Learning Outcomes
Great psychological wellness for the overall public in a given nation relies upon the nation’s mental well-being arrangement. Numerous individuals with dysfunctional behaviors tend to avoid people in general, a sign that they have no trust in the state to ensure them or cover them at all. Their investment in the national plans is likewise liable to be low. Much of the time, these individuals have a tendency to be hurtful and hazardous. The administration needs in this way to guarantee that these people are secured, and general society populace should be remained careful from the mischief to the psychological intoxicates who get furious, Slade, Teesson and Burgess (2009).
A very much planned mental wellness approach plan is instrumental in spurring different partners to venture up in their endeavors to guarantee that the overall public are all around filled in as respects to their psychological wellness administrations, that incorporate doing efforts and refinements on mental well-being issues or overseeing mental unsteadiness cases, Degenhardt et al (2008). In such manner, a national psychological wellness approach is an unquestionable requirement – have for any nation that vision in the prosperity of their residents.
The national mental well-being approach holds that ‘on-the-ground’ treatment systems alone can’t tackle the psychological well-being challenges in the nation. There is requirement for preventive ways to deal with be given a high ground in managing these cases, Berry, Bowen and Kjellstrom (2010).
This paper will ask into the need to re-survey the current mental well-being strategy in Australia and even universally. All together for the minimized gatherings of people with mental handicaps to be given an equivalent open door in the general public, there would be an incredible requirement for renewal. A cautious investigation of the current approach is an essential for any settlement that will shield the privileges of the rationally crippled class, Berry et al (2010). Arrangement examination will be instrumental to help comprehend challenges that social specialists and in addition to psychological well-being workforce are confronting. The administration and work that is done by helpful offices battling for the privileges of the rationally debilitated is exceedingly reliant on the national psychological wellness arrangement of the country. Investigation of the current mental well-being arrangement in Australia is the center goal of this paper.
Advancing psychological well-being and overseeing current mental flimsiness cases has been on the best plan in Australia’s national wellbeing systems and copies for over 10 years now. In such manner, psychological well-being and general wellbeing parts have looked to join keeping in mind the end goal to grasp requirement for a more extensive comprehension of the mental well-being suggestions. The Australian National Mental Health arrangement 2008 has been an essential driver for giving preventive methodologies to diminish instances of mental hazards in Australia, McGorry, Bates, and Birchwood (2013). The main mental wellness procedure was defined in 1992 and was the principal activity to convey psychological well-being change to the national table. It is this procedure that brought forth the national mental wellness approach.
Instructions
The objective of this arrangement incorporates the general population and private wellbeing administrations, particularly those that arrangement with mental cases, mental well-being aficionados and approach creators for psychological well-being. The key target crowd are the, real partners who are fundamentally worried about psychological wellness accomplices. Psychological well-being administrations may consider to explicitly class the mental well-being customers similarly as with age or level of collaboration with mental well-being issues, Slade, Teesson and Burgess (2009). These may incorporate youngster and immature gathering, elderly people gathering and measurable mental administrations gathering. This arranging approach makes it simple for conveyance of psychological well-being administrations. Subsequently, most psychological wellness promotion offices think that its more advantageous to work with so much classes instead of working with the entire network. These are a portion of the contemplations that should be set up when arranging and actualizing systems for psychological well-being administration, Fritze et al (2009).
Different partners in the national mental well-being approach incorporate all masters in giving psychological well-being information in all classifications, private doctor’s facilities psychological well-being divisions and private psychiatry benefit focuses, Berry et al (2010).
The approach unites various social gatherings perceived by the Australian government. These incorporate the network mind, lodging, work, equity issues, and welfare among others. These parts are viewed as assuming a vital part in improving the improvement of the mental well-being of the network help in usage of preventive measures in the populace, and in the recuperation of the influenced class of people. The Australian government is resolved to advance more consideration of social gatherings from the network. Social incorporation is intended for consideration of even the underestimated gatherings, for instance the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youngsters, McGorry et al (2013).
Francis, Wood, Knuiman and Giles-Corti (2012). have examined in their paper the connection between in urbanization and ride in psychological well-being cases. In their article is prove attracted of urbanization connected to psychological wellness challenges inside the towns. As indicated by their examination, there are numerous components that can prompt mental wellness challenges in very populated regions in urban focuses, Grob (2014). Commotion and heightened contaminations from enterprises, work weight, insufficient green rest situations are among the cases that would add to these difficulties. Destitution, another attributes in urban focuses additionally assume a noteworthy part and it is connected to mental difficulties.
Their paper arranges the causative elements of mental dangers into non-straight compose and repeating composes. Destitution cases realize the cycle of mental difficulties that if not checked will quite often support mental flimsiness cases. The paper emphatically challenges the present arrangement for psychological well-being and asks for an adjusted framework that will guarantee preventive measures are taken to lessen mental well-being inability cases, Umberson and Karas Montez (2010).
The Problem and Context
Casing of Reference
A psychological well-being strategy ordinarily includes an announcement of vision, arrangements and qualities that will frame the foundation of the approach and an announcement of goals. These indispensable components to be found in any solid strategy are defined parallel with each other, Davidson, Ridgway, Kidd, Topor and Borg (2008).
In usage of any strategy, techniques of execution must be set down first. These methodologies will be the center without bounds approach plan.
The plain first commitment in actualizing an approach is to re-survey methodology alternatives. What takes after is to decide the assets expected to actualize the approach, and whether they are accessible. Once the techniques to actualize have been obviously comprehended, the built up expenses of execution would then be able to be set up.
The exact opposite thing is to set up usage plan. The arrangement ought to be clear with goals plainly delineated techniques spread out and wanted targets recorded. Course of events, yields and difficulties should be obviously expressed as well, Cooper et al (2008).
A stake holder involves an individual or organization that is involved in implementing something or executing some task, who are liable to either gain or lose from the outcome of the process. They can as well be considered as partners who cooperate and work together for the success of the project at hand.
The stakeholders who worked together to formulate the 2008 mental health policy worked for the interest of the general public. As a basis for their interests, these are the aims that they had in mind:
- To promote mental wellbeing of the Australian general population, and to prevent cases of mental instability.
- Decrease impact of mental health problems.
iii. Enhance recovery of mental inebriate cases in the general population
- Defend rights of mental disabled cases and to ensure that they have equal rights with other citizens in the national agendas.
These objectives were the basis under that the mental health policy was formulated.
The National Mental Health Strategy of 1992 that incorporated the convocation of all the Australian ministers would finally give birth to the mental health policy. The major gap that gave rise to this policy was the indifference that had been manifested to this sector, Kieling et al (2011). Furthermore, the drive for reforming the mental health sector was as a result of mental health professionals and consumers, who were eager to see the mental health system wholly reformed. In 1992, the United Nations released a declaration for the protection of persons with mental instability. Furthermore, inquiries in various states revealed a general abuse of the rights of the mentally challenged persons. There are the driving factors that led to the formulation of the mental health policy.
Assessment Criteria
In 1993, the Burdekin Report revealed worrying state of mental illness status in Australia. The results were overwhelming. The report indicated a high level of mental health staff inadequacy, and therefore limited and inefficient mental health services, Gulliver, Griffiths & Christensen (2010). This is the report the face of Australia in regard to the mentally disabled persons. The report brought to light indifference in the community concerning the existence of mental instabilities, and the harm that the mental inebriates can caus. According to the report, there was a growing myth that people with mental illness cannot easily recover, Gulliver et al (2010).
Solution to identified Problems in Mental Health
Crime and substance abuse have a bi-directional relation to mental health. These as forces, bind with one another and reinforce mental risk in the society. Hence there is need for formulation of a new policy that will sensitize individuals and institutions on the need to be wary of these causative factors and be on the front end in implementing preventive measures that shall have been outlined in the policy in order to improve he urban life condition, Holdeman (2009).
Most reviewed scholarly works present discussions on possible changes that can be done and if they are feasible. However, it is vital to assess into the bias that social workers may have towards mentally disabled persons.
There is a great need for formulation of a better and efficient policy for urban centers. This will be clear by dissecting and cooking into the current mental health policy In Australia.
As a solution to the identified problem in Australia, the mental health policy was formulated. This was not the outcome of the national mental health strategy convocation. There are three other outcomes of the meeting, but the mental health policy is the major one. The other three were only supporting documents. The mental health policy includes the following principles:
- Liability
- Regulation
iii. Investigation appraisal
- Instigating labor force
- Hindrance and mindfulness
- Bonding mental health facilities with others
In 1998, Australian health ministers endorsed the country’s second national health plan. The significance of this plan was to put together current reforms and extend them especially on the ends of early prevention of mental instability cases and putting up clear preventive measures. Furthermore, it was the aim of the plan to increase partnerships with other public sectors and increase the quality and effectiveness of its service delivery, Slade, Teesson & Burgess (2009).
To improve the general mental health of the Australian population, external initiatives have also played a very important role. Some of those initiatives include the ‘beyond blue initiative’ that was sponsored by the Commonwealth, ‘More Options Better Outcomes” initiative that started in the year 2002 and ‘Mind Matters’ initiative, Kessler et al (2009).
Problem Context
Since National mental Health Strategy began in 1992, there have been a lot of changes in the national planning. Six years down the line, there was 61 % registered in increase in the general participation of consumers in the service delivery?, Kessler et al (2010).
There has been a registered improvement in the mental health service delivery. There are quite a number of advantages that have been registered since the first National Mental Healthy strategy meeting. There would have been more efficiency in service delivery had the mental health services been diversified, Slade et al (2009). For example, the National Mental Health Strategy Meeting would have involved creation of national initiatives to help in sensitization programs and offering of reformation services to the mental inebriates.
The mental health policy 2008 implementation has been a joint effort of the state governments and the government of Commonwealth and mental health service providers and consumers. The implementation is spearheaded by the ‘National Mental Health Working Group.’ Some of the realized benefits within the federal states in Australia include the following, World Health Organization (2014):
- There has been a drastic decrease of psychiatrist centers in all the states
- The mental health services have been blended with the mainstream health services of the states.
iii. Consumers involvement in decision making processes has immensely grown
- Psychiatrist support centers have doubled up
- Due to reduced institutions across the states, money saved can now be used for other activities.
All the states and territories have incorporated an amendment clause in their legislations to fulfill all the National Mental Health Strategy standards, Smith, Humphreys & Wilson (2008). The national Mental Health Strategy standards are all conformed to the United Nations standards as regards mental health. In order to make sure that all state agencies have conformed to all required legislations as regard mental health, the Attorney General came up with an instrument called ‘Rights Analysis Instrument that measures the compliance level of states and territories towards the mental health legislations, Slade, Teesson & Burgess (2009).
According to a report done by the Mental health council of Australia, there appears to be inconsistency in the way the National Mental Strategy’ legislations have been absorbed in by the various stakeholders, World Health Organization. (2014). There is therefore a possibility that the efforts of the National Mental Strategy may not be smoothly spread out to all stakeholders. This is an indication that the evaluation was not effective enough.
Conclusion
Mental health problems can be attributed to various factors. These may include and not limited to crime, drug and substance abuse amongst others. Depression affects many people throughout the world but can be managed by behavioral therapies, Francis et al (2012). The most effective way that this problem can be managed in Australia is by introducing preventive measures; this the world is in need of. It is imperative therefore that this issue be discussed and effective solutions be found. In conclusion, it is clear that the mental health reform efforts as held by the National Mental Health Strategy policies does not translate seamlessly to every stakeholder as is supposed to. While notable progress has been registered, there still remains a big gap that has to be bridged to ensure a complete and seamless mental health sector reform. There is still a gap in implementing the mental health policy. If this issue is not going to be addressed soon, we are liable to face more financial and social challenge in the future.
Target and partners of the Policy
References
Berry, H. L., Bowen, K., & Kjellstrom, T. (2010). Climate change and mental health: a causal pathways framework. International journal of public health, 55(2), 123-132.
Cooper, J. L., Aratani, Y., Knitzer, J., Douglas-Hall, A., Masi, R., Banghart, P. L., & Dababnah, S. (2008). Unclaimed children revisited: The status of children’s mental health policy in the United States.
Degenhardt, L., Chiu, W. T., Sampson, N., Kessler, R. C., Anthony, J. C., Angermeyer, M., & Karam, A. (2008). Toward a global view of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and cocaine use: findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. PLoS medicine, 5(7), e141.
Davidson, L., Ridgway, P., Kidd, S., Topor, A., & Borg, M. (2008). Using qualitative research to inform mental health policy. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(3), 137-144.
Fritze, J. G., Blashki, G. A., Burke, S., & Wiseman, J. (2008). Hope, despair and transformation: climate change and the promotion of mental health and wellbeing. International journal of mental health systems, 2(1), 13.
Francis, J., Wood, L. J., Knuiman, M., & Giles-Corti, B. (2012). Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Social science & medicine, 74(10), 1570-1577.
Gulliver, A., Griffiths, K. M., & Christensen, H. (2010). Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC psychiatry, 10(1), 113.
Grob, G. N. (2014). From asylum to community: Mental health policy in modern America (Vol. 1217). Princeton University Press.
Holdeman, T. C. (2009). Invisible wounds of war: Psychological and cognitive injuries, their consequences, and services to assist recovery. Psychiatric Services, 60(2), 273-273.
Kessler, R. C., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Chatterji, S., Lee, S., Ormel, J., … & Wang, P. S. (2009). The global burden of mental disorders: an update from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 18(1), 23-33.
Kieling, C., Baker-Henningham, H., Belfer, M., Conti, G., Ertem, I., Omigbodun, O., … & Rahman, A. (2011). Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. The Lancet, 378(9801), 1515-1525.
Kessler, R. C., McLaughlin, K. A., Green, J. G., Gruber, M. J., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., … & Benjet, C. (2010). Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 197(5), 378-385.
McGorry, P., Bates, T., & Birchwood, M. (2013). Designing youth mental health services for the 21st century: examples from Australia, Ireland and the UK. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 202(s54), s30-s35.
Slade, J., Teesson, W., & Burgess, P. (2009). The mental health of Australians 2: report on the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing.
Slade, T., Johnston, A., Oakley Browne, M. A., Andrews, G., & Whiteford, H. (2009). 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing: methods and key findings. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(7), 594-605.
Smith, K. B., Humphreys, J. S., & Wilson, M. G. (2008). Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: how does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research? Australian Journal of Rural Health, 16(2), 56-66.
Umberson, D., & Karas Montez, J. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of health and social behavior, 51(1_suppl), S54-S66.
World Health Organization. (2014). Social determinants of mental health. World Health Organization.
Target and partners of the Policy
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
