Tesla’s Innovation Strategy And Organizational Management

Existing Capabilities of Tesla for Delivering Appropriate Innovation

Entrepreneurship is a creation and delivery of value as it is viewed as a change for encountering a business in the inclusion of other values apart from economic ones. Tesla is an automotive vehicle that America that designs and manufactures electric cars as well as battery storage as well as related products and services. This study will focus on the existing capabilities of Tesla for delivering appropriate innovation and how people are recruited for supporting innovation. The paper will also focus on how innovation is carried out with external stakeholders and how organization reconciles explanatory learning to innovation performance.

Building new infrastructure seems to be an easy strategy as it can take time and effort for incumbents requiring old ways of doing things and building new capabilities. Tesla’s ecosystem strategy makes consideration for individual components in the products. The profits in an industry tend to follow the bottleneck components that limit the performance of the system (Wang, Duan and Liu 2021). In the case of electric cars, batteries are made by limiting the power capacity of most applications as a bottleneck for the performance of systems. By investing in batteries and producing scales in better ways Tesla is betting on how to control the bottleneck for the profit centre.

Tesla’s strategy aims at setting an entire set of compliments needed for the consumers to utilize a product. Tesla is the only electric car that drives long distances as there is infrastructure in the charging areas. In the future, there are advantages that might erode the automakers to build charging networks in the existing dealership network that delivers potentially convenient services. As of now, Tesla acquires an advantage to extend its inter-operationality with newer networks like EVgo. Regardless of its success, Tesla’s advantage lies in building charging networks and piggybacking on existing dealerships in community services. Tesla’s future lies in the market value for seeing the potential of Tesla’s future in a combined market value for GM, Ford, FiatChrysler. Tesla’s strategy accounts for a system-level understanding of the sets for the future of the industry (Alexandra and Denise 2020). Tesla’s advantage is in looking out for opportunities with inter-operability and newer networks that are fundamentally changing the industry.  

The diagnostic framework is a toolset needed to support organizations in becoming entrepreneurial and commercial. This framework builds on the practice as well as experience in advising and supporting clients for becoming innovative, commercial, and entrepreneurial. Covering this spectrum lies how strategy, people, government, risk as well as supplier and partnership management as well as funding, balance sheet as well as organization (Thomas and Maine 2018). The features of Tesla’s framework lie in how well it is needed for digitalization. One of the greatest processes that Tesla does is in creating sustainability and energy savings. Tesla’s corporate structure supports emphasis on global leadership for automotive and energy solutions in the market.

Tesla produces innovative products for the inclusion of a product range in electric cars that defies customer expectations in its U form organizational structure. The unitary form of the organizational structure determines how the company has a structural group of employees for engineering and another for sales and serviceability. In the business analysis case of Tesla, the organizational structure undertakes a traditional form of managerial focus and control for the company’s operations (Grass, Backmann and Hoegl 2020). Elon Musk’s leadership is determined by the structure’s ability to implement new strategies and manage its operational effectiveness through its organizational structure. Tesla’s corporate structure is based on how companies are able to maintain a traditional corporate structure to maintain strict control of their operations. Tesla maintains a significant amount of the business function at a significant feature. Tesla’s company analysis is in grouping the business function based on its significant feature.

Tesla’s Ecosystem Strategy

Tesla spokesperson confirmed performance reviews for performance reviews occur on an annual basis and employees meet with managers in order to discuss their achievements. Tesla’s purpose is in helping expedite the move from a hydrocarbon economy to a solar electric economy. Like most organizations, Tesla’s size and influence and its performance management system are related to the mystery (Braun and Boström 2021). For the starters, it seems that the culture of performance management has changed dramatically over the last years for which it has changed dramatically. The diagnostic evaluation framework benefits opportunities for innovative revenue and optimized solutions through innovative commercial models. In this aspect, strong governance requires clear decision-making through multiple organizations and access to benchmarks for other similar organizations.  

Tesla has been hitting deadlines and is revolutionizing a culture that helps expedite the automobile world that cannot be imagined. The applicants at Tesla demonstrated that they possess qualities for highlighting specific references in order to imply the character they are showing for. The framework builds upon an experience of advising clients about the benefit of ensuring opportunities in creating innovative practices for revenue-generating ideas. Leaders impose common constraints on innovation teams such as budget and risk (Yao et al. 2020). Tesla has led the race to power electric vehicles and the company released innovative chargers for inclusion of innovation charging and destination charging. Tesla has currently led the race through arguably being one of the most innovative companies resulting in an extreme level of hardware as well as software integration.

The organizational process needed to initiate battery makers lie in how Tesla utilized some of the batteries for Tesla vehicles. The deal for graphite is in the battery supply-related deal that shows how the supply chain is set to be developed in the coming years. As the company does not respond to making raw materials for material design, Tesla requires diverse suppliers in raw materials as they are processed where batteries and cars are assembled near batteries where cars are assembled (Phirouzabadi et al. 2020). The plant will process onto wanting for geographically diverse suppliers in raw materials. Tesla’s mission lies in acceleration of business from world transition to sustainable energy.

As EV industry grows, Tesla requires geographically diverse raw materials for finished products processed where batteries are assembled. In EV penetration, the EV models make a commitment to growing rapidly in the coming years. As a result, it is committed to billions in EV programs. Spending includes moves up to beef on EV development in assembly capacity. This spending includes beefing up the supply chain for assembly capacity (Alescio-Lautier et al. 2021). The spending is initiated for wanting to secure the supply of lithium as the industry develops. The organizational processes in a high-performance economy. The continuous process provides flexibility for the organization in delivering flexibility in an organization. Tesla’s main resources consist of the battery pack that has a structural group to the maintenance of sales and service (Casidy et al. 2021). As Tesla’s main resource, the strategy elements lie in determining the development of vehicle models to enhance market share.

Diagnostic Framework for Entrepreneurship and Commercialization

The issue faced by Tesla is the imposition of import taxes. Tesla has attempted to bring alternative technologies that limit the effect of greenhouse gas emissions. The automaker’s mission lies in accelerating the world transition to keep up with enhanced demand (Ramirez-Montoya 2020). The key challenge here lies in the high costs of batteries and uncompetitive performance in the market. In case the challenge remains unmet, the industry is considered to be unlucrative from an investment perspective. If the challenges remain unmet, there are likely chances that the industry is considered unlucrative from an investment perspective. Tesla’s ‘Open Innovation Policy’ lies in addressing the nationwide and company-specific challenge for the development of electric vehicles (Kuhlmann and Rip 2018).

As of present, the current electric battery challenges are not cheaper than existing combustion options. Knowledge sharing assists the company in accelerating levels of progress and overcoming the general knowledge of internal combustion options. In such a case, Tesla needs to share in forming competitive advantages for accelerating progress levels (Dahabieh, Bröring and Maine 2018). The focus of deriving disruptive technology is on announcing open innovation as it is considered to be a significant portion of Tesla’s value-driven by intellectual property rights as well as advancements in technology. Prior to announcing on the policy of open innovation, it is considered to be established from the competitive landscape in Tesla’s approach.

Tesla publishes the annual report by disclosing the data as well as the strengths and values of the company. Tesla is quite productive in the identification of the risk factors as they exist in the external environment. Tesla’s early years are determined by dependency on groups as investors (Bertoni 2018). They are critical for the company’s capitalization and cash flow wherein the investors and shareholders are concerned for profitability as well as business profitability and business growth. Tesla is presently leading to greater innovation and how supply chains make customers be an obvious impact on satisfaction and insight levels. Businesses can gather customer insights and satisfaction insights. Musk’s business recognizes the success levels of a vast range of stakeholders to be easily forgotten. Musk’s system approach shows that suppliers are the key drivers of success such as stability and reduced stability and decreased quality in the accommodation of products and services (Thomas and Maine 2019). By close association with stakeholders, Musk is able to bring better results for the business that is concerned.

Virtually businesses have a certain level of engagement that complains onto PR line for the client management team to be considered for the business to engage with stakeholders critical for success. As such the existing strategy is not good enough for being good enough in future perspective (Teece 2018). The process of stakeholder engagement lies in creating a flex over time and accommodating distinguishable forms in engagement levels. Therefore, it recognizes that business success is in a sense of a vast range of stakeholders for understanding the engagement levels.

Tesla decided onto fixing the problem of getting rid of complex networks in conveyor belts for the mass market. Tesla made its headlines for delivering new projected to reach the nine months on average. The investors sold onto its brands to be halted multiple engineering times. Elon Musk’s agreed on production problems to maintain consistency and accuracy levels. In assembling cars, the task makes a requirement for flexibility and creative problem solving necessary for human skills that makes it better for them. Tesla decided on fixing a problem that is virtually impossible for robots. In order to complement own admissions, production problems with Model 3 through which decisions are met for determining the human skills in which they are better.

Tesla’s Organizational Structure and Performance Management System

Automation is significant for the business and they are a substantial contribution to value creation. By their own nature, there are repetitive tasks in which machines are less prone to mistakes than those humans. Collaborative intelligence requires assigning tasks that are of automation to require initiative and flexibility by humans. These tasks in which humans and machines complement enhance one another. Tesla decided on working equally well in the services that it does in manufacturing (Griffin and Grote 2020). Thinking about robotic surgery in a machine, the human surgeon controls the robotic arm through the computer. The analysis revealed by Tesla is that it is under threat of significant financial loss and it is valid to say that the main reason lies in limited profitability. The issue is discussed in how organizational success is created from hazard problems that have an effect on profitability.

In the technological domain, exploratory innovations fundamentally change the technological trajectory determined by exploitative innovations resulting in small changes in current technological capabilities. Explorative learning determines the activities that facilitate a team to search and experiment with new knowledge. The learning method makes a requirement for utilizing the existing knowledge from past experiences as well as organizational norms (Seidle 2019). As an ambidextrous organization, it has the ability to mature markets and establish new products as well as services in emerging markets simultaneously.

The distinct approaches to innovation lie in exploration, as well as exploitation and exploration, involve innovation to start from scratch and start afresh in building new methods for present resources and products. The exploration refers to associated radical changes and learning through means of experimentation. The distinct approaches are in an approach of how they build on new methods based on existing resources and products. The difference in exploratory and explorative is that it serves on investigating that is explorative rather than exploratory.

Generating profitability

Tesla’s profitability is a true reflection of its future progress for the company. For instance, the gross profit implies how it has enhanced from 2017 to the year ending in 2020. This trend implies that Tesla has a higher future for meeting the demand for electric cars for increases. The growth for Tesla is attributed to future demand for electric cars as there are more consumers becoming environmentally conscious (Shao, Wang and Yang 2021). In the case of potential customers, they broaden the channels for future clients. In case the divisions of different promising industries are set up, the company processes a wider range of revenue resources in risk diversification. In this aspect, the profitability lies in controlling the bottleneck to the profit centre for scaling ideas in better ways.

 Increasing efficiency

Tesla is in building its motor inventor sourcing from Tier 1 suppliers. In this approach, Tesla requires a constant tweak to those parts that help in maximizing efficiency levels. As maximizing is not in its battery, the approach lies in a constant efficiency enhancement anywhere that can enhance range. Tesla’s invertor and details step onto making the oil pump needed for bringing efficient bearings and seals within a few miles in range. In a way to squeeze out on efficiency levels, this innovation is rolled out on product lines pushed into existing vehicles through updates over the air. Constant tweaking and approach are squeezing the energy for being built in assembled in-house.

Battery Supply Chain Management for Tesla’s Electric Vehicles

Expansion of foreign markets

The strategy of Tesla lies in the focus on enhancement in its manufacturing process for expansion into the foreign markets as well as product lines. As these expansions are ineffective in nature, it generates revenues for the current factory that cannot maintain production efficiency. Tesla also needs to diversify its current system in order to maintain efficiency levels (Dana 2018). In addition to that, creating a strong supplier power creates a potential for future delays wherein the current rate of cash spending requires Tesla to find cutting costs or expand on its financing as well as investment activities. Tesla needs to find ways for cutting on its costs in order to finance on investing activities. Commercializing on the market is in creating new technologies into the market for bringing sales growth and higher shareholder value.

Application of effective marketing methods

Tesla needs to make use of an effective strategy in marketing such as word of mouth. Therefore, the referral program for the brand lies in sharing experiences with that other. Consumers for instance tend to trust recommendations they gain from others through channels that are brand-owned. In order to win support, offering lessons to win support is in gaining new technologies into the market (Stobbe 2019). Innovators need to focus on making a transformation in the industry for supporting the idea of bringing newer technologies into the market. As such, these efforts deal with winning resources for commercializing on the idea that have come together for a common goal and achieving a central idea for innovation into the market.

Multi-prone strategy

Regardless of Tesla’s future success, the company has acquired a fascinating multi-prone strategy for changing the industry. The core strategy lies in a unique element at each system overturning the entire product through a key bottleneck in resolving system level limitations by the adoption of technology. At the same time, they have adopted onto supporting winning resources for executing a vision (Noel et al. 2019). Application of an effective approach in bottle-neck solution lies in building the resources based on supporting resources for executing the vision. Investors imply Tesla’s future for exceeding a combined market value that exceeds executing a vision. Investors, therefore, acquire the potential for supporting and executing the vision.

Charging networks

Tesla’s strategy accounts the system level the entire set of complements needed for consumers to utilize its product. Tesla has built onto a charging network for its cars across the country. Acting through early enabled Tesla is the only electric car that drives onto long distances for charging. In future this advantage lies in developing dealership networks for offering more convenient services. As of now Tesla acquires an advantage to be looked into by extension of inter-operability in new networks like EVgo (Harvard Business Review 2022). Building new infrastructure for an easy strategy to intimate on developing new capabilities. Historically they are great mechanical engineers and not totally software engineers. Tesla’s ecosystem is considered in the level of education for exiting leadership.

Tesla’s Mission for Accelerating Sustainable Energy Transition

High performing automobile maker

Considering the disagreements aside, the company shifted to developing electric vehicles that have achieved a consistent level of revenue. At the initial start of 2020, Tesla has been the highest performing automaker with sales and long-term shareholder value. As technology and innovation scholars, they commercialize into the new market to be set as significant members of the team (Alexandra and Denise 2020). Surely, this method applies to seeming what applies to madness for many people. In terms of vehicle and automobile maker, Toyota and Volkswagen is counted among the automobile makers on a worldwide basis. The U.S car brands are assembled and distributed for leading manufacturers by the companies.

Enhanced efficiency

Tesla’s innovation strategy lies in focusing on transforming the auto industry as a whole and how they offer enduring lessons for the innovator. Upon releasing innovative chargers, inclusion for home chargers and destination charging is inherent. Tesla’s development strategy is in making grabbing moves the acceleration faster than any production car.

Being transparent in open matters

Tesla’s stock wobbles are driven by manufacturing issues that are driven by short-term manufacturing delivery schedules. The recent drop in Tesla’s shipping lies in 22,000 vehicles in the second quarter pushing the first half of sales in its lower guidance range. Tesla softening competitors on the roll for electric models is indicated for being transparent on things that matter. In other words, attaining a transparent personality is in assuring, to be honest and reliable in nature (Straub et al. 2020). Transparency as a practice implies a practice of being honest with matters no matter how challenging it might be. In both professional and personal relationships is to thrive, with a need to eliminate whatever comes in being straightforward in nature.

Considering the international level, Tesla’s strategy is that of a transitional one. This implies that the company is present in different countries that are benefited from Tesla’s global structure that can adapt to the product and sales approach in order to meet the local requirements. Tesla cars are originally produced to achieve a high level of vertical integration as well as cost savings in all steps of the production process. Based on the market capitalization, Tesla is the most valuable car company on earth (Habib et al. 2020). As a result, Tesla is significantly lesser cars than established rivals in which investors have very hopes for the future of the American electric cars company. Tesla’s international expansion is in managing control over its operations and vertical integration in internationalizing in an efficient manner.

The product strategy for Tesla is similar to that of technology companies. They entered into the market with a high price point for a low number of units produced and products aimed at wealthy adopters. In case it was Tesla with a fully electric sports car. One specific aspect is in the company’s growth that takes a look at its internationalization strategy (Kim 2020). Tesla sells lower cars with significant rivals that have a six-fold enhancement for the future unfolds of the company. Another focus of Tesla’s characteristic is in delving into an internationalization strategy focusing on its vertical integration. The combined fact is that in the entire production process Tesla can benefit from cost reductions and implementation of innovation quickly and effectively (Chen and Perez 2020). Having a fair valuation from bubble to burst, ardent critics demonstrated impressive growth over time. Through a transnational strategy, Tesla is setting up stores and starting production for distinguishable focus regions.

Tesla also makes employment for direct selling. All stores and service centres are owned by the company directly and stand in stark contrast to its franchise dealership model which traditional franchise model that authoritative companies use. The company states that following this strategy can have better service coverage in order to inform customers about the cars as existing dealers have conflicts of interest between gasoline-powered and electric cars. Tesla achieves a high level of vertical integration for cost savings and necessitates the production process to be located there (Ingram 2019). In the year 2019, Tesla also initiated production at Tesla Giga Shanghai. As of now, only the final assembly is done through the factory in Shanghai. As of now, the final assembly is done by the factory for meeting the growing Chinese market.

In order to cover the European market, Tesla’s production starts as early as 2021. In this manner, Tesla continues to make this approach of retaining complete control in the production process to have designated fully owned factories in two markets that they currently have in through a strong presence in Europe and China. Also, Elon Musk announced an expansion of this region by starting across Dubai in UAE. The reasoning is that this was in UAE, that despite the wealth from its oil it has announced heavy investment into green technology for the next years (Taffel 2018). Over time, as research and development progress there are subsequent cheaper and cheaper while the company can benefit from economies of scale. The end goal is the provision of affordable vehicles for the mass market. The vertical integration for Tesla indicates how they are allowed to innovate quickly and this crisis is effectively initiated for continuing to be so in the future. In the provision of a range of opportunities, it can learn from conceptualizing and experimenting with how organizations can create value for stakeholders in a more sustainable and equitable approach.

Tesla aims to create affordable options to create a broader customer base and expand its geographical footprint with production facilities in China and U.S. As an innovation strategy, the common innovation mission lies in setting an extensive plan and creating new value for which the customers are willing to pay. One of the greatest processes for Tesla is in making a separate for its two pillars such as headline-grabbing moves for launching Cybertruck or the Roadster 2.0. The quality of battery partner is in a continual improvement for packs as well as battery chemistry. The innovation strategy of Tesla is in entering the market where the customers are required to make a premium and drive down the market to higher unit volumes and lower prices for the successive model (Tenhundfeld et al. 2020).

Tesla also tries in capturing value for being the first mover and building competitiveness for its continuous innovation. As an American manufacturer, it is founded in setting batteries and cars across home power storage. The strategy for Tesla lies in entering the high market where customers pay a premium and drive down the market for attaining this successive model. In the same way customers are adopting onto zero-emissions in lifecycles for running sustainable energy systems that facilitate utilization of energy generation where storage is possible (Lu et al. 2022). Tesla’s production process is initiated for the “Best Innovation Award” as published in TIME magazine. The concept of sustainable development lies in drafting on the pillars of social, economic, and environmental contexts.

In order to be successful in nature, Tesla must initiate an innovation that satisfies the customer’s needs. Innovation does not bring the desired success for bringing real benefits to the customers aimed at the wrong target group of customers. In innovation management, the strategic planning for innovation is in formulating a development mandate for new products and processes. The crisis is characterized by rhythms in economic cycles carried out for centuries. Therefore, this innovation strategy is in setting creative ideas that motivate them into enjoying the process of working. Training, as well as developing employees, helps them to utilize their skills and expertise for thinking in an innovative manner creating something novel for the organization (Dai 2020). The R&D is in gaining customer satisfaction for keeping employees well-trained and develop them in an innovative manner. Through imaginative and persistent solutions, Tesla aims to reduce pollution and initiate sustainable transport in being sustainable and innovative for the company.

References

Alescio-Lautier, B., Chambon, C., Deshayes, C., Anton, J.L., Escoffier, G., Ferrer, M.H. and Paban, V., 2021. Problem-solving training modifies cognitive functioning and related functional connectivity in healthy adults. Neuropsychological rehabilitation, pp.1-36.

Alexandra, O. and Denise, W., 2020. An evaluation methodology applied to trust-based adapted systems for e-assessment: Connecting responsible research and innovation with a human-centred design approach. In Engineering Data-Driven Adaptive Trust-based e-Assessment Systems (pp. 239-265). Springer, Cham.

Alexandra, O. and Denise, W., 2020. An evaluation methodology applied to trust-based adapted systems for e-assessment: Connecting responsible research and innovation with a human-centred design approach. In Engineering Data-Driven Adaptive Trust-based e-Assessment Systems (pp. 239-265). Springer, Cham.

Bertoni, A., 2018. Role and challenges of data-driven design in the product innovation process. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), pp.1107-1112.

Braun, S. and Boström, M., 2021. Organizing for the generation of radical innovations.

Casidy, R., Claudy, M., Heidenreich, S. and Camurdan, E., 2021. The role of brand in overcoming consumer resistance to autonomous vehicles. Psychology & Marketing, 38(7), pp.1101-1121.

Chen, Y. and Perez, Y., 2018. Business model design: lessons learned from Tesla Motors. In Towards a Sustainable Economy (pp. 53-69). Springer, Cham.

Dahabieh, M.S., Bröring, S. and Maine, E., 2018. Overcoming barriers to innovation in food and agricultural biotechnology. Trends in food science & technology, 79, pp.204-213.

Dai, R., 2020. The Analysis of Tesla’s Competitive Strategy for the Chinese Market.

Dana, C., 2018. A Strategic Audit of Tesla, Inc.: Electrifying our Future or About to Run out of Energy?.

Grass, A., Backmann, J. and Hoegl, M., 2020. From empowerment dynamics to team adaptability: exploring and conceptualizing the continuous agile team innovation process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(4), pp.324-351.

Griffin, M.A. and Grote, G., 2020. When is more uncertainty better? A model of uncertainty regulation and effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 45(4), pp.745-765.

Habib, T., Kristiansen, J.N., Rana, M.B. and Ritala, P., 2020. Revisiting the role of modular innovation in technological radicalness and architectural change of products: The case of Tesla X and Roomba. Technovation, 98, p.102163.

Harvard Business Review, 2022. Lessons from Tesla’s Approach to Innovation. [online] Harvard Business Review. Available at: <https://hbr.org/2020/02/lessons-from-teslas-approach-to-innovation> [Accessed 19 April 2022].

Ingram, N., 2018. Tesla Motors: A Potentially Disruptive Force in a Mature Industry. International journal of management and applied research, 5(1), pp.8-21.

Kim, H., 2020. Analysis of How Tesla Creates Core Innovation Capability. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(6), pp.42-61.

Kuhlmann, S. and Rip, A., 2018. Next-generation innovation policy and grand challenges. Science and public policy, 45(4), pp.448-454.

Lu, Z., Lyu, J., Wan, Z. and Wang, Y., 2022, March. The Optimal Machine Life in Tesla. In 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022) (pp. 890-894). Atlantis Press.

Noel, L., Sovacool, B.K., Kester, J. and de Rubens, G.Z., 2019. Conspicuous diffusion: Theorizing how status drives innovation in electric mobility. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, pp.154-169.

Phirouzabadi, A.M., Savage, D., Blackmore, K. and Juniper, J., 2020. The evolution of dynamic interactions between the knowledge development of powertrain systems. Transport Policy, 93, pp.1-16.

Ramirez-Montoya, M.S., 2020. Challenges for open education with educational innovation: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(17), p.7053.

Seidle, R.J., 2019. Sequences of learning types for organizational ambidexterity. The Learning Organization.

Shao, X., Wang, Q. and Yang, H., 2021. Business Analysis and Future Development of an Electric Vehicle Company–Tesla.

Stobbe Jr, J.J., 2019. A Strategic Audit of Tesla.

Straub, S., Mangesius, S., Emmerich, J., Indelicato, E., Nachbauer, W., Degenhardt, K.S., Ladd, M.E., Boesch, S. and Gizewski, E.R., 2020. Toward quantitative neuroimaging biomarkers for Friedreich’s ataxia at 7 Tesla: Susceptibility mapping, diffusion imaging, R2 and R1 relaxometry. Journal of neuroscience research, 98(11), pp.2219-2231.

Taffel, S., 2018. Hopeful extinctions? Tesla, technological solutionism and the anthropocene. Culture Unbound, 10(2), pp.163-184.

Teece, D.J., 2018. Tesla and the reshaping of the auto industry. Management and Organization Review, 14(3), pp.501-512.

Tenhundfeld, N.L., de Visser, E.J., Ries, A.J., Finomore, V.S. and Tossell, C.C., 2020. Trust and distrust of automated parking in a Tesla Model X. Human factors, 62(2), pp.194-210.

Thomas, V.J. and Maine, E., 2019. Market entry strategies for electric vehicle start-ups in the automotive industry–Lessons from Tesla Motors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, pp.653-663.

Thomas, V.J. and Maine, E., 2019. Market entry strategies for electric vehicle start-ups in the automotive industry–Lessons from Tesla Motors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, pp.653-663.

Wang, J., Duan, Y. and Liu, G., 2021. A study of specific open innovation issues from perspectives of open source and resources—The series cases of tesla. Sustainability, 14(1), p.142.

Yao, S., Akter, F., Zhang, R.Y. and Li, Z., 2020. Structural retinotopic analysis at 7-Tesla MRI in pituitary macroadenomas. Journal of Neurosurgery, 133(5), pp.1622-1624.