The nature of organizational change is contained with functional and having specific boundaries (Basile & Faraci, 2015). The common factors in the organization deal with planning and deciding the process through organizational members. The interactions will turn the effect of other things. The nature of organizational change is the procedure, which is rarely contained within functional and boundaries. Change is considered as the part of the organization that affects people as well as procedure of other parts.
Leadership skills of Cheryl Hailstrom are significant for the organization. The title of executive is used by individual process (Lewis, Cantore & Passmore, 2016). Hence, inspiration as well as motivation to people provides the best successful leaders for committing herself to the organization and nurture same type of commitment to the members. Moreover, as per the Haddock as well as Manning, a successful leader need to know the job as well as field and stays on the top of present development, trends as well as theories. It is important for the organization to share the vision of service, excellence, ethics as well as chief managers sharing the vision of service and achievement with others.
Leadership and Change Agent Analysis
It is important to give importance to the workers as the dominant symbol of the management. It represents an important elevation of the staffs to the status that is deserved. It is important to focus the value that the people can bring value in investment (Barends et al., 2014). The organizational change has influence as well as influenced by multiple features of the organizational life. The PESTLEM model analysis can be helpful for the organization to make any changes that occurs in the past. Hence, thinking about the scopes as well as conditions that are the unit of the organization and operating in the time of few years. In this perspective, construction of a long-term forecast for the particular organization would be helpful to improve the process.
However, controlling the process is one of the major issues in the organization. Conflict management is one of the major issues in an organization (Yousef, 2017). In this perspective, being conceive is required for a clear view that can make changes trying to bring about. On the other hand, devising the systems or mechanisms as well as plans allows the organization to happen the process. However, it is required to convert the old beliefs, behaviours as well as systems into the new consistent procedure that requires change.
Lakeland Wonders requires to be productive as possible for using the previous resources in order to encounter the requirements of the customers and stay competitive with the organizations (Van Den Hoven & Litz, 2016). It is required to implement an effective deal of management. Managing the principal factor through determining the factors of labour productivity is one of the essential aspects of an organization. Hence, through the concept of operation management, the organizations will be able to implement the strategies.
Hence, it is important to develop careful planning and identify the multiple risks that is required to provide consideration for more effective operation. Hence, operating planning deals with the average values of the variables involved with the system (Cummings et al., 2016). A third aspect for pointing out the significance of allocating resource can dictate and restrain the selection of strategy in the organization. Hence, money and budget can determine capability of the organization in order to provide extensive services along with the features to customers of the organization. The aspects need to be given the significance of monitoring as well as assessing the process that consists of knowledge of understanding the process of enhancing performance that provides institutional considerations as well as limitations.
SWOT Analysis
Controlling needs to be considered for involving the process and adjusting with effective management. Hence, before pursuing the plans require won over the process of support management support. It is required to be frank as well as talk with senior management individually as well as develop the process of understanding survival and acquired by others. It is required to understand the concern to the union as well as respect culture. It is important to empower the process and taking effective decisions.
Moreover, unforeseen issues that Lakeland Wonders need to meet cultural differences (Hornstein, 2015). On the other hand, evaluating interaction between culture as well as empowerment, it is required to identify as well as understand the subcultures. It might be helpful for improvement of the work and considered as the effective organizational system. On the other hand, the management requires being able regarding development of the thriving organizational culture as well as a stronger organization. Hence, it is providing requirements as well as things that they deserve being to be motivated for sake (Kuipers et al., 2014). Moreover, components like procedure of work, designing the career path and performance management along with compensation program can be useful as the part of the organization. The change management procedure can be imposed by the organization that must have been seen and meet the problem with stakeholders such as employees, customers as well as other stakeholders.
Managing people is important aspect where the human capital management requires to incorporate with the governance procedure in order to make sure equality among staffs. In this perspective, managing people in the organization is the most difficult responsibility to be taken. In addition, it is the most challenging part that where is provided adequate attention, emphasis as well as consideration. It would improve the staffs loyalty as well as hard work that may not only benefit. However, the organization may gain profit where people can provide and fulfil the expectations where it is important to have additional minds (Sharif & Scandura, 2014). The information requires achieving the job appropriately. Hence, efficacy of change management in the organization can be helpful to identify the effects regarding individual change. The Lakeland Wonders might require implementation of offshore manufacturing business.
The objectives can be integrated in operation of the organization through adding technological facilities and creation of communication centres as well as designing human resources employees. The change management is helpful to improvement of competitiveness and strength of the organization. It can suggest that there is a requirement for making change and the organization requires to be imposed the change (Vakola, 2014). As the change of management system is important, the enterprise might face issues in the downturn instead of making strengthen the business portfolio. It also assists in surviving the competition. Identification of the changes of human resource will have benefits for the organization as performance of the employees will be improved or failed on performance of the organization. Efficient front liners ensure getting success to gain competitive benefits within the market.
Types of Organizational Changes
Conclusion
From the above discussion, it concludes that personality of the leaders and implementing the leadership styles can be determined by culture. The style of leadership depends on culture as well as personality of the leader. Thus, depending the rules as well as regulations of society as well as culture of the subordinates are important to analyse. The five-factor model of personality is not determined for the style of leadership that makes leader implementing in the enterprise. It also shows that it serves as one of the vital informative tools that concentrate on the important role as well as culture of personality. It has an important role in implementing leadership in the organization. The recommendations would be essential for effective and efficient evaluation of performance in the organization that can be adopted as well as implemented a suitable leadership style. It depends on the culture, social rules and regulations as well as individual personality and characteristics of the leader.
References
Barends, E., Janssen, B., ten Have, W. & ten Have, S., 2014. Difficult but doable: Increasing the internal validity of organizational change management studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(1), pp.50-54.
Basile, A. & Faraci, R., 2015. Aligning management model & business model in the management innovation perspective: The role of managerial dynamic capabilities in the organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(1), pp.43-58.
Cameron, E. & Green, M., 2015. Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. Kogan Page Publishers.
Cordery, J.L., Cripps, E., Gibson, C.B., Soo, C., Kirkman, B.L. & Mathieu, J.E., 2015. The operational impact of organizational communities of practice: A Bayesian approach to analyzing organizational change. Journal of management, 41(2), pp.644-664.
Cummings, S., Bridgman, T. & Brown, K.G., 2016. Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. human relations, 69(1), pp.33-60.
De Massis, A., Wang, H. & Chua, J.H., 2018. Counterpoint: How heterogeneity among family firms influences organizational change. Journal of Change Management, pp.1-8.
Grosser, T.J., Assudani, R.H., Taylor, W., Gladstone, E.C. & Mehra, A., 2016. Employee Perceptions of Network Change Following an Organizational Change. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 17005). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
Hansen, P.R. & Clausen, C., 2017. Management concepts and the navigation of intersegment devices: The key role of interessement devices in the creation of agency & the enablement of organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 17(4), pp.344-366.
Hornstein, H.A., 2015. The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), pp.291-298.
Kuipers, B.S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J. & Van der Voet, J., 2014. The management of change in public organizations: A literature review. Public administration, 92(1), pp.1-20.
Lewis, S., Cantore, S. & Passmore, J., 2016. Appreciative inquiry for change management: Using AI to facilitate organizational development. Kogan Page Publishers.
Sharif, M.M. & Sc&ura, T.A., 2014. Do perceptions of ethical conduct matter during organizational change? Ethical leadership and employee involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), pp.185-196.
Smollan, R.K., 2015. Causes of stress before, during and after organizational change: a qualitative study. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), pp.301-314.
Stouten, J., Rousseau, D.M. & De Cremer, D., 2018. Successful organizational change: integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), pp.752-788.
Vakola, M., 2014. What’s in there for me? Individual readiness to change & the perceived impact of organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(3), pp.195-209.
Van Den Hoven, M. & Litz, D.R., 2016. Organizational Metaphors & the Evaluation of Higher Education Programs, Management Practices, and Change Processes: A UAE Case Study. In Systemic Knowledge-Based Assessment of Higher Education Programs (pp. 43-68). IGI Global.
Van der Voet, J. & Vermeeren, B., 2017. Change management in hard times: can change management mitigate the negative relationship between cutbacks and the organizational commitment and work engagement of public sector employees?. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), pp.230-252.
Wincek, J., Sousa, L.S., Myers, M.R. & Ozog, H., 2015. Organizational change management for process safety. Process Safety Progress, 34(1), pp.89-93.
Yousef, D.A., 2017. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and attitudes toward organizational change: A study in the local government. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), pp.77-88.
Zhao, H.H., Seibert, S.E., Taylor, M.S., Lee, C. & Lam, W., 2016. Not even the past: The joint influence of former leader and new leader during leader succession in the midst of organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(12), p.1730.