Talent Management Challenges in Aurecon, Singapore
Discuss About The Opportunities Affecting Future Challenges?
The following report provides an in-depth understanding about how management challenges need to be resolved with different strategic management tools and framework. In this assessment, the research problems have narrowed down the research problems that Aurecon, Singapore, faces. The study is concentrating widely on the Singapore marketing to understand the effects of the external forces. The report also pays attention to the gaps found in the strategic tools such as PESTLE used in the assignment one and provides justification to those gaps. In addition, the assessment also provides a more detailed research on the issues considering few strategic framework such as dynamic capabilities, 7s framework. The assessment involves a clear justification behind why the new frameworks are relevant to the issues faced by Aurecon, Singapore. The major purpose of the report is to conduct an intensive analysis to identify recent management challenges and ways to deal with management challenges.
Narrowing down the issues, that Aurecon, Singapore faces
- To develop a suitable talent management strategy for intensifying a strong pool of talent
- How can Aurecon, Singapore deal with its organization’s talent management to intensify a strong pool of talent?
The assessment 1 indicates that organization Aurecon, Singapore faces an internal issue of managing talent. Al Ariss, Cascio and Paauwe (2014) conducted a research and found that engineering, designing and consultancy sector in Singapore observed a significant lack in regional talents, which means there is a scarcity of key human resources management. On the other side, as the demands of consulting opportunities are increasing both in domestic and global environment, it has become difficult for Aurecon, Singapore to keep and manage its existing talents. In addition, Aurecon, Singapore is one of the growing companies but not a fully established; thereby, it is not able to keep its talents in place by providing training and development programs, which further limits the career growth opportunities for employees. On the other side, Armstrong and Taylor (2014) performed a study on global talent management and revealed that large organizations due to their strengths and abilities tend to hire talents from the global environment to resolve their management challenges. More specifically, from the talent management article of Benitez-Amado, Llorens-Montes and Fernandez-Perez (2015), it was found that the large engineering and consulting group ECAS Pvt Ltd, hired human resources from Canada and Malaysia to fill out the gaps in its talents. Nonetheless, it is certainly not easy for small and medium size firms such as Aurecon, Singapore Group to hire talents from global consulting market. So, the scenario including both internal and external environment implies that Aurecon, Singapore faces challenges in managing its key talents. Thus, the stated research question is based on the issues Aurecon, Singapore faces and it provides the scope for ways to deal with those issues.
The above paragraph states few issues that Aurecon, Singapore Group faces with respect to talent management. The current scenario of Aurecon, Singapore mentioned above is a challenge because a scholarly research performed by Cappelli and Keller (2014), signifies that compared to other growing organizations such as Alpha Consulting Pvt ltd, Aurecon, Singapore Group is lagging behind in terms of talent management. The way of comparing talent management of rivals with Aurecon, Singapore, helps to figure out that due to shortage of regional talents and increasing demands of consulting opportunities, Aurecon, Singapore faces the challenges of talent management. Another significant way to form the research question is, conducting an industry analysis, which helps to identify the current scenario of the organizations in the sector, future challenges that organizations might face and forces that fuel up the situation (Oladapo 2014).
Analysis of External and Internal Factors Using PESTLE and Other Frameworks
The strategic framework used in the assessment one such as PESTLE, Porter’s five forces, SWOT, VRIO to analyze the external and internal factors influencing Aurecon, Singapore. However, those frameworks did not identify the issues with a better understanding of the market. Thus, it is necessary to focus on some extended concepts such as modern management practices, VUCA ,7s framework to address the issues in a more effective manner.
PESTLE analysis conducted in assessment one provided the facts that Singapore has suitable political environment, which is backing up the small and medium sizes firms, but the framework did miss out the point of limited workforce. This means due to the presence of small and medium size firms, regional talents are lacking. To deal with the challenges the large firms started hiring talents from the global environment but small firms like Aurecon, Singapore Group, due to lack of financial resources are not able to fill the talent gap (Stone and Deadrick 2015). In addition to this, five forces analysis mentions that suppliers have a moderate power in the sector but the number of firms in the consulting sector is increasing, which should further strengthen the bargaining power of suppliers. On the contrary, the economic factor in PESTLE analysis did not mention about recent volatility in Chinese Stock market and demonetization in India. Many suppliers from these two nations are dependent on Singapore.
In addition to this, due to PESTLE analysis, the social factor did not provide statistical figure with respect to current percentage of employment and education. Thus, it is difficult to understand how and from where Aurecon, Singapore could hire workforce. This means if nation’s employment percentage is not documented compared to the overall population, it could be difficult for any organization to learn about available the figure of fresh talents. Moreover, the social element also did not provide any information about culture and trends, which would have helped to learn, towards which industry, the fresh talents are crowding. More specifically, the threats of substitutes indicate that some organizations in the consulting sector are providing the services at the most reliable price but it did not talk about the substitute industry, which could be a threat to Aurecon, Singapore. Additionally, strategic capabilities analysis conducted with VRIO framework in assessment one only talk about how Aurecon, Singapore utilizes their knowledge in multiple sector to find a develop a suitable customer base but the framework did not mention about its internal workforce capabilities which is weakening. Internal workforce capabilities are weakening because a research conducted by Cascio (2018) on global talent management reveals that due to the existence of increasing number of firms in the consulting sector, the small firms observe a significant lack in the availability of workforce. Based on the findings of journal article, it can be mentioned that Aurecon, Singapore faces talent gap in its organization and the market, where it is currently performing the operation.
VUCA stands for volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity and Ambiguity for different type of management barriers.
Strategic Solutions for Talent Management in Aurecon, Singapore
Volatility- Volatility is known as the quality of being subject to rapid, significant and frequent changes. For example, in a volatile market, the price of goods could increase or go down significantly in a short period and the track of a trend could reverse quickly. Another example is, the occurrence of unexpected natural disaster could also affect the operation of Aurecon, Singapore but PESTLE analysis did not identify this issue. Instead, the outcome of PESTLE indicates that political and economical risk is low, but an article on global economy Cascio and Boudreau (2016) reveals that the global economic market still faces the downturn and unexpected demonetization in India in the recent time doomed the Asian economy.
Uncertainty- As put forward by Church et al. (2015), uncertainty talks about an element in which the outcomes could be unpredictable. Even though the fives forces analysis reveals that bargaining power of customers is moderate but the demand of consulting services is increasing and many small and medium sizes firms are increasing in number, which certainly increases the bargaining power of the customers. Nonetheless, the five forces analysis did not provide this significant piece of information. On the contrary, due to volatility in the Chinese Stock market, Asian economy is not stable; thereby, new firms find it difficult to enter Singapore market.
Complexity: According to Claussen et al. (2014), complexity involves a multiple number of issues as well as factors ad some of them could be interconnected. For example, internal analysis tool VRIO framework indicates that Aurecon, Singapore has a strong human resource but a global talent management article performed by Collings (2014), mention that small and medium sizes firms such as Aurecon, Singapore faces significant challenges in managing talents.
Ambiguity: As put forward by Deery and Jago (2015), ambiguity could talk about a lack of clarity and difficulty in understanding the context properly. For example, PESTLE framework mentions that due to political stability and favorable economy, consulting business are in the profitable stages and new businesses in the consulting sector are welcome but in five framework, it is mentioned that suppliers’ demand is low as number of organizations is high. However, theoretically suppliers’ demand could go up if there many organizations in the sector. So, there is an unclear piece of information gained from these two frameworks.
The application of frameworks used in the assessment one considered the information of 2013 and 2016 but the scenario has changed a bit now, which means the economic environment is not stable after the volatility in Chinese Stock market and demonization in India. These, two incidents have a strong impact on Asian economy. However, Porter’s five forces, PESTLE and VRIO frameworks did not talk about these incidents and the future impact of these two incidents. For example, the increasing number of organizations, economical volatility, complexity and ambiguity talk against the facts about political and favorable economic environment mentioned in PESTLE and five forces analysis. In addition, none of the frameworks used in assessment 1 talk about the management challenge, which difficulties faced by Aurecon, Singapore in managing key talents (Sparrow, Hird and Cooper 2015).
Conclusion
VUCA framework helps to identify the gaps in the frameworks used by in assessment one and it is relevant to the research question because the research question stated above about how Aurecon, Singapore could solve its talent management challenges. The framework PESTLE, five forces and VRIO framework did not mention about talent gaps that could arise in the coming future. For example, PESTLE mentions the fact that due to political and economical stability, the new businesses and existing business can obtain the profits but the ambiguity factor indicates that political stability, when new business enter the market, the industry may face a significant decline in the percentage of regional talents.
Strategy- According to Farndale et al. (2014), organization has to develop a strategy to maintain and gain competitive advantages over the competition. For example, as Aurecon, Singapore needs to manage its talents, it should not rush to hire new talents from global or regional environment like the competitors do. Instead, it could brush up its existing workforce by providing training and development programs and career growth opportunities to employees. Hence, the competitive advantages lies on the fact of skilled force, which Aurecon, Singapore has but the competitors, are investing money to hire fresh talents. Hence, the investment on training and career growth opportunities would be smaller than the investment made on hiring fresh talents (Tatoglu, Glaister and Demirbag 2016).
Structure: The large organizations have many layers of management, which is again the question of investment. However, Aurecon, Singapore should follow a flat organizational structure with a limited layers in the middle.
System: In order to leverage the existing workforce to its fullest, the firm needs to develop an open management style, where the employees should be empowered to take individual decision based on the situation arises.
Shared value: Aurecon, Singapore should incorporate its core value into the corporate goals and organization’s work ethics. This helps employees to gain a clear understanding about their job and organization’s demands.
Style- To manage the key talents, there should be a transparent and healthy relationship between supervisors and employees at Aurecon, Singapore. In order to build such relationship, the firm needs to develop a transformational leadership style.
Staff- Training and development programs could be a suitable method for brushing up the skills and capabilities.
Skills- Aurecon, Singapore should pay attention to employees’ skills and abilities for which the employees are working for the company.
The strategic frameworks applied to assessment one did not mention about why and how Aurecon, Singapore has to manage its key talents. However, 7s framework talks about how Aurecon, Singapore could manage its existing talents without involving in the rush of hiring new global and regional talents. In addition to this, framework also states how Aurecon, Singapore manages its existing talents with leadership and incorporation of business goals into corporate goals.
As put forward by Glaister et al. (2018), the capability to achieve new sorts of competitive advantages which is known as dynamic capabilities. Martin et al. (2016) also mentioned that the capability to strengthen competence to achieve corresponding with transforming business environment is referred to as dynamic. As mentioned above, Aurecon, Singapore could gain competitive advantages by renovating its existing competencies which means that instead of making large investment on hiring fresh talents, the firm needs to enhance the strengths of its the existing talents. Implementation of dynamic capabilities require a complete and absolute innovation, which certainly means Aurecon, Singapore should arrange for an innovative training and development programs, where the employees can develop their own skills. The company has effective capabilities that can be modified and employed accordingly so that it does not require outsourcing the same. These can save costs or the company. Capitalizing on the capabilities can turn out to be advantageous for the company for the reason that it can attain competitive advantages. This can also make possible the building of foundational abilities like the lean operations and project management along with certain industry specific abilities.
Numerous companies deal with the similar problems as faced by Aurecon, Singapore. Companies operating within the same industry such as Aecom, Dycom Industries and NV5 face similar talent management concerns. These concerns include shortage of talent and lack of qualified employees (Meyers and van Woerkom 2014). Along with that other issued faced by these companies include training and development of individuals those work on a contractual project basis as well as generating talented ethical culture. In addressing such talent management concerns, following the 7s framework and VUCA technique is deemed to be highly relevant.
Conclusion
The assessment offered a clear justification behind why the new frameworks are relevant to the issues faced by Aurecon, Singapore. The major purpose of the report was to conduct an intensive analysis to identify recent management challenges and ways to deal with management challenges. It was gathered from the paper that as the demands of consulting opportunities are increasing both in domestic and global environment, it has become difficult for Aurecon, Singapore to keep and manage its existing talents. For addressing such situation, the company is advised to attain competitive advantages by renovating its existing competencies which means that instead of making large investment on hiring fresh talents, the firm needs to enhance the strengths of its the existing talents. In addition, Aurecon, Singapore should pay attention to employees’ skills and abilities for which the employees are working for the company. Moreover, training and development can also serve as a suitable method for advancing workforce the skills and capabilities.
References
Al Ariss, A., Cascio, W.F. and Paauwe, J., 2014. Talent management: Current theories and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 49(2), pp.173-179.
Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S., 2014. Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers.
Benitez-Amado, J., Llorens-Montes, F.J. and Fernandez-Perez, V., 2015. IT impact on talent management and operational environmental sustainability. Information Technology and Management, 16(3), pp.207-220.
Bratton, J. and Gold, J., 2017. Human resource management: theory and practice. Palgrave.
Cappelli, P. and Keller, J.R., 2014. Talent management: Conceptual approaches and practical challenges. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), pp.305-331.
Cascio, W., 2018. Managing human resources. McGraw-Hill Education.
Cascio, W.F. and Boudreau, J.W., 2016. The search for global competence: From international HR to talent management. Journal of World Business, 51(1), pp.103-114.
Church, A.H., Rotolo, C.T., Ginther, N.M. and Levine, R., 2015. How are top companies designing and managing their high-potential programs? A follow-up talent management benchmark study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67(1), p.17.
Claussen, J., Grohsjean, T., Luger, J. and Probst, G., 2014. Talent management and career development: What it takes to get promoted. Journal of World Business, 49(2), pp.236-244.
Collings, D.G., 2014. Integrating global mobility and global talent management: Exploring the challenges and strategic opportunities. Journal of World Business, 49(2), pp.253-261.
Deery, M. and Jago, L., 2015. Revisiting talent management, work-life balance and retention strategies. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(3), pp.453-472.
Farndale, E., Pai, A., Sparrow, P. and Scullion, H., 2014. Balancing individual and organizational goals in global talent management: A mutual-benefits perspective. Journal of World Business, 49(2), pp.204-214.
Glaister, A.J., Karacay, G., Demirbag, M. and Tatoglu, E., 2018. HRM and performance—The role of talent management as a transmission mechanism in an emerging market context. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(1), pp.148-166.
Martin, G., Farndale, E., Paauwe, J. and Stiles, P.G., 2016. Corporate governance and strategic human resource management: Four archetypes and proposals for a new approach to corporate sustainability. European Management Journal, 34(1), pp.22-35.
Meyers, M.C. and van Woerkom, M., 2014. The influence of underlying philosophies on talent management: Theory, implications for practice, and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 49(2), pp.192-203.
Oladapo, V., 2014. The impact of talent management on retention. Journal of business studies quarterly, 5(3), p.19.
Sparrow, P., Hird, M. and Cooper, C.L., 2015. Strategic Talent Management. In Do We Need HR? (pp. 177-212). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Sparrow, P.R. and Makram, H., 2015. What is the value of talent management? Building value-driven processes within a talent management architecture. Human resource management review, 25(3), pp.249-263.
Stone, D.L. and Deadrick, D.L., 2015. Challenges and opportunities affecting the future of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), pp.139-145.
Tatoglu, E., Glaister, A.J. and Demirbag, M., 2016. Talent management motives and practices in an emerging market: A comparison between MNEs and local firms. Journal of World Business, 51(2), pp.278-293.