The Background of American Pride and Equality
Americans and their Pride and equality is a tale to tell. Being an individual country where individualism is segregated among all the people for freedom of speech, freedom of association and freedom of expression, the particular application of 501(c)(3) is a violation against their laws and their ethical considerations. This particular article will be directed towards the particular article based on the non-profit status of white nationalist groups and their permission to raise tax deductible donations of nearly $8 million (Borda, 2018). In 2016 four prominent white nationalist groups received support from the government to raise tax-deductible donations for the last 10 years amounting to $8 million.
According to the New century group head Jared Taylor his organization acknowledged this rising money laundering system by the white race as a benefit for the country. The group has collected over 2 million dollars in the span of 9 years. Taylor claimed that they have all the trust for the white race where is he is supporting the act because apparently it is the duty of the American government to support their people bye by promoting racism and discrimination within the country (Mancuso, 2021).
Americans are going through treasury in the form of supporting their nationality and complexion. The federal government has been allowing for groups since 2006 to raise money from tax-deductible donations estimated to be almost $8 million. The “racist white nationalist propaganda organizations” have been named and titled as “four white nationalist groups” and have been given the authority to raise money in tax-deductible donations. These particular groups are extending their interest towards Donald Trump’s victory who are supporting the continuous racism within the United Nations (Holley, 2021). The larger ideology in this platform is to earn more money by eliminating the national policy for the American population. The New century foundation Jared Taylor is supporting the entire act as a benefit to the “white race”. This particular act is working as a treachery to the individual citizens of America who would not withstand any inequality based on their complexion, race and background.
In 1994, the denial of tax exemption status was upheld for a nationalist group residing in Mississippi. There are several tax experts who have said that the IRS is feeling criticized based on the 2013 conception of giving extra scrutiny for tea party groups who are continuously seeking tax exemptions (Rodgers & Sobczak, 2020). The IRS is trying to implement the non-profit applicants who are merely spreading the entire propaganda.
The government supporting these acts are violent for the American citizens because the subsidizing groups are getting all the benefits whereas the normal citizens still have to pay the same tax rates. The legitimacy and the respectability is lost within this particular case because the IRS is staying diplomatic because of individual non-profit organizations. The applications are flying through due to the American Renaissance online magazines who are propagandizing the act of the whites to want to be the majority race within the United Nations as “entirely normal” (Desiderio, 2021).
Tax-Deductible Donations: A System for Money Laundering?
Since 1964 all the American citizens have been legally quantified to have the right of paying the particular amount of tax liability due. All the taxpayers have to abide by the same laws and policies. In this particular case the discrimination within the taxation exemption system is impacting the pride and residue was of the normal American citizens who are generally indigenous if said show. The high taxation imposed is practically based on the tax payments and income of the individual citizens (Law, 2029). The free society of America has always created the nation’s wealth and the federal government is supporting the constitution with the rights and the properties of citizens are protected.
In this particular function Donald Trump enhances the situation about racism and the majority claim of the whites. This infused the entire violation within America regarding racism and discrimination within the tax rates of the US standards. The internal revenue services scandalized entire system while being diplomatic about the crimes committed by the four white National is groups non-profit status. None of the citizens wanted this discrimination because they could not afford the in equal rights and the policy of government tax increases for the subsidizing hate groups. The non-profit status is the civil rights of each and every citizen who is a resident of the United Nations (Avi-Yonah & Mazzoni, 2020). Due to the deceptive manner of the entire act the regulations continuously targeted the power of whites where the citizens supported them. Due to the irresponsible act of the federal government during 2016 the white nationalist openly championed President Donald Trump which increased the political dilemma within the United Nations and the racist’s voices were not silent anymore. According to the entire case the IRS needed to change the rules of taxation but the federal government was entirely based on Donald Trump and his opinion.
Donald Trump himself supported the movement of white nationalist majority system with the old tradition of justifying the prejudice of race racism as non-scientific theories of human evolution. In this particular section Donald Trump wanted the whites to become the majority race among all the others. This distinguished all the other citizens from the whites and the vindication created from this particular act led to advocate violence and direct involvement in politics (Castle, Kristiansen & Shifflett, 2020). The white National groups try to qualify for the tax exemption status because according to them the educational mission they have is based on their majority race and their educational status for qualifications. The IRS should have made a political judgment rather than a content but instead the tax-deductible donations were created and carried over by the white nationalist organizations through 501 (c)(3) section (Valasik & Reid, 2018).
According to my own opinion I wouldn’t have granted any particular benefit to the whites because I believe in complete equality and unbiasedness. The race realistic loss needs to be a non-profitable status for everyone irrespective of their backgrounds, race and complexion. The idea that Jared Taylor has provided about the entire act being beneficial to the white race of our own people, is amusing and Anti-Nationalist to be coming out of a prestigious person’s mouth. The law enforcement should be allowed for every group who are included within the United Nations. The qualification of tax breaks should be for everybody who is labelled as anti-nationalist immigrant or anti-immigrant holocaust deniers or gay or anti-gay. My ideology is based on elimination of discrimination and superiority within the national boundaries.
The Violent Impact of Tax Exemption Status for White Nationalist Groups
If anybody thinks that my particular answer in the above section is biased or someone else thinks that is just my opinion and does not have any more validity than anybody else then it would be my pleasure to agree with the second person. I do not hold any e grudges against a particular thing that explains that my opinion does not carry any more value than anybody else’s. As I obviously mentioned earlier, I believe in equality and civil rights. In this particular case also, I would like to say that I do not support racism and biases at any point of time in any circumstances. Whatever I have opinionated in the above section is my individual perspective there is no point to overthink the entire process whatever I have said. Although I would like to count all the charges where I have been accused of being biased. It is in my defence that I have always supported people who have spoken the truth and have been led by their own self-consciousness and ethical values.
Equality is a civil right. Equality is more than just a requirement, moreover it is an emotion (Kiper, 2021). With equality there is no place for people to get judged on manipulation because there would not be any superior dominance to manipulate them. Although my opinion is something that is left by my own emotions and my perspective towards the responsibilities of the federal Government and the internal revenue services system. The public debate is always there within America related to their individual perspective in cultural diversity (Mathews, 2021).
As said by Evelyn Beatrice Hall that when a person is speaking the truth and the right thing from each and every perspective then she would fight for their perspective and rights but at the same time she also made sure that she is not a green with everything that the person is saying (Criezis, 2020). The difference in mechanism mainly comes from the ethical considerations as well as from the basic understanding of the conversational subject.
My opinion matters because the nonprofit status should be similar for every citizen within the United Nations rather than only for the whites. I did not demean anybody throughout my discussion but at the same time the government all tax incentives should be subsidized among all groups of people rather than the prioritized people. Within the government’s accessibility there should not be any bias or superiority (Turner, 2018). I would support the general citizens and people to my last day because they are unable to afford equal rights as the federal government itself is supporting buyers’ superiority, prioritization and unworthiness. Within the national boundaries and in the eyes of the government it is not meant to be quietest because for the government every citizen deserves the same chance, opportunity and right.
I also support the idea that with equality comes responsibilities on behalf of the general citizen. After equal taxation is granted for them, they would have to complete their duty towards the nation and its taxability system (Sánchez-Talanquer, 2020). I support Ms. Hall’s statement in every manner. I think in the similar form that I would not agree with everything that the general people have to say but if they are saying the ethically right things then I would support them till my death. If I am asked to comment on my ideas about the federal government then I would like to say that Donald Trump’s influence was a great factor which impacted the actions of the federal Government and the internal revenue services. Donald Trump was determined to throw out all the immigrants who have been living in the United Nations for a long time. This particular hatred towards the immigrants and the indigenous people influenced the entire act during 2016 (Young, 2020). Administration could not act differently when being operated by Mr Donald Trump himself.
IRS and the Discrimination Within Taxation Exemption System
I support the idea that everything cannot be spoon fed or done by the superior authority. Sometimes it is important that the change is brought by the general citizens of the country. It is that their ethical values, considerations and beliefs are another important factor which helps to critically acclaimed their needs and demands which are rightfully the duty of the federal government to provide. Acknowledgement of the government’s ideas and perspective to understand the particular decision-making process.
Conclusion
A study can be identified that the particular decision made by the federal government on the basis of tax status and non-profit status for the fore white nationalist groups is wrong. From the perspective of the federal government, it was impossible to deny the fact that Donald Trump was the one making the decisions for the government. Even if the authority wanted to make a different decision it was not possible being a part of governmental politics. the different points of views by George on the basis of the racist whites as well as the non-racist and general citizens. Americans have always been proud of their individualist culture but there are significant groups of people who do not believe in their individualist culture but they believe in an autocratic system where there will be a significant presence of a superior dominating power. The governmental tax deduction donation is significantly a particular benefit according to Jared Taylor for “Our own people”, it significantly reflects a wrong perspective where racism is promoted by the head of New Century Group. If the superior authority is supporting the particular act, then there is no chance that America is a free country. If a few have superior powers and make absurd decisions then it is a responsibility of the citizens to go against it and let them know the individual opinions on the particular factors which are changing their lifestyles and their mental states.
References
Avi-Yonah, R. S., & Mazzoni, G. (2020). Coca Cola: A Decisive IRS Transfer Pricing Victory, at Last. Tax Notes Federal, 169(11).
Borda, O. F. (2018). Social movements and political power in Latin America. In The making of social movements in Latin America (pp. 303-316). Routledge.
Castle, T., Kristiansen, L., & Shifflett, L. (2020). White Racial Activism and Paper Terrorism: A Case Study in Far-Right Propaganda. Deviant Behavior, 41(2), 252-267.
Criezis, M. (2020). Intersections of Extremisms: White Nationalist/Salafi-Jihadi Propaganda Overlaps and Essentialist Narratives about Muslims. Journal of Education in Muslim Societies, 2(1), 88-96.
Desiderio, R. J. (2021). Planning Tax-Exempt Organizations. LexisNexis.
Holley, T. (2021). Auditing Scientology: Reexamining the Church’s 501 (c)(3) Tax Exemption Eligibility. Available at SSRN 3786391.
Kiper, J. (2021). An Obstacle to Decolonising Europe: White Nationalism and Its Co-option of Serbian Propaganda. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 30(2), 112-122.
Law, U. Aspen Park, Inc. v. Bonneville County Appellant’s Brief Dckt. 45679.
Mancuso, A. (2021). How to form a nonprofit corporation (national edition): A step-by-step guide to forming a 501 (c)(3) nonprofit in any state. Nolo.
Mathews, J. (2021). How Women’s Participation in White Nationalist Groups Affects the Group’s Propensity for Violence.
Rodgers, N., & Sobczak, P. (2020). S03, E09: 501 (c) 3 Taxes for Non Profit Organizations.
Sánchez-Talanquer, M. (2020). One-Eyed State: The Politics of Legibility and Property Taxation. Latin American Politics and Society, 62(3), 65-93.
Turner, B. S. (2018). Global sociology and the nature of rights. In Sociology of Globalization (pp. 263-273). Routledge.
Valasik, M., & Reid, S. (2018). White nationalist groups are really street gangs, and law enforcement needs to treat them that way. The Conversation, 4.
Young, C. (2020). The Myth of Millionaire Tax Flight. Stanford University Press.