The Importance of Sustainability for Business Organizations
Through its view of 2050 (WBCSD, 2010), the World Business Council for Sustainable Development provided a sobering perspective into various environmental and social changes that would bring challenges and opportunities for businesses to pursue sustained global development. Due to the sheer complexities of global change, organizations face immense pressure to promote and implement Sustainability in their business (KPMG, 2012). Sustainability has shifted from the province of the few to the many domains over the last decade (Haywood, et al, 2013). It has become tremendously significant for business organizations to link the knowledge with action gap by employing sustainable business strategies. Sustainability can be described as meeting the current demands of the users while simultaneously considering not jeopardizing the requirement of future generations.
A sustainability strategy, according to McKinsey, empowers an organization to make long-term investments for its business. Whenever Sustainability comes into play, organizations have to face larger losses in future if they do nothing for maintaining Sustainability (Rafi, 2021).
The second part of the report gives a brief overview of responsibility centres. A responsibility centre is a specific area of duty that an individual manages. The construction of a system of accumulation, allocation of costs and absorption is generally needed to define a responsibility centre. Both types of corporations use a cost centre; whether it is a profit-oriented business or a non-profit oriented business, organizations use a cost centre to keep track of their spending. A cost centre is usually defined as a subsystem that is implemented in a bigger system in charge of a specific set of actions that benefit the organization. Keeping careful tabs on the costs of running such a cost centre assists a business organization in keeping control over their total costs, allows distribution of resources more effectively, and helps the organization evaluate profitability earned on any product or profit earned through each department. In cost centres, inputs and expenses are measured in monetary terms, but outputs are not. Expense centres, on the other hand, can be classified into two types: discretionary expense centres and engineered expense centres (mbaknol.com, 2014). As per the engineered expense centres, inputs and expenses are measured if they can be expressed in monetary terms, while outputs are not measured based on monetary terms. These types of centres are usually found in manufacturing companies where they implement a standard cost system. Certain responsibility centres exist within support and administrative departments that are a part of engineered expense centres in actual forms. Under this type of centre, the cost incurred for producing any product is determined by multiplying the output involved in each unit by its standard cost. Its effectiveness can be determined by comparing the actual cost to the standard cost. When taking budgeting decisions, there is a difference between discretionary expense centres and engineered expense centres. Under an engineered expense centre, the organization’s management determines the cost by considering the operating budget needed to accomplish the activity efficiently in the future. On the other hand, a discretionary expense centre’s primary duty is to determine the scope of the job that must be completed.
What are Responsibility Centres and Its Types
This research aims to uncover and comprehend how engineered expense centres have a significant impact on overall organizational Sustainability and profitability.
The report aims to provide a brief understanding of the responsibility centres and its different types, such as profit centre, investment centre, cost centre and revenue centre. The report also aims to provide a brief explanation of why organizational Sustainability is important for business organizations. In addition, this Paper also elucidates some of the factors that affect the business’s profitability.
The research would benefit a wide range of people, including professionals, businesses organization, employees, and customers. It would provide a more in-depth understanding of how Sustainability is implemented within the organization’s framework and its primary benefits. It will provide the user with a brief understanding of responsibility centres and their various types. This study will make the user understand in detail the types of responsibility centres; in addition, the report will provide a more detailed insight into the engineered expense centre, which is generally under the categories of expense centres. The implementation of an engineered expense centre is generally related to building a management control system that usually keeps a close check on the level of performance of the entity (Bhasin, 2019).
In small businesses, decision-making and business management are frequently handled by a single person. However, when there is a growth in the organization, and it becomes larger, various commercial complexities arise, making it very difficult for one individual to handle. Since the individual does not have the right to exercise full control, he will be obliged to procure assistance from other people to fulfil the organizations’ goals. As a result, he has to share decision-making authority and responsibility with others. Delegation can be defined as the sharing of responsibility and authority, which befalls from segmentation and divisionalization. When decision-making authority is deputized to a person who is in charge of a division or a segment, known as a manager, that person must be held accountable for the consequences of their decisions and actions. This entails evaluating the management who had made decisions and holding them accountable for their actions. Thus, the resultant procedure demands the formation of responsibility centres inside the organization. A responsibility centre is a specific area of duty that an individual manages. The construction of a system of accumulation, allocation of costs and absorption is generally needed to define a responsibility centre. According to the research conducted by Robert N. Anthony and Vijay Govindarajan, a responsibility centre is an organizational unit that is said to be headed by a responsible manager.
The ability to control costs or revenue is the most important criterion or consideration in recognizing responsibility centres. Controlling costs and revenue is synonymous with keeping effective control over the business. In fact, a successful planning and control system is built around the organization’s implicit or explicit centres of authority. Managers at various levels must have a well-defined area of responsibility if an eloquent assessment is to take place. If an entity will do Accounting by responsibility centres and cost centres, it allows the entity to decentralize cost management, ensure cost fixation at all levels of management, make use of the non-traditional method of cost control that takes into consideration each unit as a unique characteristic, assist in identifying the cost involved in overhead, and, eventually, lead to a greater rise in economic efficiency (Akhmetova, et al, 2019).
Impact of Engineered Expense Centres on Sustainability and Profitability
The responsibility centre, according to Vakhrushina M.A., is “the structural unit of the organization, regulated by the head, who manages to some extent the expenditures, revenues, and money invested in the business segment.” As per the definition given by Foster, J., and Horigren, C.T, a responsibility centre is defined as “the organizational segment whose supervisors are accountable for a specific work area Another researcher, Ivashkevich V.B., argued that the responsibility centre is an area of activity that is endowed with the rights and duties of manager obligations of a specific management level. This section may consider the completion of responsibilities assigned to managers by the administration. The centres are built on the existing linear-functional management system, which is made up of enterprise services and functional divisions. For Analyzing the above-given definitions, one may draw the general conclusion that the responsibility centre should be defined as the structural units which are created based on the apparatus of the management department basis that can be the foundation that regulates and control financial flows, in addition, it determines the directions of outlaying cash flows. In management accounting, responsibility centres are categorized into four types of centres these include : revenue centres, cost centres, investment centres and profit centres (Cooper, 2018).
Revenue Centre- This centre is in charge of presenting and tracking revenue. The management has no stimulus over the investment or cost, but it can monitor some of the marketing expenses involved. The revenue centre’s production is calculated by comparing budgeted revenue to actual revenue and actual incurred marketing expenses to budgeted marketing expenses.
Cost Centre- A cost centre is a department or unit that manages, allocates, separates, and eliminates all types of firm costs. A cost center’s primary function is to monitor a firm’s costs and minimize any unnecessary expenditures that may arise. The cost is determined by the individual as well as the location. In multinational corporations, the cost centre is authorised to reduce and control costs. (strategic-control.24xls.com, 2022).
Investment Centre – The Investment Centre is in charge of both investments and revenue. The investment manager has control over income, expenses incurred, the amount of money invested in assets, and so on. He also has the power to create a credit policy, which has an instantaneous influence on the collection of debt (byjus.com, 2022).
Profit Centre- A section or department of a firm that calculates profits is generally referred to as profit centre. Different profit centres in a corporation are overseen by managers, who identify profits based on costs and incomes. The profit Centre is responsible for all actions related to product sales and production.
This classification of responsibility centres is usually based on the norm of financial statements prepared by the managers, which are evaluated based on the extent of their powers and the completeness of their responsibilities.
Under this centre, only those inputs and expenses get measured, which can be expressed in monetary terms. On the other hand, based on physical terms, the outputs get measured. This type of centre is generally used in manufacturing that employs a standard cost scheme. Certain responsibility centres within the support and administrative departments are designed to be engineered expense centres. The cost involved in the product is generally evaluated in these centres by doing multiplication of the output of each unit by its standard cost. The efficiency of the system is determined by comparing the actual cost to the standard cost.
Some of the characteristics of engineered expense centres. It can be discussed as follows:
- Their inputs can be measured in monetary terms, while their productions are measurable in physical terms.
- The ideal dollar amount of inputs required to create one unit of output may be determined.
- Engineered expense centres, which are also known as standard cost centres, are usually seen in manufacturing entities that use a standard cost system.
- Trucking, Warehousing, distribution, and other parallel units found in the marketing entity may form a part of engineered expenditure centres, and thus, following this, expenses within administrative and support departments may also be said to be an engineered expenditure centre. Some of the examples can be payable and payroll expenses in the controller department, Accounts receivable, records of personnel and the cafeteria in the HR department, records of the shareholder in the organization’s secretary department, as well as the organization’s motor pool. Since these units perform repetitive tasks, standard pricing can be established.
In an engineering expense centre, output is multiplied by the standard cost of each unit produced to determine the cost of a finished product.. When a comparison is done between this cost and the real costs involved, the gap between the two reflects the organizational unit efficiency.
This gap can be very few if any, responsibility centres where all these cost items are engineered. Even in wholly automated manufacturing sectors, the expenses involved in indirect labour and other services used might vary at the discretion of management. As a result, the phrase engineered expenditure centre can be referred to as responsibility centres where engineered expenses prevail, but this does not ensure that valid engineering estimates can be done for each and every cost component.
Expense centres are usually defined as responsibility centres where the inputs, or expenses, are quantified in monetary terms, but the output is not quantified in monetary terms. There are two types of expense centres that exist this include engineered cost centres and discretionary cost centres. Discussion about engineered cost centre was already done above. Discretionary expense centres, on the hand, are discussed as follows. Under Discretionary cost, the centre output cannot be assessed in monetary terms. This type of cost centre includes Administrative and support divisions such as legal, accounting, industrial relations, human resources and public relations. In addition to this, research and development groups and the majority of marketing operations are also included.
The word “discretionary” does not imply that management’s decisions are arbitrary or random. Certain policies were defined by the Management that should govern the entity’s operations: whether to make matching, exceed, or spend less marketing efforts; than its competitors’ the level of service that the organization provides to its customers; spend the appropriate amount on Research &Development, public relations financial planning, and many other actions. The management’s opinion on the appropriate level of discretionary costs might get change. Dramatic changes might take place when new management takes over. Following such a drastic transition, the level of discretionary expenses often follows a similar pattern from one year to the next (staffnew.uny.ac.id, 2022).
Colbert and Kurucz after completing their study give a popular definition of Sustainability, according to him sustainability is “keeping the business going,” Another term commonly used in this context refers to a company’s “future-proofing.” Boudreau and Ramstad define success as “reaching success today without jeopardizing future demands.” The Charter of Ford’s Sustainability Committee, which was established by the Board of Directors, focuses on sustainable growth, which it describes as the ability of the entity to fulfil the requirement of current customers while also considering the needs of future groups. A business model that generates value while preserving and improving environmental, financial, and social capital over time is required for sustainable growth. According to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, the essence of sustainability in an organisational context is “the notion of enhancing the environmental, societal, and economic systems within which a business organisation functions.” This introduces the concept of a three-way focus for businesses seeking long-term viability. “Sustainability entails focusing on social, economic, and environmental performance at the same time.” this idea may be related to the rise of so-called “triple bottom line accounting.”
There is a growing number of research studies that demonstrate that managerial attention to Sustainability can positively benefit an organization’s long-term performance through, among other things, its impact on employee performance (Aguinis and Glavas 2012; Jones et al. 2019; Niemann and Hoppe, 2018). The research did Previously showed that employee perceptions of managerial attention for organizational Sustainability are related positively to attitudes of the employee such as organizational identification, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and organizational trust (Boyd and Nowell 2020; Gond et al. 2017). as well as employee behaviour which include organizational citizenship behaviour, in-role and extra-role act, employee performance and retention (Crucke, et al, 2021).
For every business organization Business sustainability is considered as an essential constituent of every organization’s business planning and management cycles, this also forms an essential component for managing risk. Sustainability in business strives to help organizations by developing a balanced and integrated strategy to achieve their social, economic and environmental responsibilities to their stakeholders. As a result, a more robust organization can get develop and can be continued in the long run.
In any competitive environment, one of the primary goals of every organization is to be sustainable. To accomplish so, the organization must implement, design, and sustain strategies for enhancing its performance. Entity can achieve this by examining the internal as well as external elements that could have an influence the earnings of the organization. Managers’ quality and efficiency are dependent on their ability to identify those factors which lead to enhanced profitability. In practice, profitability is defined as the earnings of the firm from revenue after subtracting the costs made within a certain period. It is among the most important indicators of managerial success, the satisfaction of shareholders, investment attraction, and the success of the organization. Without question, the ultimate purpose of any corporation is to maximize its owners’ wealth by growing the value of its shares. Identifying the variables that influence profitability continues to be an important concern for scholars. A number of prior studies have glanced into the factors that can influence firm profitability, including the working capital management, the size of the firm, the age of the organization. However, past research has revealed discrepancies that put generalizations into doubt. Previous studies’ conclusions have largely emphasized a number of characteristics that have a profound influence on the profitability of the company. Each of these variables is useful to researchers, together with the size of the company, risk, age, liquidity, risk, leverage, type of industry, capital intensity, concentration ratio, skill, resource utilization, the share of the market, intensity of making an advertisement, intensity of R&D, retention ratio revenue growth, turnover ratios, long-term financing, ownership characteristics, working assets, exports, level of indebtedness and so on. If the growth in the economy continues, there will be even more demand for the products, especially luxury items that have high demand income elasticity. Effective management is vital for the strategic and long growth and profitability of the entity. Poor management, for instance, can cause a drop in the morale of workers, which affects service to customers and increases the employee turnover rate. Businesses could also suffer the consequences of making wrong expansion strategies. Several banks, for example, took out risky subprime borrowers, resulting in huge losses. A common example includes Tesco, they suffered as a result of diversifying into unrelated businesses such as garden centres. This resulted in the corporation overstretching itself and losing track of its main business (Pettinger, 2017).
In today’s competitive business environment, there are three factors that play key roles in an organization’s ability to compete successfully; these include quality, price and time. In order to achieve this goal entity must adjust to advancements in technology and the economy. One of the effective methods for improving manufacturing organizations’ sustainable management models is Strategic cost management. It help entity to successfully addressed many of the mistakes and gaps of traditional accounting systems, endeavoring to produce value for shareholders through accurate cost estimation, proper cost deployment to products, and waste disposal. If an organization uses a strategic cost management technique, then it can give organizations a competitive advantage since it delivers precise cost price information that users can quickly understand. The construction of an engineered expenditure centre is one such technique (Rounaghi, Jarrar, & Dana, (2021). The following attributes are found in an engineered expense centre: Their inputs can be specified in monetary terms. Their production can be measurable in physical terms. The optimal financial quantity of input supposed to create one unit of output can be estimated. The expenses involved in Engineered expense centres are most frequently identified in manufacturing companies. These units perform repetitive tasks for which a standard cost can be established. The output of an engineered expense centre is typically multiplied by the standard cost of each unit produced; this provides the cost that must be incurred for the finished product. When this cost is compared to the actual costs, the difference between the two reflects the entity’s efficiency. As a result, the kind and quantity of production are regulated, and particular quality requirements are established to ensure that manufacturing costs are not reduced at the price of quality.
Conclusion
Thus, it can be concluded that Sustainable growth necessitates for a business model that generates value by conserving and improving environmental, social capital and financial over time. The essence of Sustainability in an organizational context is “the notion of upgrading the environmental, societal, and economic systems within which a business organization functions.” This presents the notion of a three-way focus for businesses aiming for long-term viability. A responsibility centre is a specific area of duty that is managed by an individual. The construction of a system of accumulation, allocation of costs and absorption is generally needed to define a responsibility centre; there are different types of responsibility centres that exist, which are discussed in the above report. In addition to this, the study also discusses engineered business expenses that create an impact on the Sustainability and profitability of the business. This paper also discusses some factors that increase the profitability of the business.
Thus, based on the fact discussed in the report, it is recommended to the organization to do management of enterprise by building responsibility centres. If a business organization uses this as a tool, it will help the organization to manage their business efficiently as well as it will help an entity to influence the operation of the business. It will also provide the managers with a systematic understanding of the directions towards which the organization is moving as well as help in evaluating the development rate of the organization so that organization can understand how they are progressing and which parts of the entity blunt the movement. This will also assist the organization in reaching its goals with maximum earning and high-quality results. In addition to this, it is essential for management to ensure that organization develop strategy and sustainability activities in lined with each other. A common aspect is Divergence which make sustainability efforts vulnerable because of a lack of genuine commitment and prioritisation Businesses must first address compliance, which frequently refers to waste management, pollution, and energy efficiency standards, as well as human rights and labour responsibility. Regulatory compliance also become a matter of concern for Investors. Thus, developing a sustainable business environment will help organization to grow with huge profits (Haanaes, 2018).
References
Aguinis, H., and A. Glavas. 2012. “What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda.” Journal of management 38 (4):932-968. doi: 10.1177/0149206311436079.
Akhmetova, I. G., Derbenyova, A. A., Dyganova, R. R., & Husainova, E. A. (2019). Management organization accounting for the responsibility centers. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 124, p. 05030). EDP Sciences.
Bhasin, H. (2019, October 18). Management control system: Objectives, functions and advantages. Marketing91. Retrieved April 14, 2022, from https://www.marketing91.com/management-control-system/
Boyd, N. M., and B. Nowell. 2020. “Sense of community, sense of community responsibility, organizational commitment and identification, and public service motivation: a simultaneous test of affective states on employee well-being and engagement in a public service work context.” Public Management Review:1-27
byjus.com. (2022, January 6). What is a responsibility center? meaning, types. BYJUS. Retrieved April 14, 2022, from https://byjus.com/commerce/responsibility-center/
Cooper, D. (2018, July 24). Describe the types of responsibility centers. Principles of Accounting Volume 2 Managerial Accounting. Retrieved April 14, 2022, from https://opentextbc.ca/principlesofaccountingv2openstax/chapter/describe-the-types-of-responsibility-centers/#:~:text=Five%20types%20of%20responsibility%20centers%20include%20cost%20centers%2C%20discretionary%20cost,focus%20only%20on%20controllable%20expenses
Crucke, S., Kluijtmans, T., Meyfroodt, K., & Desmidt, S. (2021). How does organizational sustainability foster public service motivation and job satisfaction? The mediating role of organizational support and societal impact potential. Public Management Review, 1-27.
Gond, J. P., A. El Akremi, V. Swaen, and N. Babu. 2017. “The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person?centric systematic review.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 38 (2):225-246.
Haanaes, K. (2018, August 16). Why all businesses must embrace sustainability and lead the way. IMD business school. Retrieved April 14, 2022, from https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/articles/why-all-businesses-should-embrace-sustainability/
Haywood, L. K., Trotter, D. H., Faccer, K., & Brent, A. C. (2013). The diversity of the practice of corporate sustainability: An exploratory study in the South African business sector. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development.
Jones, D. A., A. Newman, R. Shao, and F. L. Cooke. 2019. “Advances in employee-focused micro-level research on corporate social responsibility: Situating new contributions within the current state of the literature.” Journal of Business Ethics 157 (2):293-302.
KPMG. (2012), “Expect the unexpected: Building business value in a changing world”, available at https:// www.kpmg.com/sustainability (accessed 14 april 2022).
mbaknol.com. (2014, October 1). What is expense center? MBA Knowledge Base. Retrieved April 14, 2022, from https://www.mbaknol.com/business-finance/what-is-expense-center/
Niemann, L., and T. Hoppe. 2018. “Sustainability reporting by local governments: a magic tool? Lessons on use and usefulness from European pioneers.” Public Management Review 20 (1):201-223.
Pettinger, T. (2017, December 22). Factors that affect the profitability of firms. Economics Help. Retrieved April 14, 2022, from https://www.economicshelp.org/microessays/profit/
Rafi, T. (2021, December 10). Council Post: Why corporate strategies should be focused on sustainability. Forbes. Retrieved April 14, 2022, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2021/02/10/why-corporate-strategies-should-be-focused-on-sustainability/?sh=317ee3507e9f
Rounaghi, M. M., Jarrar, H., & Dana, L. P. (2021). Implementation of strategic cost management in manufacturing companies: overcoming costs stickiness and increasing corporate sustainability. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 1-8.
staffnew.uny.ac.id. (2022). Responsibility Centers: Revenue and expense centers [email protected] staffnew.uny.ac.id. Retrieved April 13, 2022, from https://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132280876/pendidikan/presentasi-ch3-responsibility-centers.pdf
strategic-control.24xls.com. (2022). strategic-contro. Strategic management. Retrieved April 14, 2022, from https://www.strategic-control.24xls.com/en204
WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development).( 2010), “Vision 2050: The New Agenda for Business”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Conches-Geneva, Switzerland.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
