WBS
Bendingo Bank is a community bank that ties up with universities to take care of their banking needs and provides services to the staff, students, and alumni of concerned university. The profits obtained by the bank from its operations are put back into the community projects to benefit the university. The services provided by the bank to the university include opening bank account, securing loan, and insurance (Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited, 2018). The current project involves devolvement of an internet unit in the University building for Bendingo Bank. This document is a project created for this new establishment at the University. The report includes a Work Break Down structure of the project outlining the major project tasks, RACI chart identifying responsibilities of teams, scheduling options, progress reporting, risk management, change management, stakeholder management, and project closure documentation.
The figure below shows the Work Break Down structure of the project of Bedingo bank development at the university. A WBS is created to divide the project into tasks and sub-tasks until the level smallest work units are identified that are not overlapping and thus, can be completed simultaneously using different project resources. WBS divides the Bedingo bank project into a project charter, business case, project development and project implementation. Creation of the Project Charter would be the first thing to do which would involve identification of scope, time, budget, and risks based on which the project would be proposed. The project owner who would be from the university would approve this charter. The signing of the charter would mark the beginning of the project. Before actual development is carried out, a business case would be prepared with risk register, which would be approved by the executives. The development phase would consist of execution of project and procurement of the needed resources to be able to complete the implementation process. Project execution would involve planning, designing, community engagement plan, building and approval of contracts. Procurement is done for administrator resources and procurement contractor would be hired (Basu, 2005).
A schedule and project budget would be developed during the development phase. In the implementation phase, the construction would be carried out at the university premises to accommodate the Bedingo bank. It would involve understanding and communicating with major stakeholders of the project, construction of the bank unit, and office setup at the University for the Bank. Once the construction and set up is completed, the project closure documentation would be completed and the project would be handed over by the contractor to the project owner. The project owner would accept the deliverables marked by a signature on the project closure documents as completed and accepted.
RACI Chart
The table below expands upon the WBS of the project of construction of Bendigo Bank in University and identifies the milestones and project activity durations. The project is expected to take 995 days for completion after it was started on 2nd April 2018 with identification of the scope for creating the project charter. The project durations are proposed based on an earlier Bendingo bank establishment project, which was completed between 2007 and 2008. The final project handover would be done by 15 May 2020 and the final sign off would be taken on 15th June 2020 (Bendingo Bank, 2008).
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Predecessors |
1 |
Bendigo bank in University |
499 days |
Mon 30-04-18 |
Thu 26-03-20 |
|
1.1 |
Project Charter |
197 days |
Mon 30-04-18 |
Tue 29-01-19 |
|
1.1.1 |
objectives and Scope |
29 days |
Mon 30-04-18 |
Thu 07-06-18 |
|
1.1.2 |
Time, Budget, and Risks |
140 days |
Mon 30-04-18 |
Fri 09-11-18 |
|
1.1.3 |
Proposal development |
27 days |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Tue 18-12-18 |
3,4 |
1.1.4 |
Charter Sign-off |
30 days |
Wed 19-12-18 |
Tue 29-01-19 |
5 |
1.1.5 |
milestone completed |
0 days |
Tue 29-01-19 |
Tue 29-01-19 |
6 |
1.2 |
Business Case |
55 days |
Wed 30-01-19 |
Tue 16-04-19 |
|
1.2.1 |
Risk Register |
40 days |
Wed 30-01-19 |
Tue 26-03-19 |
7 |
1.2.2 |
Executives Approval |
15 days |
Wed 27-03-19 |
Tue 16-04-19 |
9 |
1.2.3 |
Milestone 1 Achieved |
0 days |
Tue 16-04-19 |
Tue 16-04-19 |
10 |
1.3 |
Development Phase |
172 days |
Wed 17-04-19 |
Thu 12-12-19 |
|
1.3.1 |
Project Execution Phase |
127 days |
Wed 17-04-19 |
Thu 10-10-19 |
|
1.3.1.1 |
Project Planning |
25 days |
Wed 17-04-19 |
Tue 21-05-19 |
11 |
1.3.1.2 |
Design |
30 days |
Wed 22-05-19 |
Tue 02-07-19 |
14 |
1.3.1.3 |
Community Engagement |
27 days |
Wed 03-07-19 |
Thu 08-08-19 |
15 |
1.3.1.4 |
preliminary Design |
35 days |
Fri 09-08-19 |
Thu 26-09-19 |
16 |
1.3.1.5 |
Detailed Design |
35 days |
Fri 09-08-19 |
Thu 26-09-19 |
16 |
1.3.1.6 |
Contracts and Approval and |
10 days |
Fri 27-09-19 |
Thu 10-10-19 |
17,18 |
1.3.1.7 |
Milestone 2 Achieved |
0 days |
Thu 10-10-19 |
Thu 10-10-19 |
19 |
1.3.2 |
Procurement |
45 days |
Fri 11-10-19 |
Thu 12-12-19 |
|
1.3.2.1 |
Administrator Engagement |
10 days |
Fri 11-10-19 |
Thu 24-10-19 |
20 |
1.3.2.2 |
Procurement contractor |
15 days |
Fri 25-10-19 |
Thu 14-11-19 |
22 |
1.3.2.3 |
Final schedule and Budget |
20 days |
Fri 15-11-19 |
Thu 12-12-19 |
23 |
1.3.2.4 |
Milestone 3 Achieved |
0 days |
Thu 12-12-19 |
Thu 12-12-19 |
24 |
1.4 |
Implementation Phase |
46 days |
Fri 13-12-19 |
Fri 14-02-20 |
|
1.4.1 |
Implementation of the Construction |
1 day |
Fri 13-12-19 |
Fri 13-12-19 |
25 |
1.4.2 |
stakeholders role |
15 days |
Mon 16-12-19 |
Fri 03-01-20 |
27 |
1.4.3 |
stakeholders communication |
25 days |
Mon 06-01-20 |
Fri 07-02-20 |
28 |
1.4.4 |
Constructions |
22 days |
Mon 06-01-20 |
Tue 04-02-20 |
28 |
1.4.5 |
official startup |
5 days |
Mon 10-02-20 |
Fri 14-02-20 |
29,30 |
1.4.6 |
Milestone 4 Achieved |
0 days |
Fri 14-02-20 |
Fri 14-02-20 |
31 |
1.5 |
Project Finalization |
29 days |
Mon 17-02-20 |
Thu 26-03-20 |
|
1.5.1 |
project handover |
7 days |
Mon 17-02-20 |
Tue 25-02-20 |
32 |
1.5.2 |
Documentation Completed |
10 days |
Wed 26-02-20 |
Tue 10-03-20 |
34 |
1.5.3 |
Signatures on paper |
12 days |
Wed 11-03-20 |
Thu 26-03-20 |
35 |
1.5.4 |
Milestone 5 Achieved |
0 days |
Thu 26-03-20 |
Thu 26-03-20 |
36 |
RACI chart is a matrix that identifies major project activities and assigns decision-making authorities for them. It identifies the roles of every team member on a project and clarifies if the roles can be assigned with a responsibility, accountability, or consulting role and if they only needed to be kept informed about the project. A RACI (responsibility, accountability, consulting, and Information) chart has been prepared for the current project of Bendingo bank development at the university stating the major roles of the project and assigning them required authorities for the project tasks identified in eh WBS chart (Bisk, 2018).
WBS |
Task Name |
Sponsor |
Project Manager |
Construction Manager |
University Head |
1.1.1 |
objectives and Scope |
C, I |
A, R |
I |
I |
1.1.2 |
Time, Budget, and Risks |
I |
A, R |
C, I |
C, I |
1.1.3 |
Proposal development |
I |
A, R |
I |
C, I |
1.1.4 |
Charter Sign-off |
I, R |
A, R |
I |
A, C |
1.2.1 |
Risk Register |
I |
A, R |
C, I |
I |
1.2.2 |
Executives Approval |
I, A |
A, R |
C, I |
R, I |
1.3.1.1 |
Project Planning |
I |
A, R |
I |
I |
1.3.1.2 |
Design |
I |
A, R, C |
R, C, I |
I |
1.3.1.3 |
Community Engagement |
I |
A, R |
C, I |
C, I |
1.3.1.4 |
preliminary Design |
I |
A, R, C |
R, C, I |
I |
1.3.1.5 |
Detailed Design |
I |
A, R, I |
R, C, I |
I |
1.3.1.6 |
Contracts and Approval and |
I |
A, R |
C, I |
R, C, I |
1.3.2.1 |
Administrator Engagement |
I, C |
A, R |
I |
R, I |
1.3.2.2 |
Procurement contractor |
I |
A, R |
I |
I |
1.3.2.3 |
Final schedule and Budget |
I, R, C |
A, R |
I |
R, I |
1.4.1.1 |
stakeholders role |
I |
A, R |
I |
I |
1.4.1.2 |
stakeholders communication |
I |
A, R |
I |
C, I |
1.4.1.3 |
Constructions |
I |
A, R |
R, I |
I |
1.4.1.4 |
official startup |
I |
A, R |
R, I |
I |
1.4.2.1 |
project handover |
I |
A, R |
I |
C, I |
1.4.2.2 |
Documentation Completed |
A. I |
A, R |
I |
C, R, I |
1.4.2.3 |
Signatures on paper |
I |
A, R |
I, C |
R, C, I (Caltrans, 2007) |
The table below shows identifies the duration for each project activities defined in the WBS with the explanation on why the duration have been chosen so. Most duration estimates are defined based on the experiences gained from a previous similar development project with consideration of differences in resources, technologies, budget, and project size (The Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc., 2015).
After Levelling, the budget of the project would be $673,440. The table below shows how this budget would be distributed among the WBS tasks for project completion.
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Predecessors |
Resource Names |
Cost |
Bendigo bank in University |
563 days |
Mon 30-04-18 |
Wed 24-06-20 |
$6,73,440.00 |
||
Project Charter |
226 days |
Mon 30-04-18 |
Mon 11-03-19 |
$2,12,640.00 |
||
objectives and Scope |
29 days |
Mon 12-11-18 |
Thu 20-12-18 |
Project manager |
$27,840.00 |
|
Time, Budget, and Risks |
140 days |
Mon 30-04-18 |
Fri 09-11-18 |
Project manager |
$1,34,400.00 |
|
Proposal development |
27 days |
Fri 21-12-18 |
Mon 28-01-19 |
3,4 |
Architect |
$21,600.00 |
Charter Sign-off |
30 days |
Tue 29-01-19 |
Mon 11-03-19 |
5 |
Project manager |
$28,800.00 |
milestone completed |
0 days |
Mon 11-03-19 |
Mon 11-03-19 |
6 |
$0.00 |
|
Business Case |
55 days |
Tue 12-03-19 |
Mon 27-05-19 |
$52,800.00 |
||
Risk Register |
40 days |
Tue 12-03-19 |
Mon 06-05-19 |
7 |
Project manager |
$38,400.00 |
Executives Approval |
15 days |
Tue 07-05-19 |
Mon 27-05-19 |
9 |
Project manager,University Head |
$14,400.00 |
Milestone 1 Achieved |
0 days |
Mon 27-05-19 |
Mon 27-05-19 |
10 |
$0.00 |
|
Development Phase |
207 days |
Tue 28-05-19 |
Wed 11-03-20 |
$2,68,720.00 |
||
Project Execution Phase |
162 days |
Tue 28-05-19 |
Wed 08-01-20 |
$1,75,520.00 |
||
Project Planning |
25 days |
Tue 28-05-19 |
Mon 01-07-19 |
11 |
Architect,Contractor,Project manager |
$60,000.00 |
Design |
30 days |
Tue 02-07-19 |
Mon 12-08-19 |
14 |
Architect |
$24,000.00 |
Community Engagement |
27 days |
Tue 13-08-19 |
Wed 18-09-19 |
15 |
Project manager |
$25,920.00 |
preliminary Design |
35 days |
Thu 19-09-19 |
Wed 06-11-19 |
16 |
Architect |
$28,000.00 |
Detailed Design |
35 days |
Thu 07-11-19 |
Wed 25-12-19 |
16 |
Architect |
$28,000.00 |
Contracts and Approval and |
10 days |
Thu 26-12-19 |
Wed 08-01-20 |
17,18 |
Project manager |
$9,600.00 |
Milestone 2 Achieved |
0 days |
Wed 08-01-20 |
Wed 08-01-20 |
19 |
$0.00 |
|
Procurement |
45 days |
Thu 09-01-20 |
Wed 11-03-20 |
$93,200.00 |
||
Administrator Engagement |
10 days |
Thu 09-01-20 |
Wed 22-01-20 |
20 |
Inspector |
$6,800.00 |
Procurement contractor |
15 days |
Thu 23-01-20 |
Wed 12-02-20 |
22 |
Contractor,Project manager |
$24,000.00 |
Final schedule and Budget |
20 days |
Thu 13-02-20 |
Wed 11-03-20 |
23 |
Architect,Contractor,Engineer,Project manager |
$62,400.00 |
Milestone 3 Achieved |
0 days |
Wed 11-03-20 |
Wed 11-03-20 |
24 |
$0.00 |
|
Implementation Phase |
46 days |
Thu 12-03-20 |
Thu 14-05-20 |
$1,11,440.00 |
||
Implementation of the Construction |
1 day |
Thu 12-03-20 |
Thu 12-03-20 |
25 |
$0.00 |
|
stakeholders role |
15 days |
Fri 13-03-20 |
Thu 02-04-20 |
27 |
Project manager |
$14,400.00 |
stakeholders communication |
25 days |
Fri 03-04-20 |
Thu 07-05-20 |
28 |
Project manager |
$24,000.00 |
Constructions |
22 days |
Fri 03-04-20 |
Mon 04-05-20 |
28 |
Architect,Contractor,Engineer,Inspector,Laborer |
$73,040.00 |
official startup |
5 days |
Fri 08-05-20 |
Thu 14-05-20 |
29,30 |
$0.00 |
|
Milestone 4 Achieved |
0 days |
Thu 14-05-20 |
Thu 14-05-20 |
31 |
$0.00 |
|
Project Finalization |
29 days |
Fri 15-05-20 |
Wed 24-06-20 |
$27,840.00 |
||
project handover |
7 days |
Fri 15-05-20 |
Mon 25-05-20 |
32 |
Project manager |
$6,720.00 |
Documentation Completed |
10 days |
Tue 26-05-20 |
Mon 08-06-20 |
34 |
Project manager |
$9,600.00 |
Signatures on paper |
12 days |
Tue 09-06-20 |
Wed 24-06-20 |
35 |
Project manager |
$11,520.00 |
Milestone 5 Achieved |
0 days |
Wed 24-06-20 |
Wed 24-06-20 |
36 |
Project manager |
$0.00 |
The table below shows how the project progress would be reported on the Bendingo bank installation project for the University. Until now, the project has reached the stage of the Risk register formation. The task that are completed into planning, scheduling, and budgeting as shown in the table below. By this time, it is understood that initially estimated budget was very accurate as per the project sponsor and thus, at the time of approval, the value of the budget has been decreased. New risks are identified and recorded in the register at this stage. The next step on this project would be presentation of the Bendingo bank design for establishment (Basu, 2005).
The table below showing the progress report of the project considering its performance against the budget on a specific date as mentioned in gantt chart.
Task Name |
Fixed Cost |
Fixed Cost Accrual |
Total Cost |
Baseline |
Variance |
Actual |
Remaining |
BCWS |
Bendigo bank in University |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$6,73,440.00 |
$0.00 |
$6,73,440.00 |
$43,200.00 |
$6,30,240.00 |
$0.00 |
Project Charter |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$2,12,640.00 |
$0.00 |
$2,12,640.00 |
$43,200.00 |
$1,69,440.00 |
$0.00 |
objectives and Scope |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$27,840.00 |
$0.00 |
$27,840.00 |
$0.00 |
$27,840.00 |
$0.00 |
Time, Budget, and Risks |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$1,34,400.00 |
$0.00 |
$1,34,400.00 |
$43,200.00 |
$91,200.00 |
$0.00 |
Proposal development |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$21,600.00 |
$0.00 |
$21,600.00 |
$0.00 |
$21,600.00 |
$0.00 |
Charter Sign-off |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$28,800.00 |
$0.00 |
$28,800.00 |
$0.00 |
$28,800.00 |
$0.00 |
milestone completed |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Business Case |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$52,800.00 |
$0.00 |
$52,800.00 |
$0.00 |
$52,800.00 |
$0.00 |
Risk Register |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$38,400.00 |
$0.00 |
$38,400.00 |
$0.00 |
$38,400.00 |
$0.00 |
Executives Approval |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$14,400.00 |
$0.00 |
$14,400.00 |
$0.00 |
$14,400.00 |
$0.00 |
Milestone 1 Achieved |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Development Phase |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$2,68,720.00 |
$0.00 |
$2,68,720.00 |
$0.00 |
$2,68,720.00 |
$0.00 |
Project Execution Phase |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$1,75,520.00 |
$0.00 |
$1,75,520.00 |
$0.00 |
$1,75,520.00 |
$0.00 |
Project Planning |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$60,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$60,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$60,000.00 |
$0.00 |
Design |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$24,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$24,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$24,000.00 |
$0.00 |
Community Engagement |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$25,920.00 |
$0.00 |
$25,920.00 |
$0.00 |
$25,920.00 |
$0.00 |
preliminary Design |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$28,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$28,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$28,000.00 |
$0.00 |
Detailed Design |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$28,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$28,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$28,000.00 |
$0.00 |
Contracts and Approval and |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$9,600.00 |
$0.00 |
$9,600.00 |
$0.00 |
$9,600.00 |
$0.00 |
Milestone 2 Achieved |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Procurement |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$93,200.00 |
$0.00 |
$93,200.00 |
$0.00 |
$93,200.00 |
$0.00 |
Administrator Engagement |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$6,800.00 |
$0.00 |
$6,800.00 |
$0.00 |
$6,800.00 |
$0.00 |
Procurement contractor |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$24,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$24,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$24,000.00 |
$0.00 |
Final schedule and Budget |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$62,400.00 |
$0.00 |
$62,400.00 |
$0.00 |
$62,400.00 |
$0.00 |
Milestone 3 Achieved |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Implementation Phase |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$1,11,440.00 |
$0.00 |
$1,11,440.00 |
$0.00 |
$1,11,440.00 |
$0.00 |
Implementation of the Construction |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
stakeholders role |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$14,400.00 |
$0.00 |
$14,400.00 |
$0.00 |
$14,400.00 |
$0.00 |
stakeholders communication |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$24,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$24,000.00 |
$0.00 |
$24,000.00 |
$0.00 |
Constructions |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$73,040.00 |
$0.00 |
$73,040.00 |
$0.00 |
$73,040.00 |
$0.00 |
official startup |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Milestone 4 Achieved |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Project Finalization |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$27,840.00 |
$0.00 |
$27,840.00 |
$0.00 |
$27,840.00 |
$0.00 |
project handover |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$6,720.00 |
$0.00 |
$6,720.00 |
$0.00 |
$6,720.00 |
$0.00 |
Documentation Completed |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$9,600.00 |
$0.00 |
$9,600.00 |
$0.00 |
$9,600.00 |
$0.00 |
Signatures on paper |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$11,520.00 |
$0.00 |
$11,520.00 |
$0.00 |
$11,520.00 |
$0.00 |
Milestone 5 Achieved |
? 0.00 |
Prorated |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
No project can skip risks completely. However, several risks can be prepared for at the start so that the damage from the risks are minimized. For this, it is essential to identify various risks that can occur on a project and build a contingency or mitigation plan to be taken as a solution to avoid the risk or mitigate its impacts after it occurs. The table below identifies the risks that a project may face me the current scenario and assesses them all by identifying how these risks would affect the project and what is the probability of the occurrence of such a risk on the project. Base on the probability and impact scores, a final severity score has been calculated by multiplying the earlier two measures. A mitigation strategy is thus planned considering the severity score of specific risks (PMI, 2008).
Risk Description |
Impact |
Category |
Probability (1 to 5) |
Impact (1 to 5) |
Score (P*I) |
Mitigation Strategy |
1 Timeline extended |
Scope creep |
Business |
4 |
3 |
12 |
Proper monitoring and auditing |
2 Budget Enhanced |
Scope creep |
Business |
3 |
2 |
6 |
Using tools for budgeting |
3 Political risk |
Delay in completion |
Procurement |
5 |
3 |
15 |
Executing proper communication and proper legal paper works |
4 Legal Contractual |
Lack in resources and funds |
Communication |
2 |
1 |
2 |
proper legal paper works |
5 Environmental |
Failure of the project |
Procurement |
3 |
4 |
12 |
Contingency plan |
6 Design |
Failure |
Technology |
2 |
3 |
6 |
Using latest technology such as 4D visualization |
7 Construction |
Reconstruction or failure (Quick Base, Inc., 2015) |
Technology |
1 |
4 |
4 |
Proper management |
Project [Bedingo Bank Installation at the University] Date [30 April 2018] Person Proposing Change: Manager
Description of Change:
The time for the office set-up has to be increased
The project budget has to be reduced and revised cost management plan to be built considering the revised budget of the project
Resources are overloaded and would not be sufficient to complete the task on time
The project sponsor has reduced the budget figure while signing off the project charter and the project expenses would get adjusted accordingly (PM4Dev, 2018)