Development of project budget
1.1 Project budget
The project that repairs the tanks of the Western Australian site requires budget of around $91,360.00 in order to finish the project effectively. The budget that is needed for executing each of the tasks of the project are provided in detail in the table that is given below:
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Cost |
0 |
Repairing the tanks of Western Australian Site |
82 days |
$91,360.00 |
1 |
Project kick off phase |
13 days |
$5,480.00 |
1.1 |
Identifying issues and problems |
3 days |
$720.00 |
1.2 |
Testing the feasibility |
4 days |
$1,600.00 |
1.3 |
Making project charter |
3 days |
$1,200.00 |
1.4 |
Hiring staffs |
4 days |
$1,120.00 |
1.5 |
Reviewing the starting phase of the project |
3 days |
$840.00 |
1.6 |
Milestone 1: Completion of kick off phase |
0 days |
$0.00 |
2 |
Planning phase |
21 days |
$16,160.00 |
2.1 |
Making plan for the project |
5 days |
$2,000.00 |
2.2 |
Making plan for the utilization of resources |
6 days |
$1,440.00 |
2.3 |
Developing the financial plan for the project |
8 days |
$2,560.00 |
2.4 |
Analyzing the quality |
7 days |
$5,040.00 |
2.5 |
Developing risk management plan |
8 days |
$5,120.00 |
2.6 |
Milestone 2: Completion of planning phase |
0 days |
$0.00 |
3 |
execution phase |
41 days |
$66,760.00 |
3.1 |
Creating agreement |
14 days |
$5,040.00 |
3.2 |
Resolving external problems and challenges |
12 days |
$4,320.00 |
3.3 |
Development of project contract |
13 days |
$4,680.00 |
3.4 |
Completion of predatory work |
10 days |
$2,800.00 |
3.5 |
Developing strategies for resolving leakage |
14 days |
$5,040.00 |
3.6 |
Development of strategies for resolving issues |
12 days |
$3,360.00 |
3.7 |
Undertaking the project work |
11 days |
$3,960.00 |
3.8 |
Completion of project prepare |
13 days |
$3,640.00 |
3.9 |
Adjustment of various project activities |
12 days |
$2,880.00 |
3.10 |
Repairing tank |
13 days |
$9,360.00 |
3.11 |
Analysis of work which is completed |
15 days |
$10,800.00 |
3.12 |
Closing issues of the project |
17 days |
$10,880.00 |
3.13 |
Milestone 3: Completion of execution phase |
0 days |
$0.00 |
4 |
Closure phase of the project |
7 days |
$2,960.00 |
4.1 |
Reviewing the project |
4 days |
$960.00 |
4.2 |
Completion of final reporting |
3 days |
$1,200.00 |
4.3 |
Documentation |
2 days |
$800.00 |
4.4 |
Milestone 4: Completion of the project closure phase |
0 days |
$0.00 |
1.2 Assumptions made
It is identified that number of assumptions are generally made in order to estimate the budget of the project effectively. The assumptions that are made are listed below:
No extension in time: It is assumed that the time of the project will not exceed and thus the project will be completed within the provided deadline and therefore the budget of the project will not extend.
No scope: The project manager makes assumption that there will be no scope creep within the project and thus the project will be effectively completed within the time that is expected and thus the project budget will not increase.
No need of additional resources: It is assumed that the extra resources for the project will not be required and the project will be completed within the resources that is provided before the initiation phase.
2.1 Preparation of project schedule with project deliverables and milestones
The project schedule with the milestones as well as deliverables are provided in the table below:
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
0 |
Repairing the tanks of Western Australian Site |
82 days |
Thu 06-09-18 |
Fri 28-12-18 |
1 |
Project kick off phase |
13 days |
Thu 06-09-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
1.1 |
Identifying issues and problems |
3 days |
Thu 06-09-18 |
Mon 10-09-18 |
1.2 |
Testing the feasibility |
4 days |
Tue 11-09-18 |
Fri 14-09-18 |
1.3 |
Making project charter |
3 days |
Mon 17-09-18 |
Wed 19-09-18 |
1.4 |
Hiring staffs |
4 days |
Mon 17-09-18 |
Thu 20-09-18 |
1.5 |
Reviewing the starting phase of the project |
3 days |
Thu 20-09-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
1.6 |
Milestone 1: Completion of kick off phase |
0 days |
Thu 20-09-18 |
Thu 20-09-18 |
2 |
Planning phase |
21 days |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
2.1 |
Making plan for the project |
5 days |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Mon 01-10-18 |
2.2 |
Making plan for the utilization of resources |
6 days |
Tue 02-10-18 |
Tue 09-10-18 |
2.3 |
Developing the financial plan for the project |
8 days |
Tue 02-10-18 |
Thu 11-10-18 |
2.4 |
Analyzing the quality |
7 days |
Wed 10-10-18 |
Thu 18-10-18 |
2.5 |
Developing risk management plan |
8 days |
Fri 12-10-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
2.6 |
Milestone 2: Completion of planning phase |
0 days |
Thu 11-10-18 |
Thu 11-10-18 |
3 |
execution phase |
41 days |
Wed 24-10-18 |
Wed 19-12-18 |
3.1 |
Creating agreement |
14 days |
Wed 24-10-18 |
Mon 12-11-18 |
3.2 |
Resolving external problems and challenges |
12 days |
Wed 24-10-18 |
Thu 08-11-18 |
3.3 |
Development of project contract |
13 days |
Tue 13-11-18 |
Thu 29-11-18 |
3.4 |
Completion of preparatory work |
10 days |
Tue 13-11-18 |
Mon 26-11-18 |
3.5 |
Developing strategies for resolving leakage |
14 days |
Fri 09-11-18 |
Wed 28-11-18 |
3.6 |
Development of strategies for resolving issues |
12 days |
Fri 09-11-18 |
Mon 26-11-18 |
3.7 |
Undertaking the project work |
11 days |
Fri 30-11-18 |
Fri 14-12-18 |
3.8 |
Completion of project prepare |
13 days |
Fri 30-11-18 |
Tue 18-12-18 |
3.9 |
Adjustment of various project activities |
12 days |
Tue 27-11-18 |
Wed 12-12-18 |
3.10 |
Repairing tank |
13 days |
Thu 29-11-18 |
Mon 17-12-18 |
3.11 |
Analysis of work which is completed |
15 days |
Tue 27-11-18 |
Mon 17-12-18 |
3.12 |
Closing issues of the project |
17 days |
Tue 27-11-18 |
Wed 19-12-18 |
3.13 |
Milestone 3: Completion of execution phase |
0 days |
Fri 14-12-18 |
Fri 14-12-18 |
4 |
Closure phase of the project |
7 days |
Thu 20-12-18 |
Fri 28-12-18 |
4.1 |
Reviewing the project |
4 days |
Thu 20-12-18 |
Tue 25-12-18 |
4.2 |
Completion of final reporting |
3 days |
Wed 26-12-18 |
Fri 28-12-18 |
4.3 |
Documentation |
2 days |
Wed 26-12-18 |
Thu 27-12-18 |
4.4 |
Milestone 4: Completion of the project closure phase |
0 days |
Tue 25-12-18 |
Tue 25-12-18 |
2.2 Discussion about project merits of the tools, techniques and methods
Used methodology
The project uses agile project methodology in the project in order to repair all the tank of Western Australian site. This methodology is generally used as with the help of this project methodology, all the activities of the project are broken for managing the activities as well as tasks of the entire project. In addition to this, this methodology assists in minimizing the project time.
Merits of tools and techniques
Scheduling technique is mainly used within the project and the advantages of the using this technique is provided below:
Tracking: The time that is required for the project will be reflected with the project schedule.
Cost: The cost that is required for the project is mainly reflected with the help of the schedule of the project.
Provides proper idea: The schedule of the project provides proper details about the activities of the project that needs to be executed effectively for accomplishing the project activities.
Comparison between agile and waterfall methodology is given in the table below:
Agile methodology |
Waterfall methodology |
It is found that agile project methodology is used for management of time for finishing the project on time. |
Waterfall methodology does not assist in time management but assists in mitigating the challenges and risks of the project. |
The agile project helps in making changes within the project that is necessary. |
This methodology helps in distributing the tasks effectively for maintaining quality of the project. |
Proper comparison between WBS and schedule of the project is provided below:
Schedule |
Work breakdown structure |
The schedule of the helps in tracking the activities of the project. |
WBS assists in breaking the entire project into number of activities for managing the project. |
The project schedule helps in reflecting the budget that is needed for the project. |
It is found as proper groundwork for budget development. |
3.1 Resources which are needed
The needed resources are listed below:
Human resources: The project stakeholders are listed below:
- Contractor
- Supervisor
- Site planner
- Project manager
- Project planner
Material resources: The material resources that are required include:
- Steel anchors
- Steel coatings
- Cranes
- Mobile resources scaffolding
- Stainless steel flow valve
Financial resources: The required budget for finishing the project of tank repair will be around $91,360.
3.2 Integration of resource with project schedule
The schedule that is provided is generally integrated with project resources.
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Resource Names |
0 |
Repairing the tanks of Western Australian Site |
82 days |
Thu 06-09-18 |
Fri 28-12-18 |
|
1 |
Project kick off phase |
13 days |
Thu 06-09-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
|
1.1 |
identifying issues and problems |
3 days |
Thu 06-09-18 |
Mon 10-09-18 |
Project planner |
1.2 |
Testing the feasibility |
4 days |
Tue 11-09-18 |
Fri 14-09-18 |
Project manager |
1.3 |
Making project charter |
3 days |
Mon 17-09-18 |
Wed 19-09-18 |
Project manager |
1.4 |
Hiring staffs |
4 days |
Mon 17-09-18 |
Thu 20-09-18 |
Site planner |
1.5 |
Reviewing the starting phase of the project |
3 days |
Thu 20-09-18 |
Mon 24-09-18 |
Site planner |
1.6 |
Milestone 1: Completion of kick off phase |
0 days |
Thu 20-09-18 |
Thu 20-09-18 |
|
2 |
Planning phase |
21 days |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
|
2.1 |
Making plan for the project |
5 days |
Tue 25-09-18 |
Mon 01-10-18 |
Project manager |
2.2 |
Making plan for the utilization of resources |
6 days |
Tue 02-10-18 |
Tue 09-10-18 |
Project planner |
2.3 |
Developing the financial plan for the project |
8 days |
Tue 02-10-18 |
Thu 11-10-18 |
Business analyst |
2.4 |
Analyzing the quality |
7 days |
Wed 10-10-18 |
Thu 18-10-18 |
Project manager, Business analyst |
2.5 |
Developing risk management plan |
8 days |
Fri 12-10-18 |
Tue 23-10-18 |
Project manager, Project planner |
2.6 |
Milestone 2: Completion of planning phase |
0 days |
Thu 11-10-18 |
Thu 11-10-18 |
Project manager, Project planner |
3 |
execution phase |
41 days |
Wed 24-10-18 |
Wed 19-12-18 |
|
3.1 |
Creating agreement |
14 days |
Wed 24-10-18 |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Contractor |
3.2 |
Resolving external problems and challenges |
12 days |
Wed 24-10-18 |
Thu 08-11-18 |
Supervisor |
3.3 |
Development of project contract |
13 days |
Tue 13-11-18 |
Thu 29-11-18 |
Contractor |
3.4 |
Completion of preparatory work |
10 days |
Tue 13-11-18 |
Mon 26-11-18 |
Site planner |
3.5 |
Developing strategies for resolving leakage |
14 days |
Fri 09-11-18 |
Wed 28-11-18 |
Supervisor |
3.6 |
Development of strategies for resolving issues |
12 days |
Fri 09-11-18 |
Mon 26-11-18 |
Site planner |
3.7 |
Undertaking the project work |
11 days |
Fri 30-11-18 |
Fri 14-12-18 |
Contractor |
3.8 |
Completion of project prepare |
13 days |
Fri 30-11-18 |
Tue 18-12-18 |
Site planner |
3.9 |
Adjustment of various project activities |
12 days |
Tue 27-11-18 |
Wed 12-12-18 |
Project planner |
3.10 |
Repairing tank |
13 days |
Thu 29-11-18 |
Mon 17-12-18 |
Contractor, Supervisor |
3.11 |
Analysis of work which is completed |
15 days |
Tue 27-11-18 |
Mon 17-12-18 |
Contractor, Supervisor |
3.12 |
Closing issues of the project |
17 days |
Tue 27-11-18 |
Wed 19-12-18 |
Contractor, Site planner |
3.13 |
Milestone 3: Completion of execution phase |
0 days |
Fri 14-12-18 |
Fri 14-12-18 |
|
4 |
Closure phase of the project |
7 days |
Thu 20-12-18 |
Fri 28-12-18 |
|
4.1 |
Reviewing the project |
4 days |
Thu 20-12-18 |
Tue 25-12-18 |
Project planner |
4.2 |
Completion of final reporting |
3 days |
Wed 26-12-18 |
Fri 28-12-18 |
Project manager |
4.3 |
Documentation |
2 days |
Wed 26-12-18 |
Thu 27-12-18 |
Project manager |
4.4 |
Milestone 4: Completion of the project closure phase |
0 days |
Tue 25-12-18 |
Tue 25-12-18 |
Project planner |
Analogous estimation tool is mainly used for estimation of project resources that are generally required for repairing the tank. This method is used for estimating the resources of the project and this method of resource estimation is helpful in minimizing the cost of the resources. In spite of the benefits that this technique provides, it is found that this technique does not provides accurate results of the project.
Alias, Z., Zawawi, E. M. A., Yusof, K., & Aris, N. M. (2014). Determining critical success factors of project management practice: A conceptual framework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 61-69.
Andersen, E. S. (2016). Do project managers have different perspectives on project management?. International Journal of Project Management, 34(1), 58-65.
Batselier, J., & Vanhoucke, M. (2015). Evaluation of deterministic state-of-the-art forecasting approaches for project duration based on earned value management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1588-1596.
Cagliano, A. C., Grimaldi, S., & Rafele, C. (2015). Choosing project risk management techniques. A theoretical framework. Journal of Risk Research, 18(2), 232-248.
Conforto, E. C., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., Di Felippo, A., & Kamikawachi, D. S. L. (2016). The agility construct on project management theory. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 660-674.
Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M. (2014). Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development?. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21-34.
Fernandes, G., Ward, S., & Araújo, M. (2015). Improving and embedding project management practice in organisations—A qualitative study. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1052-1067.
Golini, R., Kalchschmidt, M., & Landoni, P. (2015). Adoption of project management practices: The impact on international development projects of non-governmental organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 650-663.
Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291-298.
Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377-1392.
Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377-1392.
Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley & Sons.
Marcelino-Sádaba, S., Pérez-Ezcurdia, A., Lazcano, A. M. E., & Villanueva, P. (2014). Project risk management methodology for small firms. International journal of project management, 32(2), 327-340.
Ojiako, U., Chipulu, M., Marshall, A., Ashleigh, M.J. and Williams, T., 2015. Project management learning: A comparative study between engineering students’ experiences in South Africa and the United Kingdom. Project Management Journal, 46(4), pp.47-62.
Riol, H., & Thuillier, D. (2015). Project management for academic research projects: balancing structure and flexibility. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 7(3), 251-269.
Sánchez, M. A. (2015). Integrating sustainability issues into project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 319-330.
Špundak, M. (2014). Mixed agile/traditional project management methodology–reality or illusion?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 939-948.
Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382-1394.