A clear statement to the purpose
This study explains the role of leadership in various schools. The main reason of this study is to motivate various pragmatic related conversation of what actually the leadership or guidance may include in the diverse school with the culturally diverse people. It will also include the argument that is taken place around the review of some appropriate tracks, journalism & with the assumptions as well. International literature actually substantiates the centrality of the leadership of diverse school to the improvement of them & for the better results well. This study will include the importance of leadership in a diverse school including the position of the same. On the other hand, it will also include the impacts of the leader’s performance in the success of the school & its community as well. The main reason is to highlight the informal or formal roles of the leaders in the school which will help better in understanding the process or procedure of leaders to perform attractively. This study will include some arguments to support the study. It will also focus on effective use of sources or evidence for supporting the argument & rationale as well.
The main rationale of this case study is to inspect the role of leadership in the diverse school. It includes the importance of leadership in the various educational sectors. This study also examines the various principles of the conceptual framework of socially, culturally responsive & democratic leadership as well. The various objectives are underlining that leadership in the diverse schools are actually raising the abilities of so many issues. On the other hand, it is also contributing in encouraging & building the potential, raising the mediocrity & moving ahead to the education commitment or greater level of performance. This study is about the leaders who build collective abilities in schools where the other members of schools come from different cultural backgrounds or diverse schools.
According to Bambrick-Santoyo (2018), it has been observed that the general crowd becomes more diverse which impact as same on the schools too. The principles of diverse schools perform 5 different key functions which include shaping the vision of many success processes & procedures related to the academic for all the students. It also includes to create the safe learning & welcoming environment, focusing on improving the different instructions, cultivated leadership in others and etc. so that teachers can teach their best. It also includes the learning of the students, managing the data, people or processes which greatly contribute to promoting the standard of the school environment in an effective & efficient manner. In today’s’ time schools are getting operated in such a complex manner. For the diverse school administrators or teachers for achieving their mission is to educate the students in an appropriate manner, they are importantly required to lead the complete environment attentively. The educators are also requiring developing the skills of leadership so that they can direct the successful organisational changes & agreements of craft creativity with various stakeholders at different levels (Bambrick-Santoyo, 2018).
Literature Review
According to Epstein, et. al. (2018), performing the five different functions are so important as because the principals try their best to manage all the demands of various stakeholders in an appropriate manner. This is because of which the successful principals should possess the well articulated & strong values orientation. The question arises that what can the leaders of school perform for building the collective abilities across the culturally diverse staff. The impacts & range of leaders of diverse school has greatly highlighted by the widespread conversion of various concepts like the leadership of distribution and many more. At the time when the leaders get a challenge for developing productive relationships or shared values, the other focus on challenges that get faced by the principals of schools on regular basis. Including the cultural perspectives, it greatly permits the cooperative aptitude to be evaluated in the human interactions & relationships contexts. The leadership in diverse schools performs with the vision & mission of improving the learning environment of the same. It gives a very well functioning management (Epstein, et. al., 2018).
According to Terrell, et. al. (2018), the leadership in the diverse schools also includes setting the directions of schools that are mostly concerned with teachers, students, development, financial resources, allocation of material and many more. The efficient leadership also impacts on the commitment, motivation, teacher and student’s success in various ways. Facilitating the leadership to the schools is accurate & reliable for the unique needs & context of the community of the school, implementing & developing the plans of improvements of the school, establishing the effective & fair appraisal systems for teachers, structuring the rooms as per the needs & requirements of the school, ensuring the framework for supporting the functions of other personnel & departments, building the strong partnership with entire community and etc. Many of the times it can be seen that the superiors or leaders fail in understanding the diverse community. They also fail to understand the relationship between community and schools (Terrell, et. al., 2018).
According to Murphy, et. al. (2018), at the time of discussing the issues, it will vary in the different shapes & emphasis that depends upon the various contexts for targeting the intellectual background of people with the numbers of issues or purposes as well. Firstly, the increased ratio of diverse schools from different levels designs the people from various national or cultural groups. It is perfect for those schools which actually cater the students within the specific boundaries at national level & at the international level as well for drawing from these borders. On the other side, considerable investigation has been taken place into the authority of culture that how actually students can learn or how teachers & students may support or structure the diverse schools in an attractive manner. It also includes the investigation of leading staff from the various cultures (Murphy, et. al., 2018).
According to Finnan (2018), leadership in diverse schools is the procedure of guiding & enlisting the energies or talents of teachers, parents, pupil towards achieving the common educational goals or aims. Many of the universities in the United States offer the graduation degree in educational leadership. It also helps to overcome from all the obstacles of some effective leadership. It is very well known that the external context regularly includes the response to demographic, economic, cultural & political factors which actually takes place in diverse schools. The value set greatly plays in the assortments of different form as leader greatly attempts for exercising the meaningful leadership. It has been identified that human experience & identities are totally formed by the interchange of other & self as well. People are from the members of different groups that can be defined by gender, race, social class, sexual orientation and so on. Without the knowledge of own & others identity, there is no chance to negotiate the relationship among human or it can also be said that without having an identity there is no world of a human actually. It is the reason that leadership of school is directly connected with the enactment & explanation of various values within a specific human & community context (Finnan, 2018).
According to Mendenhall, et. al. (2017), leadership is importantly relational. In spite of the composition of staff, leaders actually attempt in understanding the people as members or individuals of collectives. It calls to the relationship grounded firmly within humanity or professionalism. One of the dominant subjects in leadership is that it needs to be relational. The effective relations are actually the foundation of the leadership. Building the relationship is one of the main processes that is really value-driven for all of those associations that perform for the schools or in diverse schools as well. The main focus is on collective capacity & culture which do not disprove that many other factors are there that influences the life in diverse schools and relationships as well. As per the intersectionality theorists religious beliefs, assert, class, gender, educations, cultures, age and etc. all these interact as holographically for influencing the behaviour & attitudes of the staff in the diverse school. All these interconnections basically determine the dispositions, identity view to ourselves, relations with others & as same as other relation too. The cultural norms inform the leaders & teachers to the experiences that are related to the educations for example- helping in determining the kind of teachers they are
By looking broadly it can get understood that leaders play a vital role in influencing the collective abilities which people to danger painting so confusing a picture which may be very difficult to understand. Just like same, if collects together, all the sections of leaders actually need to face the various differences that become imperceptible to people receptiveness towards the universalism (Mendenhall, et. al., 2017).
According to Leithwood, et. al. (2017), the context addresses that staff of school by leaders drawn the various cultural background & system of school as well. The question posed for guiding the conversation is- What can the leaders of the school perform for building the collective ability across the professionally & culturally diverse school body? It is the school where the leaders & teachers bring the variety of diverse cultural surroundings with them to perform & where those teachers & leaders experience their professional formation in the different diverse school systems & countries as well. The actual effect of both of these factors such as professional formations & culture is that employees carry to their performance a greater variety of unexamined views related to other, leadership, teaching & as well as schooling too. There are five different interrelated key issues that can take place into the discussion related to the leader’s nurture the collective relationships with diverse body’s’ of staff. All those 5 interrelated issues are known as-
Positioning- It is related to how the leaders actually place themselves in the cultural environment of school.
Expectation- It includes how the teachers & proprietors understand the collective performance in their own professional or cultural heritage.
Structuring- The ways of teachers to perform with collective capacity & leader’s structure of schools.
Beyond Stereotypes- It includes the ways in which leaders require being knowledgeable of all the risks of essentialising & stereotype culture to the acceptance of various important factors which shapes the cooperative processes.
Expression- The ways leaders & teachers permit their professional formation & cultural understanding by their actions in diverse school (Leithwood, et. al., 2017).
According to DeMatthews (2018), it is very well known that to all the leaders for building the collective capacity in the culturally diverse employees, they are importantly required to start with an assessment of their professional formations & cultures. It also affects in general to their views or their leadership of diverse school specifically. A challenge takes place herein that cooperation & cultural understanding may get hide by the various fact that are very fewer of us to adapt. It happens by experiencing the reality when it comes to own professional & cultural inheritance. Building the collective ability or capability is foremost about the different values. The leaders of diverse school have the key position in different values that are modeled & understood as well. In the schools where the employees learn or perform productively altogether, collaboration, cooperation & open dialogues are commonly understood & valued together across the public that is associated with it. The values which school leaders carry, they greatly need to be articulated & carefully clarified as well. The main job of leaders performing with intercultural employees is to inspect their belief system in a proper manner. The unconscious & conscious modeling of this procedure actually affects the various kinds of relations that form in school about the culture & places in the accurate collective performance (DeMatthews, 2018).
According to Glatthorn, et. al. (2018), the leaders of diverse school promotes the cultural responsive method by showing culturally responsive approaches to themselves in the relations with students, teachers & parents as well. Leaders performing their theories to the collective responses. Their expectations of teacher’s performance & point to that these may be culturally shared & determined or not. The cultural positioning basically includes the conscious critique personal beliefs about the verities of matter which are at the main area of life in the schools like learning, leadership, merit, responsibilities & the expansion of the social class, justice, culture or character too. There are no restrictions for the leaders to follow culturally positioned in the diverse school. It is an emotional or cognitive exercise which actually includes identifying & challenging the preconceived concept of culture (Glatthorn, et. al., 2018).
According to Northouse (2017), the schools are known as the cultural constructs. Physical design & structure of the school reflects the cultural presumption. Individuality is one of the most dominant characteristics of western culture that reflects in the structuring of the school. The development of the collective capabilities in leaders or teachers leads to various unimaginable in learning & teaching or as well as decision making in the school that actually turn to impact upon the learning outcomes of the students. While the chances of redesigning, the physical environment of school are mostly limited. Discussing various issues proactively with the staff & putting their input as suggestions to modify the spaces by enabling the greater collective work can help with the better results (Northouse, 2017).
According to Pankake, et. al. (2017), the re-association of the leaders into the departments, working parties, year level teams, groups of the teaching team and the determination of the workload of the teachers & expectations to conduct the work are accurately open to direction & influence of the leaders or teachers. In order to establish the expectations of collective performance, the teacher leadership literature basically includes various sorts of things which principle perform. The most critically important thing which leaders can perform to structure the diverse school for collective capability among staff is too explicit for the behavioral requirements of teachers. Creating the various new opportunities & establishing the new association for employees to perform together in teaching & decision making, of leadership is completely unsupported to be very efficient unless teachers know why these are getting accomplished & what really is anticipated from them. In relation of communicating this efficiently to the teachers, principals require having an accurate & appropriate insight into the cultural characteristics of teachers department and being capable to understand all the cultural characteristics related to the different ways in which teachers undertake & appreciate their performance (Pankake, et. al., 2017).
According to Johnson (2017), expectations takes place from the leader’s cultural values as it brings them to school & also reflects structures nurture leaders to build the collective capacity. A same it is decisively important for all the leaders to review the cultural & educational norms that actually take place in the diverse school if leaders are structuring & understanding the collective capacity in an appropriate manner. The last line is that they seek to build the collective capability & work purposely for putting in strategies of place. Infusing the controversial problems & challenges in the diverse school contributes to the various things. Presenting this conversation may be easy for two different fronts such as – the questions may be confronting to the staff & leaders as they strike to the depth of how actually people look at themselves. Secondly, depends upon the makeup of the school includes some meaning full challenges. It is importantly required to carefully plan or efficiently moderate as like as development of large staff or re-visioning & school review program as well.
Collective capacity can get built by the effective communication of face to face. Expression contributes in including the number of various emotions that people communicate in their voice tones, choices, body movements and etc. It also includes the strength with which leaders talk with, the disagreements, bragging & audacity while describing themselves to others (Johnson, 2017).
According to Tharp (2018), it is well known that the managers & leaders of diverse school positively contributes to the effectiveness of the same when they get prepared & capable to use the extensive leadership knowledge for solving the complex situations. It also includes the problems that are based on a diverse school and to build the trust by working relationships along with parents, students, school staff & community as well. Leaders may have overlapping & different styles including transformational, transactional, distributed & charismatic leadership. However, it is important required by the leaders to lead in an appropriate way to the school context & culture which can provide various opportunities to the management of school with support training. It will help in improving their performance to get appraised by municipalities, other boards, inspectors and etc. for providing the oversight on school management quality (Tharp, 2018).
According to Epstein (2018), the leaders of the school who models the strong leadership of instructional requires focusing on evaluation, planning, improvement in teaching, coordination, teacher performance and etc. that leads in the appropriate way which is pedagogically & culturally responsive to the teachers and students needs & strengths as well. Many of the times it happens that diverse school does not focus on the good implementation of processes or procedures that can help the school to grow faster & efficiently. At the same time, they fail to meet the demands, needs & requirements of the school in an appropriate manner which impacts on the learning outcomes of the students in such a negative manner. It also leads to the failure of the expansion of the same. Teacher & leaders become less knowledgeable about the deeds which need to get accomplished by them for the successful carrier of the students or school as well. The leaders are importantly required to focus on all these issues in a well-behaved manner so that one can get rid of the same. They are required to perform as per the leadership theories to find out the best ways of performing well (Epstein, 2018).
According to Kroll, et. al. (2017), effective leaders design the improvement process of school to guide their performance in an appropriate manner. The improvements plans of the schools by the leaders are also known as the development plans of schools which provide various procedures as because they are relatively based on scanning of the surroundings of the school & the circumstances that they actually face. The leaders are importantly required to priorities the objectives & goals, identifying all the planned actions for achieving the goals of the school and including the set of various methods for implementing, monitoring or evaluating the different strategies as well. They are also required to summarize the various strategies to improve the performance of the students over time & indicating that for how extensive the strategies are required to be implemented. The school development plan is the collaborative process between the councils, school professionals, stakeholders of other community, parents and etc. The leaders are required to implement the strategy of teacher appraisals. The teacher appraisal framework makes the fair evaluation by clearing & defining the responsibilities, goals or procedures of the school. It also includes the various forms as per the teacher portfolio, observation of the classrooms, administrator, surveys, peer assessments and etc. (Kroll, et. al., 2017).
According to Levison (2018), the leaders should have the clear rationale to choose the assessment measures & needs to be very cautious about using the teacher appraisal forms that can contribute to place value to the standardized test scores of the students. The leaders may also include the strategy of school community partnership. It is very effective at the time when the departments & community that are based on diverse school has been formed for the purpose of assessing the community & school requirements, building the partnerships, engaging into the community, providing the incentives, managing the resources and training to increase the capacity of the partnerships and leaders as well. Then the leaders are also required to focus on the strategy of school clusters. For collecting the resources together to improve the quality of learning & teaching the low and rural resourced schools to get grouped into the school clusters (Levison, 2018).
According to Glatthorn, et. al. (2018), the management of the school cluster basically involves similar responsibilities & roles as diverse schools. However, the additional leadership by more knowledgeable leader & committee will be required to oversee & manage the curriculum delivery across all the sites of diverse school. The decisions of forming the cluster need to be based on the assessment of requirement of schools & shared objectives across the sites of school for developing the cluster. Forming the cluster may include mapping the various activities for identifying the diverse schools that are perfectly self-sufficient & do not actually needs the inclusion at all. They also do not need to determine the accessibility problems or the spatial allocation of diverse schools in the connection for identifying the centralized area for the center of teacher resources. The well trained leaders for managing & maintaining the resources of teachers & center activities include providing training, support or resources to the teacher which is very important for the effective management of diverse schools (Glatthorn, et. al., 2018).
Conclusion
The above discussion concludes that for building the collective capability of school employees from the various background or cultures and the leaders are importantly required to understand the cultures of the diverse school community in an appropriate manner. It has been observed that the productive communication related to intercultural in diverse schools can contribute to developing the strong understanding of different cultures that compromises the diverse schools & staff both. The leaders articulate designs and nurtures the formal structures with the aim of promoting & building the relationship of intercultural. It greatly helps in improving the lives & learning of the students in the best possible manner. The structural designs of the leaders are something which needs to involve the teacher & taking account of all their responsibilities & insights so that they can love to perform collectively & efficiently as well. While designing the structure of the diverse schools the leaders are needs to be very attentive of taking the sensible account that how the cultural values may influence the expectations. It also includes the professional relationships and communications in the schools. The various cultural teams bring different assumptions for the problems of decision making, participatory leadership, teamwork, performance review and collaboration as well (Leithwood, et. al., 2018).
The values & presumptions attribute to some specific cultures and inevitably produces the different behaviors and understanding in other cultures. It is not for promoting the cultural understanding in the staff but to perform with the perfect safety of the broader community & students to impart this into the cultural & practical structure of the diverse school. By this study, it gets concluded that the leaders who look after the collective capability across the groups of cultural members are aware that relationships and people are quite complex. They know that there are various factors which actually influence to how teacher perform together with their colleagues in the diverse schools. As same they always seem to be aware of recognizing the professional personal experiences and cultural diversity of staff both that have shaped their ways, in which teacher is required to perform very effectively & smartly as well. There are so many leaders that contribute to structuring the collective capability for the form of global intelligence. It includes best interests to perform in the diverse schools & with the best results as well.
References
Bambrick-Santoyo, P. (2018). Leverage Leadership 2.0: A Practical Guide to Building Exceptional Schools. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
DeMatthews, D. E. (2018). Community engaged leadership for social justice: A critical approach in urban schools. New York: Routledge.
Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. New York: Routledge.
Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & Hutchins, D. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. USA: Corwin Press.
Finnan, C. (2018). Accelerating the learning of all students: Cultivating culture change in schools, classrooms and individuals. New York: Routledge.
Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F., Whitehead, B. M., & Boschee, B. F. (2018). Curriculum leadership: Strategies for development and implementation. USA: SAGE publications.
Johnson, C. E. (2017). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: Casting light or shadow. USA: Sage Publications.
Kroll, L. R., & Meier, D. R. (2017). Documentation and Inquiry in the Early Childhood Classroom: Research Stories from Urban Centers and Schools. New York: Routledge.
Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Pollock, K. (2017). How school leaders contribute to student success: The four paths framework. Germany: Springer.
Levison, L. (2018). Community Service Programs in Independent Schools: The Processes of Implementation and Institutionalization of Peripheral Educational Innovations. New York: Routledge.
Mendenhall, M. E., Osland, J., Bird, A., Oddou, G. R., Stevens, M. J., Maznevski, M., & Stahl, G. K. (2017). Global leadership: Research, practice, and development. New York: Routledge.
Murphy, J. F., & Louis, K. S. (2018). Positive school leadership: Building capacity and strengthening relationships. USA: Teachers College Press.
Northouse, P. G. (2017). Introduction to leadership: Concepts and practice. USA: Sage Publications.
Pankake, A., & Abrego, C. (2017). Lead with Me: A Principal’s Guide to Teacher Leadership. New York: Routledge.
Terrell, R. D., Terrell, E. K., Lindsey, R. B., & Lindsey, D. B. (2018). Culturally proficient leadership: The personal journey begins within. USA: Corwin Press.
Tharp, R. (2018). Teaching transformed: Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Routledge.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
