What is the Theory of Mind Hypothesis?
Discuss about the Evaluating Theories of Autism.
The ToM hypothesis remains the standard and mostly investigated theories of autism. It was initially developed when researchers were analyzing the features which might or might not be distinct to the human species. The notion was that the person with a ToM must identify the mental conditions individually as well as in other people and utilize such info to predict the behavior of the others. Following the reading regarding this idea, Simon Baron-Cohen (scientist) created this autism’s theory. Simon recommended that it remains apparently this capability which is compromised in kids with the autism. In a nutshell, ToM highlights that stays the deficiency to take others’ viewpoint which leads to various shared shortfalls in autism including deliberate communication, make-believe to play as well as conjecturing the beliefs and emotions of other people. Such a gap is usually referred to us, “mindfulness.” The deficit in this theory leads to people on autism spectrum to perform less in activities which need “mind reading” as opposed to respective characteristically emerging peers.
Autism is a neural developmental condition which is pervasive, and it affects processing of information in many ways. This disorder affects males more than female, and it manifests by age two (Schurz, Radua, Aichhorn, Richlan & Perner, 2014). People with autism find it hard to interact socially with other people, have difficulties in communication, have sensory deficits, and their motor coordination is poor. This condition exists in an autism spectrum disorder because its symptoms vary greatly. Some people with autism have low intellectual abilities while others are quite intelligent. The cause of autism is still unclear.
Cognitive theories predominate psychological autism’s studies The have also cut through issues of specificity that poses a question as for whether autism results from the domain-particular variable or whether manifold aspects are engaged; uniqueness which also suggests whether the variables exclusive to autism or it is further responsible for the development of other disorders? Finally, a universality which poses another question whether the factor(s) found in all autism/majority?
ToM deficit implies that ASD-infected individuals could brawl in such ways as: explanation of respective conduct; comprehending; corresponding emotions; prediction of emotional or behavior of states of other people; comprehending others’ viewpoints; inferring the others’ intentions; knowledge that behavior influences how other people feel or think and distinguishing facts and fiction. Because of such deficits, explicit teaching about how people can fathom emotion of other people and how to solve the social situations problems remains essential (Haker, Schneebeli & Stephan, 2016).
Approaches like social, role-play and visual tales to jog the memory of autistic people regarding emotional conditions and proper behavior remains critical. Moreover, teachers and parents working with people on spectrum must stay careful never to blame behavior which has repercussions which are never entirely comprehended by that kid or adult. It is always essential to think about explaining how behavior influences other people or make them feel before reprimanding (Oakley, Brewer, Bird & Catmur, 2016).
Autism and Cognitive Theories
This is the most commonly researched theories of autism. It was created by Simon. It was created initially when the investigators were investigating phenomena which could have been or not distinct to humans. It primarily targeted that a person with a ToM must specify mental conditions individually and other people and utilize the info to predict about the conduct of other individual. Simon Baron-Cohen after that developed the theory of Mind Hypothesis when he read this concept. ToM highlights that the deficiency in taking others’ viewpoints leads in several of the shared shortfalls in autism. For instance, pretend play, inferring others’ emotions and beliefs and intentional communication. The deficit is termed “mindblindness” The individuals struggle areas such as: explaining their habits, comprehending perspectives of others, predicting the behaviors or emotional states of others, fathom their conducts, differentiating fact and fiction, understanding the conduct influences how other people think and feel alongside inferring the intentions of others (Meltzer, 2018).
These deficits call for the demand of comprehensive teaching that regards understanding others’ emotions and the way of solving the problem in social context. Useful approaches like role-play, visuals or social stories for reminding autistic persons regarding emotional conditions or accepted conducts can be employed. Nonetheless, Guardians and teachers working with autistic individuals should consider not to blame actions that have consequences that are not well clear by the child or adult, they should instead explain how behaviors result on others or cause others feel before reprimanding (Cheng, Rolls, Gu, Zhang & Feng, 2015).
This theory also explains the deficits in ASD disorder hypothesis it is alternatively referred to as the compound information processing theory. This theory was proposed by Pennington and Ozonoff (1996) after observing autistic individuals wrangling in multifaceted tasks which engaged abstract ideas like planning and reasoning. Neuropsychological tests have been used to expand this theory. Individuals with ASD were observed fighting over their fellows following their brain must process complex info at once. Individuals diagnosed with ADHD also have reduced executive functioning.
An executive functioning deficit indicates that ASD-infected children skirmish in following parts; organizing things, following multi-step directions, planning in next activity or future, combining information from various sources to solve the problem. Environmental support is useful to help individuals struggling with executive functioning. This involves checklists, everyday planners alongside homework logs between guardians; teachers or parents to ensure children are organized and to assist homework accomplishment. Also, extra time to be given for students to process instructions. Instructions to be provided one step at a time or repeating the instructions once again.
Specificity
A good theory tells readers what it can say to them with specificity. As observed above, the two theories have incorporated its restraints though can swiftly and efficiently prune away inquiry lines which remain fruitless permanently (Wellman, 2014). The instance par excellence comes from classical computation theory, with its outcome on formally undecidable propositions (Milton, 2017). The best instance of this dynamic at work arises from the utilization of the Turing’s favorite result to illustrate in just fewer lines the undecidability of the static info flow safety examination. The two theories remain specific to autism and focus on helping readers to best understand the phenomena in details (Bora et al., 2016).
Challenges Associated with Theory of Mind Deficit in Autism
From the two theories, the universality criteria can be used to evaluate them. A good method has to be universal and makes its inapplicability immediately as well as unambiguously known. This could be the most vital characteristic the two theories have. There is usually a powerful temptation to being enamored with a given theory that it subsequently becomes challenging to differentiate an elegant illustration from a fully insubstantial fantasy. With its requirement for a vast plethora of swift-and-dirty theories, physical chemistry appears to be increasingly apt at the generation of models which speak their applicability up-front alongside neatly hand off control to their corresponding options when their presuppositions fail (Schurz, Radua, Aichhorn, Richlan & Perner, 2014).
Each model predicts substantially different conduct or behaviors provided different spatial scales alongside different temperature alongside pressure status, occasions radically. Whereas such a diversity of different perception could appear cluttered alongside confusing from the views of assimilating the discipline knowledge, it is, however, quite easy to establish which model applies to a particular context. Assumptions for remain extremely precise from the beginning, and albeit they integrate known alongside deliberate estimations, such are anticipated in a manner which comprehends the imprecisions alongside their corresponding aftermaths. Based, this criterion, it is true that the two theories meet the requirements as they have both made their deficits promptly known as have been highlighted above (Panero et al., 2016).
A good theory is one that makes predictions from the previous ones and hence being unique. As seen in the two theories, the uniqueness criteria have been met. This criterion applies to how much uncertainty is ushered in by the application of a given theory, or other words, to what extent a given theory lends itself to the procedure of computation. It is apparently this characteristic which accounts for the unparalleled success of the theory of ToM and Executive dysfunctional (Snyder, Kaiser, Warren & Heller, 2015). This is because, they have translated the observed phenomena, autism efficiently, into readily transformable symbolic connotations thereby allowing inferences to be composed quickly with each other. This implies that the two theories readily build on their successes (Schuwerk, Vuori, & Sodian, 2015).
Whereas there is a certain danger that the concrete realities shall never fit well with their respective symbolic outlines that is that failures shall further build on failures, the two theories can rapidly turn over their findings into novel outcomes shall have the chanced to propagate errors forward in a manner which shall ultimately remain conspicuous, and diagnosable. It is true that the two theories can readily integrate their predictions as antecedents to novel inferences and hence make them both unique (Fliss et al., 2016). Whereas it is necessary to have the conceptual foundation for taking into account any phenomenon, and while such a basis is an essential condition for these two theories, it remains easy to observe that a theory, as regarded here, remains more than merely a framing gadget (Nolen-Hoeksema & Rector, 2015).
Conclusion
Whereas a definitive breakdown of what comprises a good theory is absolutely an enticing goal, the paper is purposed more as the exploration of the matters than as any eventual word. Much has been put across on this subject of good theory. Many theories have been evaluated regarding their usefulness and have failed the test of a good theory regarding uniqueness, universality, and specificity.
ToM and Executive Dysfunctional theories have passed these criteria and hence have subsequently remained useful for many years. They have been both understandable and have exhibited reasonable, structural corroboration because they are both internally and contextually consistent. They are never trivial but remains significant with relevance to life and real behavior, autism. They have thus both presented an explanation about autism and deep understanding of the actual behavior, or the connotation hence making them accepted.
References
Fliss, R., Le Gall, D., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., Chauviré, V., Desgranges, B., & Allain, P. (2016). Theory of Mind and social reserve: Alternative hypothesis of progressive Theory of Mind decay during different stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Social neuroscience, 11(4), 409-423.
Schuwerk, T., Vuori, M., & Sodian, B. (2015). Implicit and explicit theory of mind reasoning in autism spectrum disorders: the impact of experience. Autism, 19(4), 459-468.
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46.
Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9-34.
Wellman, H. M. (2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford University Press.
Oakley, B. F., Brewer, R., Bird, G., & Catmur, C. (2016). Theory of mind is not theory of emotion: A cautionary note on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(6), 818.
Cheng, W., Rolls, E. T., Gu, H., Zhang, J., & Feng, J. (2015). Autism: reduced connectivity between cortical areas involved in face expression, theory of mind, and the sense of self. Brain, 138(5), 1382-1393.
Meltzer, L. (Ed.). (2018). Executive function in education: From theory to practice. Guilford Publications.
Bora, E., H?d?ro?lu, C., Özerdem, A., Kaçar, Ö. F., Sar?soy, G., Arslan, F. C., … & Atasoy, N. (2016). Executive dysfunction and cognitive subgroups in a large sample of euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(8), 1338-1347.
Snyder, H. R., Kaiser, R. H., Warren, S. L., & Heller, W. (2015). Obsessive-compulsive disorder is associated with broad impairments in executive function: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(2), 301-330.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Rector, N. A. (2015). Abnormal psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Haker, H., Schneebeli, M., & Stephan, K. E. (2016). Can Bayesian theories of autism spectrum disorder Help improve Clinical practice?. Frontiers in psychiatry, 7, 107.
Milton, D. (2017). Autism: A different way of thinking.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
