Advocates argument for the privatization of NHS
The advocates of the privatisation of the NHS argue that the increase in the power of the private firms associated with the healthcare industry might help in the improvement of the communication that exists among the patients. The advocates further argue that the privatisation would help in the improvement of the techniques of the treatment of various chronic diseases through the implementation of the advanced technologies. The privatization of the healthcare services tends to help in the increment of the transparency in the services by limiting the political interferences in the concerned sectors. They further imply that the privatisation of the NHS might lead to the increased efficiency in the disposal of the services that would be free of corruption. The healthcare organisations of the country have been facing immense pressure in the matters that pertain to the improvement of the efficiency and the performance of the same. This pressure has often led to the privatisation of the concerned organisations. The researches further point out the fact that the privatisation has proved to be beneficial in many such instances.
The non-supporters of the privatisation, however argue that the privatisation of the organisation would lead to the increase in the costs of the and the lowering of the health services that are offered. The privatisation of the NHS would turn it into a commodity thereby robbing it of its original identity as a healthcare service. The privatisation of the organisation might also lead to the inequality among the seekers of the service on the basis of their financial position in the society. The increase in the costs of the treatment would lead to the conditions where the poorer sections of the society might not be able to avail the services. This might also lead to the inferior quality of the treatment that is meted out to the poor and the aged section of the country.
Using the summaries you wrote in the previous task, combine them below to create the first body paragraph of your essay. Use the guide below to help you and highlight each part with the same colour. (250 – 300 words)
Say why this is a key issue (e.g. Economic/Social)
What is the counter-argument of this issue?
What is the main argument if this issue?
Why is your argument stronger than the counter-argument?
What evidence/examples do you have to support this?
What can you conclude from this? What are the implications?
Non-supporters argue against the privatization of NHS
You should use at least 2 sources in this paragraph.
A PESTEL analysis of the NHS might help in the correct analysis of the social and the economic factors that are involved in the privatisation of the NHS. The analysis of the social factors for the privatisation of the NHS helps in the comprehension of the flaws and the benefits that are associated with the privatisation of the NHS.
The advocates of the privatisation of the NHS argue that the increase in the power of the private firms associated with the healthcare industry might help in the improvement of the communication that exists among the patients. The advocates further argue that the privatisation would help in the improvement of the techniques of the treatment of various chronic diseases through the implementation of the advanced technologies. Klein (2013) argue that the privatization of the healthcare services tends to help in the increment of the transparency in the services by limiting the political interferences in the concerned sectors. They further imply that the privatisation of the NHS might lead to the increased efficiency in the disposal of the services that would be free of corruption. Powell and Miller (2016) further argue that the healthcare organisations of the country have been facing immense pressure in the matters that pertain to the improvement of the efficiency and the performance of the same. This pressure has often led to the privatisation of the concerned organisations. The researches further point out the fact that the privatisation has proved to be beneficial in many such instances.
The non-supporters of the privatisation, however argue that the privatisation of the organisation would lead to the increase in the costs of the and the lowering of the health services that are offered. The privatisation of the NHS would turn it into a commodity thereby robbing it of its original identity as a healthcare service. The privatisation of the organisation might also lead to the inequality among the seekers of the service on the basis of their financial position in the society. The increase in the costs of the treatment would lead to the conditions where the poorer sections of the society might not be able to avail the services. This might also lead to the inferior quality of the treatment that is meted out to the poor and the aged section of the country.
The privatisation of the service might also affect the ranking of the country in terms of the various healthcare services that is extended towards the residents of the country. Thus, it might be said that the privatisation of the NHS would lead to the lowering of the standards of the services that are extended to the residents of the country. However, the shared partnership among the private and the public sectors might lead to the partial privatisation of the NHS which is recommended in the current situation of the country.
PESTEL analysis – social and economic factors
This is an in-class activity. Please upload a photo of your notes here.
Write a summary about what you have just listened to. (No more than 100 words)
According to the opinion shared by Christopher Smallwood, the healthcare activities could continue to be funded by the government but the concerned government might introduce the fact that the portion of the medical costs that are borne by the government would vary in accordance to the cost of the treatment that has to be undertaken in the concerned case. The model further states that the state would bear the responsibility for the treatment of the catastrophic events while the minor treatments would require a certain part of the contribution from the individuals. This scheme that is generally based on the French style would lead to the lowering of the premium amount that the concerned person needs to bear for the insurance scheme that he or she might have invested in.
However, on the contrary, David Wrigley opines that the NHS should maintain its ideal of serving all the people of the country irrespective of their financial status. The NHS of the United Kingdom is one of the most envied healthcare systems of the world as it is funded totally by the government. Most of the funding of the NHS is borne by the general taxation that has been levied on the citizens of the country. The experts argue that the implementation of the top-up insurance plans might lead to the conditions wherein the people residing below the poverty line might not be able to access the healthcare facility for the health problems whose treatment might cost them some great amounts. The experts further argue that the NHS authorities should spend amounts for the front-line staff at the healthcare centre rather than appointing management consultants for the NHS.
Writing your argumentative essay
Using the same process you did for the first body paragraph, complete your essay below.
One of the major debateable topics for the various residents of the country as well as the politicians of the country is the privatisation of the National Health Services of the United Kingdom that is commonly known as the NHS, UK. There are many arguments that support the privatization of the NHS while there also exists the various other that present opinions against the issue. The NHS was founded in the year 1948 and has ever since been an organisation that was owned by the state that helped in providing the various health services to the residents and the common people of the country without charging them for the services that they provide. The advancement of the technology has led the various members of the society to believe in the fact that the privatisation of the concern might be beneficial to the masses.
Advocates argue for the benefits of privatization
However, the privatisation of NHS should be stalled as the act would rob the commoners of their basic rights of leading a healthy life without having to worry about the economic factors that are involved in the maintenance of the same.
A PESTEL analysis of the NHS might help in the correct analysis of the social and the economic factors that are involved in the privatisation of the NHS. The analysis of the social factors for the privatisation of the NHS helps in the comprehension of the flaws and the benefits that are associated with the privatisation of the NHS.
The advocates of the privatisation of the NHS argue that the increase in the power of the private firms associated with the healthcare industry might help in the improvement of the communication that exists among the patients. The advocates further argue that the privatisation would help in the improvement of the techniques of the treatment of various chronic diseases through the implementation of the advanced technologies. Klein (2013) argue that the privatization of the healthcare services tends to help in the increment of the transparency in the services by limiting the political interferences in the concerned sectors. They further imply that the privatisation of the NHS might lead to the increased efficiency in the disposal of the services that would be free of corruption. Powell and Miller (2016) further argue that the healthcare organisations of the country have been facing immense pressure in the matters that pertain to the improvement of the efficiency and the performance of the same. This pressure has often led to the privatisation of the concerned organisations. The researches further point out the fact that the privatisation has proved to be beneficial in many such instances.
The non-supporters of the privatisation, however argue that the privatisation of the organisation would lead to the increase in the costs of the and the lowering of the health services that are offered. The privatisation of the NHS would turn it into a commodity thereby robbing it of its original identity as a healthcare service. The privatisation of the organisation might also lead to the inequality among the seekers of the service on the basis of their financial position in the society (El-Gingihy 2018). The increase in the costs of the treatment would lead to the conditions where the poorer sections of the society might not be able to avail the services (Groome 2018). This might also lead to the inferior quality of the treatment that is meted out to the poor and the aged section of the country.
Non-supporters highlight potential consequences of privatization
The privatisation of the service might also affect the ranking of the country in terms of the various healthcare services that is extended towards the residents of the country. Thus, it might be said that the privatisation of the NHS would lead to the lowering of the standards of the services that are extended to the residents of the country (Iacobucci 2014). However, the shared partnership among the private and the public sectors might lead to the partial privatisation of the NHS which is recommended in the current situation of the country.
The economical analysis of the situations faced by the NHS is also necessary in order to conclude the feasibility of the proposed privatisation of the organisation.
According to the studies, the privatisation of the NHS might help the government get some relief on the economic front. This might help the government to focus on the various other important issues in the country (Powell and Miller 2013). The privatisation of the NHS might help in the addressal of the unemployment issues in the country. The privatisation of the healthcare systems would, according to the various experts lead to the competition in the healthcare sector of the country, thereby enhancing the performance of the healthcare industry of the country.
However, Reynolds (2013) contradict that the privatisation of the NHS would affect the financially backward segments of the country in an adverse manner. The privatisation would result in the hike of the medical charges that have to be borne by the common people of the country. The commonwealth report of 2014 asserts the fact that the NHS is the cheapest healthcare service provider of the country thus proving the fact that the privatisation of the lead the commoners to feel the pressure of affording the medical costs (O’dowd 2014). The privatisation of the NHS would rob the citizens of their only choice of a good yet cheap healthcare service. Thus, the privatisation of the NHS is not advisable for the current situation of the country.
Thus, from the above discussion it might be concluded that the privatisation of the NHS might not lead to the expected results of the privatisation advocates. The economic and the social analysis of the situation might be helpful in proving the afore-stated statement. On a concluding note it might be recommendable that the NHS be allowed to continue its function in the way that it has been doing since inception. The state might lay stress on the improvement of the infrastructure thereby helping the maintenance and the restoration of the faith of people in the healthcare institution.
Reference List
El-Gingihy, Y. 2018. The NHS is on a one-way road to privatisation. [online] The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2015/oct/02/nhs-one-way-road-privatisation [Accessed 24 Mar. 2018].
Groome, I. 2018. What would happen during privatisation of the NHS? | Metro News. [online] Metro.co.uk. Available at: https://metro.co.uk/2017/06/14/what-would-happen-if-we-lost-the-nhs-6708024/ [Accessed 24 Mar. 2018].
Iacobucci, G., 2014. GP payment system and support services are to be privatised. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online), 349.
Klein, R., 2013. The twenty-year war over England’s national health service: a report from the battlefield. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 38(4), pp.849-869.
O’dowd, A., 2014. NHS should be exempt from EU-US free trade treaty, campaigners say. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online), 348.
Powell, M. and Miller, R., 2013. Privatizing the english national health service: an irregular verb?. Journal of health politics, policy and law, 38(5), pp.1051-1059.
Powell, M. and Miller, R., 2016. Seventy years of privatizing the British national health service?. Social Policy & Administration, 50(1), pp.99-118.
Reynolds, L., 2013. The future of the NHS–irreversible privatisation? Interview by Jill Mountford. BMJ (Clinical research ed), 346, p.f1848.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
