Resitting Or Taking IMAT5262 Module: Coursework Guidelines

Coursework guidelines for resitting or taking IMAT5262 module

Digital Ethics denotes the study of managing oneself ethically at online and digital mediums. Here the individuals are expected to react professionally and in a clinically sound way. Current researches have highly emphasised in the digital ethics art. All kinds of entrepreneurs and business practice this undercurrent realms of innovations.

Thus ethics can be defined as the collection of moral principles related to or affirming particular field, group or type of conduct. Digital ethics has been comprising of ways in which participants over the internet use those platforms and more. Besides, people use the Internet particularly in the professional field, extending from job seeker or contractor or business has been looking into particular problems.

Additionally, there are other concerns regarding how to take care of online reviews and statements. Here, the best way to receive answers and resolutions to various queries are to comport an online search. Nevertheless, one of the primary issues of why digital ethics is vital is the way in which people present themselves. This includes the idea of communication and meanings that are perceived. Hence, in the following study, various research questions are identified. Various prior kinds of literature are reviewed regarding digital ethics. A critical review of different deployable research methods is discussed. Lastly, a detailed project plan is demonstrated in this paper.

Like any other moral dilemma or ethical issue, there has been a bright palette and contention of opinions from purposes, personalities and politics. It can be argued from a rhetorical viewpoint, research on digital ethics can be approached by asking the series of questions related to visual and textual communications.

• What can the clients been finding out from online?
• Has it been ethical for a business to Google, their clients?
• What happens as any business find information about their clients that have been clinically important?
• How can one handle friend request of clients at Facebook and followers over Twitter?
• What tones and languages are suitable for any particular case?
• What principles have been governing any specific online community?
• In what way the sources are utilised, remixed and changes for any specific audience? How can their sources be cited or referred in the fairway?
• In what way the users have been portraying themselves over the Internet? Whether this can be through social media, games and different other means? In what way can online ethos be maintained and developed?
• In what way can users approach the rising blurred bar between public and private?

Besides, the above issues there have been questions regarding how to control poor yelp or additional online reviews, online and digital correspondences belonging to clinical records. There must also be a determination to keep secure records in the current age.

It must be reminded that there has been no set way, no strict conduct code regarding how to make communications or engage over the Internet more than any strict code of conduct. This is to hold face-to-face, huge conversations over online campus (Merriam and Tisdell 2015). However, there are various conventions to be considered. This has been helpful to think of ethics as an appropriate method for multiple actions and related to others in a specific scenario. Further, governance and guidance for efficient online communication have existed across common patterns of experiences. This has been accumulative over time. Through starting emails with a respectful salutation or image filtering, one can be tagged over Facebook (Walliman 2017). This has been not the example to follow rules that have been true inherently. Instead, starting emails in the respectful salutation or image filtering as tagged on Facebook are essential conventions of digital ethics that abide by, since there are responsive patterns for rude emails and improper online image albums. There is lack of responses and jobs, and under the light of conventional and theoretical aspect of netiquette, within the umbrella of digital ethics, individuals can aim to memorise various netiquette ordinances. However, this is beneficial in multiple circles. Moreover, it can be designed to be understood with rhetorical view-point where digital ethics has been vital.

Extended research proposal for IMAT5262 module

According to (Luke et al. 2017), digital technology aims to provide a large number of benefits to both society and individual. The fact should be taken into consideration that digital technology aims in overcoming various kinds of technologies related to it. Both the speed and complexity of related changes aim in dilution of both ethical and social awareness among general people. Internet domain provides a platform for both communication and information which is offered for social mode and its culture. Irrespective of both legislative and other kind of effort which is given to user. It is required by both individual and society as a whole. Digital ethics can be stated as a study which can be used for managing oneself, professionally and is known to be sound through both online and digital mediums. In other words, digital ethics can be easily stated as a moral principles or rules which is needed for governing and guiding qualitative internet based research. It mainly emphasizes its required inception to both public and accuracy of given data. A large number of issues have been analyzed like flux and uncertainty with respect to given rules and regulation. Any kind of lack of flux and uncertainty is encountered in the both the practice and problems in the domain of qualitative research. Ethics can be stated as various rules and regulation related to behavior which guide research from different research from inception which is given to both publication and accuracy of data. The ultimate goal is to reduce the involved risk of both actual and potential harm which can easily improve the output of the research. Digital ethics mainly to some of ethical consideration which is used in research and web based studies in terms of activity and relate settings.

(Luke 2018) stated that with increase in the number of personal information which is being collected needs to be processed in much opaque and difficult way. With the development of given system in both business and its administration in the year of 1980. It come up with perception which require practices of powerful government and other kind of corporation in processing of personal data.

According to (Whiting and Pritchard 2017), Big Data emphasizes a certain number of practice which is done by gathering and combining a different kind of information and analyzing it. It generally makes use of self-learning to provide a decision. In many cases, it is seen that the gathered information is not personal in nature. Data are mainly gathered by a certain number of factors like weather or pollution. It is mainly used for monitoring some of the technical aspects of the total manufacturing process. It can be defined as one of the greatest value in the domain of big data which is used by both business and government.

As stated by (Lucas 2018) the output of the revenue model is mainly used by a various internet-based organization which relies on tracking of various online activity. To promote the economic value of given transaction to a large number of service providers. It can be stated as a condition or rate of issuance policies which are not only provided in the target advertisement but also increases the rate or condition of various insurance policies. In the domain of competitive market, much of user attention has been gained most of the attention where a large number of people are unaware of any kind of tracking. Big data should be taken into consideration as a personal technique which makes use of techniques which can be applied

Broad area of social and ethical consequences of computing and information technology

According to (Mulyana and Verity 2016) most of internet-based devices are connected in the commonplace like tablets and machine which is required for dispensing cash. By the year 2020, connectivity can be predicted to easily come with a certain number of features. It generally has a 25-billion-dollar objective which ranges from telemedicine services to vehicles. It can easily range from the smart meter to new kind of mobile devices which enables the various kind of cities.

(Pérez Garcias and Marín 2016) has discussed that the given sensor is provided in both immediate and proper information which is statistical in nature and survey which is cannot reach today. It may not be accurate and even be misleading in some of the cases. It is estimated that there is more than 1.8 billion automotive machines is expected by the year 2020. It will help in reduction of accidents and pollution and increasing its productivity. Some of the wearable like watches and clothes will have all the required information in the connected devices. These devices will be designed in such a way that they can easily detect blood clots along with monitoring fitness and healing of wound. It comes up with connecting fabrics and protection against in harsh weather environment for example firefighting. This upcoming design will provide all the personal data in cloud storage will be linked to social media. It has the potential to look for identification of various user and keeping a track of both behavior and movement of individual and along with crowds.

According to (Gavin and Rodham 2017), Ambient computing or cloud computing can be stated as a large number of technology which is there on the internet of things. One of the major thing which should be taken into account is its application in smart homes and offices. It comprises of a certain number of device which is built in much-sophisticated way for information for its information capacity processing. It aims to provide much greater amount of energy and informs individuals to easy influence all their consumptions (Olaniran and Williams 2015). The fact is clear that who is responsible for the given purpose and aims in processing of data which are involved in application of ambient computing application. It does not only provide individual with certain number of rights which are involved in the domain of cloud computing application. It does not only provide certain number of application which helps in protection of rights along with application. It aims in ensuring liability for the overall security of the given system.

(Olaniran and Williams 2015) stated that Cloud Computing is considered to be central based technology which aims in advancing in the domain of advanced analytics and capabilities for analytics. It mainly aims to flood of data from the internet of things. It emphasizes the centration of data from myriad that is internet of things devices. It generally relies on certain number of aspects like availability and its connectivity which comes with enormous amount of data which is used in large scale along with processing its facilities around the whole globe. Large-scale implementation of cloud computing is achieved by both public and private domains or sectors. It is expected that the overall potential can easily add facilities all around the globe.

Different piece of work for resitting IMAT5262 coursework

(Markham, Tiidenberg and Herman 2018) explained that proper control over the given personal information is known to be shared between the given customers and its cloud service providers. It emphasizes protection of data which is not clear in major of the given cases. The given obligation is mainly related to physical location of given storage of data. Even in some of the cases it is seen that background of technology is there for providing support for different business application, infrastructure for cloud computing. It can easily make use of imbalance in the domain of market which comes of 30 % of business which emphasize issues related to unsubscribing of changing providers.

According to (Young, McLeod and Brady 2018),  Currently drones or semi-autonomous aircraft are being used for various military use. With the passage of time, various aspect comes into action like mapping, transportation, public security and logistics. Various aspects like photographs, video and another kind of personal data are being collected by drones which can be easily exchanged in different telecommunication network. The use of this things have resulted in risk kind of interference design with the given privacy and providing an effect of freedom of expression. The given question can come into action which can be used for design and use of effectively regulated data which are considered as a subject of data. It can easily exercise the right to easy access to data and how effectively regulated so that the given data are mainly subject to any kind of access to vital data. It can easily exercise its right to any kind of access to any kind of data which is captured by machines.

It is done for the various organic items which make use of copies of various patients cells along with collagen that is bio bandages (Haneef 2018). It is mainly used for layout of successive row of living cells which is available at ready state. It aims in supply of various customized human anatomical section which is available in poor way along with conflict in certain zones of the world. It puts the question for ethics in medical domain, safeguarding of various intellectual property and protection of consumers (Luka, Millette and Wallace 2017). It also heavily depends on processing of various intimate and sensitive data which emphasize on individual health. It is in the application for protection of data which works as per the given rules (Fletcher 2018).

It is used in robotics which is a technological requirement for various autonomous machine used in used in both the domain like stationary and mobile (Ward 2014). It comes up with advancement which tends to provide some kind of potential which is there beyond its present application. Deep learning in the domain of computers can easily teach themselves with task which is done by crunching of large data set. It makes use of neutral network which aims to emulate the brain. Social media comes with large amount of data with respect to personal information in effectively by individuals.

Relevance of digital ethics in managing oneself professionally

Accountability in most of the cases requires proper placing of various internal policies and control system (de Salces, Thomas and Donas 2018). The ultimate goal is to focus on certain evidence which are related to the independent authorities. It aims in elimination of bureaucracy which is there is in the protection of law of data. It is achieved by reducing the certain number of requirements along with supporting documents which are required for data protection from authorities (Ward 2016). The principle of personal data is needed to be processed in such a way that it is compatible with respect to individual expectations. Codes of conduct and new generation clause are helpful in building certain number of clause along with binding rules which help in building trust in digital world.

Innovation is always considered to be product of certain number of activities which is specified by some social group of people. It mainly specifies the given context which can reflect on certain number of given society (Huang 2018). Decision of technological design should not be too much dedicated with respect to societal interaction along with structure of communities. Rather it should be supportive of value and fundamental rights. Engineers in the domain of system and software need to have a proper idea regarding the proper understanding and application of principles in much better way (Lewis and Westlund 2015). Accountability requires proper kind of support which is achieved by much greater value of research and development of its methods. It makes use of certain number of tools which can be used for ensuring of proper audits. It is mainly used for understanding the proper kind of controllers and its processors. It comes with certain number of rules which can be achieved by tagging each and every personal data with given metadata which requires protection of requirements. Proper engineering solution can easily empower individual who requires to preserve their privacy along with anonymity.

Prosumer Environment: Various individual is not passive with respect to protection of rules against exploitation. Trends in the domain of technology have resulted in establishing some positive options for improving the strength of the given individual (de Moraes and de Andrade 2015). People can easily make use of some of the content and given services. It has resulted in increasing the consideration in joint way which is needed for processing of given personal data. It makes use of virtual currencies which is being offered by user anonymity (Huettmann, Schmid and Humphries 2015). Anonymity and cross-jurisdiction are well-known nature of virtual currencies which leave individuals vulnerable to fraud activities which is very much hard to detect and investigate.

Consent: With respect to traditional way of thinking, not all the given human behaviors can be easily explained (Bengtsson 2018). In the domain of economic principles one can easily assume the given human behaviors can be easily explained by the principles of economics. It mainly assumes that various human beings are not entirely rational and sensitive in nature. In many cases consent plays a key role which results in accountability of the given data. It is especially done which is generalized consent which helps in processing of broad purpose.  

Moral principles and rules guiding digital ethics

Control and ownership of data: Various individuals should be able to put challenges with respect to unfair biases which can arise from the various logic which is being used. Data is known to be well-known resource like oil which needs to be traded and equally informed to different parties for carrying out transaction (García-Avilés 2014). Customer is not even compensated for the given personal information for each and every type of transaction. It is not compensated by their given personal information which requires to be traded. Along with it requires favor of model known as data ownership (de Moraes and de Andrade 2015).  Absolute control over the personal data is very much difficult to understand. It requires concern related to public interest and right of freedom to others.

One of the alternative ways is to provide the individuals with much better control over the data. It can provide access and use of personal data which is needed to be used for storing personal data or vaults in data (Colton 2016). Idea of personal data requires some security mechanism which helps in ensuring some of the entities by the subject of the data. It generally emphasizes certain number of security mechanism which makes access to the given data. It covers only some specific parts which can be easily authorized.

One thing which should be taken account is related to various kinds problem in the digital era issues in understanding its importance. In the present world, the goal of autonomy and respect of norms and equality, justice and fairness and practice of democratic which is there from all the given direction (Huettmann, Schmid and Humphries 2015). Nation-state acts like a defender of certain number of things like agents and rights which is weak by globalization. In various international institutes, their power is being passed in much easy way. These institutes make struggle against the collective power various corporation like Apple, Microsoft and Facebook.  With the passage of time, it is increasing its dominant in the internet space (Lewis and Westlund 2015). Different activists and NGO are looking for countering its drift which is all about digital revolution.

Other focus on certain number of problems which is encountered in human rights. Privacy is developing concept. The ultimate goal of privacy is to be deeply rooted in both social, cultural factors and changing behaviors. With the help of digital technologies, an overlap can be seen between public and private space. According to (Fiesler et al. 2016) power of algorithm is encountered in digital technologies and consequence related to it. Algorithm focus on certain number of products and services which are used in every day which ranges from platform of social media to various kinds of search engines. Apart from this, it emphasizes on certain number of things like software application and databases and social robots. Algorithm is not similar like software code which is made visible and is subjected to various intellect laws of property. Algorithm make use of methodologies and other business models which is used for defining ownership related to algorithm`(de Salces, Thomas and Donas 2018). It ultimately provides an idea regarding the ownership of algorithm and hence it may result in loss in the ability to provide attribute responsibility which is needed by them.

Issues with flux and uncertainty in qualitative research

According to (Young, McLeod and Brady 2018) the problem of cost and advantages are important factor which is in debate. Different markets do not work well with the advantages and another cost which are separated. The apparent benefits can be encountered in a social circle which is related to cost and drawbacks like security, intrusion of privacy and usage of personal data. In many cases, user does not know about the idea regarding the cost so that they are unable to make any kind of informed choices. An individual need to have reinforced and encouraged some ethical online habits.

Ethics are some of the cases are seen as a barrier to innovation in the domain of digital technologies (Olaniran and Williams 2015). Assumption and innovation can easily contradict which is not true. Ethics can be defined as an innovative challenge which emphasizes on technologist to come forward with more solution which will help in reinforcing behavior. The problem is much wider just than data. And individual needs to consider the different aspect of software and storage.

Ethics is known to soft but not weak as it provides constraints of law along with constraining different marketers and customers. In a general way, it can be analyzed that engineers are looking for ethics to provide a proper framework (Luka, Millette and Wallace 2017). Ethics should come up with regulation which will process after the given event. Ethics mainly depend on the habit at individual level.

In this research ethical research methodologies under the umbrella of a currently emerging range of methods using the internet is applied. This is to support primary research data. This is done through IMR or Inter-mediated Research.

Behavioural and social researchers have been piloting IMR tools with surveys and interviews. All of these are represented in various pioneering attempts. As IMR methods have flourished with interdisciplinary reach, a range of ethical approaches and expanded in volume, it has leas to “big data” sets (Stern 2016). These unobtrusive approaches have been using digital traces of behaviour of people over the Internet. This has led to arguments about what has been a suitable ethical process under the context of IMR.

Particularly salient issues have been occurring as a difference between public and private domain under online context. The different research method in IMR has also been generating the latest problems and debates about what ethical practices has been. Moreover, some of the issues arising has not been quickly obvious for researched who are accustomed to collect data through conventional offline methods. This has been generating necessity for IMR specific rules, highlighting caveats and issues (Gavin and Rodham 2017).  Moreover, ethical concerns have been emerging under IMR has also potentially led to various ways of thinking regarding the ethics of off-line or everyday contexts of researches.

Here, for instance through highlighting ambiguities under what has constituted private and public spaces questioning the distinction between pseudonymous and real identities.  The effect of those debates to change previous ideas of ethical research practices has been highly seen (Bruckman et al. 2017). Furthermore, a primary rennet of current research is to strive specific pre-defined set of online inquiries of moral rules that have not been helpful. Instead, queries have required to analyse various primary considerations and undertake decisions in the area of a specific research project.

The following study used IMR researches where practical guidance is to be sued over best practice procedures around a range of methodical approaches that are offered widely.

                                                         

                                       (Source: Vitak,  Shilton and Ashktorab 2016, page number: 941-953)

Different earlier pioneers, while using IMR methods has been focusing mainly on different methodological issues instead of different ethical considerations. Moreover, it has turned out to be apparent that various pressing problems applicable to current ethical standards and solving novel problems has been emerging under IMR context. As per workshop convened by AAAS or American Association for Advancement Science has been published (Flick 2014). This has highlighted in various issues of research ethics conducted online. This has included complicacies to gain informed consents, using pseudonymous or anonymous identities. This has also include inflated expectations of privacy and blurred distinction of a public-private domain. This questioned interpretation and applicability of current human subject guidelines of research under IMR context. Considering autonomy, like minimising harm and maximising benefits or beneficence and justices as the ground stone of ethical principles has been directing research with different kinds of human participants.

AAAS document has determined the various rise in risks in IMR, dubious validity and reliability of data, higher scopes of leakages of research participants for data that are identifiable personally. Moreover, there has been complicacies to implement robust informed consents and debriefing of processes including ambiguities in online public domains (Denscombe 2014).

Moreover, various professional bodies have also published different kinds of ethics guidelines for IMR. This has included AoIR or Association of Internet Researchers, APA or American Psychologist Association and BPS or British Psychology Society (Schaupp and Carter 2016). Thus, same as AAAS document, BPS guides have determined primary ethical principles for research with human participants. Here few fundamental moral tenets for experimentation with different participants respect to dignity and autonomy of people, social roles, scientific value, minimising damages and maximising benefits has been rising. This has adhered to those principles under the IMR context.

                                                             

                                            (Source: Laakso and Polonioli 2018, page number: 2018, page number: 941-953)

Here obstructive IMR methods are to be used. The various reasons to implement this are discussed hereafter.

Gaining informed consent	In this case, the participants must be knowing how to take part in the study. They are to be provided with rights to withdraw various approvals that can be debriefed suitably (Silverman 2016).
Debrief and withdrawal	In web based experiments and surveys, participants must be interacting distantly with automated programs like HTML forms. This must be instead of any presence of the researcher.
Ensuring Confidentiality	There have been various threats towards confidentially of participants going beyond what has been present under offline researches. Here, the multiple risks include access of hackers, errors in transmissions and controlling of the third party.

Here it must be reminded that risks have been higher in studies if qualitative researches. This is precisely where the source of linguistic data from various online discussion forums and cases need careful attention (Mitchell, Reynolds and Treviño 2017). Moreover, multiple ranges of contextual factors have come to play in analyse risks and make proper, sound decisions that are ethical. It has included sensitivity to the above topic and how vulnerable those people have been and how advantageous this research has been.

For this, the case of manipulating the moods of a user in Facebook is researched. It is seen that the impacts of individual feelings of Facebook users have been manipulating emotional valence of content over New Feeds. The research should take advantage of the way in which the New Feed of Facebook users is to be filtered. This must be done through a ranking algorithm for selecting and presenting every possible post available in the Feed. This study would respond to questions regarding informed consents, scopes to opt out and personal privacies (Bryman and Bell 2015). Some of the main elements that are worth highlighting are that Facebook New Feeds are manipulated routinely. Hence presenting interventions are extensions to those practices, impacts of sizes that are profoundly small, wholly anonymised data and published findings that are found.

However, dissemination and publication of those findings have led to a high deal of public outrage and anxiety at implications and conclusions. Here, the decisions can be challenged, depending on details of the process of research design, a kind of collaboration between the research team and Facebook. This relatively novel digital research method has been a challenge in the absence of any ethical guidelines that s appropriately established (Zimmer and Proferes 2014). Thus there are various ambiguities about how to deal with the use of research data that is collected online through a private entity like Facebook.

                                                                                   

                                        (Source: Williams, page number: 27-52)

Conclusion: 

In the above research, various primary ethical problems ate discussed and highlighted. This has been as requiring extra attention and care in the study of digital method. Here, some of them has not been obvious for researchers accustomed to conducting researching in offline contexts. Besides, problems have been emerging correctly to apply current ethical principles in IMR. This is to assure robust and rigorous processes for enabling under the framework of the digital world. The primary issues have included deciding what has been private and public online with devising drastic informed consents, debriefing and withdrawing processes and securing confidentiality of participants. Since, the current research is continued to debate, pilot and explore IMR processes, the ethical guideline, principles and implications have been evolving. It has been potentially affecting the way in which researches have been thinking about digital ethics under offline contexts. These digital processes are under relative infancies and hence ethical guidelines have been developed to date. In the above study, as shown by an emotional contagion of Facebook study, various challenges are varied and complicated. Here, what that has been institutionally sanctioned has been problematic under ethical standards. Moreover, researches have been disagreeing on main points like those publically accessible traces of online behaviour is regarded available to use research data instead of achieving consent from those who have created them. Here, what has seemed to be apparent is that none of the set of rules of online ethics for IMR has been likely forthcoming. Instead, there has been flexibility to apply few broader principles under the area of specific research where designs of study are needed. Thus a change in practices, new research data, experience of researchers and landscapes has been continuing to shape this refinement, revision and evolution of ethical principles and guidelines for researches on digital methods.

References:

Bengtsson, S., 2018. Sensorial organization as an ethics of space: Digital media in everyday life. Media and Communication, 6(2), pp.39-45.

Bruckman, A.S., Fiesler, C., Hancock, J. and Munteanu, C., 2017, February. CSCW Research Ethics Town Hall: Working Towards Community Norms. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 113-115). ACM.

Bryman, A. and Bell, E., 2015. Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA.

Colton, J.S., 2016. Revisiting digital sampling rhetorics with an ethics of care. Computers and Composition, 40, pp.19-31.

de Moraes, J.A. and de Andrade, E.B., 2015. Who are the citizens of the digital citizenship. International Review of Information Ethics, 23(11).

de Salces, F.J.S., Thomas, R. and Donas, J.B., 2018. Ethics awareness among stakeholders in a digital technology research project. Exploring designers and participants’ relationship whith ethical issues and procedures. Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics, (8), pp.183-206.

Denscombe, M., 2014. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Fiesler, C., Wisniewski, P., Pater, J. and Andalibi, N., 2016, November. Exploring Ethics and Obligations for Studying Digital Communities. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 457-460). ACM.

Fletcher, A., 2018. The Ethics of Immersive Reporting.

Flick, U., 2014. An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.

Flick, U., 2015. Introducing research methodology: A beginner’s guide to doing a research project. Sage.

García-Avilés, J.A., 2014. Online newsrooms as communities of practice: Exploring digital journalists’ applied ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 29(4), pp.258-272.

Gavin, J. and Rodham, K., 2017. from ethical rules to ethical puzzles: Research ethics in the digital age. Psychology Review, 23(1), pp.2-5.

Gavin, J. and Rodham, K., 2017. from ethical rules to ethical puzzles: Research ethics in the digital age. Psychology Review, 23(1), pp.2-5.

Haneef, M.S.M., 2018. Social Media and Ethics in Contemporary Age. Communication and Culture Review, 1(1), pp.1-3.

Huang, J.Q., 2018. Digital aspirations:‘wrong?number’mobile?phone relationships and experimental ethics among women entrepreneurs in rural Bangladesh. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 24(1), pp.107-125.

Huettmann, F., Schmid, M.S. and Humphries, G.R.W., 2015. A first overview of open access digital data for the Ross Sea: complexities, ethics, and management opportunities. Hydrobiologia, 761(1), pp.97-119.

Laakso, M. and Polonioli, A., 2018. Open access in ethics research: an analysis of open access availability and author self-archiving behaviour in light of journal copyright restrictions. Scientometrics, pp.1-27.

Lewis, S.C. and Westlund, O., 2015. Big data and journalism: Epistemology, expertise, economics, and ethics. Digital journalism, 3(3), pp.447-466.

Lucas, C., 2018. Digital Ethics Framework Recommendations for Social Media Archiving Applications (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology).

Luka, M.E., Millette, M.É.L.A.N.I.E. and Wallace, J., 2017. A feminist perspective on ethical digital methods. Internet research ethics for the social age: New cases and challenges, pp.21-38.

Luke, A., 2018. Digital Ethics Now. Language and Literacy, 20(3), pp.185-198.

Luke, A., Sefton-Green, J., Graham, P., Kellner, D. and Ladwig, J., 2017. Digital ethics, political economy and the curriculum: This changes everything. Handbook of writing, literacies, and education in digital cultures. New York, NY: Routledge.

Markham, A.N., Tiidenberg, K. and Herman, A., 2018. Ethics as Methods: Doing Ethics in the Era of Big Data Research—Introduction. Social Media+ Society, 4(3), p.2056305118784502.

Merriam, S.B. and Tisdell, E.J., 2015. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

Mitchell, M.S., Reynolds, S.J. and Treviño, L.K., 2017. The study of behavioral ethics within organizations. Personnel Psychology, 70(2), pp.313-314.

Mulyana, D. and Verity, F., 2016. Health consumer participation, medical dominance and digital ethics in Indonesia: the Prita Case. Health Sociology Review, 25(3), pp.300-311.

Olaniran, B.A. and Williams, I.M., 2015. Ethics in Emerging New Media and E-Learning Environments. Liinc em Revista, Rio de Janeiro, 11(2), pp.433-445.

Olaniran, B.A. and Williams, I.M., 2015. Ethics in Emerging New Media and E-Learning Environments| Ética em mídias emergentes e ambientes de aprendizado eletrônico. Liinc em Revista, 11(2).

Pérez Garcias, A. and Marín, V.I., 2016. Ethics Issues of Digital Contents for Pre-Service Primary Teachers: A Gamification Experience for Self-Assessment with Socrative. IAFOR Journal of Education, 4(2), pp.80-96.

Schaupp, L.C. and Carter, L., 2016. Ethics and social networking: An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating online information disclosure. International Journal of Systems and Service-Oriented Engineering (IJSSOE), 6(2), pp.1-28.

Silverman, D. ed., 2016. Qualitative research. Sage.

Stern, R.A., 2016. Does Hegelian Ethics Rest on a Mistake?.

Vitak, J., Shilton, K. and Ashktorab, Z., 2016, February. Beyond the Belmont principles: Ethical challenges, practices, and beliefs in the online data research community. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 941-953). ACM.

Walliman, N., 2017. Research methods: The basics. Routledge.

Ward, S.J., 2014. Radical Media Ethics: Ethics for a global digital world. Digital Journalism, 2(4), pp.455-471.

Ward, S.J., 2016. Digital journalism ethics. In The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies (pp. 61-69). Routledge.

Whiting, R. and Pritchard, K., 2017. Digital ethics.

Williams, M.L., Burnap, P., Sloan, L., Jessop, C. and Lepps, H., 2017. Users’ Views of Ethics in Social Media Research: Informed Consent, Anonymity, and Harm. In The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 27-52). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Young, J.A., McLeod, D.A. and Brady, S.R., 2018. The Ethics Challenge: 21st Century Social Work Education, Social Media, and Digital Literacies.

Zimmer, M. and Proferes, N.J., 2014. A topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), pp.250-261.