The Need for Sustainability and Leadership in Russian Higher Education
Question:
Discuss about the Problems of Contemporary Education Socio-Cultural.
The world is confronting numerous interrelated issues — money related insecurity, social and financial imbalance, dangers to sustenance and vitality security, expanded wellbeing dangers, environmental change, contracting biodiversity and declining water and non-renewable energy source assets and other such exhaustible resources (Abramov et al., 2017). This has prompted a comprehension of the requirement for ‘sustainable development’. This is a form of improvement that perceives the interlinked idea of civilization, financial system and natural world that are capable of addressing the issues of the present without compromising the capacity of future ages to address their own particular issues (Aktas et al., 2015). As per UNESCO, Education for Sustainable Development [ESD] enables students to make educated choices and perform responsible activities for ecological uprightness, financial feasibility and a just and fair society, for the present generation and the generations which are yet to come, while considering cultural diversity (Kapitul?inová et al., 2018). Therefore, inclusion of sustainability and leadership principles within the teaching programs of Russian universities appears to be a mandate.
Sustainability and leadership in the domain of higher education is about deep rooted learning, and is a fundamental part of value training (Egorov et al., 2015). It is because education for Sustainable Development is all encompassing and transformational instruction, which tends to learning substance and results, teaching method and the learning condition (Annan-Diab & Molinari, 2017). Moreover, it accomplishes its motivation by bringing about alteration in society (Beattie, 2018). Education for Sustainable Development, functions much more than providing pupils data about manageability or sustainability (Vasyakin et al., 2016). This is evidently because education for Sustainable Development is about providing chances to work cooperatively, to welcome numerous points of view, to be intelligent, to think fundamentally and innovatively, and act productively; in other words, it is also about the all-round development and implementation of the entire range of qualities of leadership (Salimova, Guskova & Neretina, 2015). It must also be noted that the higher education institutions must include sustainability and leadership qualities in their curriculum and pedagogy, since this is expected to empower the students with skills and knowledge and further render them capable of living and working in a sustainable manner (Ivashchenko et al., 2017). It has been a proven fact that leadership in the environment and sustainability training, makes an important commitment to long tenure regional and worldwide manageability through Education for Sustainable Development (Salimova, Guskova & Neretina, 2015).Additionally, the study can be justified in that both employers and students are in demand of a more noteworthy presence of sustainability and leadership skills in advanced or higher educational programs (Alonso-Almeida et al., 2015).
Education is an irreplaceable component for accomplishing sustainable improvement. Russia takes a dynamic part in the provincial Strategy on Education for Sustainable Development. From one perspective, Russia possesses abundant natural resources. Then again, there are numerous industries bringing about unsalvageable harm to the earth. Therefore, the issue of eeducation for susstainable advancement has an exceptional significance for Russia.
Education for Sustainable Development in Russian Universities
The associations, namely- school instruction and working environment preparation, and the need of casual courses for people who have graduated from the educational system, for example, through non-governmental organizations, cannot be the spine in training for sustainable improvement in Russia, in light of the fact that the Russian social model requires strong government support (Kamalova & Raykova, 2016). Consequently, the objective of the paper is to recognize issues in the execution of the idea of sustainable improvement in Russian higher education and to detail standards of the national development framework in light of the idea of sustainability. The accompanying assignments are to be done to accomplish the objective:
- to inspect existing government state instructive guidelines from the situation of the perception of sustainability
- to examine projects of advanced education regarding sustainable improvement and leadership principles
- to define recommendations for the advancement of higher education in view of the idea of sustainability.
The following questions help in the progress of the research:
- Does the federal state education of Russia maintain a standard with respect to sustainability?
- Are the programs of higher education in Russia liable to sustainable development?
- Does the concerned authorities formulate proposals based on the concept of sustainability and principles of leadership?
According to Kamalova and Raykova (2016), the higher education framework is a key component of the national arrangement of development. The uniqueness of the advanced education framework lies in its capacity to acknowledge instruction, research, development and incitement. Research associations, inventive undertakings and development framework, are generally in charge of the phases of the advancement procedure—research, commercialization of the research outcomes, large scale manufacturing of creative items. Kashina et al. (2016) states that universities are engaged with the usage of all phases of the development cycle, from arrangement of profoundly qualified faculty to commercialization of research outcomes. Since the capacities actualized by the advanced education framework are nearly interlinked, improvement of the advanced education framework based on the idea of sustainable advancement and principles of leadership, ought to happen in each of the four utilitarian territories and prompt a multiplier impact.
As Beattie (2018) opines, the progress to higher education for sustainable improvement is not likely to require noteworthy assets (unlike pre-school and school instruction), since, most importantly, it needs to utilize the current hierarchical resources:
- Inclusion of standards of sustainable advancement in the fundamental part of educational projects as general proficient capabilities or as a part of the common culture.
- Inter-disciplinary approach and association of monetary, human and engineering controls in educational projects.
- Inter-staff reconciliation in the acknowledgment of teaching designs and learning projects. Along these lines pupils of the existent task and research activities will have substantially more elevated amount of improvement and mindfulness which are bound to get reflected in their future professions.
Kashina et al. (2016) states that sustainable development is the main conceivable reason for the advance of the national economy, with regards to the extending of worldwide human issues. It is important to examine and to make an arrangement of rules that actualize the idea of sustainable advancement in all areas of economy. Basically, Kashina et al. (2016) states that it is fundamental in the domain of learning and advancements, owing to the fact that the improvement of a national arrangement of advancement assumes a key part in the transformation to one knowledge economy. According to As Beattie (2018), the requirement for action in the field of environmental instruction was perceived quite a while back, however, higher education for the purpose of sustainable development is a more extensive idea.
According to Kamalova and Raykova (2016), it is important to inspect the sites of various universities in Russia to distinguish admission standards and the substance of educational projects. As stated by Annan-Diab and Molinari (2017), examination of the arrangement of Federal State Educational Standards demonstrates an exceptionally limited way to deal with the sustainable advancement. The ‘competence model’ in Federal State Educational Standards incorporates three kinds of competence: general intellectual, general proficient and expert. Educational program and substance of courses are characterized by this arrangement of capabilities. Therefore, as Salimova, Guskova and Neretina (2015) states, if any standard contains a competence, it will absolutely be incorporated in the learning procedure. On the off chance that the standard does contain a stated competence, only a globally acclaimed teacher and teaching standard will be acceptable. Nevertheless, the idea of sustainable improvement is hardly known in Russian culture. According to Kashina et al. (2016), comprehension of the possibility of sustainable advancement is at a low level. Kamalova and Raykova (2016) argues that the fundamental part of higher education incorporates 54 gatherings of educational projects in eight zones; the aggregate number of instructive projects is 179. One is likely to discover sustainable improvement as a zone of activity, only in four educational projects: ‘Ecology and Nature Management’, ‘Geography’, ‘Cartography and Geoinformatics’ (a gathering earth science), and ‘Landscape Architecture’.
An examination of the rundown of colleges which understand these instructive projects has demonstrated that:
- Predominantly established universities contain ‘Geography and Cartography’ and ‘Geoinformatics’ lessons.
- ‘Ecology and Nature Management’ is acknowledged basically in biological and topographical resources. Endeavors to execute this educational program in economical universities are not upheld by the governmental administration.
- ‘Landscape Architecture’ is acknowledged in agrarian universities.
At Master’s level, these four instructive projects are adopted by numerous universities. Likewise, Egorov et al. (2015) states that a few universities in Moscow and St. Petersburg execute programs for sustainable administration, however as a rule these projects are twofold degree programs with abroad universities, costly and not exceptionally well known.
References
Abramov, A. P., Chuikov, O. E., Gavrikov, F. A., & Ludwig, S. D. (2017). The Problems of Contemporary Education Socio-Cultural Dimension of Military Education in Modern Russia. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(2), 189-195.
Aktas, C. B., Whelan, R., Stoffer, H., Todd, E., & Kern, C. L. (2015). Developing a university-wide course on sustainability: A critical evaluation of planning and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 216-221.
Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 73-83.
Beattie, L. (2018). “We’re all mad here…” Soviet leadership and its impact on education through the looking glass of Raymond Williams’s cultural materialism. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 1-8.
del Mar Alonso-Almeida, M., Marimon, F., Casani, F., & Rodriguez-Pomeda, J. (2015). Diffusion of sustainability reporting in universities: current situation and future perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 144-154.
Egorov, E. E., Lebedeva, T. E., Bulganina, S. V., & Vasilyeva, L. I. (2015). Some aspects of the implementation of the principle of transparency in Russian universities: research, experience, perspectives. International Education Studies, 8(5), 191.
Ivashchenko, O., Yarmak, O., Galan, Y., Nakonechnyi, I., & Zoriy, Y. (2017). Leadership as a fundamental aspect of the performance of student-athletes in university men’s sports teams. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17(1), 472.
Kamalova, L. A., & Raykova, E. (2016). The quality and criteria of evaluation of educational work at the universities of Russia at the contemporary stage. Mathematics Education, 11(1), 71-79.
Kapitul?inová, D., AtKisson, A., Perdue, J., & Will, M. (2018). Towards integrated sustainability in higher education–Mapping the use of the Accelerator toolset in all dimensions of university practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4367-4382.
Kashina, S. G., Chudnovskiy, A. D., Aleksandrova, N. S., Shamov, I. V., & Borovaya, M. A. (2016). Management of Students’ Vocational Training in Conditions of Social Partnership between the University and Industry. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(3), 447-456.
Salimova, T., Guskova, N., & Neretina, E. (2015). Education for sustainable development in Russia: problems and challenges. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 9(3-4), 246-261.
Vasyakin, B. S., Ivleva, M. I., Pozharskaya, Y. L., & Shcherbakova, O. I. (2016). A Study of the Organizational Culture at a Higher Education Institution [Case Study: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE)]. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(10), 11515-11528.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
