Justification
Project Description Project Description and Background
1.2 Justification The project is justified as it will provide a number of benefits. The output of the project, outcome and the benefits are discussed below.
|
The key stakeholders, associated with the project are mentioned in the following table-
2.1 Key Stakeholder List
|
Stakeholder |
Category (i.e. Sponsor / Supplier / User) |
Description of Interest |
Description of Influence |
1 |
SET |
Sponsor |
SET committee is interested in this training program as the project is an initiative by SET |
High Influence as this stakeholder is one of the primary sponsors. |
2 |
NAIDOC |
Sponsor |
This stakeholder has a high interest in the project since the plan I to coincide the project with NAIDOC week 2019 |
High Influence as this stakeholder is one of the primary sponsors. |
3 |
Project Team |
Supplier |
Medium Interest: responsible for organizing and execution of a project. |
Influence is Medium as it is not the main stakeholder for decision making |
4 |
Students |
User |
Has low interest on the project although the project is designed for them |
Has low influence in the project |
5 |
Employees |
User |
Has low interest on the project although the project is designed for them |
Has low influence in the project however, it is the primary user |
6 |
CQU University |
Sponsor |
Will be designing the training program and therefore has a high interest. |
Influence of this stakeholder is high as it is the organizing party. |
Stakeholders Engagement Assessment Matrix
Stakeholders Engagement Assessment Matrix
Stakeholder |
Unaware |
Resistant |
Neutral |
Supportive |
Leading |
1. SET |
ü |
||||
2. NAIDOC |
ü |
||||
3. Project Team |
ü |
||||
4. Students |
ü |
||||
5. Employees |
ü |
||||
6. CQU University |
ü |
Stakeholder Communication
Communication method |
INTERACTIVE, PULL or PUSH |
Justification |
Email and Phone |
Interactive |
The communication methods that have been set can be easily operated. An interactive communication is necessary as this is quite a sensitive project and needs extreme level of management |
Obtaining expert judgement
While developing the stakeholders’ management plan, it is necessary to sought expert judgement. The two different methods for obtaining expert judgment are either interviewing a single expert or by interviewing a group of expert who have knowledge about stakeholders’ management.
3. REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT
It is recommended to make use of three or more stakeholders for representing the owners since the size of the project is huge which will in turn make it difficult for any one stakeholder to track and manage the campuses.
3.2. Opening statement style
The opening statement “Acknowledgement of Country” will be suitable opening statement for this training project as it gives an idea of theme of the project.
3.3 Requirements gathering for training package
The use of a training package that was previously developed for some other cultural awareness program is not considered to be a suitable method that can be used for requirement gathering as it is completely a new project and modifying a previously developed project will not serve the purpose.
3.4 Requirements traceability
The project progress report along with the resource management plan can help in tracing and tracking the requirements throughout the execution of the project.
The technique of identifying the most important requirement associated with a particular project is termed as requirement prioritization process. It is necessary to inform the same to the stakeholders as all the stakeholders are required to known the progress of the project.
The four components of MoSCoW technique are as follows-
- Must Have Requirement
- Should Have Requirement’
- Could Have Requirement
- Won’t have Requirement
The training program or the project that has been planned aims in development of cultural awareness among the staffs and the employees of CQU. The project is expected to be executed with the NAIDOC week 2019. The project will need to incorporate the indigenous history, culture, languages and the protocols.
The programme will include offline training and online training. The project will be tailored to the students’ requirement and the employees of the University.
The requirements gathering of the project is planned and the project will follow a planned approach in implementation. It is a sensitive and complex project and needs an accurate management.
4.2 Work breakdown structure
The work breakdown structure of the project is as follows
Note: This WBS is not intended to represent the full project scope of the training project.
Requirement s Gathering |
|||||
WBS ID |
1.1.1. |
||||
Description of work |
The requirements and the necessities of the project will be gathered in this phase |
||||
Cost Estimate |
$8,704.00 |
||||
Start and Finish Dates |
|
Planning |
|||||
WBS ID |
1.1.2. |
||||
Description of work |
The phase of planning deals with the making of the project plan that will be developed for the project along with scheduling and budget estimation. |
||||
Cost Estimate |
$5,984.00 |
||||
Start and Finish Dates |
|
Online |
|||||
WBS ID |
1.2.1. |
||||
Description of work |
This is one of chosen delivery mode of the training program |
||||
Cost Estimate |
$5,440.00 |
||||
Start and Finish Dates |
|
Face to Face |
|||||
WBS ID |
1.2.2. |
||||
Description of work |
Apart from online training, a face to face or offline mode of training will be delivered. |
||||
Cost Estimate |
$7,344.00 |
||||
Start and Finish Dates |
|
Aboriginal History and Culture |
|||||
WBS ID |
1.3.1. |
||||
Description of work |
It is the training content that will be designed in this phase. |
||||
Cost Estimate |
$12,240.00 |
||||
Start and Finish Dates |
|
Aboriginal language and Protocol |
|||||
WBS ID |
1.3.2. |
||||
Description of work |
It is a content of the training that will be designed in this phase. |
||||
Cost Estimate |
$5,440.00 |
||||
Start and Finish Dates |
|
Requirements Gathering
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
Understanding the Training needs |
This is a significant sub-phase and will ensure accurate requirement gathering |
Fri 07-09-18 |
Thu 27-09-18 |
15 |
Research |
Both online and offline research will be done |
Fri 28-09-18 |
Mon 15-10-18 |
12 |
Documentation and preparation for planning phase |
Documentation is necessary for working on the next phases |
Tue 16-10-18 |
Mon 22-10-18 |
5 |
Planning
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
Understanding the gathered requirements |
The proper identification of the requirements will help in designing the project |
Tue 23-10-18 |
Thu 01-11-18 |
8 |
Budget estimation |
This is one of the most significant phases of the project |
Fri 02-11-18 |
Tue 13-11-18 |
8 |
Scheduling |
Scheduling is required for completion of the project within the set time |
Wed 14-11-18 |
Wed 21-11-18 |
6 |
Online
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
Identifying the process by which an online training will be delivered |
This is an important phase in the project as it will help in defining the process by which the training will delivered |
Thu 22-11-18 |
Wed 28-11-18 |
5 |
Selecting the trainer |
A good trainer is needed to be chosen for the project. |
Thu 29-11-18 |
Wed 05-12-18 |
5 |
Designing the training package |
Accurate designing of the training package will help in easier training delivery |
Thu 06-12-18 |
Wed 19-12-18 |
10 |
Face to Face
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
Selection of the venue and setting it up for the training process |
Proper setting up of the venue is essential |
Thu 20-12-18 |
Wed 02-01-19 |
10 |
Selection of the Trainer |
Choosing an appropriate trainer is necessary and therefore, it is an important phase |
Thu 03-01-19 |
Fri 18-01-19 |
12 |
Designing the training package |
Designing accurate training package is necessary |
Mon 21-01-19 |
Fri 25-01-19 |
5 |
Aboriginal history and culture
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
Researching the Content |
The content of the training will include Aboriginal history and culture |
Mon 28-01-19 |
Fri 08-02-19 |
10 |
Designing |
The designing phase will ensure easier delivery of the training |
Mon 11-02-19 |
Fri 22-02-19 |
10 |
Finalization |
Finalization of the final content and approval. |
Mon 25-02-19 |
Fri 01-03-19 |
5 |
Aboriginal language and Protocol
Activity |
Description of work |
Start Date |
End Date |
Duration (days) |
Researching the Content |
This phase is necessary as researching the aboriginal language and protocol is necessary for the training program. |
Mon 04-03-19 |
Wed 06-03-19 |
3 |
Designing |
Designing the content is necessary |
Thu 07-03-19 |
Fri 15-03-19 |
7 |
Finalization |
This phase finalizes the content of the project. |
Mon 18-03-19 |
Fri 29-03-19 |
10 |
Activity Name |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
Understanding the Training needs |
$4,080.00 |
|||||||||
Research |
$3,264.00 |
|||||||||
Documentation and preparation for planning phase |
$1,360.00 |
|||||||||
Planning
Activity Name |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
Understanding the gathered requirements |
$2,176.00 |
|||||||||
Budget estimation |
$2,176.00 |
|||||||||
Scheduling |
$1,632.00 |
|||||||||
Online
Activity Name |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
Identifying the process by which an online training will be delivered |
$1,360.00 |
|||||||||
Selecting the trainer |
$1,000 |
$360 |
||||||||
Designing the training package |
$2,720.00 |
|||||||||
Face to Face
Activity Name |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
Selection of the venue and setting it up for the training process |
$2,720.00 |
|||||||||
Selection of the Trainer |
$3,264.00 |
|||||||||
Designing the training package |
$1,360.00 |
|||||||||
Aboriginal history and culture
Activity Name |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
Researching the Content |
$2,000 |
$720 |
||||||||
Designing |
$2,720.00 |
|||||||||
Finalization |
$1,360.00 |
|||||||||
Aboriginal language and Protocol
Activity Name |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
Researching the Content |
$816.00 |
|||||||||
Designing |
$1,904.00 |
|||||||||
Finalization |
$2,720.00 |
|||||||||
genous Cultural Awareness Training Project
Risk Register
Name
|
Description |
Likelihood |
Impact |
Response type |
Mitigation strategy |
Risk 1
|
Resource Inefficiency |
Medium |
High |
Mitigate |
Resource Management Plan |
Risk 2
|
Disengaged Stakeholders |
High |
High |
Mitigate |
Communication Plan |
Risk 3
|
Technical Issues |
Medium |
Medium |
Avoid |
Hiring technical Expert |
Risk 4
|
Inaccurate scheduling |
Low |
Medium |
Mitigate |
Project Plan |
Opportunity
|
The Project will be a success |
High |
High |
Exploit |
Project needs high promotion. |
Tolerance |
Specific Tolerance allowed |
Tolerance specified for time |
+15 days |
Tolerance specified for cost |
+$10,000 |
Previous lessons learned |
Proposed action to address (in current project) |
Lesson 1 The first lesson involved an ‘off-the-shelf’ online training program which failed to properly interface with the universities learning system. |
The off the shelf idea is dropped since it is an example of a failed project. |
Lesson 2: The second lesson involved the use of a generic cross cultural training package which failed to properly address the nuances which exists between different indigenous groups located in various geographical areas. |
The considerable use of a cross cultural training package is not a good idea since it is very generic as well as it will not address the main need or requirement of the project that is to generate awareness. |
Project Submission Approval
The undersigned acknowledge that they have reviewed the Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Project Assessment Task 2 and agree with the information presented within this document.
Signature: |
Kindly Insert |
Date: |
Kindly Insert |
Print Name: |
Kindly Insert |
||
Title: |
Project Executive |
||
Organisation: |
SET |
Beringer, C., Jonas, D., & Kock, A. (2013). Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 830-846.
Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.
Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of project management. Amacom.
Kerzner, H., & Kerzner, H. R. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Kolisch, R. (2013). Project scheduling under resource constraints: efficient heuristics for several problem classes. Springer Science & Business Media.
Larson, E. W., Gray, C. F., Danlin, U., Honig, B., & Bacarini, D. (2014). Project management: The managerial process (Vol. 6). Grandview Heights, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.
Marchewka, J. T. (2014). Information technology project management. John Wiley & Sons.
Slowinski, R., & Weglarz, J. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in project scheduling. Elsevier.