The Goal of Reduced Inequality for Nursing Profession
The goal in this case is selected to be Goal no. 10 of Reduced Inequality among people within the nursing profession. The sustainability development goals help in creating a better world as a whole. The Reduced Inequality in this case provides the goal of removing inequalities from the health care system that enhances the well-being of people and the nursing community as a whole (Unstats.un.org, 2021).
The example in this case is selected to be, discrimination level of women with disabilities. This is a particular example within the world-wide communities in the nursing profession. The customers as well as the nurses face the same thing. The covid-19 pandemic is making the situation worse as the existing pattern are changing with its discriminations and stigmas.
The goal of “Reduced Inequality” focuses and aims at reducing the gender inequality within the nursing community world-wide. The discriminations among women with disabilities can also be removed with this significant goal of sustainability. There are inequalities within different countries that are being the centre of concern for most of the organizations. Through inequality, the vulnerability of the poor people are increasing. The social and economic inequalities within the nursing profession is hitting the vulnerable parts of the countries deeply in this Covid-19 pandemic (un.org, 2020).
The goal of Reduced Inequality is important within the nursing profession because the relevance of the goal is quite high according to the professional needs. The discriminations among the gender of the patients as well as the professionals are increasing with time. Simultaneously, women with disabilities are going through more discrimination in the entire world. This inequality is impacting the healthcare needs and rights of the individuals and making the nursing profession more vulnerable. Nursing profession is based on care provision which needs appropriate assistance during shifts. If the discrimination exists within the workplaces then the female nurse will fail to incorporate with the necessities of the patients (Alston, 2018).
During the period of 2014-2019, 31 countries reported that 2 out of 10 people have experienced discriminations within the healthcare system. Women are the main victims in this case in comparison to men. Women are facing the discrimination in their professional field due to which the opportunities of growth is declining for them.
With the covid-19 pandemic, the discriminations among women and men in case of being patients or professionals is increasing and deepening its roots world-wide. Certainly, the existing structure of discrimination is far from being demolished. Instead, the discriminations are increasing against women within the nursing profession and the health care system (Fincher & Saunders, 2020).
From the previous researches, it is identified that Women with disabilities face a great deal of challenge due to their health condition in general lifestyle as well as during healthcare system. Within the health care system, there is no place for employment for disable women or men within the healthcare system. The gender inequality is impacting the human dignity through income discrimination, lifestyle discrimination, social discrimination and emotional pressure.
The higher inequality is impacting the mortality rate and the health status of the women nurses. Here, income inequality is relative to disability issues of the women. Association of women with the nursing profession can be a safer option in many countries however, with increasing income inequality, the risks are increasing within this profession and impacting the human dignity of the nurses (Backholer et al., 2021).
Discrimination Against Women with Disabilities in the Nursing Profession
The situation explained within the example of Women disabilities and the discriminations are contributing to the employment policies as a whole. Within the society, women are disregarded in making decisions or appointing as a leader. The social status of women and nurses are being disregarded entirely. Through the context of women being the victims, society is unable to develop its mind-sets towards equality and mass endearment. The common good is getting impacted through the discrimination among women nurses and their rights to the healthcare systems (Hensher, 2020).
With the explanation of Women discriminations who have disabilities have a reason of tempting the solidarity principle of CST. This principle entangles the rights and ethics of respecting every other person with dignity and recognition. The inequality has no place within the CST principles. Solidarity provides the base idea of building a relationship with people and understanding them who have a different life than others (Brown & Bowman, 2020). Discrimination in nursing community due to women disabilities which are a big disappointment in the name of solidarity because it breaks every possible rule that Solidarity stands for.
In South-Africa Khoe-San is a particular community who reside in the Kalahari Region of South Africa. These indigenous people re already excluded from the major population and basic human rights due to the minority. Being a third world country there are significant problems and discriminations existent which impact the gaols and lifestyles of the people.
Through the achievement of the inequality reduction, these indigenous people will be able to get their rights just like the rest of the population. By reducing the inequality, South Africa will be able to open up to the world for better employment and cultural opportunities. The Women will have their own human dignity and the healthcare system will be evolved within the world map (Hensher, 2020).
References
Alston, P. (2018). The right to social insecurity: a human rights perspective on the evolution of Australian welfare policy. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 24(3), 253-275.
Backholer, K., Baum, F., Finlay, S. M., Friel, S., Giles-Corti, B., Jones, A., … & Demaio, S. (2021). Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?. Medical Journal of Australia, 214, S5-S40.
Brown, J. T., & Bowman, D. (2020). Economic security and dignity: a financial wellbeing framework.
Fincher, R., & Saunders, P. (2020). The complex contexts of Australian inequality. In Creating Unequal Futures? (pp. 1-37). Routledge.
Hensher, M. (2020). Covid-19, unemployment, and health: time for deeper solutions?. bmj, 371.
un.org. (2020). Reduce inequality within and among countries – United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 9 December 2021, from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/inequality/
Unstats.un.org. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. Retrieved 9 December 2021, from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2020.pdf
Within the Australian context, the situation created through Women with disabilities facing the discrimination in nursing profession is increasing with time and changes in the international strategies. The sustainability goal of the health-care system is based on the establishment of moral system related to gender equality and relationships between different people. The Australian health care system is impacting the human dignity through its discrimination because with the human rights of the women, men are getting better and more enhancement in health-care system. The contribution of men and women are equal, however the income and dignity inequality is impacting the well-being and mental satisfaction of the women due to lack of recognition (Sandel, 2020).
Impact of Discrimination on Healthcare System and Human Dignity
The healthcare professionals in Australia re getting impacted by the inequality towards women of the nursing profession. The utilization of economic and social rights are the human claims of every individual working within the health care system. Without further issue in the Australian healthcare system, the citizens are facing challenges while remaining in the unequal properties of Australia. Here, citizens are getting discriminated on the basis of their gender and income status. This is sabotaging the social and human rights of the Australian citizens only for the women (Bapuji et al., 2018). The women nurses are diminished on the basis of their racial and income based disparities. This discrimination is impacting their mental and emotional health for which the job satisfaction level is declining.
The solidarity principle of Catholic School Teaching (CST) is evidently impacted within the Australian Health care system and Nursing Community. The discrimination between men and women nurses are increasing the barriers in solidarity within the healthcare system. The nurses are generally positioned in a unique manner to sustain contact with other employees. This is creating a situation where the appropriate communication level cannot be carried out. The discrimination is impacting the solidarity principle where women are disregarded for their efforts (Mackean et al., 2020). The cultural barriers and the gender discriminations are increasing the changes within the Australian health-care system. For the nursing profession, the challenges for women re continuously increasing due to the lack of respect and recognition from each other.
Within the Australian healthcare system, there was a study which focused eligible women for competing their survey on perinatal care and public models of discriminations. 4366 eligible women participated in this study regarding their perinatal care within Australian hospitals and health-care system. The comparison of the different healthcare system focused on the discriminations of women through majority and minority groups and their experiences. Here it was identified that there were several stressful events where the discrimination was clearly visible in the system as broad daylight (Trollor et al., 2018). Especially young women below 25 years and had a habit of smoking faced most of the discriminations irrespective of their physical appearance.
The appropriate SMART objective towards achieving the aim of reducing inequality can be done by the future professional nurses are directly done through their moral values and ethical considerations. The elimination of health disparity can be confirmed through utilization of better mind-sets of the professionals (Yelland, Sutherland & Brown, 2019). The nurses need to be more radical and outspoken in order to get their fair way to the rewards and recognitions. With certainty in the comparison among men and women nurses, the disparity needs to be demolished by the female themselves. It is important that the inequality within the income source or gender get demolished through recognition and appreciation. The nurses need to start contributing equally without including feminism into the responsibilities. The indigenous people need to be respected and treated equally like other Australian citizens (McCall et al., 2019). The engagement can be done by eliminating cultural barriers and economic biasness.
Importance of Reduced Inequality for the Nursing Profession
The appropriate respect and behaviour would work like a medicine on people who had been treated unfairly in the past. Compassion and equal mind-set helps in gathering empathy towards all and others. The comparison among gender is not the answer to the community well-being, instead if men and women nurses start to respect and appreciate each other on their contributions then the community will be able to maximize the equal statistics. In case of Women with disabilities, the community should adjust its mentality with empathy to help and respect each other with human dignity and solidarity. The economic disparity can also be eliminated with compassion, solidarity and respect, irrespective of gender biasness (Hardill, 2019). The community will be declining gender biasness and inequality with time and eventually create a better world with equal rights, respect and recognition within the Australian health care system.
In this case of reducing inequality, the nurses may like to take help through advocacy from different organizations and mediums. The significant mediums will be able to increase the awareness among citizens related to the women discrepancies. With the help of public support it is possible to change the dimension of the organizational and cultural behaviour within Australian health-care system. The community has the power to change the policies against women inequality.
The government will help in providing legal help and provision for improving the terms of nursing professionals, employment policies and authoritative policies (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 2021). On the contrary, the Media houses and Press will help the citizens to gather more people to join the movement of excluding women disparity and discrimination into the healthcare system.
Executing the plan into an entire profession can be extremely challenging, especially, when it is the healthcare system of Australia. People cannot go against the policies entirely otherwise the provision of healthcare will demolish and the problems of healthcare negligence and mortality rate will arise.
In this case the citizens and the professional nurses need to sign petitions to evolve the policies of the organizations and discuss their terms with different authorities of the health care system to solve their problems into succession. The health care system of Australia might not take any positive action if the sincerity of the matter is not provided to them by a governmental department (Vic.gov.au, 2021). In that case, the citizens and the professional nurses need to make the statement clear for their own involvement and contribution within the operational structure.
Australia is a first world country which is impacting the contribution of its healthcare system will contribute to the mind-sets of other countries. Here, the maximization of policy changes might help with the changes of global scenario in the meantime. Being an example against women discrimination within the Australian health-care system will help developing the policies and changing them in different countries at the same time.
In no country, gender inequality should be with stood. The well-being of the citizens are in the hands of the country and its authorities who are operating the healthcare system. With high levels of respect for each other and a sense for human dignity it is considered that Australian healthcare system and nursing will help evolving other countries (health.gov.au, 2021). Certainly the global impact is based on the successful change in one country that is Australia in this case.
References
Bapuji, H., Husted, B. W., Lu, J., & Mir, R. (2018). Value creation, appropriation, and distribution: How firms contribute to societal economic inequality. Business & Society, 57(6), 983-1009.
Hardill, K. (2019). That look that makes you not really want to be there: How neoliberalism and the War on Drugs compromise nursing care of people who use substances. Witness: The Canadian Journal of Critical Nursing Discourse, 1(1), 13-27.
health.gov.au. (2021). Department of Health | Strategic Outcome 2: Improve access and reduce inequity. Retrieved 9 December 2021, from https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/NPHC-Strategic-Framework~strategicoutcome2
Mackean, T., Fisher, M., Friel, S., & Baum, F. (2020). A framework to assess cultural safety in Australian public policy. Health promotion international, 35(2), 340-351.
McCall, J., Phillips, J. C., Estafan, A., & Caine, V. (2019). Exploring the experiences of staff working at an opiate assisted treatment clinic: an interpretive descriptive study. Applied Nursing Research, 45, 45-51.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. (2021). Health Inequalities: Trends, Progress, and Policy. Retrieved 9 December 2021, from
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124658
Sandel, M. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit: What’s become of the common good?. Penguin UK.
Trollor, J. N., Eagleson, C., Turner, B., Salomon, C., Cashin, A., Iacono, T., … & Lennox, N. (2018). Intellectual disability content within pre-registration nursing curriculum: How is it taught?. Nurse education today, 69, 48-52.
Vic.gov.au. (2021). Disabilities and Health Inequalities in Australia. Retrieved 9 December 2021, from
https://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/-/media/ResourceCentre/PublicationsandResources/Health-Inequalities/VH_Disability-Summary_web.pdf?la=en&hash=3347870D3B7ADF0227C5B7B831E02A2ED27AE31E
Yelland JS, Sutherland GA & Brown SJ, (2019). Women’s experience of discrimination in Australian perinatal care: the double disadvantage of social adversity and unequal care. Birth. 2012 Sep;39(3):211-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00550.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27. PMID: 23281903.