Overview of the Big Five Personality Traits
Discuss about the Personality Traits of Job Performance Role.
The report helps in understanding the proper definition of Big Five Personality Traits that are required in order to define the individual characteristics. The Big Five Personality Traits helps in analysis of the personalities towards five main dimensions that includes openness, agreeableness, Neuroticism, extraversion as well as conscientiousness. The effect of the Five Factor Model helps in analyzing the usage of the personality traits in determining the different factors that affects the behavior of individuals in the daily life. The report also helps in discussing about the proper effect of Five Factor model on the intrapreneurial behavior of the individuals.
The main aim of the report is to understand the importance of the Five Personality Traits in the behavior of the individuals. The proper theories and models has to be discussed as this will help in analyzing the importance of the personality traits of the individuals and it will help in analyzing the importance of organizational commitment as well. The main purpose of the assignment is to analyze the importance of the intrapreneurial behavior of the individuals in the organization. The intrapreneurial behavior of the individuals has to be properly linked with the Five Factor Model that will help in analyzing the effect of the linkage between the FFM as well as intrapreneurial behavior of the individuals as well.
The structure of the report includes the effect of Five Personality Traits on the behavior of the individuals in the entire world. The effect of FFM on the intrapreneurial behavior has to be analyzed that will help in providing a brief idea on the importance of organizational commitment of the individuals in the different organizations as well. Lastly, the link between FFM and organizational commitment is essential as to understand the usage of personality traits in the organizations as well as in daily life (Salas and Iwig 2016).
The Five Personality Traits is essential and it helps in describing the different individual characteristics that are cognitive, behavioral as well as emotional aspects of the individuals in different organizations or in day-to-day life as well. The personality traits have become famous and help in the process of recruitment as well as in assessment that are done personally.
According to Rhoades (2014), the big five personality traits of the individuals, it helps in working multifunctional way as this helps in representing different personality trait theories that will have the same kind of framework. The Big Five Personality Traits is making huge and remarkable progress as this will help in analyzing the different attitudes of the individuals at workplace as well as in the normal life.
Five Dimensions of Personality Traits in Individuals
The Big Five Personality Traits helped in highlighting the different dimensions of the respective model that are discussed as follows:
- Openness to different kinds of experiences is one trait wherein it describes the different individuals who have interest in different kinds of things such as proper as well as accurate expression of emotions, feelings, ideas as well as ideas of different things (Reb, Narayanan and Chaturvedi 2014).
- Conscientiousness is another trait that helps in describing the individuals who have the tendency in order to showcase their discipline as well as performing the works in proper order as well. This is the trait wherein it helps in understanding the personal achievement starving in the different individuals (Seibert and DeGeest 2017).
- Agreeableness is the trait wherein this helps in describing the type of individuals who trust others easily and they are straightforward in nature as well. These are the different kinds of individuals who are tender mindedness as well as they are cooperative in nature with other individuals as well.
- Neuroticism is the type of trait that helps in describing the kind of individuals or person who feel too much anxiety as well as they get angry, depressed as well as they are self conscious in nature.
- Extroversion is the kind of trait wherein the individuals treat the others in the organization or outside as well with proper warmth and they try to maintain positive emotions in the organization as well. These are the kind of individuals who tries to seek simulation while companying other individuals in the entire organization (Power and Pluess 2015).
While there are different employees in the organizations, who evaluates the performance of the employees in the organization regarding the different skills as well as knowledge regarding different issues that are faced by them in the organization. The big five traits helps in understanding the different factors regarding the characteristics of the individuals in the organizations (Skarmeas, Lisboa and Saridakis 2016). The personalities of the individuals are the most essential element that has to be properly analyzed as this will help in analyzing the characteristics of the individuals that are possessed by them.
The five factor model of the personality traits help in analyzing the different factors that is known as OCEAN (Smith, Rees and Murray 2016). The individuals who do not exhibit the proper as well as clear picture of their self in front of other individuals have to be properly understood by the organizations. This will help the organizations as well to understand the different characteristics and analyze the behavior on the same basis as well. The Big Five Personality Traits Model helps in comprehending the relationship between the academic behaviors as well as the personality of the individuals as well. The descriptions of the different personality traits are described as follows:
The openness to experience is defined as the general appreciation that has been provided to the individuals for art, adventure, emotion as well as unusual ideas or the kind of curiosity of the individuals for the different situations as well. The individuals who are open to different kind of ideas and intellectually curious in nature as well are the ones who are openness to different kinds of challenges that are faced by them in the organization. There are different kind of individuals who are willing to try different things at workplace and in the day-to-day life (Sovacool et al. 2017).
These are the different kind of individuals in the organization who are open to different kind of challenges and this will help them in being more creative as well as aware about the different feelings perceived by them as well. There are different kinds of individuals in the organization who score high on the openness test and this helps in providing them the scope to enjoy different kinds of experiences as well. The openness to experience helps in flashing the different level of the intellectual curiosity of the individuals in the organization.
Significance of Personality Traits for Organizational Success
This can be elaborated as the scope wherein the individual is independent or imaginative in their thoughts and this helps in portraying the personal preference of the individuals for different kinds of activities over a scheduled routine (Spain, Harms and LeBreton 2014). It even includes curiousness or inventiveness that is contrast to the cautiousness or consistency as well. The openness to experience helps in analyzing the appreciation for different positive emotions as well as adventure unusual ideas along with other variety of the activities that is invited.
This is defined as the tendency of the individuals in being standardized in nature and this will help in analyzing the characteristics of the individuals who are focused on the goals as well as prioritizing the different activities according to the importance of the tasks. This is the personality trait that helps in understanding the behavior of the individuals about the efficiency that is required wherein the individuals are honest as well as cautious in nature. This is the kind of personality trait wherein proper planning is required as it is essential in nature and it is helpful in solving such issues as well (Peng et al. 2016). It helps in contrasting with the organized as well as efficient behavior or the careless behavior of the individuals. (Stoughton, Thompson and Meade 2013).
This is the kind of trait of the personality of the individuals in the organization that helps in understanding the tendency of the individuals of being cooperative as well as this will help in generating positive energy as well as tendency of the individuals to explore stimulation in the organization as well. These individuals contradict with the energetic or the reserved kind of behavior of the individuals in the organization. The individuals in the organization are the ones who are experiencing positive emotional feeling as well as the other qualities that will help in making the individuals more influential in nature (Turró, Urbano and Peris-Ortiz 2014).
This kind of the personality trait will help in understanding the different tendencies of being compassionate and cooperative in nature. This is the proper method of measuring the helpful as well as trusting behavior of the individuals in the workplace as well. This is the kind of personality trait that helps in analyzing that the individuals in the organization has the proper tendency to get along with the other individuals in the organization as well (Park, Kim and Krishna 2014).
Link between Big Five Personality Traits and Intrapreneurial Behavior
This is the kind of behavior or the trait that will help in contradicting with the nervous or the sensitive nature of the individuals in the organization. The attitude of being bias towards the other individuals in the organization will help in understanding the unpleasant emotions of the individuals such as depression, anxiety as well as other vulnerabilities of the individuals in the respective organization as well (Orchard, Sindakis and Ribiere 2014).
Analysis of the five personality traits
From the different personality traits of the individuals in the organization, it can be analyzed that empathy is important as well as essential in nature in order to understand the relationship between empathy and the big five personality traits of the individuals in the organization. According to Zgheib (2017), the five-factor model of personality traits of the individuals in the organization is useful in nature, as this will help in describing the different personalities of the individuals in the different organizations.
The five-factor model of the personality traits of the individuals in the organization helps in understanding the different correlation between the five personality traits of the individuals along with the organizational commitment and intrapreneurial behavior of the individuals towards the achievement of the organizational goals as well (Zajac et al. 2014). The five-factor model of the individuals helps in understanding the different assumptions of the trait theory. The trait theory is based on the different assumptions of the individuals in the organization wherein the five personality traits of the individuals in the organization are disjunctive as well as conjunctive in nature.
Intrapreneurship is the kind of behavior that is embodying taking different kinds of risks as well as help in radical innovation of the product as well. The activities that are related to Intrapreneurship behavior helps in improving the growth of the organization and this will enhance the profitability of the organization as well (Zopiatis, Constanti and Theocharous 2014).
Intrapreneurship is becoming popular in nature as this will become the concern for different organizations and this will have huge impact on the growth of the organization as well. Due to gaining competitive advantage in the competitive market, it is essential for the organizations to follow the intrapreneurial activities (Wille and De Fruyt 2014).
The extrovert individuals are warm, energetic as well as enthusiastic in nature as this will help them in feeling motivated about the different kinds of tasks that are performed by them. The extroversion is related to the intrapreneurial behavior that is positive in nature. The individuals who are extrovert in nature tries to find different ways that will help them in coping up with different ideas for the different problems that has been caused to them rather than just walking away from the problems (Wihler et al. 2017). The hypothesis statement helps in understanding that the there is a positive correlation between the extroversion as well as intrapreneurial behavior in the organizations.
Importance of Organizational Commitment in Intrapreneurial Behavior
Furthermore, agreeable is the trait that is wherein the individuals in the organization are cooperative as well as trustworthy in nature. These are the individuals who are good-natured and they are tolerant about the different activities that have to be followed by them. These kinds of individuals are more inclined towards the helping of other individuals in the organization and this helps them in creating proper communication process in the entire organization. From this particular analysis of the entire trait, this helps in understanding that agreeableness has a negative effect on the intrapreneurial behavior and they are correlated negatively (Wayne et al. 2013).
Before approaching towards the argument that is relating to the personality traits as well s the Intrapreneurship behavior wherein the terms has to be properly defined and this will help in analyzing the hypothesis between the five personality traits along with the intrapreneurial behavior. According to Oh and Wee (2016), personality is defined as the psychology of the personality that helps in determining the behavior as well as the forms of the personality that helps in describing the individual best. There are different kinds of personality traits wherein few of them are positively related to each other and there are few that are negatively related to one another.
There are different kinds of researchers who had described the risk taking as well as the innovativeness as dimensions of the Intrapreneurship activities in the organizations. Furthermore, it is noticeable that Intrapreneurship behavior has been given equal importance as that of the organizational behavior as both are equally important in nature and this will help in understanding the different dimensions of the Intrapreneurship behavior as well. Proper development of hypothesis is conducted as this will help in understanding as well as analyzing the issues and this will help in sorting the issues with proper hypothetical statements and views as well (Northouse 2015).
Similarly, agreeableness is another trait of personality that includes trust, cooperative as well as courteous behaviors. These kinds of individuals tend to be good-natured, considerate as well as tolerant in nature. However, in contrary to this, there are different individuals who score much less on the particular trait that are manipulated, suspicious as well as self-centered in nature. The different creative as well as innovative ideas are regarded as challenge to the status quo and this will interrupt the relations that are interpersonal in nature as well. Neessen et al. (2017) commented that there is importance of articulation as well as communication as well as the social networking of the different employees in the organization is successful kind of innovations.
Impact of Personality Traits on Recruitment and Assessments
The five-factor model is related with the overall satisfaction of the job of the employees in the workplace. Proper satisfaction of the employees is essential in nature in the organization, as this will help in providing motivation to the individuals as well. Furthermore, it can be analyzed that big five personality traits of the individuals at the workplace help the satisfied employees of the workplace to remain in the same position and this will help in avoiding absences than the other employees who are dissatisfied in nature. The initial research in the different research studies has helped in analyzing that the neuroticism is negatively related with the job satisfaction of the employees in the organization but there is a negatively relationship between the two factors (Nandan, London and Bent-Goodley 2015). On the other hand, it can be analyzed that extraversion conscientiousness as well as agreeableness are positively related with one another wherein proper job satisfaction is provided to the employees in the organization as well. Furthermore, there is negligible influence of the openness to the experience of the individuals at the workplace on the job satisfaction of the employees (Mowday, Porter and Steers 2013).
The findings have also suggested that due to the low level of the arousability for the individuals in the workplace. Moriano et al. (2014) commented that when the workplace is a social environment, it is essential that the extraverted employees in the organization will have low level of arousal at the workplace and there will be less stimulation at the workplace as well. On the other hand, the introvert individuals will be having high or optimum level of arousal outside the organization where there will be less stimulation present in the organization as well.
The deviance in the workplace will occur when the individuals in the organization voluntarily helps in pursuing different course of actions that threatens the entire well being of the different employees at the workplace. The deviance in the workplace is related to the five factors of the personality traits of the individuals at the workplace, as this will help in understanding the different kind of interpersonal deviance. The deviance that is interpersonal in nature is negatively correlated with the agreeableness that is higher in nature (Mesmer-Magnus et al. 2017).
This helps in understanding that the the different individuals in the organization who are the stable emotionally and conscientious are the ones who are less likely to withhold the different efforts of the individuals in the workplace as well. The other different factor that has to be considered is the perception of the individuals in the workplace. The employees in the organization who are having a positive perception towards the workplace and the different activities of the workplace are the ones who are likely to pursue the different behavior that are deviant in nature (Li et al. 2014).
Theories and Models to Understand Personality Traits
The research studies help in indicating that the personalities of the individuals are the ones who act as the moderating factor in the organization. The deviance of the workplace will help in endorsing with the different aspects of the individuals as well who perceive both negative as well as positive perceptions of about the entire workplace as well, such as wherein the emotional stability as well as the agreeableness is low in nature (Leutner et al. 2014).
There are different factors wherein the conscientiousness is the single factor in the workplace that helps in making the performance of the job predictive in nature. The factors are as follows:
The absence in the job is an important part of the performance of the job of the employees in the workplace. When the employees are not performing effectively in the organization, then it can lead to issues in the entire workplace as well. Furthermore, it can be analyzed that neuroticism is not highly related with the absence of the employees at the workplace (Lee and Ashton 2014).
Furthermore, the other reason for the absenteeism in the workplace by the employees is that the individuals who are introvert in nature are the ones who are less satisfied with the different kinds of work performed by them at the workplace as well.
On the other hand Kumar and Pathak (2017) discussed that agreeableness is related with the different needs of the organization as this will help in providing supportive environment at the workplace. Furthermore, Kude et al. (2017) commented that in the empirical study, agreeableness is related negatively with the behavior that is risk taking in nature. As due to the desire in the interpersonal harmony, the individuals with agreeable personality may face different kinds of difficulty in properly expressing as well as generating different kinds of thoughts that are completely different from the others. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that agreeableness is negatively related to the intrapreneurial behavior (Kranz, Leonhardt and Kolbe 2016).
Furthermore, there is an association between conscientiousness as well as innovation that is vague in nature. Innovation requires the kind of behavior that is goal oriented in nature and this will help the individuals in becoming more self disciplined in nature. These different kinds of behavior are traits of high conscientiousness kinds of individuals in the organizations. According to Kozlowski et al. (2015), the individuals who are conscientiousness in nature are the ones who are high risk taking performer in the organizations and this will provide them higher level of job satisfaction. These kinds of individuals in the organizations are the ones who are less motivated in nature in order to search for a new job opportunity. Furthermore, it has been seen that there are individuals in the organizations, who are having the conscientiousness trait wherein they do not prefer performing experimentations as well as taking risks in the organization. They do not take such risks these may cause different uncertainties as well as unexpected delays in the work that is performed by them. Therefore, it can be analyzed that conscientiousness is the kind of behavior that is negatively related to the intrapreneurial behavior.
Different Attitudes of Individuals at Workplace and in Life
Similarly, in case of the individuals who are emotionally stable, are the ones who are calm, composed as well as self confident in nature as well, while the individuals who are neurotic in nature are depressed as well as fearful in nature. The different kind of individuals in the organization who are having neurotic personality, are less energetic in nature and they do not feel like performing the work as required by them. Furthermore, there are different kind of individuals who are scoring much less on emotional stability trait and this can cause lack of confidence as well as they are less interested towards taking risk in completing the different activities in the organization. However, Knote and Blohm (2016) commented that there are different kind of individuals who are having the emotional stability trait, it is essential for them to be effectives, fearless as well as confident about the different kinds of task that has to be performed by them. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that emotional stability is positively correlated to the intrapreneurial behavior of the individuals.
Lastly, the openness to the experience is the most important as well as essential factor in the five traits of personality. There is a consistent relationship between innovation as well as the creativity. The individuals who are carrying this trait of openness to experience, they are the ones who are broad minded as well as imaginative in nature. Innovation is the ultimate product of different ideas that are unfamiliar in nature and the different kinds of individuals who are scoring high on the trait named openness to experience are the ones who have the curiosity to make the products more innovative in nature. However, on the contrary, there are individuals in the organization who are scoring less on openness to experience and they are the ones who are conservative in nature (Kluemper, McLarty and Bing 2015).
This kind of individuals follows different traditions as well as the norms that are equal for everyone. They are the ones who are comfortable in following the norms as they feel this will help them in reducing uncertainties as well as risks from the different kinds of jobs as well. Therefore, it can be analyzed that openness to experience is positively correlated to the risk taking abilities of the individuals. The hypothesis helps in understanding that there is positive correlation between openness to experience as well as intrapreneurial behavior. The big give personality traits helped in understanding that creativity has a major role to play in the intrapreneurial behavior of the individuals in the different organizations as well as in their personal life as well.
Organizational Evaluation of Employee Performance
Creativity is referred to the potentiality of the individuals in generating positive ideas about the different issues that are faced by them. Furthermore, based on the trait performance as well as the creativity in the organization, it is essential that proper theoretical framework has to be developed as this will help in understanding the interaction between the variables of motivation along with personality traits of the individuals.
There are different kinds of scholars who are able to demonstrate the creative performance of the intrapreneurs as well as the big five personality traits of the individuals in the organization as well as in the daily life. There has been proper hypothesis conducted on the big five personality traits as well as on the individual creativity. According to the theory of goal setting, it is analyzed that proper behavior of the individuals helps in reflecting different intentions as well as goals that has been set by them. According to Kehoe and Wright (2013), motivation has a crucial role in the performance of the individuals in the organizations and this will help in setting appropriate standards as to achieve proper goals in the organization. This will help in enhancing the inner resources that are required as this will help in developing proper self-regulatory behavioral approach.
There are different researchers who have been able to identify the distinct forms of the motivation that is intrinsic as well as extrinsic motivation. Intrinsic motivation helps in understanding the natural inclination towards the different kinds of interest as well as exploration that will help in representing the critical source of vitality as well as enjoyment. This kind of motivation helps the intrapreneurs in the organization in developing proper success rates and this helps the organization in generating proper performance in the future as well.
On the other hand, extrinsic motivation is the kind of motivation that helps in understanding the inclination of the individuals towards performing the tasks as this will help them in attaining some consequences that are separable in nature that includes verbal as well as tangible rewards. These kinds of motivations help the individual employees in the organization to behave according to the self-regulation as well as behave in order to the self regulation that will help them in achieving proper goals in the organization.
The motivational factors has huge role in the intrapreneurial behavior along with the five big personality traits as this will help in analyzing the issues that are faced by the individuals in the organization and this will help in behaving as per the motivational factors. Both the intrinsic as well as the extrinsic motivation has huge influence on the creative performance of the employees, as this will help them in generating high level of energy along with understanding their own creativity effects on the different tasks that has been performed by them. Proper hypothesis has been created as this will help them in creating moderate relationship between the creative performance of the different individuals as well as the big five personality traits of the individuals (Judge et al. 2014).
Descriptions of Different Personality Traits
Furthermore, while establishing a new model or theory, it is essential in nature to consider the compatibility as well as the psychological theories. Judge and Zapata (2015) proposed that the structure of the entire personality is best conceptualized with the creative performance of the individuals. The Big five personality traits has huge influence on the intrapreneurial behavior the individuals as this will help them in understanding the creativity and this will help them in searching for the different factors that are suitable with the method or the procedure that has been adopted by them in the organization.
A successful psychological model or theory has the proper capability in order to apply in the different organizational activities as this will help them in maintaining proper consistency in the organization. The intrapreneurs have to be provided with proper opportunity in the organization and this will help them in measuring the level of reliability of the individuals in the organization as well (Jehanzeb, Rasheed and Rasheed 2013).
The big five personality traits of the individuals need to be analyzed by the organizations as this will help them in gaining proper competitive advantage and this will help in analyzing the issues that are faced by the intrapreneurs and solve them properly as this will help them in solving such issues without many hindrances. With proper implementation of the five personality traits, it is assumed that proper job satisfaction is provided to the individuals in the organization and this will help them in achieving proper goals in the organization as well.
The big five personality traits need to be properly analyzed with the implementation of the changing environment at the workplace. Intrapreneurship is the type of behavior that is acting like the entrepreneur in the organization and achieving proper goals as well. The proper innovation or the innovative ideas along with the creativity plays a major role in the intrapreneurial behavior in the organizations and this will help the intrapreneurs to showcase their personality traits.
However, as per the hypothesis that has been done regarding the intrapreneurial behavior as well as the Big Five Personality Traits, it can be assumed that there is a proper positive relationships in some cases as well as there are different traits that has negative correlations with the intrapreneurial behavior. It is essential for the managers in the organizations to prioritize the Intrapreneurship behavior along with satisfaction of job that is correlated with each other, as this will help the organizations along with the intrapreneurs in the organization to properly portray their issues and the grievances that are faced by them.
Openness to Experience
Through analyzing the personality traits, it can be analyzed that the intrapreneurs in the organization needs to understand the issues and proper clarity is required as well in their thoughts in order to solve such issues within stipulated time frame.
The five factor model helps in analyzing the different levels of the big five personality traits of an individual in the organization. Organizational commitment is defined as the bond that is experienced by the different employees in the organization with the tasks that are performed by them in different organizations. The employees in the organization who are committed to the entire organization, there is a special bond that is felt by them while performing different tasks in the entire organization as well (Heinze and Weber 2015).
Three different kinds of commitment towards job are described as follows:
Normative commitment is defined as the kind of commitment wherein the employees feel a proper sense of obligation towards the entire company. This obligation exists within the employees as they feel that they can implement better opportunities in other fields, however there is sense of obligation that affects the motive of the individuals and he/she feels the thing that he/she is performing is the right thing that is done by him for the entire organization (Healey, Vuori and Hodgkinson 2015).
Affective commitment is defined as the kind of organizational commitment that is felt by the employees of the organization when there is an emotional attachment of the employees for their tasks in the organization as well as for the entire organization as well. Job satisfaction arises for the employees and by the employees when they are able to perform the different kinds of task in the organization of their choices (Harari, Rudolph and Laginess 2015).
Continuance commitment is defined as the process of commitment that usually occurs when there is sense of obligation in the entire company or when the employees are unhappy with the different kinds of role that are assigned to them as well. The different severity of losses increases with the experience as well as the age. The example of normative commitment is when the employees performs well but there are few issues that are faced by the employees of a company wherein in order to succeed and perform well in the organization as well as to get promotion in the organization, the employees are always in a fear to perform better to achieve positive results.
Conscientiousness
From the analysis of the organizational commitment, it can be identified that proper and affective commitment is essential in nature, as this will help in developing proper and greater job satisfaction. Proper ascertainments are required as this can help me in experiencing greater benefit and manage proper normative as well as continuous commitment as well. In different organizations, human resource is the most important resource of the entire organization. The managers of the different organizations have realized that human resources of the organization plays a major role in gaining proper competitive advantage among the other competitors in the organization as well. The organizational commitment is defined as the proper attitude that is required in order to properly continue employment in the respective organizations.
The organizational committed employees are valuable in nature as this helps in bringing positive impact on the entire organization as well. This kind of commitment of the employees in the entire organization will help in achieving positive performance in the organization along with generating huge amount of productivity in the organization as well. Proper and affective commitment in the organization will help in generating effective and efficient process of communication in the entire organization as well.
A relationship exists between the five-factor model as well as the organizational commitment of the employees. There is different kind of researches that has commented that there is a positive kind of relationship exists between the organizational commitment of the employees as well as the five-factor model of the personality traits. The findings have also suggested that the individuals who possess the different traits of openness, extraversion, conscientiousness as well as neuroticism in the organizations (Gupta 2016).
The organizational commitment is one of the most popular construct that is psychological in nature helps in understanding that proper job satisfaction plays a vital role in the entire process of management. The organizational commitment is defined as one of the job attitudes that help in examining the different association towards the five factor model of the personality traits (Guchait, Tews and Simons 2014). The first and foremost factor of the personality traits help in understanding that there is a proper linkage between the organizational commitment of the employees as well as the big five personality traits of the organization as well.
There have been few studies in the past that has carried out in order to properly investigate that there is a proper as well as positive relationship between the extroversion, normative commitment as well as affective commitment. The continuous commitment have a proper relationship among the others, however there are few issues that can lead to problems in the organization commitment. Furthermore, there are different studies as well wherein continuance as well as normative commitment has been positively linked with one another as well as to conscientiousness and neuroticism respectively.
Agreeableness
On the other hand, few studies revealed that the employees in the organization who score high on the openness as well undervalue the different things that are valued by the other individuals such as informal as well as formal rewards. According to Guchait, Lei and Tews (2016), employees who score high on the neuroticism and openness approach helps in understanding that there is a positive relationship exists between the five traits of the personality of the individual as well as the organizational commitment of the employees as well. From the argument, this can be concluded that employees of the organization are positively related to different normative as well as continuance kind of organizational commitment. However, on the other hand, there is negatively relation between the affective commitment as the normative and continuance commitment of the organization is based on a certain objective that does not have a positive approach towards the organizational commitment as well.
Furthermore, the extrovert employees in the organization are generally positively linked with the continuance commitment and this will help in understanding that proper commitment is essential in the organization and this will have huge influence on the motivation of the employees as well. On the other hand, the extrovert employees of the organization are not positively linked with the employees and they have negatively related with the normative commitment as well.
Extrovert employees of the organizations are emotionally involved with the environment of their organization. Due to the energetic as well as social behavior of the different employees in the organization, this will help in making those employees more influenced in nature. The different studies related to the relation between the five factor model as well as organizational commitment, it can be analyzed that notion helps in understanding that employees of different organizations would score much higher on the continuance commitment that is one of the organizational commitments as well (Grohs, Schneiders and Heinze 2016).
It is also found that neuroticism kind of employees usually showed nervousness as well as lack of confidence among the employees and this has a positive kind of relationship among the employees of the organization as well. From the above analysis, it can be understood that there are different hypothesis for the above study that are described as follows:
- There is a proper and significant relationship between the big five personality traits of the organization as well as the organizational commitment of the employees
- There is significant as well as proper relationship that exists between the employees as well as the affective commitment
- There is a significant and proper relationship that exists between continuance improvement as well as the personality traits of the individuals in the organization
- There is a significant kind of relationship that exists between the personality traits of the employees in the organization along with the normative commitment of the employees in the organization (Gómez and Azanza 2014)
Proper retention of the highly committed employees in the organization is the most essential element that has to be properly maintained by the organization. The plethora of the entire research helped in understanding that in the field of the organizational behavior and commitment, proper success has to be achieved with proper implementation of different strategies. Among the different antecedents that have been recognized, apart from the personality traits, majority of the personality traits of the individuals are experiential as well as situational in nature (Georgellis 2015).
Neuroticism
The different results from the studies helped in understanding that these are the different kinds of studies helped in examining the dispositional antecedents that includes inconclusive findings in the future. Additionally, it can be analyzed that there is a generation of doubt in the organization that will help in understanding the different doubts in the organization regarding the disposable factors in the organization.
The concept of organizational commitment helped in understanding that three dimensions of the organizational commitment helped in achieving proper success as well as attaining proper productivity for the entire organization as well. The five factor model of the personality traits helped in understanding that proper commitment in the organizational activities as this will help in achieving proper success and productivity in the organization (Gawke, Gorgievski and Bakker 2017). The negative as well as positive influences of the organizational commitment has different kinds of influences as well as effects on the different personality traits of the individuals in the different kinds of organizations. The organizational employees needs to properly analyze that there can be issues when there is lack of organizational commitment among the employees.
The organizational commitment of the employees in the organization will affect the entire performance of the organization along with the respective individual. The organizational employees have to understand the different issues that can be faced by them in the future and take proper and necessary actions regarding such issues as well. Proper conscientiousness of the employees in the organization will have a huge influence on the contextual performance of all the employees in the organization. The performance of the different employees in the organization depends on the different kinds of tasks that are performed by them. This will help in analysis of the big five personality traits of the individuals in the organization along with their commitment towards the organization (Fu and Deshpande 2014).
The big five personality traits of the individuals in the organizations help in understanding the different kinds of behavior that are presented by them in different kinds of situations or circumstances as well. The individual who want to learn the different new things in the organization and enjoys different kinds of new experiences are usually the ones who scores high in the openness test of the organization. Furthermore, this kind of openness trait of the individual in the organization will have huge influence on the organizational commitment on the employees (Farooq et al. 2014).
Extraversion
Similarly, the individuals of the organization who are conscientiousness in nature helps in understanding the high degree of conscientiousness that are prompt as well as reliable in nature. This kind of traits is methodic, thorough as well as organized in nature as well. This kind of trait helps in organization commitment of the employees as well as the job satisfaction is provided to the employees with proper reliability (Dovey and Rembach 2015).
On the other hand, the individuals in the organization who are having the trait known as extraversion helps in understanding that these are the individuals who get proper energy in order to properly interact with the other individuals in the organization. However, on the other hand, there are individuals who are the ones who do not interact much with the other individuals and they are ones who stay to themselves (Dovey and McCabe 2014). The extraversion traits of the employees in the organization are the ones who are assertive as well as talkative in nature.
From the above trait of personality, it can be analyzed that the extraversion trait has huge influence on the organizational commitment of the employees in the organization as well. The extrovert employees help in achieving proper goals as well as they help in increasing the productivity of the organization as well. The organizational commitment helps in receiving proper achievements in the entire organization as well (Dhar 2015).
Similarly, the individuals who are agreeable in nature are the ones who will help in understanding the different traits of the individuals such as compassionate, cooperative as well as friendly in nature as well. On the other hand, the individuals with low agreeableness are the ones who are more distant in nature as well. These are the individuals who are affectionate as well as kind in nature. These kind of individuals in the organization helps in achieving proper organizational objectives with proper commitment towards the entire organization as well as they are the ones who receive proper satisfaction from their job in different organizations (Dentchev et al. 2016).
Furthermore, neuroticism is another personality trait of the individuals in the organizations as they are the ones who help in understanding the bringing positivity as well as stability in the organizational culture. The neuroticism is the personality trait that is also known as emotional stability of the individuals in the different kinds of organizations. The neuroticism trait of the personality of the individuals will help in relating towards the emotional stability of the individuals in the organization along with the degree of negative emotions. This is the dimension that helps the individuals in relating to the different emotions such as positive as well as negative stability of the individuals in the organizations.
The five factor model or the big five personality traits is essential in nature in the organization as this will help in providing different aspects to the employees in the organization. The different importance of the big five personality traits of the individuals in the workplace is described as follows:
- It helps in providing the job satisfaction to the different employees in the organization who possess different kind of characteristics in the entire organization
- It will help the individuals in the organization to make them aware about the different issues related to the workplace that can be faced by them as the behavior of the individuals in the workplace differs from one another (Demirtas and Akdogan 2015)
- The five factor model or the big five personality traits of the individuals in the organization will help in making the individuals in different teams understand about the meaning of good leadership in the organization
- Proper teamwork is required and it is essential in nature as this will help the employees in the workplace to understand the motivational skills that are required in the workplace to perform the tasks with proper interest (Dane and Brummel 2014)
- Five Factor Model will help in making the individuals in the organization understand about the different issues that is related to the influencing of the job performance of the individuals at workplace
These are the different prospects in the organization that the individuals in the organization has to properly follow as this will help in making the individuals aware about the different personalities that will help in making the different kinds of task much easier as well. A personality of an individual in the workplace will have huge impact on the productivity of the entire organization along with providing motivation to the other individuals as well. The openness to the experience among the individuals will have the cognitive ability among the individuals in the workplace as this will help in providing social interactions among the individuals in the workplace (Colbert, Barrick and Bradley 2014).
The personality of the different individuals at workplace is having huge influence on the performance of the job as well. The social aspects of the five personality traits will have huge influence on the different factors of providing proper satisfaction of job to the employees in the entire workplace. Furthermore, it can be ascertained that the performance of the job of the individuals in the workplace will have a proper and accurate relationship with the different traits of the individuals that can have both positive and negative impact on the organizational as well as the performance of the individuals who are working in the organization (Clark and Vanderbleek 2016) .
The cognitive ability of the individuals in the organization will help in analyzing the outcomes of the workforce of the individuals in the workplace as well. From the different analysis of the researchers from the previous studies, it has been analyzed that the personality of the individuals in the workplace may not have huge impact on the productivity or on the performance of the individuals as well. However, there are different impacts on the entire work performance of the individuals with different traits of personality in the organization (Chun et al. 2013).
Although the job performances of the individuals in the organization are closely related with the different traits of the individuals in the workplace, it can be analyzed that the different factors include agreeableness, extraversions as well conscientiousness of the individuals in the organizations (Choi, Oh and Colbert 2015). The previous research studies has helped in implementing that cognitive ability of the individuals in the workplace is one of the predictors for the proper completion of the different tasks successfully in the organization. The cognitive ability of the individuals in the organization plays a vital and essential role in the organization and this will be requiring proper decision making facility and the acknowledgement of the individuals in the organization as well (Chen et al. 2014).
The second and the most important predictor of the performance of the career of the individuals will help in analyzing the long term goals of the individuals in the entire organization. The employees who are performing the best in the respective field in the organizations help in providing proper job satisfaction to the employees as well. This will help in providing proper ability in restraining the different feelings related to anger as well as self-doubt of the individuals in the workplace (Çetin, ?e?en and Bas?m 2014). The emotional intelligence of the individuals who are working in the organizations is positively and accurately correlated with the success in the work as well as happiness that is provided to the individuals at the workplace as well.
The above research studies that have been revealed helped in understanding that there is a strong as well as positive relationship between the successes of the individuals in the workplace along with the personality of the individuals at the workplace. The job satisfaction along with the five personality traits of the individuals at the workplace has huge influence on the individuals as well (Ceschi et al. 2016).
According to Carter et al. (2015), the personality of the individuals in the workplace has huge influence on the individuals. The outgoing or the introverted kind of individuals in the workplace will help in providing friendly as well as helpful service as this will help in generating the cognitive ability of the individuals at the workplace. It will help in understanding the conscientious behavior of the individuals as this will help in maintaining proper ethics at the workplace. A strong and proper work ethics is essential and it is required in the workplace, as this will help in maintaining proper performance at the workplace as well. There is a strong and positive relationship between the cognitive ability of the individuals along with the ability of the employees in the workplace as this will help them in generating proper revenues in the future for the entire workplace.
Cañadas-De la Fuente et al. (2015) commented that proper attention is required to be provided by the employees in the organization as this will help in generating huge revenues and profit for the entire organization. The motivational factor is essential for the employees in the organization, as this will help in motivating the different employees in the organization for achieving the proper performance in the job. The personality of the individuals in the workplace can have huge influence on the performance of the individuals at workplace as well. Personality of the individuals will be defined as the motor that will help in understanding the different kinds of behavior in the organizations. This will help in predicting the rate of success that will be created and generated by the individuals in the workplace (Braunerhjelm, Ding and Thulin 2017).
The unique factors of the individuals in the workplace will be the proper combination as this will help in measuring the entire success at the workplace. Secondly, it is analyzed that the personality of the individuals in the workplace will have proper affects on the different situations at the workplace as well (Braunerhjelm, Ding and Thulin 2017). Proper attention has to be provided to the different requirements of the individuals as this will help the higher officials in the organization to imagine the clear and bigger picture of the particulars that has to be achieved by the individuals in the future at the workplace. Proper deal oriented issues has to be properly ascertained as this will help in understanding the different motives to provide job satisfaction to the employees (Braun et al. 2013).
Intrapreneurship is essential in nature, as this will help in the growth of the organization as well as for the achieving organizational commitment among the employees as well. The organizational commitment is essential in the workplace that has to be created by the employees in order to achieve proper goals in the future.
- Proper innovation is achieved in the organizational objectives as this will help the employees along with the entire organization to perform the tasks effectively and with proper innovative strategies (Boyles 2016)
- Proper and right individuals are essential in nature in the entire organization as this will help the entire organization to provide aggressive growth for the entire organization as well
- Intrapreneurship is the kind of behavior that helps the individuals along with the organization to provide a proper environment that will help in sustaining as well as sustain proper growth in the organization (Borrás 2016)
- Lastly, Intrapreneurship requires proper set of behaviors as well as competencies that will help in the growth of the company in the future
The five personality traits as well as the intrapreneurial behavior of the individuals at the workplace are positively correlated with one another. This will help the individuals along with the employers of the organization to achieve proper results in the future as well. Proper leadership as well as change management is essential in the entire organization as this will help in understanding the leaders who are intrapreneurs are the ones who are the change agents (Börjesson, Elmquist and Hooge 2014).
The intrapreneurial leaders of the organization are the ones who blaze different trails in the organization and they are the ones who are compatible with the different changes in the organization as well (Ahmad, Athar and Hussain 2016). The intrapreneurs in the organization help in enabling the entire organization to work effectively as well as efficiently to accelerate as well as manage the different changes in the work environment. Proper engagement is essential in the organizations, as this will help in providing a proper platform to the individuals in the workplace to engage the different employees wherein the work is challenging as well as meaningful in nature (Akhtar et al. 2015).
Proper Intrapreneurship behavior is required and is essential in nature as this will help in providing employees different platforms and make the employees engaged in nature as well. Engagement is essential in the organization, as this will the employees and the entire organization to perform effectively as well as efficiently in the organization. Several researchers in the past has also commented that the there are different elements of the intrapreneurial behavior of the individuals (Awais Bhatti et al. 2014)
The organizational commitment of the employees in the organization will help in understanding the commitment of the different employees in the organizations towards the different tasks they have to perform in the organization (Bakker and Demerouti 2014). There is huge effect of the organizational commitment on the employees that includes high performance among the employees in the organization and this will help them in achieving goals for the organization as well.
This kind of commitment in the organization will help the employees as well as the entire organization in maintaining proper as well as supportive climate in the organization. This will help in lowering the absenteeism as well as the turnover of the different employees in the organization. Proper enhancement in the organizational activities is essential in nature as this will help in committing to the different individuals about the values that have to be followed by them along with the clarifying the communication among the employees in the workplace as well. This will help in achieving proper organizational justice and this will improve the morale of the employees as well (Baruah and Ward 2015).
Furthermore, the organizational commitment will help in creating a proper sense of community among the workplace, as this will enhance the development of the employment of the employees in the workplace. Organizational commitment of the employees is the level of dedication of the employees in achieving the goals more effectively as well as efficiently in nature. The engagement of the employees is essential is necessary in nature as this will help in understanding the level of involvement of the employment in the workplace.
- Organizational Commitment of the employees helps in predicting the work variables properly that includes the turnover rate of the individuals along with the job performance of the employees in the workplace
- Proper performance of the job is essential in nature, as this will help in maintaining proper organizational citizenship kind of behavior with the other employees in the workplace.
- Due to proper organizational commitment, there will be fewer turnovers of the employees in the workplace and this will help in improving the performance of job of the employees as well.
- The organizational identification is essential in nature as this will help in understanding the different experiences of the employees in the workplace to understand the feeling of the performance of the job of the employees (Bolman and Deal 2017)
It can be analyzed the individuals who are having high neuroticism are the ones who often experiences negative emotional stability or emotional instability in the organization as well. This is the kind of trait includes tense as well as moody in nature but this kind of trait is good as well as bad for the achievement of the goals in the organization. The different personality traits of the individuals have different effects and impacts on the organization as well as on the productivity of the organization. The organizational commitment is necessary and is essential in nature as well as this will help in understanding the different issues that can be faced by the individuals in the organization who are of different traits.
There is both positive as well as negative relationship between the organizational commitments along with the five personality traits of the individuals in the organization. In organization, proper commitment is essential in nature as this will help in achieving proper goals in the entire organization and this will help in providing different individuals the job satisfaction that is required in the organization. The commitment towards the organization by the employees helps in providing the individuals different insights towards the different aspects of the organizational objectives.
In order to ascertain as well as determine the different issues in the organization, the employees with different traits need to understand the issues that are faced by them. Such issues have to be properly ascertained and this will help in understanding the different techniques to solve such issues within a stipulated period. The organizational behavior of the personnel is essential in nature, as this will help in influencing the organizational reward system of the different specific organizations. The organizational commitment is essential in nature and this will have huge influence as well on the behavior of different individuals in the organization as well (Berzin and Pitt-Catsouphes 2015).
The affective commitment is the one that helps in analyzing the different issues faced by the individuals in the organization and this will help in achieving the goals of the organization as well. The organizational commitment is essential in nature as well as this will help the individuals in the organization to ascertain the different techniques that are required to perform the different kinds of task successfully. On the other hand, in normative commitment, it is essential that proper aspirations that are desired by the individuals in order to make the tasks more efficient and effective in nature as well.
Furthermore, there are continuous commitments that help in understanding the different issues or the fears that are faced by the individuals in the organization and this will help them in removing and overcoming such issues with proper implementation of different strategies in the organization. Proper awareness is essential in nature as this will help in pressure of the opinions of the other employees in the organization. The five personality traits of the employee along with the organizational commitment are an essential tool and are positively related as well with one another in the entire organization.
Lastly, the organizational commitment has to be properly ascertained by the individuals in the organization with proper implementation of the different techniques such as understanding the exact nature of the individuals in the organization as well as understanding the various issues that are faced by the individuals in the workplace as well. The main objective of the entire research is to combine both organizational commitment as well as five factor model of the personality traits as this will help in analyzing the job satisfaction traits of the individuals in the entire organization (Ahmad, Athar and Hussain 2016). The agreeable as well as the affective commitment of the individuals in the organization will help in understanding the different characteristics of the individuals in the organization as well.
The continuance commitment of the individuals in the organization, agreeable personality of the different individuals in the different organizations as well as the conscientiousness personality of the different individuals in the organization will help in ascertaining the different characteristics and the issues that the particular individual is facing in the organization. Proper satisfaction in the job is required as this will help the individual and the organization in achieving proper goals in the organization as well.
Proper and emotionally stable employees in the organization will create positive impact on the individuals and this will help in continuous improvements in the entire organization as well. The individuals in the organization require the sportsmanship behavior as it will help in managing the different tasks of the organization and achieve successful outcomes and results in the future. Similarly, the positive commitment is essential in nature as this will help in creating a positive as well as remarkable approach in the organizations by achieving proper goals in the organization as well.
Therefore, it can be analyzed that proper organizational commitment as well as the five factor model will have positive influence on achievement of the goals of the organization as well. This will help the individuals in the organization to achieve goals and attain job satisfaction as well.
Conclusion
Therefore, it can be concluded that there is a mixed relationship between the job performances of the employees in the workplace along with the big five personality traits of the individuals at workplace. The organizational commitment as well as the five personality traits of the individuals has to properly analyze the issues that can arise in the organization. This has to be properly analyzed as this will help in making proper efforts to make the performance of the employees better in nature.
The five factor model as well as the organizational commitment is positively correlated with one another wherein the proper commitment is essential in nature in the organization to perform effectively and understand the jobs that has to be performed by the employees in the workplace. Lastly, it can be inferred that the five factor model of the personality traits of the individuals has to provide job satisfaction as well as proper identification of the organizational commitments as well.
References
Ahmad, J., Athar, M.R. and Hussain, M., 2016. Linking Personality Traits with Job Performance Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment: An Empirical Evidence.
Akhtar, R., Boustani, L., Tsivrikos, D. and Chamorro-Premuzic, T., 2015. The engageable personality: Personality and trait EI as predictors of work engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, pp.44-49.
Awais Bhatti, M., Mohamed Battour, M., Rageh Ismail, A. and Pandiyan Sundram, V., 2014. Effects of personality traits (big five) on expatriates adjustment and job performance. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 33(1), pp.73-96.
Bakker, A.B. and Demerouti, E., 2014. Job demands–resources theory. Wellbeing.
Baruah, B. and Ward, A., 2015. Metamorphosis of intrapreneurship as an effective organizational strategy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), pp.811-822.
Berzin, S. and Pitt-Catsouphes, M., 2015. Social Innovation from the Inside: Considering the “Intrapreneurship” Path. Social work, 60(4), pp.360-362.
Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E., 2017. Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
Börjesson, S., Elmquist, M. and Hooge, S., 2014. The challenges of innovation capability building: Learning from longitudinal studies of innovation efforts at Renault and Volvo Cars. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 31, pp.120-140.
Borrás, S., 2016. Organisations in Innovation Systems: Entrepreneurship, Intrapreneurship and Public Policy. Copenhagen Business School [wp].
Boyles, J.L., 2016. The Isolation of Innovation: Restructuring the digital newsroom through intrapreneurship. Digital Journalism, 4(2), pp.229-246.
Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S. and Frey, D., 2013. Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), pp.270-283.
Braunerhjelm, P., Ding, D. and Thulin, P., 2017. The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Intrapreneurship, Labour Mobility and Innovation by Firm Size (No. 459). Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS-Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
Brown, S. and Taylor, K., 2014. Household finances and the ‘Big Five’personality traits. Journal of Economic Psychology, 45, pp.197-212.
Cañadas-De la Fuente, G.A., Vargas, C., San Luis, C., García, I., Cañadas, G.R. and Emilia, I., 2015. Risk factors and prevalence of burnout syndrome in the nursing profession. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(1), pp.240-249.
arter, D.R., Seely, P.W., Dagosta, J., DeChurch, L.A. and Zaccaro, S.J., 2015. Leadership for global virtual teams: Facilitating teamwork processes. In Leading Global Teams (pp. 225-252). Springer New York.
Ceschi, A., Costantini, A., Scalco, A., Charkhabi, M. and Sartori, R., 2016. The relationship between the big five personality traits and job performance in business workers and employees’ perception. Int. J. Bus. Res, 16, pp.63-76.
Çetin, F., ?e?en, H. and Bas?m, H.N., 2014. Exploring the Effects of EFQM Excellence Model on the Process of Intrapreneurship: A Research from Turkey. International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2(4), pp.173-191.
Chen, X.P., Eberly, M.B., Chiang, T.J., Farh, J.L. and Cheng, B.S., 2014. Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of management, 40(3), pp.796-819.
Choi, D., Oh, I.S. and Colbert, A.E., 2015. Understanding organizational commitment: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five-factor model of personality and culture. Chun, J.S., Shin, Y., Choi, J.N. and Kim, M.S., 2013. How does corporate ethics contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of collective organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management, 39(4), pp.853-877.
Clark, L.A. and Vanderbleek, E., 2016. Schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, pp.1-4.
Colbert, A.E., Barrick, M.R. and Bradley, B.H., 2014. Personality and leadership composition in top management teams: Implications for organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), pp.351-387.
Dane, E. and Brummel, B.J., 2014. Examining workplace mindfulness and its relations to job performance and turnover intention. Human Relations, 67(1), pp.105-128.
Demirtas, O. and Akdogan, A.A., 2015. The effect of ethical leadership behavior on ethical climate, turnover intention, and affective commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), pp.59-67.
Dentchev, N., Baumgartner, R., Dieleman, H., Jóhannsdóttir, L., Jonker, J., Nyberg, T., Rauter, R., Rosano, M., Snihur, Y., Tang, X. and van Hoof, B., 2016. Embracing the variety of sustainable business models: social entrepreneurship, corporate intrapreneurship, creativity, innovation, and other approaches to sustainability challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113.
Dhar, R.L., 2015. Service quality and the training of employees: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Tourism Management, 46, pp.419-430.
Dovey, K. and McCabe, B., 2014. The politics of innovation: Realising the value of intrapreneurs. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 11(3), pp.185-201.
Dovey, K. and Rembach, M., 2015. Invisible practices; innovative outcomes: intrapreneurship within the academy. Action Learning: research and practice, 12(3), pp.276-292.
Farooq, O., Payaud, M., Merunka, D. and Valette-Florence, P., 2014. The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), pp.563-580.
Fu, W. and Deshpande, S.P., 2014. The impact of caring climate, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment on job performance of employees in a China’s insurance company. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), pp.339-349.
Gawke, J.C., Gorgievski, M.J. and Bakker, A.B., 2017. Employee intrapreneurship and work engagement: A latent change score approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, pp.88-100.
Georgellis, Y., 2015, January. Regional unemployment and employee organizational commitment. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2015, No. 1, p. 12430). Academy of Management.
Gómez, A.A. and Azanza, G., 2014. GO FOR IT. ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL AWARENESS PROGRAMMES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO (SPAIN). THE CASE OF INGENIO AND EKIN-IT. In INTED2014 Proceedings (pp. 7192-7198). IATED.
Grohs, S., Schneiders, K. and Heinze, R.G., 2016. Outsiders and Intrapreneurs: The Institutional Embeddedness of Social Entrepreneurship in Germany. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, pp.1-23.
Guchait, P., Lei, P. and Tews, M.J., 2016. Making Teamwork Work: Team Knowledge for Team Effectiveness. The Journal of psychology, 150(3), pp.300-317.
Guchait, P., Tews, M.J. and Simons, T., 2014. The influence of transactive memory systems and psychological safety on effectiveness of service management teams in a restaurant setting. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 13(3), pp.234-252.
Gupta, M., 2016. Intrapreneurship Centric Innovation: A Step towards Sustainable Competitive Advantage. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 5(2).
Harari, M.B., Rudolph, C.W. and Laginess, A.J., 2015. Does rater personality matter? A meta?analysis of rater Big Five–performance rating relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(2), pp.387-414.
Healey, M.P., Vuori, T. and Hodgkinson, G.P., 2015. When teams agree while disagreeing: Reflexion and reflection in shared cognition. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), pp.399-422.
Heinze, K.L. and Weber, K., 2015. Toward organizational pluralism: Institutional intrapreneurship in integrative medicine. Organization Science, 27(1), pp.157-172.
Jehanzeb, K., Rasheed, A. and Rasheed, M.F., 2013. Organizational commitment and turnover intentions: Impact of employee’s training in private sector of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(8), p.79.
Judge, T.A. and Zapata, C.P., 2015. The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), pp.1149-1179.
Judge, T.A., Simon, L.S., Hurst, C. and Kelley, K., 2014. What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: relationship of work motivations and behaviors to within-individual variation in the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), p.199.
Kehoe, R.R. and Wright, P.M., 2013. The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Journal of management, 39(2), pp.366-391.
Kluemper, D.H., McLarty, B.D. and Bing, M.N., 2015. Acquaintance ratings of the Big Five personality traits: Incremental validity beyond and interactive effects with self-reports in the prediction of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), p.237.
Knote, R. and Blohm, I., 2016. It’s not about having Ideas-It’s about making Ideas happen! Fostering Exploratory Innovation with the Intrapreneur Accelerator.
Kozlowski, S.W., Grand, J.A., Baard, S.K. and Pearce, M., 2015. Teams, teamwork, and team effectiveness: Implications for human systems integration. The handbook of human systems integration, pp.535-552.
Kranz, J.J., Leonhardt, D. and Kolbe, L.M., 2016. The Enabling Effect of Collaborative Innovation in Information Technology Outsourcing on Individual Intrapreneurial Behavior.
Kude, T., Kude, T., Hoehle, H., Hoehle, H., Sykes, T.A. and Sykes, T.A., 2017. Big data breaches and customer compensation strategies: Personality traits and social influence as antecedents of perceived compensation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(1), pp.56-74.
Kumar, R. and Pathak, G.S., 2017. Barriers of Intrapreneurship in Organizations: A Literature Review.
Lee, K. and Ashton, M.C., 2014. The dark triad, the big five, and the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, pp.2-5.
Leutner, F., Ahmetoglu, G., Akhtar, R. and Chamorro-Premuzic, T., 2014. The relationship between the entrepreneurial personality and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and individual differences, 63, pp.58-63.
Li, N., Barrick, M.R., Zimmerman, R.D. and Chiaburu, D.S., 2014. Retaining the productive employee: The role of personality. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), pp.347-395.
Mesmer-Magnus, J., Niler, A.A., Plummer, G., Larson, L.E. and DeChurch, L.A., 2017. The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a continuation. Career Development International, (just-accepted), pp.00-00.
Moriano, J.A., Molero, F., Topa, G. and Mangin, J.P.L., 2014. The influence of transformational leadership and organizational identification on intrapreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(1), pp.103-119.
Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. and Steers, R.M., 2013. Employee—organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic press.
Nandan, M., London, M. and Bent-Goodley, T., 2015. Social workers as social change agents: Social innovation, social intrapreneurship, and social entrepreneurship. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1), pp.38-56.
Neessen, P., Caniels, M.C., Vos, B. and De Jong, J., 2017, January. The Intrapreneurial Employee: Towards an Integrated Model of Intrapreneurship and Research Agenda. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2017, No. 1, p. 10355). Academy of Management.
Northouse, P.G., 2015. Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
Oh, H.S. and Wee, H., 2016. Self Efficacy, Organizational Commitment, Customer Orientation and Nursing Performance of Nurses in Local Public Hospitals. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 22(5), pp.507-517.
Orchard, S., Sindakis, S. and Ribiere, V., 2014, October. Innovation and Big Data. In The 7th International Conference on Innovation and Knowledge Management in Asia Pacific (IKMAP 2014) (p. 128).
Park, S.H., Kim, J.N. and Krishna, A., 2014. Bottom-up building of an innovative organization: Motivating employee intrapreneurship and scouting and their strategic value. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(4), pp.531-560.
Peng, J., Li, D., Zhang, Z., Tian, Y., Miao, D., Xiao, W. and Zhang, J., 2016. How can core self-evaluations influence job burnout? The key roles of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of health psychology, 21(1), pp.50-59.
Power, R.A. and Pluess, M., 2015. Heritability estimates of the Big Five personality traits based on common genetic variants. Translational psychiatry, 5(7), p.e604.
Reb, J., Narayanan, J. and Chaturvedi, S., 2014. Leading mindfully: Two studies on the influence of supervisor trait mindfulness on employee well-being and performance. Mindfulness, 5(1), pp.36-45.
Rhoades, L., 2014. Impact of work environment factors on organizational commitment across generational cohorts in the management consulting industry (Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University).
Salas, E. and Iwig, C., 2016, May. Can Teamwork Enhance Safety?. In Offshore Technology Conference. Offshore Technology Conference.
Seibert, S.E. and DeGeest, D.S., 2017. The Five Factor Model of Personality in Business and Industry. The Oxford Handbook of the Five Factor Model, p.381.
Skarmeas, D., Lisboa, A. and Saridakis, C., 2016. Export performance as a function of market learning capabilities and intrapreneurship: SEM and FsQCA findings. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), pp.5342-5347.
Smith, L., Rees, P. and Murray, N., 2016. Turning entrepreneurs into intrapreneurs: Thomas Cook, a case-study. Tourism Management, 56, pp.191-204.
Sovacool, B.K., Jeppesen, J., Bandsholm, J., Asmussen, J., Balachandran, R., Vestergaard, S., Andersen, T.H., Sørensen, T.K. and Bjørn-Thygesen, F., 2017. Navigating the “paradox of openness” in energy and transport innovation: Insights from eight corporate clean technology research and development case studies. Energy Policy, 105, pp.236-245.
Spain, S.M., Harms, P. and LeBreton, J.M., 2014. The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1).
Stoughton, J.W., Thompson, L.F. and Meade, A.W., 2013. Big five personality traits reflected in job applicants’ social media postings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(11), pp.800-805.
Turró, A., Urbano, D. and Peris-Ortiz, M., 2014. Culture and innovation: The moderating effect of cultural values on corporate entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, pp.360-369.
Wayne, J.H., Casper, W.J., Matthews, R.A. and Allen, T.D., 2013. Family-supportive organization perceptions and organizational commitment: The mediating role of work–family conflict and enrichment and partner attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), p.606.
Wihler, A., Meurs, J.A., Wiesmann, D., Troll, L. and Blickle, G., 2017. Extraversion and adaptive performance: Integrating trait activation and socioanalytic personality theories at work. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, pp.133-138.
Wille, B. and De Fruyt, F., 2014. Vocations as a source of identity: Reciprocal relations between Big Five personality traits and RIASEC characteristics over 15 years. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), p.262.
Zajac, S., Gregory, M.E., Bedwell, W.L., Kramer, W.S. and Salas, E., 2014. The cognitive underpinnings of adaptive team performance in ill-defined task situations: A closer look at team cognition. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(1), pp.49-73.
Zgheib, P.W., 2017. Corporate Innovation and Intrapreneurship in the Middle East. In Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation in the Middle East (pp. 37-56). IGI Global.
Zopiatis, A., Constanti, P. and Theocharous, A.L., 2014. Job involvement, commitment, satisfaction and turnover: Evidence from hotel employees in Cyprus. Tourism Management, 41, pp.129-140.
Effect of Five Factor Model on Organizational Commitment