PCA for US Public Utilities Data
This includes the items which are set for handling the different corporate data which is in the different utilities of public. Along with this, there is a proper formation of the groups which include the measurements that are based on the standards of clustering and working on the cost models for the different utilities of the data. There is a detailed standard for the cost impact of deregulations and to work on all the important analysis that will bring a change to the different utility patterns. (Chen et al., 2016)
The PCA includes the use of orthogonal transformation which include the different set of observations with the correlated variables and how the different values are set in a linear coordinated manner. There are principal components which works for the components that are less than the number of the original variable number. Hence, the algorithm has been used for the transformation with the principal amount with largest variance.
It includes the datasets which are for the corporate data of the different 22 US public utilities. The objects have been used for the clustering for the utilities. There are different measurements which are important for the clustering and for handling the cost impact of deregulation. The analysis is for the economists which tends to work on the detailed cost model and the various other utilities.
Descriptive Description:
x1 |
x2 |
||
Mean |
1.114090909 |
Mean |
10.73636364 |
Standard Error |
0.039337914 |
Standard Error |
0.478432933 |
Median |
1.11 |
Median |
11.05 |
Mode |
1.16 |
Mode |
9.2 |
Standard Deviation |
0.184511171 |
Standard Deviation |
2.24404937 |
Sample Variance |
0.034044372 |
Sample Variance |
5.035757576 |
Kurtosis |
0.40478282 |
Kurtosis |
-0.449974004 |
Skewness |
-0.019718589 |
Skewness |
-0.06509568 |
Range |
0.74 |
Range |
9 |
Minimum |
0.75 |
Minimum |
6.4 |
Maximum |
1.49 |
Maximum |
15.4 |
Sum |
24.51 |
Sum |
236.2 |
Count |
22 |
Count |
22 |
Descriptive description has been calculated for the part to compare the relation between utilities.
Here, the utilities are mapped with the different US Public patterns, where there are different groups and the measures on the x axis to depict about the clustering and then scaling of the estimated results which are important.
X1: Fixed-charge covering ratio (income/debt) |
X2: Rate of return on capital |
X3: Cost per KW capacity in place |
X4: Annual Load Factor |
X5: Peak KWH demand growth from 1974 to 1975 |
X6: Sales (KWH use per year) |
X7: Percent Nuclear |
X8: Total fuel costs (cents per KWH) |
Figure 3: A 3D chart has been plotted to understand the importance of data trends and their contribution in the trend.
The above chart is based on depicting about the standards and how the different utilities are able to work on different costing charts. There are variations with particular range that are depicted above.
The focus has been on handling the eigen vector based multivariate that has been set for the different coordinates which are for the high dimensional forms of the data space. The user with the low dimensional structure includes the projection and the different viewpoints which are related to the factor analysis (Witten et al., 2016). The incorporation of the specific domains about the structure helps in handling the different matrix structure. PCA includes the coordination with the description of the single dataset.
Descriptive Statistics
PCA includes the orthogonal structure with the linear transformation with the new set of the coordinate systems. It includes the structure with the great variance and how the system is able to handle the data matrix with the zero empirical mean. The regression analysis is based on the explanatory variables with overfitting the model that is able to produce some conclusion based on generalising the other datasets (Shmueli et al, 2017). The principle component includes the stronger correlations with dimensionality reduction when the elements in the dataset are noisy. The set structure includes the mapping with the signal-to-noise ratio with the different components that include the dimensionality and the other factors related to the reduction method. The consideration is about working over the use of orthogonal standards and the optimal orthogonal forms which works over the discrete cosine transform. The sample variance is set to take hold of the alignment with the variables of different units like the temperature and mass.
Conclusion
PCA works on the pattern recognition with the optimisation for the class separability. The classes are defined to quantify the measures with the principal component space and to measure the distances between the centre of mass of space (Shouval et al., 2016).
The major focus is on handling the data set with the focus on containing 5000 customers with the working on the customer relationship. The standards are et with the active user who works on the customer response and the other loan campaigning (Roiger, 2017).
Row Labels |
Count of Personal Loan |
0 |
2016 |
0 |
1428 |
1 |
588 |
1 |
2984 |
0 |
2102 |
1 |
882 |
Grand Total |
5000 |
Figure 4: The Pivot Table has been created with CC and Loan variables.
Figure 5: Plot of the values from Pivot Table created using Excel and XLMiner.
The standards re set for the online column variable which includes the working on the row variable and the loan which is one of the secondary row variable. The check is on the values and the system that includes the count and how the records are set in the cell. The classification is based on the forms which owns a bank and the check is over the probability which includes the conditional changes with the loan offer.
Figure 6: Pivot Table and Chart for Part a. Pivot table calculation shown in the right column.
Figure 7: Pivot Table and Chart for Part b.
Figure 8: Pivot Table and Plot for Part C. Calculation shown on the right column.
Pivot Tables and Charts
Figure 9: Pivot Table and Plot for Part C. Calculation shown on the right column. The CC has been used.
The classifiers are scalable with the number of parameters that are linear to the number of variables in the learning problem. The maximum likelihood is based on the closed form expression with the linear time set for the models that assign the class labels to the problem instances with the vectors of features values. Bayes classifiers are working on the values with the particular feature that relates to the common principle which includes the forms that work with the value which contribute towards the correlations to the colour, roundness and the diameter feature. The supervised learning is based on the maximum likelihood with the acceptance that include the conditional feature distribution. The cure of dimensionality works with the forms that include the serious deficiencies in the underlying naïve probability mode.
Naïve Bayes classifiers are working on the use of tokens and the standards which include the calculation of probability with the emails using the baseline technique. It includes the maximum likelihood with the different closed form expressions which takes the linear time rather than setting an expensive iterative approximation process. Naïve Bayes works on the algorithm which includes the different multi-class issues related to understanding the binary and the categorical values of the input. The check is also on the dependency with the assumptions based on the real data that is able to attribute which do not interact (Chen et al., 2016). The setup is based on working over the training with the probability that includes the functioning with each class that has been allotted to the different input values. The check is also on the binary classification with the probability including the different instances.
Part A
Pivot Table:
Row Labels |
Count of Personal Loan |
0 |
2016 |
0 |
1428 |
1 |
588 |
1 |
2984 |
0 |
2102 |
1 |
882 |
Grand Total |
5000 |
Pivot Chart:
Part B
Pivot Table:
Row Labels |
Count of ID |
0 |
2016 |
0 |
1428 |
1 |
588 |
1 |
2984 |
0 |
2102 |
1 |
882 |
Grand Total |
5000 |
Pivot Chart:
The probability that customer will accept the loan offer would be:
Pivot Table 1: For loan and online:
Row Labels |
Count of Personal Loan |
0 |
2016 |
1 |
2984 |
Grand Total |
5000 |
Pivot Chart:
Pivot Chart:
The best possible strategy to get a loan to the customer is to provide them a credit card first, and then ask them to join the online banking facility. As the customer using both these facilities ae more probable to use the loan facility, they will tend to take a loan.
References
Chen, P. E. N. G., Rong-Cai, Z. H. A. O., ZHENG, S., Jia, X. U. N., & Li-Jing, Y. A. N. (2016). Android Malware of Static Analysis Technology Based on Data Mining. DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering, (aice-ncs).
Roiger, R. J. (2017). Data mining: a tutorial-based primer. CRC Press.
Shmueli, G., & Lichtendahl Jr, K. C. (2017). Data Mining for Business Analytics: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications in R. John Wiley & Sons.
Shouval, R., Labopin, M., Unger, R., Giebel, S., Ciceri, F., Schmid, C., … & Shimoni, A. (2016). Prediction of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation related mortality-lessons learned from the in-silico approach: a European society for blood and marrow transplantation acute leukemia working party data mining study. PloS one, 11(3), e0150637. Lu, H., Setiono, R., & Liu, H. (2017). Neurorule: A connectionist approach to data mining. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.01358.
Witten, I. H., Frank, E., Hall, M. A., & Pal, C. J. (2016). Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann.