Company Analysis Using Strategy Models or Tools
Discuss about the Strategy Analysis of LEGO.
LEGO Company is among the renowned organizations all over the world that has its business operations in manufacturing toys for children. A carpenter named Ole Kirk Christiansen in the year 1932 with few employees started the company. 60 years ago, the company used to manufacture wooden toys in Denmark (Forbes 2016). In the year 1934, the company got its name LEGO which is derived from Danish phrase “leg godt” that means, “Play well” (Forbes 2016). With increased popularity of plastic toys, it started manufacturing plastic toy trucks that could be easily separated and reassembled. In the year 1947, LEGO Company expanded its business and started manufacturing plastic toys (Forbes 2016). The company is headquartered in Denmark and focuses on a major aspect in growth, development of children’s creativity through playing and learning by accumulating LEGO brick.
In the recent days, the company offers products in over 130 nations with around 10,000 employees globally (Forbes 2016). Over the years, the company evolved with stepping up with the market demands and consumer preferences. The core activities of the company are innovation, development, marketing and selling of toys. LEGO bricks have remained the company’s core product and the company became renowned with gaining the name “Toy of the Century” twice (Jensen et al. 2014). The company’s toys have undergone massive advancement with years but the foundation remains its traditional LEGO bricks.
Figure 1: LEGO Company’s Position in the World
(Source: Jensen et al. 2014)
The objective of the report is to conduct strategy analysis of the LEGO Company by employing various strategy models and tools. SWOT, PESTLE, porter’s 5 forces and ‘value chain model’ analysis of the company will help in revealing the manufacturing and engineering based competitive challenges faced by LEGO in the recent years (Aldred 2013). These strategic models are also efficient in evaluating the business environment of LEGO and the business risks affecting the competitive position of the company.
SWOT analysis serves as an analytic framework that can help to reveal a company’s greatest business risks and find most prospective new markets through identifying both external and internal factor influences on its business (Altun et al. 2013).
Table 1: SWOT Analysis of LEGO Company
Strengths
|
Weaknesses
|
Opportunities
|
Threats
|
(Source: Sherrow 2015)
Strengths- LEGO Company manufactures toys with educational features that facilitate key skill development of children. The company advertises its toys on TVC’s that gives huge advertising to target consumers and have a strong product portfolio. To sustain its competitive position LEGO Company has manufactured advanced video games and has diversified into TV, movies and other merchandise (Andersen et al. 2013).
Weaknesses- Several weaknesses mostly associated with its innovative approach in technology and manufacturing can contribute to its business failure in comparison to its competitors. The company lacks knowledge regarding its core business area, is deficient in marketing and has limited expertise in technology. Moreover, LEGO Company experiences a steady loss of market share in the area of online games and faces fierce competition from toys of several renowned brands (Anger et al. 2013).
SWOT Analysis of LEGO Company
Opportunities- Certain kinds of materials and factors such as like films and movies can play a vital role in advancing LEGO toys. For instance, the company has the opportunity to manufacture toys based on international famous movies like Star War, the Avengers, Spiderman and to name a few. The main markets of the company’s business operation are in Europe and USA, though the company has an opportunity to expand its business in some in prospective markets such as Asia, United Arab Emirates and Africa focusing on low cost production (Anton 2015).
Threats- Modern technologies are increasing and are developing rapidly these days. In this scenario, most children are getting involved in computer games having colorful and imaginative sights despite of playing with traditional toys like LEGO bricks. Increasing substitutes of advanced technologies in toy industries seem to affect the profitable business of LEGO Company (Bischoff 2016).
PESTLE analysis facilitates in evaluating the business environment in which a company operates its business and helps in tracking the level of competition and business risks affecting a company’s business (Black et al. 2016).
Figure 2: PEST Analysis of LEGO Company
(Source: Black et al. 2016)
Political- In LEGO Company’s business environment there exits certain political factors that can have a considerable effect on LEGO Company’s business. The nation has strong trade relations with several nations worldwide however; the nation occasionally experiences some political conflicts with its close nations regarding land ownership. Considering such factors, LEGO Company benefits from decreasing exposures to political instability but will have increased regulatory legislation on toys (Buglione et al. 2013). Toy safety directives rules have necessitated LEGO Company to pay close attention to the security of children’s products and the raw materials from which the products are manufactured.
Economic- Some economic variables those affect LEGO Company’s business environment circumstances are its exceptionally high per capita Gross Development Product (GDP). Few nations in which it operates has low unemployment rate and is responsible for highest amount of foreign direct investment within the region. LEGO Company has managed to survive from the impacts of global financial crisis and has gained increased profitability (Bull et al. 2016). However, there is increased exposed risk from currency by hedging currencies that might harm its profitability if it converts its income into domestic currency.
Figure 3: LEGO Bricks Piece Price Over Years
(Source: Chang and Taylor 2016)
Social- Most of the people using LEGO Company’s products have a comfortable lifestyle and globalization is resulting in mix of several cultures within countries. Religion serves as a vital factor few nations that affect the society. Increased demand for electronic games has decreased sales of the company (Chang and Taylor 2016). Considering such factors, LEGO Company will require entering into the digital screen for grabbing consumer attention. The company is striving to launch new online games and expensive toys considering high spending power of citizens of most of the nations in which it operates its business. As children are spending a huge time on internet, the company has developed its online site in a way so that consumers can gain detailed or newest information about their products even there is a shortage of LEGO outlets few nations.
PESTLE Analysis
Technological- Young populations these days are observed to be tech-savvy that requires companies operating business in this nation to advance their technology. Amount of wealth available in the nation facilitates it to acquire new equipment for leveraging technology. LEGO Company now has shifted to a new distribution network that consists of a web shop where consumers can buy their products directly from online stores (Cordon et al. 2016). For improving its revenue growth LEGO Company is forced to enhance its innovativeness in product development and shift from manufacturing traditional toys to producing electronic and online games.
Environmental- Considering the environmental factors, few nations in which it operates is found to be in the coastal areas that will ease out trade through sea. Additionally, few nations have strict rules on environment protection that necessitates using eco-friendly materials in toy manufacturing. To deal with the issue of increasing carbon emissions LEGO Company had to sign a deal with World Wildlife Fund (WWF) for reducing such harmful emissions. The company is asked to reduce emissions of its product by 10% in the nation (Coxon 2012). By improving its existing manufacturing technology and its supply chain the company can easily attain its mission reduction plan.
Legal- Sales and performance of LEGO Company has been greatly impacted over the recent years because of ample imitator and counterfeit products presence in the market those are cheaper than the company’s products. The company recently filed a complaint against a Chinese company Coko for imitating its toy designs and had to dispose all its products. Considering such situation, LEGO Company has to be highly cautious regarding copyright of its designs and making good use of copyright and patent laws of the nations in which it operates its business (Direction 2012).
Porters five forces analysis tool serves as an effective tool for realizing the level of competition in an industry and for business strategy formulation (Dobbs 2014). This analysis will help in evaluating the strength of the company’s recent competitive position and the strength of the position that the company is considering to move in. Porter’s five forces analysis of LEGO Company is conducted below:
Threat of New Entrants- This threat is high for LEGO Company, which requires the company to develop strong and large distribution network. Introduction of advanced technologies in few nations is also a barrier that presents difficulties for new competitors in this business market. LEGO Company needs to develop its technologies constantly for establishing itself as a strong competitor (Feick and Roche 2013). The existing competitors in the market have already occupied best location to situate their factories within the market. This presents a challenge for LEGO Company to compete with those existing stores at an accessible market location for gaining competitive advantages over others.
Threat of Substitutes- Threat of substitutes is high for LEGO Company as it has increased influences, which can organization to lose its consumers. Risks from substitutes are a problem for the company as several companies employ standard technology to manufacture quality services. Moreover, substitutes to toys also encompass sports, hobbies and certain extracurricular activities (Fraser et al. 2014). Moreover, parents these days prefer their children to stay more involved with extracurricular activities rather than playing with toys. Children getting more involved in these activities have become a threat for toys and games industry. High switching costs occurred because substitutes pose the company’s profitability based on its relative price to performance ratios of several products.
Porter’s 5 Forces Analysis
Level of Competition- This threat is low for LEGO Company for the reason that there exist very less rivals in global toy industry. For this reason, the company’s competitors cannot generate ample risks for it as LEGO Company has acquitted enough percentage of loyal consumers. Toy industry is oligopolistic with limited companies in few nations (Grienitz et al. 2013). Level of competition remains intense for LEGO Company and for gaining a broader market in children’s entertainment, the company started to include huge incumbents from electronic sectors. Moreover, intensity of rivalry of LEGO has helped it to determine its value generation through fierce competition that indicates high internal rivalry for the company.
Figure 4: LEGO Traditional Toys and Games Value Share Worldwide
(Source: Hadida 2013)
Power of Buyers- High bargaining power of buyers exists for LEGO Company in the global toy market because of other educational toy companies. To minimize this threat the company is striving to maintain reasonable prices for its products for sustaining first-rate relationship with its esteemed consumers (Hadida 2013). Additionally, the company is constantly attempting to develop several promotional strategies to restrict them from purchasing competitor’s products. It is observed that huge part of decision making in respect to their product prices is based on its consumer’s decisions that is considerably increasing the bargaining power of buyers. Such scenario is significantly affecting LEGO Company’s profitability in the toy industry. However, setting low prices for its toy products can enhance the company’s produce and service quality (Hadida 2013).
Power of Suppliers- Suppliers bargaining power is average for LEGO Company in toy industry. This is because the company has based its offerings from standardized inputs such as plastics and chemicals. However, the company ensured that suppliers have high bargaining power. It has attained this through supporting its suppliers to demonstrate their importance in toy industry (Ibrahim and Perez 2014). Additionally, LEGO has made sure that that the prices suppliers demand materials depicts identical value as the products quality. This facilitates the company to make sure that it efficiently utilizes its budgets. LEGO Company has always attempted to retain suppliers bargaining power through its brands high power.
Value chain analysis of a company is based on a basic economic principal of advantage in which each art of the production process of a company is identified within which certain steps from the manufacturing process can be removed or improved. Such enhancements can help in cost savings or in gaining competitive benefits through improving production process. Value chain involves primary activities of the company such as logistic, outbound logistics, operations, marketing and sales (Jackson et al. 2013). Support activities of a company include material management, technology development, human resource management and company infrastructure. LEGO Company has implemented strategic planning to enhance efficient use of all its resources in order to maintain company’s competitive advantage (Jensen 2016). The value chain for LEGO Company is conducted under:
Inbound Logistics- LEGO Company gained sufficient knowledge to enhance its manufacturing technology and produce new materials like non-toxic plastics that business rivals cannot imitate. Such improvement in production material has of LEGO Company has increased its market share and profitability (Jensen et al. 2014). However, inferior imitations of the company’s products remain a threat to the brand for the reason that such products come with lower price that attracts a huge consumer segment. Moreover, consumers prefer to purchase inferior imitations for LEGO products. Considering these threats, the company in order to manufacture superior value for products should ensure that operations of LEGO Company sustain and protect its brand power (Kim 2015).
Operations- LEGO Company has developed a very strong product development staff that comprises 160 employees focused towards product development (Keinz et al. 2012). The company has implemented an “open innovation technique” that can support the company to gather information regarding user habits, consumer expectations of all age groups all over the world. Ideas gathered from the consumers can facilitate the company in identifying product advancement and innovations. Additionally, LEGO Company maintains fruitful relationships with all its retailers for gathering information regarding desirers of its consumers and retailers that will help in planning future product portfolio. The products manufactured by LEGO Company are turning out to be valuable and more attractive to its consumers as its offerings are developing and innovating constantly (Kim and Coxon 2016).
Out-bound Logistics- LEGO Company decided to outsource its manufacturing for cost reduction. For completing an efficient outsourcing transaction, the company advanced its supply chain. Moreover, it maintained good relationship with its suppliers for generating expectations for improving market feedback (Kourdi 2015). This helps in enhancing innovation ability, gain market information for enhancing rapid adjustments of sale for long and short run. Development of these aspects promotes the seasonal sales success, enhance competition of company and considerably increase market share and profitability.
Marketing and Sales- LEGO Company expanded its retail network in order to increase sales and increasing marketing share all over the world like other renowned companies such as Wal-Mart and Toy R U’s, online sales network and retail stores of brands (Kurkovsky 2016). Successful establishment of the company’s broad retail network contributed to high quality of its products and improved brand power. As offerings of LEGO Company attracted increased number of retailers, its bargaining power also increased significantly. This serves as the most vital factor that can facilitate business expansion of the company and its competitive international presence (Kourdi 2015). Maintaining good relationships can facilitate the company to get quick market feedback and increase flexibility of sales for both short and long duration.
Technology Development- Considering this aspect, LEGO Company’s product advancement and innovation entered into a digital circumstance like online multiplayer game. The digital world offers numerous options for young consumers if they do not prefer traditional toys. Several option and facilitative opportunities offered to children is an efficient way for keeping consumers loyal. The company manufactured diverse products in consideration to demands of all ages (Lancellotti and Tijhuis 2014). This will enable LEGO Company to satisfy the requirements of distinct consumers. Moreover, the company is involved in continuous product development and innovation in technology development to maintain attractiveness of all its products, which resulted in superior sales growth and international market share increase.
Firm Infrastructure- In accordance to its privately owned business approach, the LEGO Company has enhanced capital structure for decreasing its debt burden. During the years of crisis, the company has divested a part of its LEGOLAND for gaining some amount that could reduce the company’s debt burden that efficiently developed its traditional business (Madsen et al. 2013). LEGO Company’s traditional business development improved its business growth, boosted profitability and decreased huge debt burden. As the traditional business of the company rapidly grew, it increased profits of the company that further resulted in increasing security of its financial position. Through improving its traditional business, LEGO Company has been able to increase its profitability and its financial position remained strong over years. Increased financial strength increased the pace of product innovation (Marketing and Logue 2015). The company along with focusing on product designing and development has also considered innovation and product quality improvement to be its core competence.
In the recent years, LEGO Company’s major focus will be on optimization of its manufacturing processes. Internally, the company will optimize its production process through implementing contemporary technologies. The company will incorporate modular concepts within production techniques that will facilitate the company to maintain flexibility in its product variation (Martin 2012).
New technologies such as Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), advanced molding technologies and packaging machineries will be implemented in the manufacturing process of its toys. Moreover, LEGO Company will also implement DPD in all its products for boosting product variation and flexibility of processes (McCusker 2014). However, through implementing such advanced technology, the company might experience several manufacturing and engineering challenges. It might face the risk of competing with its competitors in making its production process efficient. Recent challenges that the LEGO Company might face through such strategy implementation are mentioned below:
Due to increase in customization with its new technological strategy implementation, LEGO Company might feel the pressure to decrease batch sizes and this can present challenge to its supply chain management (Muhammad 2015). Such trend can be gradually developed in the recent years and challenge the manufacturing capabilities and flexibility of its production processes.
For remaining closer to its consumers, LEGO Company will distribute its manufacturing internationally. For this reason, geographical separations of its manufacturing might make the company unable to implement a cross-organizational production process because of differences in labor costs, skilled workforce and automation capabilities (Onishi et al. 2014). Such differences can present a challenge in maintaining consistent level of quantity and quality between all its production locations.
Increased focus on optimization might have an adverse impact on LEGO Company’s agility as the manufacturing processes might be optimized to certain extent. Moreover, variations in product specifications, new product integration and quantity can increase the risks (Prahalad and Ramaswamy 2013).
In the toy industry, the impact of seasonality on demand is huge. LEGO Company can face rapid demand fluctuations and the challenges in forecasting demands of it toys that can further result in low fit percentage between anticipated and actual demand. Implementation of DPD technology might result in over-production of products those are not in demand, can increase inventory costs and result in longer lead times for products those are actually demanded and consumer satisfaction challenges (Roos et al. 2014).
Supply chain strengthening strategy will increase the competitive advantage for LEGO Company. As a major part of the company’s sales takes place through large retailers like Wall-mart and Kmart, they look for more innovative products with shorter delivery times. Considering such demands, LEGO Company will focus on getting closer to its retailers for understanding from sales to end consumer chain (Schlagwein and Bjørn-Andersen 2014). For competing strongly with other renowned toy brands, LEGO Company will plan to focus on cost cutting strategies in its manufacturing process. In cost cutting strategy, the brand must focus on introducing advanced technology in its production and procurement process. Moreover, significant number of consumers needs being reduced that will result in gradual cost reduction and increased savings.
Despite of such supply chain strategy rapidly increasing popularity of electronic games, digital toys and several software-based games can make the competition fierce for LEGO Company’s traditional toy products (Schoemaker and Krupp 2015). If this strategy does not consider understanding the new demands of consumers, then lack of profitable innovation will be clear in case of LEGO Company that might restrain it from attaining competitive benefits. However, sales of the company’s products might be increased but its bottom line could be hampered.
Figure 5: Supply Chain Visibility of Lego Company
(Source: Schoemaker et al. 2013)
Outsourcing manufacturing of some of its products in cheaper locations will result in huge operation cost reduction. In the upcoming years, it might be observed that sales of LEGO toys become more seasonal and can have short order horizons. For this reason, its supply chain needs great flexibility for which it has to manage its own international production operations more efficiently by cancelling the layoffs (Schoemaker et al. 2013).
Designs or fashion of toy products are expected to change rapidly and in some occasion some of a company’s products can decrease or improve its annual turnover. The LEGO Company that will consider manufacturing new innovative toy products under the title “Obviously LEGO, never seen before” and will implement innovation strategy focused on product improvement” (Schultz and Hatch 2013). To manufacture products based on recent fashion trends among children, the company will develop new concepts every two to three years. The LEGO games ranges will develop into a family broad games range with an attitude of changeability. The brand will also expand its LEGO Education division that will work in association with schools. However, after the implementation of such strategies, difference between the physical and digital world might become blurred and less important for children. To deal with such risks, product advancement strategy will be made more efficient by LEGO Company through developing its digital business (Seyedhosseini et al. 2015).
For responding to the recent fashion trends, the toy producers are planning to design products based on a story or concept, for instance Star Wars. Moreover, numerous companies are attempting to manufacture toys based on an identical concept such as Spiderman and Harry Potter (Sherrow 2015).
Figure 6: Increase in Number of Toy Components of Lego Bricks
(Source: Srivastava 2015)
Focusing on new media or digital innovation strategy by decreasing total dependence on global mega brand influenced toys will increase the demand and popularity of its toys among children. To remain competitive LEGO Company will follow footsteps of its business rivals by adding technology to its products. This might help in addressing the risk that the company might face in the upcoming years because a huge segment of children might turn out to be largely interested in technologically advanced toys other than traditional toys (Srivastava 2015). LEGO Company can incorporate advanced technology in its products as a method to make its classic toys more important to the evolving consumer base. Using advanced machineries in production will turn out to be successful strategy but that would need engineers to figure out how successfully the electronic components are associated with LEGO bricks (Van den Bosch and De Man 2013). Checking for failures and time spent in playing will be needed, as simply manufacturing a product that encompasses technological factors does not mean it will succeed in future years. Extra money in research and development will be required for generating technologically advanced product ranges.
LEGO Company revealed that at the time, it could generate innovative play experience to sustain its competitive position in the market without bricks and construction. With this strategy, there might be a risk that it can confuse the company’s typical toy buyers and enrage major fans of the brand. The consumers of LEGO Company can get unsatisfied and can demand for advanced version of LEGO bricks. This dissatisfaction can decrease sales of the company’s products, which might signify that LEGO Company needs further technological innovation (Wong and Arlbjorn 2012).
Considering the scenario of disappointments and failures that might arise in future, LEGO Company can implement new construction toys on action figures those are liked by most children these days. Moreover, little complementary innovations in the form of new packaging, books, comics, video games, direct-to-video movies and licensed merchandise can bring in huge success for the company (Wong 2015). In addition, such strategy can be highly effective for the reason that complementary innovations like this were not at all risky or inexpensive. Constantly creating variations in these construction toys through advanced technology can contribute to increased success of the company in the upcoming years.
Increasing variety of shapes and colors of LEGO products might present a threat to the company. Other challenges can be to make sure that demanded products are available in the stock and increased number of components required huge investments (Yurevich 2014). Moreover, piling of inventory because of LEGO Company’s forecast errors and seasonal demand variations can present a threat of increased cost in manufacturing process.
To deal with the risks LEGO Company will need to focus on decreasing the growth of is several product components. In addition, the company should outsource its production capacity to some low cost subcontractors such as Sonoco, Weldenhammer, 2B pack and Flextronics (Wong and Arlbjorn 2012).
An implementation plan serves as a strategic tool that will discuss the critical steps in starting a project and estimated time Manufacturing and engineering based strategy implementation plan for LEGO Company is prepared that will ensure timely implementation of manufacturing and engineering based strategies for business growth (Altun et al. 2013).
Table 2: Strategy Implementation Plan over Six Years
Strategy Implementation |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
Innovation strategy by constantly manufacturing new version of LEGO bricks |
||||||
Innovative product development with new themes such as LEGO friends and Ninjago by expanding product lines |
||||||
Rationalizing product lines by reducing number of products to be manufactured on each machine |
||||||
Enabling simplification by decreasing the number of color options |
||||||
Signing longer-term contracts that will decrease and stabilize pricing and will eliminate excess costs |
(Source: Jensen et al. 2014)
Over the years from 2016 to 2018 innovation strategy will be implemented by manufacturing new versions of LEGO bricks on a constant basis. While implementing such strategy, LEGO Company needs o be careful of the risk that might arise from over diversifying its product line through constant innovation (Feick and Roche 2013). To gain competitive advantage over the Chinese low cost manufacturers, LEGO Company needs to redesign all the aspect of its product manufacturing and by aligning its innovation capability with the market. The producer designers of the company will think of producing LEGO bricks of unique designs by factoring in the material price that will be used in its production and the costs associated with production. By analyzing such production concern, the company is expected to sustain the cost pressures of international toy market (Altun et al. 2013).
Moreover, the production sites of the company will be shifted from high-cost nations such as Denmark to low-cot countries such as China and Africa. By doing so operators will no longer need to respond to last minute demands that requires implementing cost changeovers. LEGO Company. By decreasing several Danish manufacturing factories the company will decrease the over capacity utilization by 70% (Andersen et al. 2013).
In the years 2018 and 2019, the company will focus on producing toys based on new themes those are becoming popular among children. To manufacture products for international market and make huge profits, LEGO Company will analyze bestseller themes of the countries in which it operates its business (Andersen et al. 2013). As LEGO City these days is famous of being the number-one theme globally, it will focus on modifying the theme and present in the global toy market. Construction toys on Spiderman, LEGO duplo creative chest, basic bricks deluxe and spider-man spider truck adventure can establish itself as renowned themes among the children worldwide.
Enabling simplification of its production process by reducing the number of color options will be an effective strategy for the company (Black et al. 2016). Over the years from 2019 to 2020, LEGO Company will plan to decrease the proportion of existing color options in half. For instance, developing a cost matrix will be helpful in improving the production process that is calculated for its product designers for the high cost impact on the supply chain of changing colors and shapes of products (Jackson et al. 2013). In addition, the number of logistics service providers of the company will be reduced from 26 to 4. Distribution centers of the company will
Until the year 2020, LEGO Company will implement strategies for rationalizing its production lines. In this strategic plan, the company will focus on decreasing the number of products that can be produced from each machine, which is supposed to add simplicity to the manufacturing process and reduce changeover costs (Feick and Roche 2013). The company needs to establish very fixed production lines and efficiently tied manufacturing to all aspects of its supply chain. For instance, it was not acceptable for LEGO Company to enable manual changes within its molding machine by not informing the finished goods packing group. This is a vital consideration since various kits are packaged in various boxes (Jackson et al. 2013).
Until the year 2021, the company will focus more on quality during production will support the cost-reducing plan of the company. The company will consider reducing considerable number of its plastic resin suppliers and sign extended term contracts that decreased and stabilized pricing, decreased costs and enabled efficient planning (Jensen et al. 2014).
Based on the manufacturing and engineering based strategic risks revealed in case of LEGO Company’s business operations certain recommendations are offered to the company that will help in gaining competitive edge. Strategic recommendations are mentioned below:
Manufacturing new product line can serve as an effective strategy. In consideration to the scenario that the core products such as building blocks are expensive, that attracts less consumers. For this reason, the company should introduce a new product line of LEGO bricks that should be packaged without set instructions and at a cheaper price. Manufacturing advanced versions of LEGO bricks will facilitate the company to reach a broader consumer segment belonging to lower socioeconomic spectrum. For emerging markets, this new product line can be launched to gain larger market share.
LEGO Company is recommended to invest its resources in manufacturing of innovative products as per the recent demands of the target consumer groups such as in LEGO bricks, PC games and LEGO land, which transforms into a technology advanced capability. This is also associated with recent children entertainment venues. The similarities to monopoly games linked with sports, Barbie and in recently Disney themes so that the company should consider branching out to identical avenues. This strategy is not only focused on the development of its manufactured products that will influence schoolchildren but also will tap a considerable number of young teenagers. In making this possible, the fascination of sports and cars are deemed to remain imperative for manufacturing the designed models for creative LEGO bricks that can be played by consumers by logging in to LEGO factory website.
LEGO Company is recommended to adopt several vertical integration strategies for some parts of it value chain. Suppliers for the company should be increased to source enough sustainable materials that will address the demands of the consumers. Design of majority of products manufactured by LEGO Company should be redesigned in partnership with MIT based on consumer feedback. Moreover, the company for significant cost savings should outsource production of simple parts.
Eliminating the number of elements and color in product manufacturing can make it simpler for LEGO Company to rationalize its production cycles. This strategy can be implemented by practicing the time-honored practice of making all the machines assessable for manufacturing any element. This approach requires regular costly retooling. For this reason other than this strategy, the production team can allot specific moulds to definite machines and set up constant four to twelve manufacturing cycles. Based on this the manufacturing team deemed that its operations and sales could set orders at a regular meeting that will focus on decreasing the requirement for constant changeovers.
The LEGO Company should invite its target consumers to take part in the product development process. This would not only make its consumers get more emotionally attached to the brand and make them happier but its strong replenishment and forecasting technology would facilitate the marketers of the company to gain access to higher level of insight into buyer behavior than the firm had on its own. The LEGO Company can also allow its retailers to make the assortment decisions and strengthen the relationship with them.
As LEGO Company is struggling to decrease its manufacturing costs it requires implementing a new cost effective approach to manufacture LEGO Bricks. Despite of making huge efforts on producing new shapes and colors to develop scope of creativity, the company should focus on manufacturing universal bricks that comes with limited number of colors and moulds. This strategy would facilitate the company to cut down unnecessary production costs of their recent and future licensed products. Once the production costs are controlled, the company should hire an internal auditor for tracking their manufacturing costs that will facilitate in managing its short and long-term profits. Through simplifying its strategy with their traditional “LEGO bricks” and making it universal, LEGO Company along with cutting back its overall costs can also redefine its brand identity with respect to its licensed products.
LEGO Company is recommended to enhance its market realignment might result in increased revenues along with decrease in the production costs generated by the cutback of colors and moulds of traditional LEGO brick by making it further “plug-in-play” for future product lines. This will also provide the company the capability for competing successfully in changing children’s toy market.
Conclusion
The objective of the report was to conduct strategy analysis of the LEGO Company by employing various strategy models and tools. Analysis of SWOT, PESTLE, porter’s 5 forces and value chain model of the company has helped in revealing the manufacturing and engineering based competitive challenges faced by LEGO in the recent years. Strategic evaluation of the company revealed that increasing substitutes of advanced technologies in toy industries are capable to affect the profitable business of LEGO Company. Additionally, LEGO Company might experience a steady loss of market share in the area of online games and faces fierce competition from toys of several renowned brands.
To deal with such risks a manufacturing and engineering and manufacturing based implementation plan is prepared that will facilitate LEGO Company to maintain its strategic position worldwide. Innovation strategy by constantly manufacturing new version of LEGO bricks, rationalizing product lines by reducing number of products to be manufactured on each machine and signing longer-term contracts that will decrease and stabilize pricing and will eliminate excess costs can serve as highly effective strategies.
Reference List
Aldred, J., 2013. “Plastic blocks and theatrical blockbusters can make a great mix”: Digital abstraction as franchise strategy in LEGO The Lord of the Rings. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 6(1), pp.20-26.
Altun, H., Korkmaz, O., Ozkaya, A. and Usta, E., 2013. Lessons learned from robot-in-class projects using LEGO NXT and some recommendations. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality, 7(4), pp. 303-307.
Andersen, P.H., Kragh, H. and Lettl, C., 2013. Spanning organizational boundaries to manage creative processes: The case of the LEGO group. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(1), pp.125-134.
Anger, I., Pergler, E. and Kittl, C., 2013. User-centric, Value-oriented Business Models? An Analysis of how Value is Seen in Different Business Model Research Streams. In Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, 6(4), p. 204.
Anton, R., 2015. An Integrated Strategy Framework (ISF) for Combining Porter’s 5-Forces, Diamond, PESTEL, and SWOT Analysis. Ecosystem Services, 6(7), pp.94-101.
Bischoff, A.L., 2016. Porters Five Forces. Innovation through Business, Engineering and Design: How does rivalry in a market as well as customer expectations influence the process of a design concept from a business perspective?. Berlin: GRIN Verlag.
Black, R.W., Tomlinson, B. and Korobkova, K., 2016. Play and identity in gendered LEGO franchises. International Journal of Play, 5(1), pp.64-76.
Buglione, L., von Wangenheim, C.G., McCaffery, F. and Hauck, J.C.R., 2013. The LEGO strategy: guidelines for a profitable deployment. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 36(1), pp.10-20.
Bull, J.W., Jobstvogt, N., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Mascarenhas, A., Sitas, N., Baulcomb, C., Lambini, C.K., Rawlins, M., Baral, H., Zähringer, J. and Carter-Silk, E., 2016. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats: A SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework. Ecosystem Services, 1(7), pp.99-111.
Chang, W. and Taylor, S.A., 2016. The effectiveness of customer participation in new product development: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), pp.47-64.
Cordon, C., Garcia-Milà, P., Vilarino, T.F. and Caballero, P., 2016. Strategy is Digital: How Companies Can Use Big Data in the Value Chain. Berlin: Springer.
Coxon, S.V., 2012. The malleability of spatial ability under treatment of a first lego league-based robotics simulation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(3), pp.291-316.
Direction, S., 2012. How Guinness, Lego and others face a struggle: Failures at successful companies. Strategic Direction, 20(11), pp.112-134.
Dobbs, M., 2014. Guidelines for applying Porter’s five forces framework: a set of industry analysis templates. Competitiveness Review, 24(1), pp.32-45.
Feick, R. and Roche, S., 2013. Understanding the Value of VGI. In Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge, 9(4), pp. 15-29.
Forbes, 2016. Forbes Welcome. [online] Available at: https://www.forbes.com/companies/lego-group/ [Accessed 2 Aug. 2016].
Fraser, J., Simkins, B. and Narvaez, K., 2014. Implementing enterprise risk management: Case studies and best practices. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Grienitz, V., Schmidt, A.M., Kristiansen, P. and Schulte, H., 2013. Vision Statement Development With LEGO® SERIOUS PLAY®. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings, 9(4), p. 791.
Hadida, A.L., 2013. Let your hands do the thinking! Lego bricks, strategic thinking and ideas generation within organizations. Strategic Direction, 29(2), pp.3-5.
Ibrahim, M.E. and Perez, A.O., 2014. Effects of organizational justice, employee satisfaction, and gender on employees’ commitment: evidence from the World. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(2), p.45.
Jackson, S.E., Joshi, A. and Erhardt, N.L., 2013. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of management, 29(6), pp.801-830.
Jensen, M., 2016. The LEGO Group – About Us LEGO.com. [online] Lego.com. Available at: https://www.lego.com/en-us/aboutus/lego-group [Accessed 2 Aug. 2016].
Jensen, M.B., Hienerth, C. and Lettl, C., 2014. Forecasting the Commercial Attractiveness of Userâ€ÂGenerated Designs Using Online Data: An Empirical Study within the LEGO User Community. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(1), pp.75-93.
Keinz, P., Hienerth, C. and Lettl, C., 2012. Designing the organization for user innovation. Journal of Organization Design, 1(3), pp.20-36.
Kim, G.J., 2015. A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality rehabilitation and therapy. Presence, 14(2), pp.119-146.
Kim, K.H. and Coxon, S.V., 2016. Fostering Creativity Using Robotics among Students in Stem Fields to Reverse the Creativity Crisis. In Interplay of Creativity and Giftedness in Science, 9(5), pp. 351-365.
Kourdi, J., 2015. Business strategy: a guide to effective decision-making. New Jersey: Public Affairs.
Kurkovsky, S., 2016. A LEGO-based Approach to Introducing Test-Driven Development. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 8(2), pp. 246-247.
Lancellotti, V. and Tijhuis, A.G., 2014. Mixed LEGO-EFIE approach for the analysis of radiating elements and anisotropic media. In The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, 8(5), pp. 2598-2602.
Madsen, B., Rzevski, G., Skobelev, P. and Tsarev, A., 2013. A strategy for managing complexity of the global market and prototype real-time scheduler for LEGO supply chain. International Journal of Software Innovation (IJSI), 1(2), pp.28-39.
Marketing, G. and Logue, C., 2015. Seminar assignments-LEGO Case Study. Strategic Direction, 25(2), pp.5-9.
Martin, F.G., 2012. Circuits to control: Learning engineering by designing LEGO robots. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 12(6), pp. 56-61.
McCusker, S.E.A.N., 2014. Lego, Seriously: Thinking through building. Intl. J. Knowledge, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), pp.27-37.
Muhammad S. C., 2015. A Comparative Study of Strategic Planning Practices of SMEs and Largeâ€ÂSized Business Organizations in Emerging Economies: The Case of UAE. Strategic Change, 24(6), pp.553-567.
Onishi, Y., Tominaga, H., Hayashi, T. and Yamasaki, T., 2014. Exercise analysis and lesson plan with robot behavior in LEGO programming contest for problem solving learning. In Proceedings of Ed-Media, 2(1), pp. 1943-1950.
Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V., 2013. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. London: Harvard Business Press.
Roos, J., Victor, B. and Statler, M., 2014. Playing seriously with strategy. Long Range Planning, 37(6), pp.549-568.
Schlagwein, D. and Bjørn-Andersen, N., 2014. Organizational learning with crowdsourcing: The revelatory case of LEGO. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(11), p.754.
Schoemaker, P.J. and Krupp, S., 2015. Overcoming barriers to integrating strategy and leadership. Strategy & Leadership, 43(2), pp.23-32.
Schoemaker, P.J., Krupp, S. and Howland, S., 2013. Strategic leadership: The essential skills. Harvard business review, 91(1), pp.131-134.
Schultz, M. and Hatch, M.J., 2013. The cycles of corporate branding: The case of the LEGO company. California Management Review, 46(1), pp.6-26.
Seyedhosseini, S.M., Cyrus, K.M., Fahimi, K. and Badkoobehi, H., 2015. A new methodology to construct organization’s strategies based on supply chain concept. International Journal of Engineering Science, 26(2), pp. 2008-4870.
Sherrow, L.A., 2015. Using Commercially Available Picture Activity Schedules and System of Least Prompts to Teach Lego Assembly. Harvard business review, 1(1), pp.13-14.
Srivastava, T.P., 2015. Innovation strategy to sustain a technological edge for national security & global leadership. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 6(4), pp. 67-73.
Van den Bosch, F.A.J. and De Man, A.P. eds., 2013. Perspectives on strategy: contributions of Michael E. Porter. New Jersey: Springer Science & Business Media.
Wong, C.Y. and Arlbjorn, J.S., 2012. Managing uncertainty in a supply chain reengineering project towards agility. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 3(4), pp.282-305.
Wong, H.Y., 2015. Is the International Marketing Channel Strategy Adapted? An Empirical Study. In Global Enterprise Management, 6(4), pp. 97-114.
Yurevich, S.D., 2014. Analysis of the internal environment of Lego Group based on the model 7s. Economics and innovations management, 3(1), pp. 8-10.
strategy-analysis-of-lego
Get a qualified writer to help you with
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline