Problem Definition
Maybe food is not that good after all!? Or to state it more simply, unobserved food consumption is not good for your health. Even then, what can be the comfortable measure to be termed as observed food consumption and what is not? Such and other dilemmas alongside a number of other factors such as genetics have left Australia marred from the after effects of unobserved food consumption which more often than not are indicated by overweight and obesity. Shahian (2018) in her article on the causes, effects and probable diagnosis of obesity states that “obesity occurs in an instance where a person has an above average fat in their body.” Further she notes that obesity may be caused by factors such as:
- Illness
- Poor diet
- Sedentary lifestyle
- Family
- Socioeconomics
- Genetics
Sadly, obesity as an issue is not only an Australian problem but a trend spread among a number of nations, Zukiewicz et al (2014) on the paradox of obesity in developed nations, identifies that there are more instances of obesity in developed counties than there are in underdeveloped countries. The paper notes “… the number of obese people in Europe has increased threefold over the last 20 years…” (Zukiewicz et al, 2014).
The aim of this paper is to explore the distribution of obesity in the Australian society through exploration of the different social statistics; the analysis will involve stratification of the society into a number of stratums such as age groups, socioeconomic classes, and geo-location. From the analysis, inferences on the effects of various factors that cause overweight and obesity, conclusions on the distribution of obesity effects will be drawn and recommendations to some of the suitable remedy given for consideration by the relevant authorities.
The research’s main concern is to explore the distribution of obesity and overweight majorly in the Australian society as well as examine how Australia performs in the wider image of developed countries. The paper also explores what would be the causes of obesity and overweight. It aims at establishing a pattern between the obesity rates among different social strata through data analysis and inference to previous studies. Following the analysis and discussion, the paper should be able to offer effective guidelines to possible remedies and preventive measures for overweight and obesity.
A survey by Comans et al (2017) indicates that young children are among the major causalities of obesity, therefore begging the question as to what really causes obesity and who is to take responsibility. Depleuch et al (2015) in their paper on obesity and developing countries of the south, argue that obesity is rampant among the affluent in the society, in this regard, he notes that, “…excess weight appears first among the affluent and then among the low-income. According to Flynn MA (2006), for a while obesity has been an issue mostly related to the developed countries; however it has recently encroached developing counties, indicating an increase in the overall statistics recorded on overweight and obesity. The major factors that influence obesity are nutrition adoption of fat-enriched foods mostly found in junk foods. Chapparro (2010) identifies fat-enriched foods as lipid-based which are a “range of fortified, lipid-based products…” which are ready-to-use also known as fast foods most often categorized under junk foods which are among the major contributors of fat in the body. (Chapparro, 2010). In a study on the factors that influence obesity in Australia: Gulay, Roger and Kathy (2017) note that in the year 2009, 1 in 4 adults in Australia were obese which is quite a staggering figure. Most recently, there have been increases in weight as recorded by many Australians. More often, the effects of obesity are demanding. As such these may include:
- Weight related illnesses
- Financial strain in order to contain the already gained weight
- Psychological effects such as lack of confidence by the victims due to the feeling of inferiority, etcetera
Background to the problem
The main aim of this study is to explore the effects obesity, the causes of obesity, the distribution of obesity in Australia as well as the rest of the world. Additionally, the paper aims at examining the growth rate of obesity over the past years and comment on the pattern
There are a number of factors put forward as causes of obesity
- Theory one: Inferior dietary routines
As noted earlier on, unobserved dietary consumption is one of the major factors that cause obesity. Some of the reasons for such dietary patterns may comprise: Most of the young Australia generation is addicted to the low cost street and unhealthy food, additionally busy schedules which deprive a majority of the individuals’ ample time to cook healthy meals and therefore resort to junk foods.
- Theory two: Genetics
A paper by Ulaval (2018) indicate that there are various types of obesity that concentrate in a family, as such, the chance of a person from a line of family with a history of obesity to be obese are relatively higher than that of a person from a non-obese history. Studies indicate that genes are susceptible to solely lead to obesity. Such disorders include the Bardet-Biedl and Prader-WIlli syndromes. Nevertheless, it is not always that genes may lead to health complications; in the case of obesity it is often a combination of both genes and behavior that cause genes to be included as a causal agent of obesity.
- Theory three: Socioeconomic factors
Researches done by Pampel et al. (2012) suggest that, “The higher the nation’s economic development, the higher the shift in the obesity rates…”
- Theory four: Level of physical activities
Pampel (2012) argues that “…activities such as reading, attending cultural events, and going to the movies…” are effectual in lowering the BMI (Body Mass Weight) just the same as exercise. Whereas, passive activities like watching television or movies had no effect on lowering the BMI.
To enable focus of the researcher on the specific objectives of the research, the following research questions are used:
- What are the factors that are likely to cause overweight and obesity?
- Does overweight indicate a path to obesity i.e. does overweight act as a preliminary stage to obesity or are they disjoint?
- Is there a difference in the Australian population strata of persons with instances of overweight and obesity?
Previous studies have expressed different views and projections of the situation of obesity and overweight in Australia. Sadly, there have not been enough social groups out to take the responsibility of ensuring reduction of the rates obesity despite exposure of the pending epidemic by both researchers and scholars. In a study by Moretto and Byrnes (2017) on the role of government on the fight against obesity in their paper about “Public Preferences for the Use of Taxation and Labeling Policy Measures to Combat Obesity in Young Children in Australia,” they debate that the government is interested on initiatives of launching taxation policy however from the recent survey it is noted that taxation policy has not make a great impact over street food addiction of young generation. Comans et al. (2017) argue that unless the young generation reconsider their take on unhealthy foods the issue of obesity is likely to stay for a while. The previous researches do not highlight the underlying events that may lead to addiction of junk foods but only concentrate on the ultimate addiction. Therefore, making leaps past the root causes of unhealthy food observances into conclusions of the effect of such unhealthy food observances, therefore creating a gap.
Literature review
The secondary data for this project was obtained from the Australian health department database for the years 1995 to 2015. It is divided into various data-sets according to categories which include (Region- urban and rural, Age – young and old, Australian cities, Adults (1995-2015). Whereas, the primary data is obtained from sample surveys filled by members of different Australian strata groups.
In order to examine the research questions, two sets of hypotheses are formulated to help in the process of establishing the rate of obese and overweight in Australia and how it is related to various factors such as:
- Age
- Place of residence
- Rural areas / Urban areas
To explore the difference of obesity rates between different Australian cities, the hypotheses to determine the statistical difference are:
Null hypothesis
H0: Factors such as overweight lead to obesity in both children and adults
Alternative
H1: There is no relationship between factors such as overweight and obesity children and adults, i.e. obesity and overweight do not correlate children grow into obese adults.
To test the difference of obesity between urban and rural areas, the hypothesis includes:
Null hypothesis
H0: There is more obesity in urban centers than in rural areas
Alternative
H1: There is no statistical difference between the obesity rates of urban and rural areas
The data analysis tool for the study was the SPSS software, while the data collection of secondary sources was from the ministry of health databases through the internet.
Obesity rates in different countries |
||||
Country |
Overweight but not obese (%) |
Obese (%) |
Overweight or obese (%) |
|
Australia |
Mean |
35.50 |
27.90 |
63.40 |
Grouped Median |
35.50 |
27.90 |
63.40 |
|
Belgium |
Mean |
32.40 |
18.60 |
51.00 |
Grouped Median |
32.40 |
18.60 |
51.00 |
|
Canada |
Mean |
34.50 |
25.80 |
60.30 |
Grouped Median |
34.50 |
25.80 |
60.30 |
|
Chile |
Mean |
39.40 |
25.10 |
64.50 |
Grouped Median |
39.40 |
25.10 |
64.50 |
|
Czech Republic |
Mean |
34.00 |
21.00 |
55.00 |
Grouped Median |
34.00 |
21.00 |
55.00 |
|
Estonia |
Mean |
33.30 |
18.00 |
51.30 |
Grouped Median |
33.30 |
18.00 |
51.30 |
|
Finland |
Mean |
40.20 |
24.80 |
65.00 |
Grouped Median |
40.20 |
24.80 |
65.00 |
|
France |
Mean |
32.40 |
16.90 |
49.30 |
Grouped Median |
32.40 |
16.90 |
49.30 |
|
Germany |
Mean |
36.40 |
23.60 |
60.00 |
Grouped Median |
36.40 |
23.60 |
60.00 |
|
Hungary |
Mean |
32.30 |
30.00 |
62.30 |
Grouped Median |
32.30 |
30.00 |
62.30 |
|
Ireland |
Mean |
38.00 |
23.00 |
61.00 |
Grouped Median |
38.00 |
23.00 |
61.00 |
|
Israel |
Mean |
39.30 |
22.90 |
62.20 |
Grouped Median |
39.30 |
22.90 |
62.20 |
|
Japan |
Mean |
20.10 |
3.70 |
23.80 |
Grouped Median |
20.10 |
3.70 |
23.80 |
|
Korea |
Mean |
28.10 |
5.30 |
33.40 |
Grouped Median |
28.10 |
5.30 |
33.40 |
|
Latvia |
Mean |
31.40 |
23.20 |
54.60 |
Grouped Median |
31.40 |
23.20 |
54.60 |
|
Luxembourg |
Mean |
35.50 |
22.60 |
58.10 |
Grouped Median |
35.50 |
22.60 |
58.10 |
|
Mexico |
Mean |
39.20 |
33.30 |
72.50 |
Grouped Median |
39.20 |
33.30 |
72.50 |
|
New Zealand |
Mean |
35.20 |
31.60 |
66.80 |
Grouped Median |
35.20 |
31.60 |
66.80 |
|
OECD average |
Mean |
34.20 |
22.80 |
57.00 |
Grouped Median |
34.20 |
22.80 |
57.00 |
|
Slovak Republic |
Mean |
34.60 |
16.90 |
51.50 |
Grouped Median |
34.60 |
16.90 |
51.50 |
|
Turkey |
Mean |
33.10 |
22.30 |
55.40 |
Grouped Median |
33.10 |
22.30 |
55.40 |
|
United Kingdom |
Mean |
36.00 |
26.90 |
62.90 |
Grouped Median |
36.00 |
26.90 |
62.90 |
|
United States |
Mean |
31.90 |
38.20 |
70.10 |
Grouped Median |
31.90 |
38.20 |
70.10 |
|
Total |
Mean |
34.22 |
22.80 |
57.02 |
Grouped Median |
34.50 |
23.00 |
60.00 |
Figure 6: Area map for distribution of obesity in developed countries
Figure 7: Children Statistics of obesity and overweight
N |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
|
Overweight but not obese- boys (%) |
7 |
14.2 |
29.4 |
20.800 |
5.0030 |
Obese- boys |
7 |
4.8 |
8.2 |
6.729 |
1.1772 |
Overweight but not obese-girls (%) |
7 |
8.7 |
21.4 |
16.400 |
4.1396 |
Obese |
7 |
5.5 |
11.5 |
8.629 |
1.7566 |
Overweight but not obese-All children (%) |
7 |
11.3 |
24.7 |
18.771 |
4.4984 |
Obese |
7 |
6.0 |
10.0 |
7.771 |
1.2880 |
Valid N (listwise) |
7 |
Spread of obesity according to age group |
|||||||||
Overweight but not obese- boys (%) |
Obese- boys |
Overweight but not obese-girls (%) |
Obese |
Overweight but not obese-All children (%) |
Obese |
||||
Age group |
12–15 |
1 |
23.3 |
4.8 |
18.8 |
9.0 |
21.2 |
6.9 |
|
Total |
Mean |
23.300 |
4.800 |
18.800 |
9.000 |
21.200 |
6.900 |
||
16–17 |
1 |
29.4 |
8.2 |
17.7 |
8.7 |
24.7 |
7.9 |
||
Total |
Mean |
29.400 |
8.200 |
17.700 |
8.700 |
24.700 |
7.900 |
||
2–4 |
1 |
14.2 |
6.7 |
8.7 |
9.0 |
11.3 |
8.7 |
||
Total |
Mean |
14.200 |
6.700 |
8.700 |
9.000 |
11.300 |
8.700 |
||
5–7 |
1 |
15.8 |
8.1 |
13.6 |
11.5 |
14.6 |
10.0 |
||
Total |
Mean |
15.800 |
8.100 |
13.600 |
11.500 |
14.600 |
10.000 |
||
8–11 |
1 |
20.6 |
6.0 |
21.4 |
5.5 |
21.0 |
6.0 |
||
Total |
Mean |
20.600 |
6.000 |
21.400 |
5.500 |
21.000 |
6.000 |
||
Total aged 2–17 years |
1 |
20.4 |
6.7 |
16.4 |
8.5 |
18.4 |
7.5 |
||
Total |
Mean |
20.400 |
6.700 |
16.400 |
8.500 |
18.400 |
7.500 |
||
Total aged 5–17 years |
1 |
21.9 |
6.6 |
18.2 |
8.2 |
20.2 |
7.4 |
||
Total |
Mean |
21.900 |
6.600 |
18.200 |
8.200 |
20.200 |
7.400 |
||
Total |
Mean |
20.800 |
6.729 |
16.400 |
8.629 |
18.771 |
7.771 |
||
Figure 10: Statistics of persons older than 18 years
Obesity statistics of persons above the age of 18 |
||||||||
Overweight but not obese-Men |
Obese-men |
Overweight but not obese-Women |
Obese-Women |
Overweight but not obese-Persons |
Obese-Persons |
|||
Age group |
18–24 |
1 |
26.9 |
17.3 |
17 |
17.3 |
22 |
17.1 |
25–34 |
1 |
41.9 |
20.8 |
25.1 |
17.3 |
33.4 |
19 |
|
35–44 |
1 |
47.5 |
26.7 |
27.6 |
30.7 |
37.4 |
28.6 |
|
45–54 |
1 |
46.7 |
33.2 |
28.6 |
33 |
37.6 |
33 |
|
55–64 |
1 |
44.5 |
36.8 |
33.3 |
34.9 |
38.8 |
35.9 |
|
65–74 |
1 |
42.20 |
38.20 |
36.10 |
32.70 |
38.90 |
35.40 |
|
75–84 |
1 |
44 |
32.40 |
41.40 |
27.10 |
43.40 |
29.60 |
|
85 years and over |
1 |
47.3 |
11.20 |
35 |
21.50 |
38.80 |
17.80 |
|
Total 18 years and over |
1 |
42.4 |
28.4 |
28.8 |
27.4 |
35.5 |
27.9 |
Figure 11: Socioeconomic statistics on obesity and overweight in Australia
Statistics of obesity according to remoteness and social classes |
||||||
Persons |
Women |
Men |
||||
Remoteness area |
Group 1 (lowest socioeconomic group) |
1 |
67 |
61 |
72 |
|
Total |
Mean |
66.50 |
61.20 |
72.00 |
||
Group 2 |
1 |
65 |
58 |
73 |
||
Total |
Mean |
65.30 |
57.80 |
73.20 |
||
Group 3 |
1 |
65 |
59 |
71 |
||
Total |
Mean |
64.70 |
59.00 |
70.70 |
||
Group 4 |
1 |
63 |
56 |
69 |
||
Total |
Mean |
62.60 |
55.50 |
69.40 |
||
Group 5 (highest socioeconomic group) |
1 |
58 |
48 |
69 |
||
Total |
Mean |
58.00 |
47.70 |
68.60 |
||
Inner regional |
1 |
69 |
63 |
75 |
||
Total |
Mean |
69.20 |
63.30 |
75.40 |
||
Major cities |
1 |
61 |
53 |
69 |
||
Total |
Mean |
61.10 |
53.30 |
69.10 |
||
Outer regional/Remote |
1 |
69 |
64 |
74 |
||
Total |
Mean |
69.10 |
64.30 |
74.30 |
||
Total |
Mean |
64.56 |
57.76 |
71.59 |
||
Correlations |
|||||||||
Age group |
Overweight but not obese-Men |
Obese-men |
Overweight but not obese-Women |
Obese-Women |
Overweight but not obese-Persons |
Obese Persons |
|||
Spearman’s rho |
Age group |
Correlation Coefficient |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
. |
||
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Overweight but not obese-Men |
Correlation Coefficient |
. |
1.000 |
.017 |
.267 |
.477 |
.385 |
.267 |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
. |
. |
.966 |
.488 |
.194 |
.306 |
.488 |
||
N |
0 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
||
Obese-men |
Correlation Coefficient |
. |
.017 |
1.000 |
.483 |
.828** |
.561 |
.950** |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
. |
.966 |
. |
.187 |
.006 |
.116 |
.000 |
||
N |
0 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
||
Overweight but not obese-Women |
Correlation Coefficient |
. |
.267 |
.483 |
1.000 |
.360 |
.946** |
.517 |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
. |
.488 |
.187 |
. |
.342 |
.000 |
.154 |
||
N |
0 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
||
Obese-Women |
Correlation Coefficient |
. |
.477 |
.828** |
.360 |
1.000 |
.479 |
.904** |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
. |
.194 |
.006 |
.342 |
. |
.192 |
.001 |
||
N |
0 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
||
Overweight but not obese-Persons |
Correlation Coefficient |
. |
.385 |
.561 |
.946** |
.479 |
1.000 |
.644 |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
. |
.306 |
.116 |
.000 |
.192 |
. |
.061 |
||
N |
0 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
||
Obese Persons |
Correlation Coefficient |
. |
.267 |
.950** |
.517 |
.904** |
.644 |
1.000 |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
. |
.488 |
.000 |
.154 |
.001 |
.061 |
. |
||
N |
0 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
||
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
Paired Samples Test |
|||||||||
Paired Differences |
t |
df |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
||||||
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference |
||||||
Lower |
Upper |
||||||||
Pair 1 |
Obese – Overweight but not obese- boys (%) |
-12.1714 |
5.7564 |
2.1757 |
-17.4952 |
-6.8477 |
-5.594 |
6 |
.001 |
Figure 14: Statistics to test hypothesis (two)
One-Sample Test |
||||||
Test Value = 0 |
||||||
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference |
||||||
t |
df |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
Mean Difference |
Lower |
Upper |
|
ObesePersons |
10.951 |
8 |
.000 |
27.144 |
21.43 |
32.86 |
Overweight but not obese-Persons |
18.163 |
8 |
.000 |
36.200 |
31.60 |
40.80 |
Discussion and Analysis
As shown from figure 4 above, the Australian population has an average rate of 35.50 rates of people who are overweight but not yet obese and an average of 27.90 obese people which is one of the highest in developed countries. Finland, Chile and Israel have the highest number of people who are overweight but not obese at an average of 40.20, 39.40, and 39.30 respectively. However, Finland has a 24.0% rate of people with obesity. Such high statistics indicate that Obesity is not a single country’s problem but a global issue. For instance, USA has the highest obesity rate of approximately 38.20%. On average the percentage of boys who are overweight but not obese of the age between 2 and 17 is 20.8%, while the obesity rate among boys is 8.2%. Moreover, overweight girls’ average at 16.4% and the percentage of obesity among young girls is 8.629. The overall percentage of overweight instances among children is 18.771 while obesity is 7.771. From the statistics there are more overweight boys than girls, however, there are more obese girls than boys, and therefore the statistics indicate that girls make a larger proportion of obese children.
Research Questions
Figure 6 indicate that boys between the ages of 16-17 have the highest rates of obesity of 8.2% compared to those between the ages of 12-15 who average at 4.8%. The highest percentage of obese girls is those of the age of 5-7 at 11.5%. Overall, children between the ages of 5-7 have the highest rate of obesity at 10.0%
Notably, from figure 9, persons from the lowest socioeconomic group have the highest percentage of obesity (66.50%) followed by the second lowest, all the way to the highest class who have the lowest level of obesity at 58.0%. Additionally, people from the inner regions have an obesity percentage of 69.20%, while those from urban regions have an obesity rate of 61.0% and those from outer (rural regions) have an obesity percentage of 69.10%.
In testing whether factors such as overweight does lead to obesity among children the null hypothesis of whether there exists statistical evidence to conclude that overweight instances in children lead to obesity at a significance level of 5% is used. The p-value is 0.001 which is less than 0.005. We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that if a child is overweight, there are chances that they may eventually be obese. Moreover, the rate of obesity between urban and rural areas (inner regions) as well as outer regions is statistically different following a difference in distribution of obesity percentage between urban regions, rural areas and outer regions. We therefore reject the second null hypothesis that there is no sufficient statistical evidence that the rate of obesity between urban and rural areas is the same and conclude that there is difference in the rates of obesity between different regions as well as socioeconomic strata.
The study contributes to the wide literature on the effects of weight issues on health, thereby aiding raise awareness on the extent to which unmonitored weight can affect the health of individuals. In addition, the study helps outline the various factors that are causal agents of overweight and/ or obesity. As such, it sensitizes on the very factors that individuals ought to avoid or concentrate on in order to ensure their BMI is on the right scale, in aim of avoiding weight related illnesses. Lastly, the study explores the health issues such as hypertension resulting from obesity or overweight.
The study is limited by the chosen sampling method, whereby, the sample chosen may not be representative of the whole Australian population. Additionally, the secondary data obtained is not fully verified and therefore there might be inherited errors which may tamper with the integrity of the output of the results.
Conceptual Framework
For future research purposes, there should be a consideration on studies on natural remedies to weight related concerns. For instance, are there natural means of dissociating gene caused obesity, and if there is. The emphasis to undertake public sensitization on such means of weight control should be undertaken by the government.
Conclusion
In conclusion, following the study on the causes, effects and distribution of overweight and obesity in Australia it can be noted that there are various factors affect the rate of obesity among different persons, such factors include:
- Lifestyle
- Economic status/class
- Overweight
- Regions
Some factors such as region may not be directly correlated with obesity but do affect other factors such as lifestyle. From the analysis, persons from interior regions exhibit the highest rates of obesity as well as those from lower economic classes. Therefore, it can be concluded that, economic ability influence to a large extent factors such as health observations and fitness exercises among Australian households, i.e. the higher the economic status, the higher the ability to check on health matters. Other factors such as weight are directly correlated with obesity such that overweight persons are more prone to being obese compared to underweight persons. In conclusion, there are a wide range of factors which eventually influence overweight cases which may include unhealthy lifestyles in a number of developed countries.
Gulay, A., Roger, H., and Kathy, T. (2017). Factors influencing the incidence of Obesity in Australia: A generalized Ordered Probit Model. Public Health, 14(2), p.177. Available at from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5334731/ Accessed on 14th July 2018.
Ackerman, I.N. and Osborne, R.H. (2012). Obesity and increased burden of hip and knee joint disease in Australia: results from a national survey. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 13(1), p.254.
Lin, W., McEvilly, K. and PAntano, J. (2016). Obesity and sex Ratios in the U.S. Revised Economics, 14(1), Pp. 269-292. DOI: 10.1007/s11150-014-9269-2.
Shanian, T. (2018). Obesity, Causes and Risk Factors. [Online]. Available from: https://www.innerbody.com/diseases-conditions/obesity. Accessed on 14th July 2018.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Overweight & obesity Reports – Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. [online] Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-statistics/behaviours-risk-factors/overweight-obesity/reports . Accessed on 14th July 2018.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Overweight & obesity Overview – Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. [online] Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-statistics/behaviours-risk-factors/overweight-obesity/overview .
Chen, G., Ratcliffe, J., Olds, T., Magarey, A., Jones, M. and Leslie, E. (2014). BMI, health behaviors, and quality of life in children and adolescents: a school-based study. Pediatrics, pp.peds-2013.
Chittleborough, C.R., Grant, J.F., Phillips, P.J. and Taylor, A.W. (2007). The increasing prevalence of diabetes in South Australia: the relationship with population ageing and obesity. Public health, 121(2), pp.92-99.
Flegal, K.M., Kruszon-Moran, D., Carroll, M.D., Fryar, C.D. and Ogden, C.L. (2016). Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. Jama, 315(21), pp.2284-2291.
Nichols, M.S., Reynolds, R.C., Waters, E., Gill, T., King, L., Swinburn, B.A. and Allender, S. (2013). Community?based efforts to prevent obesity: Australia?wide survey of projects. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 24(2), pp.111-117.
Marshall, T., Champagne-Langabeer, T., Castelli, D. and Hoelscher, D.(2017). Cognitive computing and eScience in health and life science research: artificial intelligence and obesity intervention programs. Health information science and systems, 5(1), p.13.
Nam, S., Redeker, N. and Whittemore, R. (2015). Social networks and future direction for obesity research: a scoping review. Nursing outlook, 63(3), pp.299-317.
Patt, P., Yamaki, K., Lowry, B.D., Becker, J., DeVore, J., Jasper, C., Lescher, S. and Vogel, L.C. (2015). Obesity Prevalence in Youth with Mobility Limitations: A Comparison across Diagnoses and Geographic Regions. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 115(9), p.A17.
Yu, O.K., Cha, Y.S., Byun, M.S., Nam, S.T., Jin, C.Y. and Kim, D.G. (2016). Understanding Obesity through a Big Data Analysis on Lifestyle Diseases. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 19(3), p.877.