What are Personality Disorders?
A personality disorder refers to a form of a psychological condition characterized by inflexible and harmful thinking patterns, acting, and behavior (El-Khodary & Samara, 2019). A patient suffering from a personality problem has difficulties seeing and connecting to circumstances and others. This has a tremendous impact on friendships, community engagements, employment, and education. Individuals could be unaware that they possess a psychological problem since their style of belief, as well as acting, appears normal to themselves. In addition, sufferers might criticize everyone else for their difficulties. Psychological problems often manifest themselves in adolescence or young age (Espinosa & Rudenstine, 2018). Personality problems come in a variety of forms. Many kinds might develop fewer noticeable when they reach middle adulthood. Personality disturbance is a form of psychological condition that is distinguished by inflexible and harmful ways of seeing, experiencing, working, and reacting. Features of malfunction in intellectual, emotional, behavioral regulation, and social interactions. Cognizing and connecting to circumstances and individuals is difficult, resulting in limits in relations, cultural events, jobs, and education. Emotional intelligence, also referred to as psychological quotient is the capacity to comprehend, utilize, as well as control one’s own feelings in order to alleviate tension, interact efficiently, sympathize with individuals, accomplish problems, and diffuse tension (Jauk & Ehrenthal, 2021). The primary goal of this study is to investigate how well a personality problem can have a significant impact on a client’s emotional intelligence.
Personality disorders are defined by irrational actions, unsteady autonomy as well as social interactions, and significant difficulty managing emotions including attitude (Hyde et al., 2020). It is caused largely by the interplay of emotional instability as well as an unfavorable atmosphere. Emotional downregulation is caused by mental unpredictability, that is effective volatility as well as high responsiveness to mental stimulation, as well as a lack of emotional modification, which is the incapacity to modulate one’s feelings. Persons experiencing personality disorders have been shown to have low psychological performance. Other studies of emotional processing in personality disorders have looked at it from the perspective of inherent emotional intelligence. Personality disorders are generally classified into three categories depending on comparable traits and behaviors. Several persons who suffer single psychological problems also show indications of at minimum one other character problem (Robinson, Hull & Petrides, 2020). This is usually required to display all of the above clinical indicators, in addition, to being identified with a condition. Group A personality illnesses are distinguished by unusual or unconventional thoughts or conduct. Reflective character disease, schizoaffective disease, including schizophrenic tendencies personality dysfunction are among them. Characteristics of Group B psychological problems include passionate, highly expressive, or unexpected thoughts or behavior. Antisocial character disease, borderline mental illness, hysterical personality dysfunction, and narcissism character dysfunction are some of them. Anxious, apprehensive thoughts or conduct describe Group C character illnesses. Avoidant character illness, dependent character dysfunction, and obsessive-compulsive behavior dysfunction are among them. Sentimental knowledge is the ability to recognize, regulate, and communicate one’s feelings, as well as to manage relational interactions wisely as well as compassionately (Wollny, Jacobs & Pabel, 2020). Now all three types of Personality disorders play different types of effects on mental health. So the persons suffering from each of the types of the disorders show a different social responsibility towards their relatives and the other people’s lives around themselves. So the patient suffering from Personality disorder loses their ability to be aware all of the time and express their emotions and handle all of their relationships properly with all of the people surrounding them. In this way Personality disorders generally influence the emotional intelligence of the patients (Petrides & Mavroveli, 2018). Some evidence-based example and their critical analysis of the influence of Personality disorder on emotional intelligence are as follows.
The Impact of Personality Disorder on Emotional Intelligence
Different types of Personality disorder has different types of characteristics and impact the emotional intelligence of the person having that disorder differently. Some of the Evidence-based examples of how different types of Personality disorders impact the emotional intelligence are as follows:
Borderline Personality Disorder patients frequently exhibit a tendency for black-or-white reasoning. Such an approach to seeing the environment may cause tremendous psychological pain as well as be especially damaging in a relationship. Most individuals are generally perceived as being either entirely nice, which means individuals are always caring and accessible to satisfy their wants, or all terrible, which means they are malevolent and cruel, having no degrees of darkness somewhere between (Hyde et al., 2020). Occasionally the perception of an individual might alter in a matter of moments from entirely fantastic to absolutely terrible. As another instance, consider a lady who believes her husband is the greatest devoted and kind individual on this planet. No person can reach this perfection all the moment, so whenever her spouse commits emotionally distant or careless behavior, including missing their marriage, the first inference is that her spouse may indeed not care for her. Her spouse is cruel and inhumane. It may indeed not always finish here, since if her spouse does not at all cherish her, he certainly despises her. It is simple to observe how this way of perceiving relations causes considerable anguish and elicits a strong psychological response in those that believe in such away. As a result, their spouses might be perplexed as well as upset by such radical modes of belief. Fighting is expected to occur often in these situations (Mattingly & Kraiger, 2019).
Individuals with Narcissistic Character Disorder have skewed thoughts whenever they fall among excessively and severely discounting themselves (Mallion & Wood, 2021). Furthermore, individuals possess a propensity to exaggerate the value of their skills and capabilities. Narcissistic character disorder patients usually fantasize about possessing infinite authority, prosperity, or extraordinary skills. Such excessive opinions about oneself might lead to egotistical, cruel, and arrogant behavior. Excessive conduct typically leads to a great deal of friction with others. An individual with Narcissistic Character Disorder, for instance, might disregard the cultural tradition of staying in line to buy a reservation. Alternatively, individuals would advance towards the forefront of the alignment, feeling that individuals seem better essential than the others in connection and so deserved preferential attention. The individuals quietly standing in line do not react well, as well as tension ensues. The individual with Narcissistic Personality Disorder will ultimately encounter a scenario is something that they will realize they possess some regular, human limits. Whenever this happens, individuals are likely to have a very tough time dealing with reality (Petrides & Mavroveli, 2018). Any hint of defeat is too much for them to bear. The startling discovery of normal individual limits usually causes individuals to totally devalue themselves, transitioning between an excessively illusion of infinite achievement as well as exceptional talents to a crushing and paralyzing sense of full unworthiness, humiliation, and failure.
Evidence-based Examples of the Impact of Personality Disorder on Emotional Intelligence
Some other examples of other types of Personality disorders that impact emotional intelligence are people with paranoid character disorders who possess distrustful thoughts and so have difficulties trusting others (Lea et al., 2018). Individuals might misunderstand what others think or do as deliberate intended to harm, injure, or exploit their benefit of them. As a result, they tend to grievances and might exhibit extremely protective, confrontational, or even violent behavior. One might understand that this thinking process causes a great worry for the nervous individual and that this sort of cautiousness, dismissiveness, and anger is highly uncomfortable for the individuals surrounding them. Clearly, this level of mistrust creates close partnerships difficult. People who suffer from Avoidant Personality Disorder believe they have been totally imperfect and inadequate to everyone else (Kotsou et al., 2019). Individuals suffering from Avoidant Personality Disorder have been incapable to recognise all their positive and negative traits. Their excessively poor identity assures individuals that everyone else sees them as imperfect and inadequate. As a result, they feel confident that no person would appreciate themselves and anticipate that others would mock them. The above causes individuals to reject social interactions since they expect uncomfortable and unwanted interactions. Regardless of such ideas, individuals are unable to enjoy pleasure at gatherings or other public meetings, and as a result, they waste out on chances to get a satisfying social existence (Koc & Boz, 2020). In this way, different types of Personality disorders impacted differently in their personal lifestyle by influencing their emotional intelligence. Professional way, they may ignore sociable encounters or public addressing, and as a result, they may lose business and marketing chances that help career growth and progress. Individuals suffering from Schizotypal Character Problems have strange views. They may be exceedingly paranoid and believe in strange forms of magic or the paranormal. Some individuals may think such an individual strange as well as unconventional, and they might experience uneasy living among somebody who has such bizarre and uncommon opinions. Individuals with Schizotypal Character Syndrome see themselves to be significantly distinct among strangers and have frequently conscious that individuals appear uneasy around themselves. As a consequence, individuals have persistent emotions of barely belonging (Pérez-Daz & Petrides, 2021).
To evaluate the overall level of Personality disorder of a patient and how that impacts the overall emotional intelligence of the patient there are so many different types of models and frameworks that are used. One of the most important and mostly used theories is The trait theory. According to the characteristic model of character, persons have some basic qualities, as well as the degree and severity of such traits accounting for character variations (Wood, 2020). Throughout time, psychiatrists’ perspectives on character features have changed. A feature is a behavioral attribute that meets three criteria: consistency, stability, and variation from individual to individual. A trait, according to this description, is a generally constant quality that leads people to act in specific ways. One of several key conceptual topics in the research of character is indeed the trait method. According to trait theory, human personalities are generally made up of a variety of inclinations. The attribute perspective to character, in contrast to numerous other theories of personality, such as psychodynamic or humanism views, focuses on distinctions among people. The interplay and mixture of many features result in a mentality that is distinctive to every individual (Miao et al., 2019). The trait concept is concerned with discovering and quantifying these distinctive mental traits.
If the physician believes the client has a character problem, a diagnosis can be made using the following methods: medical examination, mental assessment, and DSM-5 clinical diagnosis. The physician might perform a medical examination and ask detailed inquiries regarding the patient’s condition (Casale et al., 2019). In certain circumstances, the patient’s complaints might well be related to an actual physiological medical issue. Lab testing and substance and drinking assessment testing might be included in the participant’s examination. This comprises a talk regarding the participant’s ideas, emotions, and behavior, as well as the administration of a survey to aid in the identification of a diagnosis. Data regarding family and friends or colleagues might be usefully provided the client’s agreement. The physician could evaluate the client’s side effects to the requirements in the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM-5 (Ke & Barlas, 2020). This way the doctor can diagnose the personality disorder and based on the characteristics and impact of the emotional intelligence discussed above the doctor can take different types of treatment procedures to cure the disorder.
The appropriate therapy for the most client is determined by the participant’s specific character condition, its degree, as well as the participant’s living condition. A collaborative strategy is frequently required to ensure that all of the patient’s mental, physical, and interpersonal requirements are satisfied (Miao et al., 2019). Because character problems are chronic, therapy might take weeks or decades. Your medical physician or another main care practitioner, and a Psychiatrist, Psychiatric nurse, or Care worker, might be part of the participant’s therapy team. If indeed the client’s problems are minor and well, he or she may just require therapy through the participant’s main doctor, a psychotherapist, or another therapist. Patients may understand their disease and discuss their emotions, emotions, ideas, and actions with a psychiatric medical expert throughout therapy (Kircaburun, Griffiths & Billieux, 2019). The person may learn to control their disease and manage pressure. Individual meetings, team meetings, or workshops with relatives or colleagues can all be used for therapy. There are many forms of psychotherapy available, and a participant’s behavioral care expert may help them decide whichever one is ideal for themselves. Psychosocial training might be provided to the client. Throughout this session, patients may apply their newfound awareness and understanding to discover appropriate strategies to control their problems as well as eliminate habits that compromise overall working as well as connections. Families living with a close relative with a psychological disorder might benefit from family counseling, which gives assistance as well as information. Medications are another option for therapy. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not authorized any drugs to treat psychological issues in Australia (DUONG et al., 2020). Several forms of psychological drugs, on the other hand, might assist with certain character problem characteristics. Antidepressants might well be beneficial if the individual has a low temperament, aggression, recklessness, impatience, or hopelessness, all of which are symptoms of personality problems. Mood stabilizers, even as the name implies, might assist to smooth down emotional fluctuations or lessen anger, impatience, and violence (Casale et al., 2019). These might be beneficial if somehow the client’s indications include losing touch with actuality, schizophrenia, or, in certain situations, stress or rage issues. These could be beneficial if patients suffer from worry, restlessness, or sleeplessness. However, because they might promote aggressive behavior in certain circumstances, they are discouraged in certain forms of mental illnesses. A character disorder might be so serious in some situations that people need to be hospitalized for psychological treatment. This is normally suggested once the person is unable to protect and care for themself or is at imminent risk of injuring themselves or somebody else (Bacon, Lenton-Maughan & May 2018). After the client has stabilized in the hospitalization, one‘s physician may suggest a day clinic program, a housing program, or outpatient therapy.
Conclusion
According to the findings of the preceding study, each character disorder does have its unique set of clinical guidelines. Nevertheless, according to the DSM-5, a character problem is often diagnosed when there is a lengthy notable divergence from social standards that causes considerable discomfort or disability in at minimum two of these domains. The participant’s perception and interpretation of oneself, external persons, and circumstances. The compatibility of the participant’s emotional reactions. How effectively does the individual operate when interacting with others and in relationships are given ideas about their mental status. The participant’s ability to regulate their emotions. It might be challenging to establish the kind of personality problem because some have identical characteristics and greater than one type could be involved. Other diseases, such as sadness, stress, or drug addiction, might be interpretive much more difficult. However, it is worthwhile the patience and commitment to obtain a correct diagnostic just so the client can receive proper therapy. Depending on different types of characteristics of personality disorders there are different types of impacts on emotional intelligence are also observed. In this study, all of the impacts of different types of personality disorders on different types of emotional intelligence is being described with a different evidence-based examples. Also in the critical analysis, the best theory to evaluate mental health and level of personality disorder and how to treat them is discussed. Therefore from this study, it can be concluded that personality disorder is a state of mental health where the patient suffering from this influences the surroundings differently which creates different types of impact on their emotional intelligence and based on the type of the disorder different types of treatment can be given to cure that.
References
Bacon, A. M., Lenton-Maughan, L., & May, J. (2018). Trait emotional intelligence and social deviance in males and females. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 79-86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886917306141
Casale, S., Rugai, L., Giangrasso, B., & Fioravanti, G. (2019). Trait-emotional intelligence and the tendency to emotionally manipulate others among grandiose and vulnerable narcissists. The Journal of Psychology, 153(4), 402-413.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223980.2018.1564229
DUONG, T. M., TRAN, N. Y., HA, A. T., & Phung, Y. (2020). The impact of emotional intelligence on performance: A closer look at individual and environmental factors. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(1), 183-193.
https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO202014862061780.page
El-Khodary, B., & Samara, M. (2019). The mediating role of trait emotional intelligence, prosocial behaviour, parental support and parental psychological control on the relationship between war trauma, and PTSD and depression. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 246-256. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265661830059X
Espinosa, A., & Rudenstine, S. (2018). Trait emotional intelligence, trauma and personality organization: analysis of urban clinical patients. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 176-181.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886917306839
Hyde, J., Grieve, R., Norris, K., & Kemp, N. (2020). The dark side of emotional intelligence: the role of gender and the Dark Triad in emotional manipulation at work. Australian journal of psychology, 72(4), 307-317.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ajpy.12294
Jauk, E., & Ehrenthal, J. C. (2021). Self-reported levels of personality functioning from the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD) system and emotional intelligence likely assess the same latent construct. Journal of personality assessment, 103(3), 365-379. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223891.2020.1775089
Ke, T., & Barlas, J. (2020). Thinking about feeling: Using trait emotional intelligence in understanding the associations between early maladaptive schemas and coping styles. Psychology and Psychotherapy: theory, research and practice, 93(1), 1-20. https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/papt.12202
Kircaburun, K., Griffiths, M. D., & Billieux, J. (2019). Trait emotional intelligence and problematic online behaviors among adolescents: The mediating role of mindfulness, rumination, and depression. Personality and individual differences, 139, 208-213. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886918306202
Koc, E., & Boz, H. (2020). Development of hospitality and tourism employees’ emotional intelligence through developing their emotion recognition abilities. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(2), 121-138.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19368623.2019.1608885
Kotsou, I., Mikolajczak, M., Heeren, A., Grégoire, J., & Leys, C. (2019). Improving emotional intelligence: A systematic review of existing work and future challenges. Emotion Review, 11(2), 151-165.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1754073917735902
Lea, R. G., Qualter, P., Davis, S. K., Pérez-González, J. C., & Bangee, M. (2018). Trait emotional intelligence and attentional bias for positive emotion: an eye tracking study. Personality and Individual Differences, 128, 88-93.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886918300837
Mallion, J. S., & Wood, J. L. (2021). Comparison of emotional dispositions between street gang and non-gang prisoners. Journal of interpersonal violence, 36(9-10), 4018-4038. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0886260518789147
Mattingly, V., & Kraiger, K. (2019). Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation. Human Resource Management Review, 29(2), 140-155. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053482218301840
Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., Qian, S., & Pollack, J. M. (2019). The relationship between emotional intelligence and the dark triad personality traits: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 189-197. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656618303738
Pérez-Díaz, P. A., & Petrides, K. V. (2021). The Spanish-Chilean Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form: The Adaptation and Validation of the TEIQue-SF in Chile. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(1), 67-79. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223891.2019.1692856
Petrides, K. V., & Mavroveli, S. (2018). Theory and applications of trait emotional intelligence. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 23(1), 24-36. https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/psychology/article/view/23016
Robinson, E., Hull, L., & Petrides, K. V. (2020). Big Five model and trait emotional intelligence in camouflaging behaviours in autism. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109565. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886919304970
Wollny, A., Jacobs, I., & Pabel, L. (2020). Trait emotional intelligence and relationship satisfaction: the mediating role of dyadic coping. The Journal of psychology, 154(1), 75-93. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223980.2019.1661343
Wood, P. (2020). Emotional intelligence and social and emotional learning:(Mis) interpretation of theory and its influence on practice. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(1), 153-166.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02568543.2019.1692104