Tax Concession for Research and Development
Discuss the tax implications of R&D incentives.
There are numerous nations that provides the substantial subsidies for the innovations associated to the research and development. In the year 1985-86 research and development tax incentive was introduced by Australia that offers the business with the amenities of subtracting the expenses by approximately 150% [1]. The implementation of tax concession in the research and development was introduced in the year 1985 when the Australian business industry was making their shift towards more integration and international economy.
The tax concession in the research and development was introduced by the government for re-orienteering the Australian companies as well as altering the management attitudes towards the research and development [2]. In order to expand the small business sector, the government of Australia has introduced the entree research and development as the mechanism of support that provides the business with softs of moving in the direction of research and development which have significantly led during the last decade at the government expense. The tax concessions that is provided is termed as generous in respect of the Australian standards. Notwithstanding of the rate of discount that is provided in the concession, Australia offers that small business with the third most generous treatment of tax of research and development among the other OECD countries.
The tax incentive that is provided to the small business for research and development helps in promoting the engagement of the research and development activities that ultimately benefits the Australian economy and also provides encouragement through tax incentives to the small business[3]. The program of research and development was very launched as the temporary measures that was due to be concluded on 30 June 1991. However, the Australian government in the March month made an announcement that the research and development activities would for a permanent measurement that would have the feature of one single subject with numerous changes over the period of time.
The basic feature that govern the activities of the research and development is the tax incentive that is provided to the small business so that the small business is encouraged to undertake the activities of the research and development in Australia[4]. The concept of research and development is held as the wider subject that has changed over the years. The government implemented the tax concession of 150 per cent with the objective of promoting the Australian companies engaged in the activities of research and development. The objective of the company is to make the companies more internationally competitive and innovations oriented. The primary purpose of providing tax concession was to improve the situation of commercialization relating to the innovative process and techniques with the help of which the products are developed in Australia.
Eligibility Criteria for Small Businesses
According to the Taxation ruling of TR 92/2 an explanation has been provided relating to some certain forms of expenses that occurs at in the process of scientific research and development which forms its base on subsection 73A (1) of the ITAA 1936 [5]. The taxation rulings provide that small business should be allowed to claim deductions on their income tax relating to the research and development activities under subsection 73 A (1) of the ITAA 1936. The expenses are not considered as the allowable deductions under any other provision of the act. Under the taxation ruling of 92/2 small business are provided with the facilities of claiming an allowable deductions relating to the expenses of the research and development given the activities are conducted from the approved scientific research institute[6]. In order to claim deductions for the small business it is necessary that the expenses that are incurred relating to the research and development should be from the scientifically research institute.
The ITAA 1997 is viewed as the Australian parliament. It is regarded as the primary statute of computing the tax liability. The ITAA 1997 provides numerous sections and acts but the primary consideration is the tax incentive for the research and development activities in which the small business engage[7]. Under subsection 73 A (1) of the ITAA 1997 there are certain forms of expenses under the taxation ruling of 92/2 that is allowed as deductions. Since the adoption of the enactment of section 73 A of the ITAA 1946 the taxpayer are able to make a claim for the research and development associated to the cost that are occurred by the business on the scientific research and development. The section 73 A of the ITAA 1946 provides that the expenses relating to the research and development is not deductible under any other provision of the law[8].
According to the ITAA 1997 there are generally two types of the research and development payment that are allowed as deductions for the business. This comprises of the payments and the expenses that are in the nature of capital. Under the section 73 A of the ITAA 1997 it allows the small business to claim both types of payments since that are incurred in generating the assessable income in the business course[9]. However an important consideration of the ITAA 1997 is that both types of payments should be made only the scientifically approve research institutes.
Allowable Deductions under the ITAA 1997
Ever since the introduction of the section 73 A in 1946 the taxpayers are provided with the facilities of claiming a permissible deductions for the expenses that are occurred in the scientific research and development and the same may not have been allowed as allowable deductions under any other provision of the act. In order to be held eligible for the small business to claim deductions relating to research and development there are some conditions that is required to be fulfilled[10]. This comprises of the payments that is made to the research and development institute should be scientifically approved institute and must in the associated with the business purpose.
Under section 73 A small business are allowed to claim an allowable deductions associated to the research and development given the plant is used specifically for the business purpose. According to the subsection 73 A (1) an explanation has been provided that during the year of income small business are allowed to claim deductions associated to the gaining of taxable income[11]. But an important consideration of the subsection 73 A (1) is that such payment is only made to the scientifically approved research and development institute. Additionally the objective of undertaking the activities of research and development should be relate to the class of business in which the business operates. Under subparagraph of 73A (1) (a)(i) payments associated to the approved research and development institute are held deductible. Such payments are usually viewed as contractual based payments and are usually associated to the particular working of the taxpayers business.
The research and development tax incentives provides the small business with the facilities of tax offset in order to promote engagement in research and development research and development actions[12]. Under this scheme small business are provided with 43.5% refundable tax offset to the research and development entities that eligible and has the aggregate annual turnover of less than $20 million each year. In addition to this the small business are offered with 38.5% of the non-refundable tax offset relating to the amount that is unused and can be offset or carried forward for use in future. The activities of research and development assures that in the event of revocation the provision would still be applied for things that is carried out by the small business.
The concessional rate of 125 per cent provides the small business with concessional deductions relating to all types’ research and development that eligible[13]. The effectiveness of the research and development tax incentive is that small business are able to subtract the current expenses by a minimum of 125 per cent from their total costs that is incurred in their business. The current costs consists of the wages, salaries and other types of labour costs that are directed towards the research and development activities. Additionally these costs must be contracted with the scientifically approved research and development institutes.
Benefits of the Tax Incentive
The effectiveness of the research and development tax incentives comprises of giving the small business with the opportunity of claiming the cost of depreciation to the equipment that is used in the process of research and development for more than the period of three years[14]. The effectiveness of the provision is that tax deductions can be claimed equivalent to 125 per cent of the deductions which is applicable for the small business. Small business that are considering to conduct the research and development would be allowed to claim an allowable deductions if the activities of research and development is carried out from approved institutes.
Not like several special tax provision there is a strong and economic rationale relating to the research and development tax credit[15]. Expenses associated to the research amounts the understanding of the business and economy. This paves the way for new innovative research and changes in the process or products provides an economical products and services. Upon making a successful innovations there is an increased economic expansion and efficiency as well. Higher amount of productivity improves the standard of living for the citizens. Hence, promoting the innovation in small business it results in improved productivity with better income for business.
The research and development tax incentive is regarded as an effective tool since small business are facilitated to invest in the research and development activities till they obtain the equivalent costs of conducting the research[16]. Ideally, the small business are able to make investment in those activities that not only yields benefits for the business but for the society as well.
The main purpose of tax reformation is to promote economic expansion and cutting the effective tax rate involved in investment. Respondents of small have voiced that there is a needed reformation in tax incentive structure. The government must showcase stability for research and development tax incentive to derive greater output. There is a need for government certainty.
Stability in the government policy is required in the biotechnology industry as it involves higher costs of products, hazardous clinical trials and longer development of pipeline. There is a need of government stability in the tax incentive policy by providing guarantee to the program[17]. Reforming the tax incentive policy would ultimately help in creating a strong tax incentive policy.
Relating to the future direction the government has introduced a refundable tax offset that would be capped at $4 million on annual basis that is mainly applicable on the small claims[18]. Any kind of claim which is greater than $4 million then it would be carried forward to the future years as non-refundable offset. The refundable offset would provide a benefit at fixed rate of 13.5% which would be associated to the company tax rate.
A premium benefit would also be introduced by the government that has wider benefits for those claimants that undertake higher intensive research with higher rate of non-refundable tax offset [19]. A new budget has been announced by the government of $2.4 billion to create an effective research and development tax incentive. The policy of the government is found to be emphasising on the tax incentive instead of emphasising on the future direction of research and development.
Conclusion:
On a conclusive note the tax incentive is regarded as the essential part of the Australian innovation policy and it is vital in attracting investment from small business. However, it should be noted an adverse response from the government towards tax incentive might result in reduced investment from the outside sources.
The small business might struggle to obtain appropriate fund relating to research and development and may result in lessor number of firms in the activities of research and development. The government must seriously boost the innovation in small business by funding their activities and should introduce more stability in it’s polices for uninterrupted economic growth.
Reference List:
Appelt, S., Bajgar, M., Criscuolo, C. and Galindo-Rueda, F. R&D Tax Incentives: Evidence on design, incidence and impacts 2016.
Armstrong, C.S., Blouin, J.L., Jagolinzer, A.D. and Larcker, D.F., Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), pp.1-17 2015.
Barkoczy, S., Foundations of taxation law 2016. OUP Catalogue 2016.
Basak, S., Equalization Levy: A New Perspective of E-Commerce Taxation. Intertax, 44(11), pp.845-852. 2016.
Bronzini, R. and Piselli, P., The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), pp.442-457 2016.
Busom, I., Corchuelo, B. and Martínez-Ros, E., Tax incentives… or subsidies for business R&D?. Small Business Economics, 43(3), pp.571-596 2014.
Cao, L., Hosking, A., Kouparitsas, M., Mullaly, D., Rimmer, X., Shi, Q., Stark, W. and Wende, S., Understanding the economy-wide efficiency and incidence of major Australian taxes. Canberra: Treasury working paper, 2001 2015..
Castellacci, F. and Lie, C.M., Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A meta-regression analysis. Research Policy, 44(4), pp.819-832 2015.
Dechezleprêtre, A., Einiö, E., Martin, R., Nguyen, K.T. and Van Reenen, J.,. Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RD design for R&D (No. w22405). National Bureau of Economic Research 2016.
Dechezleprêtre, A., Einiö, E., Martin, R., Nguyen, K.T. and Van Reenen, J., Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RD design for R&D (No. w22405). National Bureau of Economic Research 2016.
Ernst, C., Richter, K. and Riedel, N. Corporate taxation and the quality of research and development. International Tax and Public Finance, 21(4), pp.694-719 2014.
Graetz, M.J. and Warren, A.C., Integration of corporate and shareholder taxes. 2016
Long, B., Campbell, J. and Kelshaw, C., The justice lens on taxation policy in Australia. St Mark’s Review, (235), p.94. 2016.
Middleton, T., Banning, disqualification and licensing powers: ACCC, APRA, ASIC and the ATO–regulatory overlap, penalty privilege and law reform. Company and Securities Law Journal, 33, pp.555-580. 2015.
Renwick, M.J., Brogan, D.M. and Mossialos, E., A systematic review and critical assessment of incentive strategies for discovery and development of novel antibiotics. The Journal of antibiotics, 69(2), p.73 2016.
Richardson, G., The Determinants of Tax Evasion: A Cross-Country Study. In Financial Crimes: Psychological, Technological, and Ethical Issues (pp. 33-57). Springer, Cham. 2016.
Saad, N., Tax knowledge, tax complexity and tax compliance: Taxpayers’ view. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, pp.1069-1075. 2014.
Shen, L., He, B., Jiao, L., Song, X. and Zhang, X., Research on the development of main policy instruments for improving building energy-efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp.1789-1803 2016.
Tan, L.M., Braithwaite, V. and Reinhart, M., Why do small business taxpayers stay with their practitioners? Trust, competence and aggressive advice. International Small Business Journal, 34(3), pp.329-344. 2016.
Woellner, R., Barkoczy, S., Murphy, S., Evans, C. and Pinto, D., Australian Taxation Law 2016. OUP Catalogue 2016.
Dechezleprêtre, A., Einiö, E., Martin, R., Nguyen, K.T. and Van Reenen, J.,. Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RD design for R&D (No. w22405). National Bureau of Economic Research 2016.
Ernst, C., Richter, K. and Riedel, N. Corporate taxation and the quality of research and development. International Tax and Public Finance, 21(4), pp.694-719 2014.
Armstrong, C.S., Blouin, J.L., Jagolinzer, A.D. and Larcker, D.F., Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), pp.1-17 2015.
Castellacci, F. and Lie, C.M., Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A meta-regression analysis. Research Policy, 44(4), pp.819-832 2015.
Shen, L., He, B., Jiao, L., Song, X. and Zhang, X., Research on the development of main policy instruments for improving building energy-efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp.1789-1803 2016.
Graetz, M.J. and Warren, A.C., Integration of corporate and shareholder taxes. 2016
Renwick, M.J., Brogan, D.M. and Mossialos, E., A systematic review and critical assessment of incentive strategies for discovery and development of novel antibiotics. The Journal of antibiotics, 69(2), p.73 2016.
Saad, N., Tax knowledge, tax complexity and tax compliance: Taxpayers’ view. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, pp.1069-1075. 2014.
Appelt, S., Bajgar, M., Criscuolo, C. and Galindo-Rueda, F. R&D Tax Incentives: Evidence on design, incidence and impacts 2016Busom, I., Corchuelo, B. and Martínez-Ros, E., Tax incentives… or subsidies for business R&D?. Small Business Economics, 43(3), pp.571-596 2014.
Richardson, G., The Determinants of Tax Evasion: A Cross-Country Study. In Financial Crimes: Psychological, Technological, and Ethical Issues (pp. 33-57). Springer, Cham. 2016.
Dechezleprêtre, A., Einiö, E., Martin, R., Nguyen, K.T. and Van Reenen, J., Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RD design for R&D (No. w22405). National Bureau of Economic Research 2016.
Middleton, T., Banning, disqualification and licensing powers: ACCC, APRA, ASIC and the ATO–regulatory overlap, penalty privilege and law reform. Company and Securities Law Journal, 33, pp.555-580. 2015
Woellner, R., Barkoczy, S., Murphy, S., Evans, C. and Pinto, D., Australian Taxation Law 2016. OUP Catalogue 2016.
Barkoczy, S., Foundations of taxation law 2016. OUP Catalogue 2016
Tan, L.M., Braithwaite, V. and Reinhart, M., Why do small business taxpayers stay with their practitioners? Trust, competence and aggressive advice. International Small Business Journal, 34(3), pp.329-344. 2016.
Cao, L., Hosking, A., Kouparitsas, M., Mullaly, D., Rimmer, X., Shi, Q., Stark, W. and Wende, S., Understanding the economy-wide efficiency and incidence of major Australian taxes. Canberra: Treasury working paper, 2001 2015..
Long, B., Campbell, J. and Kelshaw, C., The justice lens on taxation policy in Australia. St Mark’s Review, (235), p.94. 2016
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
