The Significance Of Prioritization And Productivity In Management

Defining Productivity

One of the most significant aspects of management is prioritizations in the modern world. The manager should prioritize productivity by motivating the team to operate on most key urgent tasks and finish them on priority. The management should train the teams on how to manage tasks and addition of their priority. The teams must adhere and motivated in order to produce better results on a given timeline for great achievements of targets (Rice 2013).  Productivity increases the overall efficiency of management in a particular organioztion.it enables the management to utilize all available resources in an effective and efficient manner. The management should be aware that the more the products the company make the lower the overhead hence increased profitability. In the modern world, the management put productivity on the first priority since it increases confidence of local and foreign investors in the company. In addition, it leads to increment of share value of the firm thus building a business image of good will. Similarly, a company can share a part of its high profits with the workers due to enhanced production. This boost the morale of the workers as they get more satisfied on the job which in turn tends to increase their working efficiency. This leads to the success of the firm due to high productivity levels (Rice 2013). 

“Improvement of productivity is a national responsibility and not the responsibility of individual organizations only.”

Increase in productivity is deemed as a national responsibility and not an individual organization responsibility. Team work is a key aspect in improvement of productivity in the nation. Different market players for example the government agencies, culture of a society, individual customers, investors, management, distributors and suppliers work together in order to increase the productivity of all the organizations. By doing this, it will benefit the entire single organizations since productivity culture will have been instilled among the workers. Making it a national responsibility is efficient since skills, knowledge and technological advancements are diversified creating a conducive environment for production in the companies. The befits acquired from the individual companies together raises the economy of the entire nation. 

What is meant by productivity?

Productivity involve several measures of production efficiency. It refers to the ratio of output to input that are utilized during the production process of the company. It is a critical factor in production increased performance of firms since it raises the living standards of people.

Productivity and Profitability

Productivity is equal to profitability.” Is this true? Discuss

Yes. Productivity growth enables the company to be more profitable. The level of productivity in affirm should be proportionate to the profitability level. The more the firm invests in productivity the more the profits expected (Raza  et al 2014)A firm should increase its production in the market by modifying, diversifying and introducing new products in order to increase the sales volume to acquire more profits returns. 

Improvement of productivity will lead to a decrease in job opportunities available,

Improvement in productivity will lead to lowering of job opportunities existing in the company. This is because as productivity increase the level of technology advances thus lowering the need for manual work that could be carried out by employees (Rice 2013).   Productivity also makes the firm reluctant from hiring new employees since they are satisfied on their current performance.

Productivity applies to a factory environment and not to, for example administrative offices.” q “Productivity is only to the advantage of management

It applies to a factory environment because in such company’s different employees are sued to produce tangible products taken to the market. It involves factory inputs that are utilized to produce efficient factory outputs as end products.

Productivity is only to the advantage of management.

Productivity not only benefits the management but also other key players in the market including, employees, customers, the government agencies and the entire nation. Employees benefit from productivity through job satisfaction on profit gain sharing as they acquire bonuses from the firm. Consumers benefit from increased quality products and continuous supply thus they are able to acquire efficient goods and services all time. The government benefits from taxes levied which in turn raises the economy of the entire nation.

Productivity programmes interfere with normal work activities and, as such, are an additional burden to worker

Yes, productivity programmers are additional activities added on the normal routine that requires only the hardworking employees to benefit from them. Some therefore find these programs an additional burden from their normal delegated duties (Raza et al 2014).

Productivity is management’s counter-offensive against trade unions.

Its evident that unionized organizations are more productive than those organizations which are nonunionized. Researchers argue that trade unions usually exert high pressure on salaries, bonuses and wages. This makes the manager to increase capital intensity. However, trade unions oppose the adoption of new trends in technology. They can make employees to cease working and engagement in sabotage. These strikes and go slows reduce the productivity of the firm. Thus high organization productivity is the only counter-offensive measure to avoid trade union implications regarding prevention of disruptions in workflow and firm operations. Improved productivity makes the management to have a good working relationship with the employees thus reducing chances of trade union interruptions. 

The Impact of Productivity on Stakeholders

Improvement of productivity means working longer hours

Yes, it means working extra hours by putting extra efforts in the completing the daily tasks. This is done in accordance to the increased demand for productivity and the need to achieve the goals of the organization by all means. Thus employees have to work extra hours so that they can make a huge significance difference.

Management makes it difficult to improve productivity

Good mangers should use their skills and knowledge in training and initiating strategies and policies required for the improvement of productivity. This hard work will make the firm achieve its goals without much difficulty.

Government makes it difficult to improve productivity

The government might make laws and regulations for example some regulation policies that make it difficult for the firm to improve its productivity in such conditions (Arvanitis & Loukis 2009). Also during politics, companies suffer immensely since investment is barred. However, the government improves productivity by providing incentives and funds to the firms and creating conducive terms of operations.

Competitors make it difficult to improve productivity

Rivals in the market often makes it hard for   certain company to produce effectively. Since competitor deals with similar products in the market it makes efforts to discredit the products of the initial company in the market so that it can control a wider market share. Competition is an inhibiting factor that prevents effective productivity from taking place.

Productivity cannot be measured objectively.

This statement is true because, in certainity, we have no way of reasonably measuring the productivity of organizations. In simple terms, productivity is something that individuals determine by viewing the input and output of an activity. Since we cannot measure output, thus we cannot measure productivity objectively. Based on a teamwork setting, it’s hard to figure out the contribution of each individual in that team.

Do you believe that higher salaries or bonuses can increase productivity? Please motivate your reply

Yes, I believe so. High salaries and bonuses are efficient in increasing the productivity levels of the company. When employees receive the bonuses, they are motivating to do even more extra efforts in order to continue acquiring bonuses. Higher salaries and bonuses raises the living standards employees increasing their job satisfaction. The intern raises their spirit in striving harder to improve the productivity. 

Does the personnel merit system work as a motivator and does it lead to improved productivity?

Yes, the merit system is important as it evaluates the employee’s performance and rewards them, based on merit. This creates a spirit or culture of hard work made by employees in improving their efforts needed to carrying out productivity activities. It is not fair for the workers who perform highly not to be rewarded. This concept also ensures other workers to make extra efforts so that they can also receive rewards. 

Challenges of Productivity Improvement

How and what kind of non-financial rewards can improve productivity

Offering leadership opportunities. Employees and managers understand their roles used to strive to produce. Offering guidance in a project is important as its instills value in leadership and effort thus increasing productivity (Arvanitis & Loukis 2009).

Giving employees the recognition they deserve. This kind should enable the workers to realize and feel appreciated giving a sense of pride and ownership over their job. Thus they will put more efforts to acquire accolades and praise from management thus improving productivity.

Autonomy and responsibility. The managers improve this sense by offering workers more meaningful tasks and responsibilities to have high impact on the business making him to feel more connected to the company. This enables them to have a space and license to opinion and ideas without fear of being ignored. This enables proper team feedback thus increased productivity. 

Which of an individual-based as opposed to a group-based financial reward system will yield better results and why

Bonus incentives compensation programs (Arvanitis & Loukis 2009). The role of providence of incentives is to actually motivate the individual workers and engage them to propel the business outcomes and reward thus differentiating employees fairly in accordance to the value they have created to the company. Firms install sales performance management approach that is aimed to track worker performance. This individual based reward system Is therefore more efficient to use in this case.

Distribute gain sharing economy such that it will promote productivity?

Gain sharing company measures overall performance through use of a predetermined formula sharing the savings with worker. The company actual performance is in comparison with its baseline company in identifying the amount gained. This gives the workers a chance to earn a relative gainsharing bonus. These gains therefore should be distributed basically on a monthly or quarterly basis. The gain should be distributed according to the basis of individual’s employee percentage efforts and performance ratio measure. It should be done by taking in to account the productivity, customer service and quality of work completed by the employees of the firm.

An importance of productivity is the continued economic growth and development in the globe. Thus there exist little knowledge about measuring and management of productivity. Part of the challenge may be in unit analysis that an organization applies to measure productivity and recognize the complex issue regarding the relationship between productivity of an individual employee and the overall performance of the company (Arvanitis & Loukis 2009). Only by understanding the individual level of productivity can theorist and researchers be able to design theories and models with synergies occurring when workers are grouped into work teams, organization departments, nature, structures and the entire economies of scale systematic approach. It is significant to focus on the outset that considers individual productivity measures as it provides a myopic overview of the nature of the organization. Productivity interacts closely with other domains of a company including, worker’s performance, financial controls, innovation skills and efficiency of competition.

The Role of Non-Financial Rewards

The aim of the measurement system is to very important in determination of particular measures to be designed. For instance, if the measures are for planning and control purposes, the inputs and outputs into the measures might be estimated figures that offer guidance for anticipated future capacity. If the measures installed are used for the purpose of worker evaluation technique resulting to bonuses, layoffs and salary raises, inputs and outputs provided must be precise and accurate for shorter periods of time.

At the company level, top level managers will coordinate operations, allocate available resources and make informed decisions in order to optimize performance level as directed on the measurement system. At each level of evaluation, productivity measures should be chosen in a way that total performance of the unit focus on the goals of the other higher level. The goal alignment model indicates that individual companies, groups and units are not often goal propelled, but measurement driven (Cummings & Worley 2014). A company established and communicates the expected goals and objectives of a project and then go ahead and design and implement measurement systems that can be optimized only by performance that results to goal accomplishment, Organizations are not ideal thus the level at which they can achieve set targets and design n efficient productivity measurement systems will indicate their survival and success chances.

Designing productivity servo system model

This model seeks to provide a normative model that indicates the relation of different factors affecting overall worker performance. In this particular model the term performance would be used to describe productivity and other job related factors. Individual worker performance is viewed as the key point of this model as organization factors either influence the employee’s performance directly or indirectly.

Elements

Employees performance results to measures of performance and methods of data set collection. These data leads to several positive rewards which influences employee job satisfaction. The mental and physical energy of employee is directed towards improvement of the process that are diversified by the existing organization systems (Raza et al 2014). This model should be incorporated by the company since its purpose is to ensure understanding and evaluation of employee performance towards measuring the level of productivity experienced in the entire company. It provides a conceptual framework for offering current knowledge and skills by coordinating efforts used to acquire high level of productivity measurements.

Developing a productivity Improvement programmer for PP

After establishing the measurement model used by PP company, standards and reporting software should be designed so that they can facilitate changer for the better. This will involve positioning of end users, employees and managers to increase the ability to make important improvements on productivity (Cummings & Worley 2014). Due to the validation of standards for each level of productivity, the management requires to work closely with all existing associates, assuring that they completely understand how the standards were developed and the reporting process designed to enable the right model and program to be utilized. The implementation of the programs takes pace over a certain period specifically several weeks, with anticipation of achieving 100% performance level; by the end of the intended period of time.

Typical, this illustration indicates a curve for the improvement implementation of a standard program. The dashed line shows an estimated rate of anticipated improvement across a nine-week period of time. The accurate rate of improvement will vary for each line but requires to be ultimately planned and instruction communicated in order for all employees to understand and get involved in the program. Success of the organization Is enhanced by ensuring that the expectations set are clear and precise (Raza et al 2014).

During the process of productivity improvement programs some companies have made other significant discoveries (Cummings & Worley 2014).  It is crucial to coordinate several or multiple observations with all associates of the company in each level of work in order to maximize on implementing productivity improvement programs. The managers should put a great deal of emphasis on training associates as related to interpretation and utilization of planning and balancing dataset contributing to immense benefits. All time communication is also a vital element to be emphasized on. (Raza et al 2014). This takes the form of focusing on real time feedback on performance and more active participation in the making of key decision required for high productivity. It is evident that as workers take in to account serious performance, the quality of products and services rise along with the overall productivity. Individuals are focused extensively on their work thus fair and objective documented concepts should be employed in increasing performance programming which in turn will lead to high levels of productivity in the entire company and nation.

1. Based on units of competency
2. Criteria based on qualifications framework
3. Assessment criteria guideline
4. Conduct an environmental plan to acquire company intelligence of the existing skills and training requirements
5. Development of a continuous improvement plan that enable training packages conform to the provide skill requirements
6. Undertaking quality assurance operations
7. Adopting endorsement of the training package under review
8. Criteria based on revising package on the national register firm
9. Criteria based on companion volume implementation guideline

      10.Total Quality Management criteria

This approach enables complete satisfaction of the needs and capacity of various strategic business.

Promotes moderation of result based assessments to increase on quality

It enables learner to gain important experiences

Disadvantages

Ineffective since learners never submit portfolios and do not spend free time efficiently.

Guidance and support is not sought by learners hence this approach will face difficulty

Affected by distance constraints and time limits.

Personally I feel that this approach is very crucial and significant to better things in future and contributes to much benefits to the learners. Thus I support the approach and ought to be approved with immediate effect.

Based on my own experience, I think quality assurance systems in the company is both effective and efficient. This is because it increases customer satisfaction. Quality assurance is effective in improving the quality of products raising consumer satisfaction.

Time efficiency

Quality assurance team can decrease the amount of inspections required in a processing organization

Improved employee morale. A company using the system enables higher morale in an organization. It involves employees and stakeholders in the success of the organization thus results to high turnover among the employees.

1. Do the different training institutions in your organization define quality assurance in training the same?
2. Training institutions in my organization that offer training activities in quality assurance are not similar because all have a different criteria composed of different skills. Their nature is quite not the same since they use distinct models, methods, rules and policies during the training process. Also the trainers are different which makes them to have different objectives and goals. Who is responsible for evaluating quality of training in your organization

My organization should adopt a Total Quality management model

This is because it enables employees to be mainly focused on the quality of products rather than the quantity of the products. It involves high effort of both top level management and also the workers of a company to enhance effective strategies and policies in order to formulate high quality products (Cummings & Worley 2014).  This goes hand in hand with consumer satisfaction.TQM model depicts that customer feedbacks and anticipations are more essential and effective when implementing ideas and strategies to maintain high quality products than the existing rivals in the market leading to high revenues and profitability ration in the company. My organization should specifically employ ISO quality management standard TQM model.

List the deficiencies that you feel are present in the quality-assurance model or procedure in use by your organization.

Difficulty to achieving an organization-wide commitment to the high quality improvement

Challenged by lack of efforts and resources

How should training institutions be involved in the quality-assurance process?

Training institutions impart knowledge and skills required to diversify Total Quality management model. The skills acquired through training is important in producing high quality goods that increases customer satisfaction.

How should HR Management sections be involved in the quality-assurance process?

HR managers hire the correct personnel with the necessary skills required for the job in order utilize the employee’s skills in providing quality services (Tohidi 2011).

How should learners be involved in the quality-assurance process?

Learners contribute to this dimension by taking part in research activities required to build strategies and policies for the improvement of TQM model

How should evidence of quality training be gathered in training institutions?

 Relevant information and evidence should be collected through the following means; 

• Questionnaires
• Interviews
• Online periodicals
• Journals and articles

Importance of international competitiveness

Competition is very important in quality assurance. This is because firms strive and work hard in order to produce superior and top quality products so that the customers can chose their goods over their rivals (Tohidi 2011). This increase the productivity of the firm when customers are satisfying with the existing standards of their products. Customers are able to buy in impulse levels making the firm control a wide share of the market. This leads to increased sales volume and profits. Competitiveness also enhance building of the company’s quality image of good will. It also instills good business ethics in producing quality goods.

Yes. This is because it has large capacity of skills and resources available for training purposes. It also has the correct personnel required to training other employees.

Do you think your organization’s training institutions should be part of the national quality-assurance system?

YES. This is because my organization training institutions trains various personnel and imparts different knowledge and skills that match the national standards. Also My organization has the capacity to train personnel who can fit other international companies to contribute to national economic development.

Break the main criteria into a number of lower level yardsticks that can be used to evaluate the quality-assurance policy and processes of private providers against

	Main criteria	Lower level yardstick
1	Quality-assurance	Ensuring the provider of learning and assessment knows and understands the resources necessary to achieve the required standard and qualification.
2	Quality audits	Regularly monitor and report on the effectiveness of learning and assessment activities.
3	Quality control	Quality management of systems. Identification of processes and outlining the necessary procedures that ensures implementation of quality management organization through QM processes and QM procedures
4	Enhancing  efficiency	Set goals for each objective that present improvement on previously achieved goals and also report progress on the goals that have been identified.
5	Customer care	Regularly assess the existing consumer satisfaction, provide detailed reports on the same and identify where various expectations and needs have not been met or satisfied.

Formulate questions

1. What quality assurance testing tools should a trainer recommend, utilize, and why?
2. How would a trainer bring down the existing deficiencies in quality assurance projects?
3. What are the strategies to be employed ensuring efficient customer care?
4. What are the existing policies to be undertaken in improving the efficiency?
5. What are the methods or models to be designed in quality control?

 Discuss what is meant by RPL and what it can be used for

Recognition of the prior learning also known as the RPL is the idea or the process of identifying the knowledge and the skills against the appropriate qualification which can be through the identification, the issue of meditation and the acknowledgement t that is believed to come from the informal and the formal mode of learning (Andersson et al,2013).That is RPL in general mean the recognition of the work done by an individual by use of the skills and the knowledge acquired through one’s lifetime. The concept is very crucial in determining on how work was done regardless of where the skills and the knowledge came from. The concept of the RPL can be used in areas such as the schools, training centers and also the military centers (Hamer,2010).

Discuss the possible implication of RPL for a candidate, the employer of the candidate and the community in which the candidate’s lives

Generally, the idea of the RPL makes a certain sense between the employer and the employees in the south Africa. In all professions found in the country the government has formulated new laws and regulations that will determine how the professions are carried out within the country (Sandberg,2012). The implications that the RPL have are;

The RPL gives a way that for the most of the universities in the South Africa to recognize the level of the skills one obtains from the idea of the informal education within the country. It new ways and paths to access the education within the country.

The RPL also has positive implications to those individual within the country will consider to further their education level. The RPL will try to open the education and the training program needed by the groups or the candidates involved (Zhang & Li,2010). In sometimes it encourages those candidates that don’t have the formal education to enter in training institutions and also the universities.

It gives certificates to the candidates in different fields. Employee are guaranteed to have certificates that will enable them to work in any work place. In school’s certificates are issued thus allowing everyone to have an access to the formal education (Cameron, 2011).

The purpose of the RPL here is to key factor such as;

• The idea of the personal development that either be within the employee or the employer.
• The concept of learning program within the institution.
• The promotion and the career development in the working place.

What, in your opinion, are the requirements for a learning institution or assessment center to offer RPL?

• The institution need to be aware on the RPL guidelines.
• Institution is supposed to submit any formal document issued.
• Should have the accreditation number regarding how training was done.
• Formal registered forms are required and the institution need to be registered by the ICB
• The SAQA qualification registration number should be available for the institution to offer the RPL

Design an RPL procedure that a learning institution or assessment center can use.

Step 1. Filling the results and the details of the institution.

Step 2. Paying the fee required to apply the RPL.

Step 3. Filling the information of the learner in a letter.

Step 4. Reviewing the process of the and application of the RPL within the institution

Step 5. The registration of the candidate so as to get appropriate information that will be used for the evaluation by the ICB (Coates et al,2011). One needs to pay a fee that is the registration fee.

Integrating the education and the training development using the RPL

There always two group members that are targeted by the RPL concept in South Africa. The first is the one that is search for the access of the education systems and the other group search for the redress.

In education the targeted group may not have the formal skills needed by the RPL especially the adult learners. This group is required to improve the educational skills by the RPL within the country. The RPL can also try to incorporate those individuals who are believed to have minimal education skills thus requesting the to improve their education system. For the candidate to access any information regarding the RPL then a quality assurance is done to check whether the level of the education and training corresponds to the standards available (Brendel & Todorovic,2011). The concept is highly practiced in many formal institutions such as the universities and the other educational services in the South Africa. By adhering to all the programs of the RPL the training skills are expected improve and also the academic performance will be anticipated to increase. Mostly the concept of the RPL will be carried in educational institutions within the South Africa.

Use of the quality assurance measures has facilitated the working of the RPL in the country. The working assessment can now be analyzed through use of the appropriate standards. Movements such as the RPL ministerial task team has provided the huge benefits for the RPL within the country (Hamer,2013). This led to formation of the new SAQA rules which campaigned for the implementation of the RPL within the country. The government ensured there was free sharing of the RPL tools within the country. New policies were generated to prevent all the buildings and the networks for the RPL. This affected the RPL positively and in so doing the rate of sharing of the education and the training practices epically to the adults increased within the country.

Previous exposure to the RPL practices.

Experiences learnt during the exposure to the RPL;

Lesson learned.

The concept of the RPL was a better method to match the outcomes from a certain evidence. The way in which a candidate acquires a skill is supposed to match on skills that someone has (Hamer,2012).

The RPL should be funded in any institution. Before one enters the RPL there must be registration fee that is paid by every new candidate.

RPL focuses on the issue of developing one’s skills and development. This is evident in the adults whereby it focuses to improve the education and the training skills.

Also the RPL training requires adequate time and the resources. Training someone to acquire the appropriate RPL assessments then it seems to be costly in terms of money and the tools need for the whole concept. Use of education system and measures also facilitates the need for the resources in the RPL (Conrad, 2010).

Areas where the RPL was not recognized before

The following areas were behind in terms of the RPL applications;

• The education services.
• Board of directors.
• The training centers.
• Quality and assurance
• Managerial positions

Factors to show the effectiveness of the RPL.

Commitment to the maintenance and the development of the appropriate assessment systems.

The objectives and the goals of the RPL so as to determine the results to be incurred when using the RPL concept.

Availability of the formal details regarding the RPL will measure the effectiveness of the RPL.

The fee paid during the registration will tell whether the RPL is effective or not.

Previous results of the RPL within an institution determines how one will benefit from the RPL model (Breier,2011).

Objectives of the RPL considered in planning RPL drive.

Allocating the appropriate priority to the learner so as to access the adequate assessment.

Need to accept the diversity of the knowledge and the learning programs.

Maintaining the development of the training and the education system within the country.

Creating solutions for solving the challenges faced by the community.

Equating the adult with the specific training measures.

Yes, have spent more than 7hours in the class explaining mathematical concepts in the class.

1. Board of directors.
2. Management body
3. Departmental heads
4. Coaches
5. Employees

Issues to be included in RPL

• The level of the competency of the candidate.
• The RPL policy guide.
• RPL procedures and the processes.
• Quality assurance policies.
• Assessment measures and criteria

Requirements needed by person to be accepted in RPL.

• Must pay the RPL entry fee.
• Should have academic skills in different fields.
• Should individual training provider.

Quality assurance mechanisms that should be included in the RPL

The use of the RPL in quality assurance determines the assessment.RPL is used as key factor in the field of the education and the training. The use of the appropriate techniques and issues in the RPL will boost the access to the education and the training programs. The assessment of the RPL considers the following;

The use of the credible assessment factors within the organization.

The issue of the quality and the level of the evidence.

Use of the appropriate instruments and tools for accessing the quality measures.

The issue of the assessment process that is found within the educational and training environment.

The moderation and the application of the quality assurance measures.

What to include in execution of RPL?

• The criteria for evaluation.
• The quality and assurance assessment.
• The competency results for the candidates.

 Advices for RPL candidates.

Performing individual tasks in good manner. This will enhance the issue of responsibility to the candidate.

Designing a plan to do task. This will assist in attainment of the goals and the objectives of an individual.

Adjusting to situations. This describes the idea of competency. Training will help to impart new skills to the candidates.

Entry and the exit points of learning programs and their impact to the RPL.

RPL fee. Would assist providing the tools and services needed during training.

The evaluation results. Would give the level of competency for each student. 

Support from facilitator, mentor and coach.

• Training skills.
• Financial support.
• Mentorship

Impact of RPL in productivity.

Productivity is affected by the RPL in different dimensions. The work of the RPL is measure the level of the training through the help of the quality assurance policies. The training competency of the employees and also the education level of the adults will affect the production (Baccouche  et al,2011). During the valuation of the appropriate criteria on how the RPL can affect the production the following functions displayed how the production will be affected by the RPL.

RPL determines whether the assessments within the production environment are fair and reliable.

RPL provides a certain procedure that will determine whether appropriate production mechanisms are adhered.

The RPL will give a certain feedback about the production. If the feedback requires the organization to improve the production level, then appropriate procedures are followed. When the feedback id positive then specific mechanism is redesigned do as to maintain the production line (Andersen & Laugesen,2012).

Difference of RPL assessment and assessment of formal learning.

RPL deals with the quality assurance measures while the assessment of formal learning uses the exams for evaluation.

RPL focuses on imparting skills while the assessment of formal learning aims at providing a knowledge to the candidate.

RPL uses a specified criterion to offer skills to the candidate while the formal learning determines how the student will synthesis the information.

RPL have specific techniques and tools which provide a basement for acquiring skills while the formal learning uses written information’s to acquire knowledge.

RPL tend to be practical when it comes to using the skills while the formal learning revolves more on the theoretical knowledge.

1. The RPL student should possess the following competency features.
2. Ability to use national skills in a workplace.
3. Identifying the required qualifications.
4. Saving time when taking the formal studies within the work place.
5. Should possess increased career developments.
6. Ability to do tasks appropriately.

Reflective exercise 5-2. Merits of the RPL  

The RPL concept usually occurs in three parts. This is the RPL evaluation, the assessment and also the improvement of the quality within the organization. The assessment level checks on factors such as the formative of the RPL, the summative and the diagnostic of the RPL. The RPL mechanism has the following advantages to the country of the South Africa.

It helps to evaluate the performance in different sectors such schools and other training areas.

RPL provides a room to redesign the required assessment within an institution.

The concept helps to give an appropriate procedure and a feedback that will boost the production and enhance the training skills (Shah et al,2013).

Sometimes RPL allows the candidates to de-register if there is issue of the unsatisfactory.

Gives information that determines the level of the education and the skills that a candidate have within the country.

How to improve RPL processes.

Increasing the quality assurance measures. This will standardize the RPL assessment procedures.

Improving the training methods and techniques. Will assist to come up with the appropriate RPL criteria’s and procedures.

Use of the improved tools and coming up with appropriate methods to boost the RPL surveys.

Advising the candidates on the importance of the competency.

Providing educational services to all the candidates. This may either be formal or informal type thus helping candidates to acquire skills.

Standards, learning and leadership programs.

• Appropriate procedures should be used to analyze academic level.
• Leadership should be done in apt ways.
• Candidates requirements for entry.
• Need to be conversant with the rules.
• Entry fee is charged.

Fee structures.

• Should include specific amount paid in installments.
• Appropriate fee should be charged.
• Fee for each activity should be defined.

Steps of RPL process.

1. Need to be clear to all candidates.
2. They should account for the quality and assurance policies.

Quality assurance

• Should focus on the quality assessment and verification.
• Should set appropriate standards.
• Should be done by authorized personnel.

Administration of RPL

• Place of operation.
• Should define the authority.
• Objectives and goals should be well defined.

Facilities and tools

• Quality assurance tools should be provided.
• The condition of each tool should be checked.
• Each activity should have specific tool.

Deliverables at the end of the programme.

1.The definition. In any educational system the recognition of the RPL provides the cornerstone for the valuation and the use of the acknowledgement skills and knowledge that is required in performing a particular activity (Sandberg,2012). The knowledge can be formal or informal. In academic it noted that the basic skills start from the informal to the formal. When the concept of the quality assurance is applied to the education system then useful information for accreditation Is given.

2.The aim of the RPL. The purpose of the RPL in any academic institution is to provide a holistic or conducive environment that will facilitate the appropriate assessment. It also describes the lifelong of the academic and also the giving a chance for the access of the higher education within the country.

3.The principles and rules governing the RPL. The RPL is always concerned with model of the development. This means that the adult knowledge is developed from already acquired information that was learning before. The assessment done to determine improvement of the academic will lead to introduction of the RPL.

4.RPL process. The policy comprises the guidelines on how to use the RPL process. The adult learners who are in need to access the academic information should be included.

5.Training strategies. Training development activities need to use certain criteria (Andersen & Laugesen,2012). This means that candidates will be subjected to approach a relevant office or a learning center so as access the appropriate information about it.

6.Academic and training development. The policy includes all measures that are to be used by the students and adult learners. The RPL should offer adequate support in order to assist student to acquire the education and the training programs.

7.The staff.RPL need to include the stuff available within the institution. Also new opportunities for developing the staff in terms of academic and training need to be established.

8.Use of the RPL methods. The methodologies can include the interviews, observations, use of the written information’s and also the use of letters. The practices and the procedures need to be legit, paying attentions and transparency in the education field.

1. Assessment procedures. Assessment methods in quality assurance in RPL need to include in the RPL policy. The methods should be selected wisely depending on what should be discussed (Andersen & Laugesen,2012).

10.Quality assurance. Adequate information’s should be provided to check the judgement of the results from education and training programs. The quality assurance management should be included to the academic context where necessary.

References

Rice, A. K. (Ed.). (2013). Productivity and social organization: The Ahmedabad experiment: Technical innovation, work organization and management. Routledge.

Lovelock, C. H., Wirtz, J., & Chew, P. (2009). Essentials of services marketing.

Sahdat, M., Sajjad, S. I., Farooq, M. U., & Rehman, K. (2011). Emotional intelligence and organizational productivity: a conceptual study. World Applied Sciences Journal, 15(6), 821-825.

Arvanitis, S., & Loukis, E. N. (2009). Information and communication technologies, human capital, workplace organization and labour productivity: A comparative study based on firm-level data for Greece and Switzerland. Information Economics and Policy, 21(1), 43-61.

Asgarsani, H., Duostdar, O., & Rostami, A. G. (2013). Empowerment and its impact on the organization productivity. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research In Business, 1(11).

Caliendo, L., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2012). The impact of trade on organization and productivity. The quarterly journal of economics, 127(3), 1393-1467.

Garicano, L., & Heaton, P. (2010). Information technology, organization, and productivity in the public sector: Evidence from police departments. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(1), 167-201.

Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: An empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 117-144.

Tohidi, H. (2011). Teamwork productivity & effectiveness in an organization base on rewards, leadership, training, goals, wage, size, motivation, measurement and information technology. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1137-1146.

Edwards, P. (Ed.). (2009). Industrial relations: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

Chaudhary, N., & Sharma, B. (2012). Impact of employee motivation on performance (productivity) in private organization. International Journal of Business Trends and Technology, 2(4), 29-35.

Paygude, P., & Devale, P. R. (2013). Automated data validation testing tool for data migration quality assurance. Int J Mod Eng Res (IJMER), 599-603.

Shenglei, P. (2010). Study on Quality Value Stream and Its application [J]. Technology Economics, 8, 023.

JIANG, Z. H., LENG, H. J., YAN, J., & CAI, T. G. (2011). Research on Quality Management Based on Hall Three Dimensions Structure [J]. Logistics Sci-Tech, 2, 028.

HAN, X. H., QIN, X. S., & WANG, K. Q. (2009). The Process-oriented QFD Control Mode of Information Quality [J]. Manufacture Information Engineering of China, 3, 005.

Yong, Y. E. (2012). Evaluation of classroom teaching quality based on data mining and cloud model. Computer Simulation, 8, 091.

Lin, Z. S. Z. (2011). Research and Practice of Internal Quality Assurance System in Higher Vocational College. Journal of Wuhan Polytechnic, 6, 007.

Yawen, L. W. D. (2009). Application of 6σ Management in Textile Enterprise Quality Improvement [J]. Cotton Textile Technology, 9, 013.

Andersson, P., Fejes, A., & Sandberg, F. (2013). Introducing research on recognition of prior learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32(4), 405-411.

Hamer, J. (2010). Recognition of prior learning-Normative assessment or co-construction of preferred identities?. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 50(1), 100.

Sandberg, F. (2012). A Habermasian analysis of a process of recognition of prior learning for health care assistants. Adult Education Quarterly, 62(4), 351-370.

Zhang, Q., & Li, B. (2010, June). Discriminative K-SVD for dictionary learning in face recognition. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010 IEEE Conference on (pp. 2691-2698). IEEE.

Cameron, R. (2011). Australia: An overview of 20 years of research into the recognition of prior learning (RPL).

Coates, A., Carpenter, B., Case, C., Satheesh, S., Suresh, B., Wang, T., … & Ng, A. Y. (2011, September). Text detection and character recognition in scene images with unsupervised feature learning. In Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 2011 International Conference on (pp. 440-445). IEEE.

Zhang, Q., & Li, B. (2010, June). Discriminative K-SVD for dictionary learning in face recognition. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010 IEEE Conference on (pp. 2691-2698). IEEE.

Brendel, W., & Todorovic, S. (2011, November). Learning spatiotemporal graphs of human activities. In Computer vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE international conference on (pp. 778-785). IEEE.

Hamer, J. (2013). Love, rights and solidarity in the recognition of prior learning (RPL). International journal of lifelong education, 32(4), 481-500.

Hamer, J. (2012). An ontology of RPL: improving non-traditional learners’ access to the recognition of prior learning through a philosophy of recognition. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(2), 113-127.

Conrad, D. (2010). Achieving flexible learning through recognition of prior learning practice: a case?study lament of the Canadian academy. Open Learning, 25(2), 153-161.

Breier, M. (2011). South Africa: Research reflecting critically on Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) research and practice. Researching the recognition of prior learning: International perspectives, 200-227.

Baccouche, M., Mamalet, F., Wolf, C., Garcia, C., & Baskurt, A. (2011, November). Sequential deep learning for human action recognition. In International Workshop on Human Behavior Understanding (pp. 29-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Andersen, M., & Laugesen, C. (2012). Recognition of prior learning within formal adult education in Denmark. PLA Inside Out: An International Journal on Theory, Research and Practice in Prior Learning Assessment, 1(2).

Shah, A., Moodley, K., Cooper, L., & Jones, B. (2013). Recognition of Prior Learning as “Radical Pedagogy”: A case study of the Workers’ College in South Africa. McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill, 48(3), 511-530.

ALIZADEH, F., TABIBI, S., Nasiripour, A. A., & GOUHARI, M. R. (2009). Work-life quality and manager’s productivity in social security hospitals (Tehran; 2007-2008).

Mamaghani, F. (2012). Impact of telecommuting on organization productivity. European Journal of Management, 12(3).

Dixit, V., & Bhati, M. (2012). A study about employee commitment and its impact on sustained productivity in Indian auto-component industry. European journal of business and social sciences, 1(6), 34-51.

Aibieyi, S. (2014). Training as an Essential Tool for Increasing Productivity in Organization: Uniben in Focus. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 35-38.

Raza, H., Anjum, M., & Zia, S. M. (2014). The impacts of employee’s job performance behavior and organizational culture on organizational productivity in pharmaceutical industries in Karachi. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(12), 285-400.

Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organization development and change. Cengage learning.

Dehghan Nayeri, N., Salehi, T., & Ali Asadi Noghabi, A. (2011). Quality of work life and productivity among Iranian nurses. Contemporary nurse, 39(1), 106-118.