Stanford Solar Car Development: Project Management Concepts And Tools

Introduction to Project Management Concepts and Tools

The project management concepts and tools are very helpful for the development of the existing facilities and formation of the advanced processes. According to Djalalinia et al. (2014), the projects can be construction based, IT system development based, manufacturing based, or service based. These types of the projects require the use of project management concepts and processes for the development of the successful project completion scenario. There are some models like waterfall, agile, scrum, and XP that can be utilized for deploying the effective management of the project operations.

The following assignment would be helpful for development of the improved processes and successive development of the operations. The analysis of the project named Stanford Solar Car Development would help in forming the analysis of the improved services in the organization. The development of renewable and non exhaustible fuel source would help the organization to form the explicit improvement functions.

Description of Stanford Solar Car Development Project’s Organization

Stanford Solar Car Development Project’s Organization formed for implementing the improved processes of the organization (Solarcar.stanford.edu. 2017). The development of the organization was based for the implementation of the processes. The organization was founded in 1989 and they were non profitable organization. The organization develops the cars and their supporting components for the development of the improved processes. The organization manufactures the automobiles and their supporting parts for the advancement of the enhanced procedures (Wang et al. 2017). The solar powered car engine development would be assisted by the successful sending of the enhanced procedures. The association concentrates on the improvement of the keen procedures and it would include the arrangement viable administration framework process. The ramifications of the procedures would enjoy the administration of operations. The development of the procedures would include the procedures. The solar car development would imply the effective deployment of the improved processes (Flacco 2016). The organization focuses on the development of the smart processes and it would involve the deployment effective management system process. The implication of the processes would indulge the management of operations. The formation of the processes would involve the processes.

Description of the Stanford Solar Car Development Project

The project had indulged the development of a solar powered car and it would help in developing improved transportation services in the organization. The solar project was deployed for integrating the smart processing and supplementation. The Stanford Solar Car Development Project would involve the management of the smart processing and deployment (Solarcar.stanford.edu. 2017). The Stanford Solar Car Development Project includes the deployment of the effective and smart management process. The solar powered batteries are sent for coordinating the smart preparation and supplementation in place of fossil fuels. The Stanford Solar Car Development Project incorporates the organization of the undeniable and knowledgeable administration process (Shirazi, Kazemipoor and Tavakkoli-Moghaddam 2017). The exercises of the project incorporate making suitable outline for the auto, making foundation for the auto, conveying motor and principle outline, introducing sun oriented batteries, associating the circuits, outside improvement, connecting seats and mirrors, and handle, adapt and other outer parts are joined. The adequate sending of the sunlight based auto improvement extend incorporate the administration of the precise operations and advancement. The activities of the project include making appropriate design for the car, making infrastructure for the car, deploying engine and main frame, installing solar batteries, connecting the circuits, exterior development, attaching seats and mirrors, and handle, gear and other external parts are attached (Siami-Irdemoosa, Dindarloo and Sharifzadeh 2015). The sufficient deployment of the solar car development project includes the management of the systematic operations and development.

Objectives of the Project

Overview of Stanford Solar Car Development Project

The objectives of the project of Stanford Solar Car Development Project are given below,

To develop an implementation plan for the development of solar car development project and it would involve the deployment of the effective processes

To develop solar car designs for forming effective use of the solar energy for the deployment of the effective and smart processes

To integrate the existing facilities for forming the acute system integration of the car design and integration process

To harvest the solar energy confined in solar cells for forming the effective deployment of the processes and operations of car transportation

Importance of the Project for the organization

The project of Stanford Solar Car Project would help the organization for developing a clean source for the running of the car and automobiles. The development of an implementation plan for the development of solar car development project would involve the deployment of the effective processes and it is the primary benefit for the project (Normansell and Welsh 2015). The solar car designs for forming effective use of the solar energy for the deployment of the effective and smart processes is another major important factor for the project. The integration of the existing facilities for forming the acute system integration of the car design and integration process would help in forming the successful car development. As opined by Nisar and Suzuki (2015), the harvesting of the solar energy confined in solar cells for forming the effective deployment of the processes and operations of car transportation would help in developing a clean and renewable source of fuel for the automobiles.

Scope of the Project

In Scope: The in scope item of the project includes the implementation plan for the development of solar car, effective use of the solar energy, integration of the existing facilities for forming the acute system integration of the car design and integration process, and harvesting the solar energy confined in solar cells as a fuel.

Out of Scope: The out of scope items for the project include the transportation plan for the resources required in the project, supplementations for the project, and contingency plan that might be necessary for the project of developing solar car.

Priorities of the Project

The project for the development of the solar powered cars would require the development of a priority list for the project. The accumulation of the resources, and the harvesting of the solar energy is the most important requirement for the project and it has been kept at the highest priority. The development of the project plan is a major priority for the project. The project activities would be considered fruitful if the operations of the project are successful at the end. The evaluation can be done by using testing of activities and components developed. The project priority matrix for the project of Stanford Solar Car Development is shown below,

Objective and Scope of the Project

	Time	Scope	Cost
Constraint	X
Enhance		X
Accept			X

The work breakdown structure or WBS for the project of ‘Stanford Solar Car Development” has been shown in the diagram below,

Figure 1: WBS Diagram for the Stanford Solar Car Project

(Created by the author in WBS Schedule Pro)

The table showing the WBS notation for the project activities in tabular view is given below,

WBS	Task Name
0	Development of Stanford Solar Car at Bridgestone
1	Project Initialization
1.1	Making Initial Documents
1.2	Project Charter Development
1.3	Submission of the project charter
1.4	Signing project charter
2	Project Planning
2.1	Selecting planning methodology
2.2	Developing plan outline
2.3	Reviewing plan developed
2.4	Completing the plan
2.5	Plan approval
3	Solar Car Development
3.1	Design Development
3.1.1	Selecting design platform
3.1.2	Making Appropriate design for the car
3.1.3	Reviewing the design
3.1.4	Design Approval
3.2	Car Development
3.2.1	Making infrastructure for the car
3.2.2	Deploying engine and main frame
3.2.3	Installing solar batteries
3.2.4	Connecting the circuits
3.2.5	Exterior Development
3.2.6	Attaching seats and mirrors
3.2.7	Handle, Gear and Other external parts are attached
3.2.8	Car is completed
3.3	Testing
3.3.1	Design Prototype Testing
3.3.2	Solar Charging Testing
3.3.3	Engine Start Testing
3.3.4	Car Running Testing
4	Project Completion
4.1	Making Final Reports
4.2	Clearance from Government Automobile Board
4.3	Getting Patents and Rights
4.4	Project is Completed

Table 1: Table showing WBS notation for the project activities

(Created by the author in Ms-Project)

Developing the Project Plan

The project plan had been developed by using the agile methodology and Ms-Project Software. Detailed analysis of “Developing Project Plan” is formed for the development of the specific plan of operations in the project. The agile methodology for the project would include the implication of the existing facilities to implement the manufacturing of the operations and tools (Mir and Pinnington 2014). The formation of the improved processes would help in forming the improved processes of the operations. The development of the project plan would form the use of effective and improved operations. The project planning is helpful for the deploying the effective management system. The phases of the project would involve the deployment of the improved system modification and it would result in forming the effective deployment scheme. The implication of the existing facilities would form the deployment of the improved processes (Niesen and Corboz 2017). The agile development methodology consists of five phases for the completion of the project. The project plan development using Agile includes the initialization phase, planning phase, development phase, evaluation phase, and closure phase. The project plan developed has been shown in the diagram below,

WBS	Task Name	Duration	Start	Finish
0	Development of Stanford Solar Car at Bridgestone	90 days	Mon 1/1/18	Fri 5/4/18
1	Project Initialization	7 days	Mon 1/1/18	Tue 1/9/18
1.1	Making Initial Documents	3 days	Mon 1/1/18	Wed 1/3/18
1.2	Project Charter Development	2 days	Thu 1/4/18	Fri 1/5/18
1.3	Submission of the project charter	1 day	Mon 1/8/18	Mon 1/8/18
1.4	Signing project charter	1 day	Tue 1/9/18	Tue 1/9/18
2	Project Planning	12 days	Wed 1/10/18	Thu 1/25/18
2.1	Selecting planning methodology	1 day	Wed 1/10/18	Wed 1/10/18
2.2	Developing plan outline	3 days	Thu 1/11/18	Mon 1/15/18
2.3	Reviewing plan developed	2 days	Tue 1/16/18	Wed 1/17/18
2.4	Completing the plan	5 days	Thu 1/18/18	Wed 1/24/18
2.5	Plan approval	1 day	Thu 1/25/18	Thu 1/25/18
3	Solar Car Development	62 days	Fri 1/26/18	Mon 4/23/18
3.1	Design Development	15 days	Fri 1/26/18	Thu 2/15/18
3.1.1	Selecting design platform	1 day	Fri 1/26/18	Fri 1/26/18
3.1.2	Making Appropriate design for the car	7 days	Mon 1/29/18	Tue 2/6/18
3.1.3	Reviewing the design	3 days	Wed 2/7/18	Fri 2/9/18
3.1.4	Design Approval	1 day	Thu 2/15/18	Thu 2/15/18
3.2	Car Development	47 days	Fri 2/16/18	Mon 4/23/18
3.2.1	Making infrastructure for the car	15 days	Fri 2/16/18	Thu 3/8/18
3.2.2	Deploying engine and main frame	5 days	Fri 3/9/18	Thu 3/15/18
3.2.3	Installing solar batteries	6 days	Fri 3/16/18	Fri 3/23/18
3.2.4	Connecting the circuits	2 days	Wed 3/28/18	Thu 3/29/18
3.2.5	Exterior Development	4 days	Tue 4/3/18	Fri 4/6/18
3.2.6	Attaching seats and mirrors	2 days	Mon 4/9/18	Tue 4/10/18
3.2.7	Handle, Gear and Other external parts are attached	3 days	Wed 4/11/18	Fri 4/13/18
3.2.8	Car is completed	1 day	Mon 4/23/18	Mon 4/23/18
3.3	Testing	50 days	Mon 2/12/18	Fri 4/20/18
3.3.1	Design Prototype Testing	3 days	Mon 2/12/18	Wed 2/14/18
3.3.2	Solar Charging Testing	2 days	Mon 3/26/18	Tue 3/27/18
3.3.3	Engine Start Testing	2 days	Fri 3/30/18	Mon 4/2/18
3.3.4	Car Running Testing	5 days	Mon 4/16/18	Fri 4/20/18
4	Project Completion	9 days	Tue 4/24/18	Fri 5/4/18
4.1	Making Final Reports	3 days	Tue 4/24/18	Thu 4/26/18
4.2	Clearance from Government Automobile Board	2 days	Fri 4/27/18	Mon 4/30/18
4.3	Getting Patents and Rights	3 days	Tue 5/1/18	Thu 5/3/18
4.4	Project is Completed	1 day	Fri 5/4/18	Fri 5/4/18

Scheduling Resources and Costs

Description of the scheduling resources is done for forming the effective deployment of the operations. The resource schedule is developed for implementing the improved system implication (McConnell 2015). The scheduling of the resources can be described for the formation of the system implicit models of operations. The cost and resources scheduling would help in forming the accurate development of the operations and it would implied for forming the impactful deployment of the improved processes. The scheduling of the resources and costs are being done for evaluating the considerations of the system implementation process. The scheduling would help in detecting effective plan of operations for deploying improved processes in the organization (Martinsuo and Killen 2014). The schedule for the project resources and their costs for the project of Stanford Solar Car Project is shown in the table below,

Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Priority Matrix

Resource Name	Activity List	Work	Cost
Documenter	Making Initial Documents	24 hrs	$1,440.00
Project Charter Development	16 hrs	$960.00
Submission of the project charter	8 hrs	$480.00
Making Final Reports	24 hrs	$1,440.00
Total	72 hrs	$4,320.00
Project Manager	Signing project charter	8 hrs	$1,000.00
Plan approval	8 hrs	$1,000.00
Design Approval	8 hrs	$1,000.00
Car is completed	8 hrs	$1,000.00
Clearance from Government Automobile Board	16 hrs	$2,000.00
Getting Patents and Rights	24 hrs	$3,000.00
Project is Completed	8 hrs	$1,000.00
Total	80 hrs	$10,000.00
Planner	Selecting planning methodology	8 hrs	$600.00
Developing plan outline	24 hrs	$1,800.00
Reviewing plan developed	16 hrs	$1,200.00
Completing the plan	40 hrs	$3,000.00
Total	88 hrs	$6,600.00
Designer	Selecting design platform	8 hrs	$640.00
Making Appropriate design for the car	56 hrs	$4,480.00
Reviewing the design	24 hrs	$1,920.00
Total	88 hrs	$7,040.00
Automobile Engineer	Making infrastructure for the car	120 hrs	$14,400.00
Deploying engine and main frame	40 hrs	$4,800.00
Installing solar batteries	48 hrs	$5,760.00
Connecting the circuits	16 hrs	$1,920.00
Total	224 hrs	$26,880.00
Mechanic	Exterior Development	32 hrs	$2,880.00
Attaching seats and mirrors	16 hrs	$1,440.00
Handle, Gear and Other external parts are attached	24 hrs	$2,160.00
Total	72 hrs	$6,480.00
Tester	Design Prototype Testing	24 hrs	$2,040.00
Solar Charging Testing	16 hrs	$1,360.00
Engine Start Testing	16 hrs	$1,360.00
Car Running Testing	40 hrs	$3,400.00
Total	96 hrs	$8,160.00

Table 2: Project Resource Scheduling and Cost

Planning Risk Response

Detailed analysis of risk response: The risk response can be established with the help of implementing risk mitigation strategies in the organization. The risk mitigation includes the following of the steps mentioned below,

Risk Identification- The risk identification consists of following some measures that could result in identifying the factors of risk in the project. The risk identification would involve the deployment of the effective and smart risk management strategies for implementing the smart development model (Kendrick 2016). The project is helpful in developing the effective risk factor identification and it would involve the deployment of the effective management of risk factors.

Risk Analysis- The risk analysis is a process that involves the process of analysing the risk factors and developing some strategic methods for implying the effective deployment of the project management concepts for forming the smart analysis of the risk factors for deploying the explicit management of operations.

Risk Mitigation- Risk Mitigation includes the development of the improved processes that could form the impact on the development of the factors of risk and its effective deployment methods (Hughes et al. 2016). The mitigation of the risk factors would form the supplementary development of the project information processing.

Risk Evaluation- The mitigation strategies developed in the risk management would form analysis of the impact of the risk mitigation implementation (Hajdu 2013). The evaluation of the risk mitigation would result in forming the factors of the developing some improvements in the plan of implementing the project.

Project Cost and Time Plan

Detailed analysis of project cost and time plan: The project cost and time plan is developed for ensuring that the resources of the project are being used correctly and the time plan ensures that the operations would help in the cohesive deployment of the operations (Lee, Kim and Yu 2014). The estimation of the cost and time plan would result in forming the sufficient deployment of the operations. The project cost and time plan includes the evaluation of the effective management plan. The sufficient development of the operations would include optimized management of the cost and time schedule. The project cost and time plan development is helpful for forming the improvement of the operations (Djalalinia et al. 2014). The following is the table depicting the cost and time of the project,

WBS	Task Name	Start	Finish	Cost
0	Development of Stanford Solar Car at Bridgestone	Mon 1/1/18	Fri 5/4/18	$69,480.00
1	Project Initialization	Mon 1/1/18	Tue 1/9/18	$3,880.00
1.1	Making Initial Documents	Mon 1/1/18	Wed 1/3/18	$1,440.00
1.2	Project Charter Development	Thu 1/4/18	Fri 1/5/18	$960.00
1.3	Submission of the project charter	Mon 1/8/18	Mon 1/8/18	$480.00
1.4	Signing project charter	Tue 1/9/18	Tue 1/9/18	$1,000.00
2	Project Planning	Wed 1/10/18	Thu 1/25/18	$7,600.00
2.1	Selecting planning methodology	Wed 1/10/18	Wed 1/10/18	$600.00
2.2	Developing plan outline	Thu 1/11/18	Mon 1/15/18	$1,800.00
2.3	Reviewing plan developed	Tue 1/16/18	Wed 1/17/18	$1,200.00
2.4	Completing the plan	Thu 1/18/18	Wed 1/24/18	$3,000.00
2.5	Plan approval	Thu 1/25/18	Thu 1/25/18	$1,000.00
3	Solar Car Development	Fri 1/26/18	Mon 4/23/18	$50,560.00
3.1	Design Development	Fri 1/26/18	Thu 2/15/18	$8,040.00
3.1.1	Selecting design platform	Fri 1/26/18	Fri 1/26/18	$640.00
3.1.2	Making Appropriate design for the car	Mon 1/29/18	Tue 2/6/18	$4,480.00
3.1.3	Reviewing the design	Wed 2/7/18	Fri 2/9/18	$1,920.00
3.1.4	Design Approval	Thu 2/15/18	Thu 2/15/18	$1,000.00
3.2	Car Development	Fri 2/16/18	Mon 4/23/18	$34,360.00
3.2.1	Making infrastructure for the car	Fri 2/16/18	Thu 3/8/18	$14,400.00
3.2.2	Deploying engine and main frame	Fri 3/9/18	Thu 3/15/18	$4,800.00
3.2.3	Installing solar batteries	Fri 3/16/18	Fri 3/23/18	$5,760.00
3.2.4	Connecting the circuits	Wed 3/28/18	Thu 3/29/18	$1,920.00
3.2.5	Exterior Development	Tue 4/3/18	Fri 4/6/18	$2,880.00
3.2.6	Attaching seats and mirrors	Mon 4/9/18	Tue 4/10/18	$1,440.00
3.2.7	Handle, Gear and Other external parts are attached	Wed 4/11/18	Fri 4/13/18	$2,160.00
3.2.8	Car is completed	Mon 4/23/18	Mon 4/23/18	$1,000.00
3.3	Testing	Mon 2/12/18	Fri 4/20/18	$8,160.00
3.3.1	Design Prototype Testing	Mon 2/12/18	Wed 2/14/18	$2,040.00
3.3.2	Solar Charging Testing	Mon 3/26/18	Tue 3/27/18	$1,360.00
3.3.3	Engine Start Testing	Fri 3/30/18	Mon 4/2/18	$1,360.00
3.3.4	Car Running Testing	Mon 4/16/18	Fri 4/20/18	$3,400.00
4	Project Completion	Tue 4/24/18	Fri 5/4/18	$7,440.00
4.1	Making Final Reports	Tue 4/24/18	Thu 4/26/18	$1,440.00
4.2	Clearance from Government Automobile Board	Fri 4/27/18	Mon 4/30/18	$2,000.00
4.3	Getting Patents and Rights	Tue 5/1/18	Thu 5/3/18	$3,000.00
4.4	Project is Completed	Fri 5/4/18	Fri 5/4/18	$1,000.00

Conclusion

It can be concluded from the report that the deployment of the effective management tools would help in forming the advanced processing for the project. The project development largely focused on the deployment of the existing facilities and it would result in forming the improved processes of the organization. The report had evaluated the deployment of the existing facilities to develop an understanding for developing the project plan, scheduling resources and costs, planning risk responses, and project cost and time control.

Detailed Project Plan using Agile Methodology and Ms-Project Software

Agarwal, V., Oxstrand, J.H. and Le Blanc, K.L., 2014. Automated work packages architecture: An initial set of human factors and instrumentation and controls requirements (No. INL/EXT–14-33172). Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States).

Aguarón, J., Escobar, M.T. and Moreno-Jiménez, J.M., 2016. The precise consistency consensus matrix in a local AHP-group decision making context. Annals of Operations Research, 245(1-2), pp.245-259.

Banfield, M.A., Barney, L.J., Griffiths, K.M. and Christensen, H.M., 2014. Australian mental health consumers’ priorities for research: qualitative findings from the SCOPE for Research project. Health Expectations, 17(3), pp.365-375.

Ding, R., 2016. Project Closure Aiming for Maximum Value. In Key Project Management Based on Effective Project Thinking (pp. 325-338). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Djalalinia, S., Owlia, P., Malekafzali, H., Ghanei, M., Babamahmoodi, A. and Peykari, N., 2014. Project monitoring and evaluation: An enhancing method for health research system management. International journal of preventive medicine, 5(4), p.505.

Flacco, F., 2016, November. The tasks priority matrix: A new tool for hierarchical redundancy resolution. In Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

Fleming, J.F. and Poole, K.W., 2016. NASA Work Breakdown Structure% 28WBS% 29 Handbook.

Hajdu, M., 2013. Network scheduling techniques for construction project management (Vol. 16). Springer Science & Business Media.

Heagney, J., 2016. Fundamentals of Project Managementw. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.

Hughes, F., Adams, W., Butchart, S., Field, R., Peh, K. and Warrington, S., 2016. The challenges of integrating biodiversity and ecosystem services monitoring and evaluation at a landscape-scale wetland restoration project in the UK. Ecology and Society, 21(3).

Kendrick, T., 2016. How to Manage Complex Programs: High-impact Techniques for Handling Project Workflow, Deliverables, and Teams. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.

Lee, S.K., Kim, K.R. and Yu, J.H., 2014. BIM and ontology-based approach for building cost estimation. Automation in Construction, 41, pp.96-105.

Lee, S.K., Kim, K.R. and Yu, J.H., 2014. BIM and ontology-based approach for building cost estimation. Automation in Construction, 41, pp.96-105.

Lehtinen, T.O., Mäntylä, M.V., Vanhanen, J., Itkonen, J. and Lassenius, C., 2014. Perceived causes of software project failures–an analysis of their relationships. Information and Software Technology, 56(6), pp.623-643.

Li, D. and Lu, M., 2016. Automated Generation of Work Breakdown Structure and Project Network Model for Earthworks Project Planning: A Flow Network-Based Optimization Approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(1), p.04016086.

Liu, L., Oza, S., Hogan, D., Perin, J., Rudan, I., Lawn, J.E., Cousens, S., Mathers, C. and Black, R.E., 2015. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. The Lancet, 385(9966), pp.430-440.

Marcelino-Sádaba, S., Pérez-Ezcurdia, A., Lazcano, A.M.E. and Villanueva, P., 2014. Project risk management methodology for small firms. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), pp.327-340.

Martinsuo, M. and Killen, C.P., 2014. Value management in project portfolios: Identifying and assessing strategic value. Project Management Journal, 45(5), pp.56-70.

Mascia, M.B., Pailler, S., Thieme, M.L., Rowe, A., Bottrill, M.C., Danielsen, F., Geldmann, J., Naidoo, R., Pullin, A.S. and Burgess, N.D., 2014. Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation. Biological Conservation, 169, pp.258-267.

McConnell, P.E., 2015. Assembly Tests and Possible Future Rail Tests ST Transportation Work Packages (No. SAND2015-5337PE). Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States).

Mir, F.A. and Pinnington, A.H., 2014. Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International journal of project management, 32(2), pp.202-217.

Niesen, I. and Corboz, P., 2017. A tensor network study of the complete ground state phase diagram of the spin-1 bilinear-biquadratic Heisenberg model on the square lattice. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01953.

Nisar, S.A. and Suzuki, K., 2015, January. Critical Activity Analysis in Precedence Diagram Method Scheduling Network. In International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems (pp. 232-247). Springer, Cham.

Normansell, R. and Welsh, E., 2015. “Asthma can take over your life but having the right support makes that easier to deal with.” Informing research priorities by exploring the barriers and facilitators to asthma control: a qualitative analysis of survey data. Asthma research and practice, 1(1), p.11.

Omiciuolo, L., Hernández, E.R., Miniussi, E., Orlando, F., Lacovig, P., Lizzit, S., Mentes, T.O., Locatelli, A., Larciprete, R., Bianchi, M. and Ulstrup, S., 2014. Bottom-up approach for the low-cost synthesis of graphene-alumina nanosheet interfaces using bimetallic alloys. Nature communications, 5, p.5062.

Shirazi, F., Kazemipoor, H. and Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., 2017. Fuzzy decision analysis for project scope change management. Decision Science Letters, 6(4), pp.395-406.

Siami-Irdemoosa, E., Dindarloo, S.R. and Sharifzadeh, M., 2015. Work breakdown structure (WBS) development for underground construction. Automation in Construction, 58, pp.85-94.

Singh, M., 2014. Project Deliverable: Process and Guidelines. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 3(8).

Solarcar.stanford.edu. (2017). Stanford Solar Car Project | Designing, building, and racing solar-powered vehicles. [online] Available at: https://solarcar.stanford.edu/ [Accessed 17 Aug. 2017].

Wang, D., Zhang, M., Li, J., Li, Z., Li, J., Song, C. and Chen, X., 2017. Intelligent constellation diagram analyzer using convolutional neural network-based deep learning. Optics Express, 25(15), pp.17150-17166.