Issues
Discuss About The Toward A Gender Diverse Renewable Energy?
Sex and gender discrimination takes place in different organization when they treat their employees unfavorably depending upon that employees’ sex. This takes place when that individual is applying for a job or when they are a current employee (LaNauze, 2015). Researchers are of the opinion that although women have made it evident that they indeed have the ability to perform with the same skills and success in every endeavor, which is performed by men, the issue of gender discrimination, is still prevalent in the recent times (Adapa, Rindflesih & Sheridan, 2016). The government has passed many anti-discrimination laws that had clearly stated that gender discrimination is illegal. However, human resource management as well as many employers undertakes practices that are small, mid size and do not support equal distribution of resources and respect for women (Loi, Loh & Hine, 2015). Still greater organizations favor advancement of man stating that men are much more productive and focused than women although researches state otherwise. This kind of thinking invokes criticism and every organization should implement human resource management who will effectively help in bridging the gap and will thereby help in increasing the pace by which gender discrimination should be erased from the nation.This assignment will mainly denote how the case of gender discrimination is still reported in the nation of Australia. It will depict challenges that women usually face in their organizational place and how human resource management can take an active part in recommending solutions for overcoming the challenges.
In the workplace, women are subjected to various types of discriminations in comparison to men. In most of the cases, it is seen that qualified women are often not nominated for promotions as the management considers that women will not be able to handle greater responsibility due to a number of reasons. They think that women may become pregnant, or have to dedicate her in family duties for which they might not be able to serve the position well. Even researches conducted in the recent decade states that women are also discriminated with other women for looks like they are “not pretty”, “too old”, “not stylish” or others. Many positions like these in sales and public relations, women get placements in firms according to the ways they look (VonHippel et al., 2015). “Glass ceiling” is also a form of gender discrimination. This term can be referred to the barriers and challenges that prevent female employees from getting higher ranks in the management. This mainly takes place when the executive positions or the upper level positions are given to men. Often men are seen to get more time off than females. They are seen to get better compensation package and different benefits than women.
Hiring, promotions and firing
Often human resource management becomes helpless but has to accept certain unethical demands from their long-term clients. In many cases, it is seen that often there are female employees who have excellent qualifications and better experiences than their male counterparts do. However, often the human resource department cannot hire them simply because the clients of the company are more comfortable in dealing with male employees (Winchester & Browning, 2015). Moreover, the human resource departments are seen to lay off their female employees during company cutbacks and reorganization at the same time when male counterparts in the same job and will less seniority can keep their jobs intact. Interviews conducted by the researchers in different organizations have supported the same fact. Australia’s sex discrimination commissioner namely, Kate Jenkins had thereby stated to Guardian Australia that “Incorrect assumptions are being made that gender equality has been achieved despite disturbing and comprehensive evidence to the contrary” (Davey, 2018). Often it is seen that there are many human resource managers who interviews female in an unethical ways. They often are seen to be asked about their number of children, their plan of having children in future and many similar others which are not asked to any male interviewees. This is a direct form of gender discrimination that is often done by human resource managers. The plans of a female member having children or the number of children she has, does not state any fact about the skills she need to have for the job (Sojo, wood & Genat, 2016). Therefore, these unethical practices need to be stopped. Often management, while taking interviews set up minimum height or weight requirements from female employees, which does not have any link with their job profile or job performance. Terminating them or not hiring them with these excuses, are still seen in many organizations.
Often men are seen to be paid more in comparison to that of the females although both of them are performing the same job. An interesting data was provided in the guardian that is provided below:
The national gender pay gap is mainly seen to be calculated by WGEA called the Workplace Gender Equality Agency. They mainly use data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics called the ABS. they have found out that the current gender pay gap nationally is 15.3%. For the past two decades, the numbers are hovering between 15 to 19%. This gender pay gap mainly shows the difference between the men and women’s average weekly full time base salary earnings. Data by WGEA had shown that fulltime remuneration gender-pay gap is currently 22.4% (Wgea.gov.au, 2018). This thereby states that women who are working full time are getting $27,000 a year less than that of the men counterparts who are also working full time. The main reasons provided by the data sets for this sort of gender discrimination are mainly biasness and discrimination in hiring and in paying decisions (Charlesworth & Macdonald, 2015). Secondly, men and women working in different industries and different jobs are paid differently with female dominated industries and jobs that are paid lower salaries (Wgea.gov.au, 2018). Other causes depicted by them are the women’s disproportionate share of domestic work and unpaid caring as well as their facing of lack of workplace flexibility for accommodating caring and other responsibilities (especially in senior managerial roles). Data has shown that between the time of 1997 and 2017, the lowest gender pay gap was found in 2004, which was 14.9% and was highest in November 2014 which was 18.5%. The following graph would help in portraying the facts:
Unequal pay
Studies conducted by different researchers over the years had held the human resource management responsible for the poor job description and job classification developed by them. This is one of the sources of gender discriminations at the workplace. It has been seen in the researches that male gendered words in job descriptions make an impact on the females who are seeking for jobs. It was found that masculine worded descriptions of jobs are responsible for significantly deterring women from applying to those jobs. This takes place regardless the nature of the job being stereotypically female, male or gender neutral. Human resources management knowingly or unknowingly use masculine worded gender descriptions to tell women that they were not the right fit for the role she is applying for (McDonald, Charlesworth & Graham, 2015). This actually gives them a suggestion that they should not supply for this job regardless of qualifications. In cases of masculine gendered job descriptions, researchers found that women employees to give significantly lower job appeal rating to those jobs. Their sense of belongingness to these kinds of jobs gets drastically reduced. This factor adds to the cause of the development of confidence gap (Membre et al., 2015). Many ultimately perceive that women suffer from lack of confidence when compared to that of men in the workplace. Other than that, benefits provided the company policies to the women are also not similar to that of the man. Often the human resource management is seen to provide health insurance policy to the woman that does not cover their spouse. This is assumed that their husbands will have their own benefits in their own organizations. However, at the same time, male coworkers have their wives covered by the benefits of the policy. Again, it is seen that the policies of the organization are such that as the husband of the female coworkers are in jibs, they have to provide increased health benefit (Gentry et al., 2015). However, the male coworkers do not have to pay for their jobs. Therefore, the human resource department should take a strict step against such of these policies of the organization and report about this form of discrimination effectively.
One of the female employees was asked an open-ended question in an interview. She had stated that she had been working in an organization for a large number of days. She has received exemplary reviews from a variety of stakeholders of the organization (Pocock & Charlesworth, 2017). She had even won employee of the year reward; yet five of the times she had applied for promotions it had been filled in by men who are less qualified than she is. Jenkins had been seen to state in Guardian Australia that “I think that probably one of the most surprising and concerning findings was just how prevalent the opposition to advancing gender equality is” (Davey, 2018). The human resource management has one of the largest responsibilities of erasing this sort of discrimination from workplace. They have the power of influencing the workforce in ways that will promote a diverse workplace where males and females have equal rights and respect.
Job description and benefits
The human resource management should reassess the job requirements for the senior leadership team. They should develop strategies by which women are given chances to serve positions in their organization by conducting ethical hiring procedures. Companies should not only hire women but should also try their best to examine the different barriers faced by the already existing employees to reach the leadership positions. The human resource management should rethink their interview processes. They should set a set of questions for the interviewees for a specific job role that would be irrespective of males and females seeking the job. While setting job description or while asking questions in the interview, care should be taken that proper phrasing of the words are done so that it does not elicit different answers from the employees. Researchers are of the opinion that fear of litigation changes behavior. They suggest that in the later stages of interviewing there should be teams of mixed gender interview candidates for reduction of hiring biases (Davis, Frolova & Callahan, 2016). Moreover, the human resource department should also make sure that all the employees have the same access to different opportunities. In many cases, it is seen that male counterparts get opportunities to talk with valuable clients and hence they are considered as more impressive candidate for promotion. Therefore, HRM should make sure that they introduce processes so that all employees irrespective of males and females get the opportunity to meet the same standards as they progress through their careers (Pearl-Martinez & Stephens, 2016). This will help to ensure that all will get the same exposure to training and opportunities. Moreover, the human resource management should also make sure that proper policies are prepared following that the salary slab will be prepared. The allocation of salary structure will be same for both the gender and monitoring bodies should be given responsibilities. The policies should also contain proper hiring and promoting guidelines. Care should be taken so that biasness is not incorporated.
Men are thought to be more productive, responsible and focused than the women. This old age orthodox belief had been inculcated in the organizational cultures that restrict any changes. Although the present day enthusiasm showed by the social workers and activities and also the various types of initiatives taken by the organization, the gender pay gap cannot still be bridged (Crebbin et al. 2015). The human resource managers should help employees to manage work as well as personal responsibilities at the same time of assessing the gender pay gap issues. They should also help employees who are primary care givers when they remain involved in caring of elders, child or both. The human resource manager should ensure that the number of work hours demanded by the job is allowing for personal life. He should make sure that the system is focusing on the bottom line rather than face time. It should not matter to him that when the assigned work is completed but he should only care that the assigned work is completed within deadline and with good quality. Offering support for childcare an elder care can be assured. Care should be taken that employees do not leave due to punishing hours or work rules. Rather control should be provided to them over their schedules (Tomaskovic-Devey, 2014). Men play an important part in solving the issue of gender discrimination and therefore training sessions and counseling sessions are required by which the age-old orthodox thinking can be eliminated. Rather men should be trained as such that they themselves become an active part in erasing away gender discrimination by making the workplace healthier for women mentally, physically and emotionally (Pocock & Charlesworth, 2017). Care should be taken that there are strict penalties for harassments of the women employees. Proper laws should be prepared which would keep out sexual harassment out of place.
Conclusion:
Gender discrimination is one of the most important issues in the nation currently. Different laws, policies and rules have been published by the government and by different organizations. However, still the effect is present which is accounting for about 15.3% of pay gap between them. Biasness in hiring, termination and promotion, unequal pay of salaries and improper job description and benefits provided to women employees be mainly the trends yet noticed in the human resource management. Therefore, recommendations are provided so that work life balance can be maintained. Sexual harassment can be eliminated and training of the male employees needs to be ensured for smooth work. Moreover, proper policy structure for fixed salaries, proper hiring, firing and promoting guidelines and unbiased interview questions are ensured.
References:
Adapa, S., Rindfleish, J., & Sheridan, A. (2016). ‘Doing gender’in a regional context: Explaining women’s absence from senior roles in regional accounting firms in Australia. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 35, 100-110.
Charlesworth, S., & Macdonald, F. (2015). Women, work and industrial relations in Australia in 2014. Journal of Industrial Relations, 57(3), 366-382.
Crebbin, W., Campbell, G., Hillis, D. A., & Watters, D. A. (2015). Prevalence of bullying, discrimination and sexual harassment in surgery in Australasia. ANZ journal of surgery, 85(12), 905-909.
Davey, M. (2018). Australian report finds disturbing evidence of gender inequality. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/mar/08/australian-women-display-tremendous-resilience-in-face-of-gender-inequality-kate-jenkins-finds [Accessed 30 Jan. 2018].
Davis, P. J., Frolova, Y., & Callahan, W. (2016). Workplace diversity management in Australia: what do managers think and what are organisations doing?. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 35(2), 81-98.
Gentry, W. A., Clark, M. A., Young, S. F., Cullen, K. L., & Zimmerman, L. (2015). How displaying empathic concern may differentially predict career derailment potential for women and men leaders in Australia. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(4), 641-653.
La Nauze, A. (2015). Sexual orientation–based wage gaps in Australia: The potential role of discrimination and personality. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 26(1), 60-81.
Loi, N. M., Loh, J. M., & Hine, D. W. (2015). Don’t rock the boat: The moderating role of gender in the relationship between workplace incivility and work withdrawal. Journal of Management Development, 34(2), 169-186.
McDonald, P., Charlesworth, S., & Graham, T. (2015). Developing a framework of effective prevention and response strategies in workplace sexual harassment. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 53(1), 41-58.
Membere, A. A., Ahmad, A. S., Anderson, A. J., Lindsey, A. P., Sabat, I. E., & King, E. B. (2015). Individual, Interpersonal, and Organizational Outcomes of Workplace Bullying. Bullies in the Workplace: Seeing and Stopping Adults Who Abuse Their Co-Workers and Employees: Seeing and Stopping Adults Who Abuse Their Co-Workers and Employees, 175.
Pearl-Martinez, R., & Stephens, J. C. (2016). Toward a gender diverse workforce in the renewable energy transition. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 12(1), 8-15.
Pocock, B., & Charlesworth, S. (2017). Multilevel work–family interventions: Creating good-quality employment over the life course. Work and Occupations, 44(1), 23-46.
Sojo, V. E., Wood, R. E., & Genat, A. E. (2016). Harmful workplace experiences and women’s occupational well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 10-40.
Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2014). The relational generation of workplace inequalities. Social Currents, 1(1), 51-73.
von Hippel, C., Sekaquaptewa, D., & McFarlane, M. (2015). Stereotype threat among women in finance: Negative effects on identity, workplace well-being, and recruiting. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(3), 405-414.
Wgea.gov.au. (2018). Australia’s gender pay gap statistics. [online] Available at: https://www.wgea.gov.au/sites/default/files/gender-pay-gap-statistics.pdf [Accessed 30 Jan. 2018].
Wgea.gov.au. (2018). What is the gender pay gap?. [online] Available at: https://www.wgea.gov.au/addressing-pay-equity/what-gender-pay-gap [Accessed 30 Jan. 2018].
Winchester, H. P., & Browning, L. (2015). Gender equality in academia: A critical reflection. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 269-281.