Inductive reasoning
1.
i) Thai people living with tuberculosis and how they adhere to treatment: A grounded theory study.
ii) Jiraporn Choowong, Per Tillgren and Maja Söderbäck,
iii) 2017
iv) Nursing and health sciences
v) 10.1111/nhs.12362
I) Inductive reasoning is the analysis of specific data collections in relation to a phenomenon to arrive to a more generalized conclusion. ‘Inductive reasoning is reaching to a conclusion by generalizing from examples of the whole category’ (Bengtsson, 2016)
- ii) Deductive reasoning in contrary to inductive reasoning moves from more generalized principles logically to specific conclusions. Ary et al(2018, p2) describe deductive reasoning as a thinking where one proceeds from general knowledge to a more specific form using logical arguments.
A qualitative research seeks to understand a real life occurrence, tries to find out the meaning people have attached to factors under study in their life and also emphasizes on the impact of the research on the daily life, Taylor et al (2015,p9-11). In a qualitative research data is collected from large sample size that represents the entire population, analyzed to come up with a logically evaluated conclusion. The article by Choowong, Tillgren and Söderbäck (2017) meets these requirements since it clearly evaluates a real life situation, has a large sample size that well represents the population. Data analysis is also well designed to reach reasonable conclusion.
i) As one’s bodyweight increases, chances of one developing diabetes also increases.
ii) Is there a distinct relation between C-reactive protein and the risk of developing type 2 diabetes?
i) Access medicine
ii) CRP and diabetes
iii) Verhagen, S.N., Wassink, A.M., Graaf, Y. and Visseren, F.L., 2013. C?reactive protein and incident diabetes in patients with arterial disease. European journal of clinical investigation, 43(10), pp.1052-1059.
i) A systematic review is an evaluation of a phenomenon based on findings by other researchers in various studies in the topic. Systematic review is a secondary evidence since they rely on information available which has been collected and analyzed previously.
ii) Systematic reviews study given phenomena on different dimensions involving a pool of experts. The kind of conclusion derived from the review is therefore inclusive of all the possible factors under study and thus chance of a valid conclusion on the study variable.
i) Google scholar database and the search terms: benefits of breastfeeding, systematic review
i) Horta, B.L., Loret de Mola, C. and Victora, C.G., 2015. Breastfeeding and intelligence: a systematic review and meta?Acta paediatrica, 104(S467), pp.14-19.
ii) According o, breastfeeding and intelligence quotient of children and adolescents are positively related Horta et al ( 2015, p15). Children who have been breastfed for longer duration show improved performance in intelligent tests. Follow-up also indicated that breastfeeding has a positive influence on schooling and adults’ performance too.
References
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Irvine, C.K.S. and Walker, D., 2018. Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Bengtsson, M., 2016. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, pp.8-14.
Choowong, J., Tillgren, P. and Söderbäck, M., 2017. Thai people living with tuberculosis and how they adhere to treatment: A grounded theory study. Nursing & health sciences, 19(4), pp.436-443.
Horta, B.L., Loret de Mola, C. and Victora, C.G., 2015. Breastfeeding and intelligence: a systematic review and meta?analysis. Acta paediatrica, 104(S467), pp.14-19.
Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R. and DeVault, M., 2015. Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley & Sons.
Verhagen, S.N., Wassink, A.M., Graaf, Y. and Visseren, F.L., 2013. C?reactive protein and incident diabetes in patients with arterial disease. European journal of clinical investigation, 43(10), pp.1052-1059.