Interaction Concept and Interface Design
Several factors have been noted to contribute greatly to failure of information system implementation. These failure are overlooked in most of the cases and this makes them to be very devastating when they occur. ERP implementation is not an exception because it is quite obvious that many ERP have actually failed at the final stages of deployment. There are several factors that can be attributed to system development and implementation (Hawari & Heeks, 2010). System failure can be categorized into modules such as interface, functional and non-functional as well as failure to meet requirement analysis and specifications provided during initial stages of software development life cycle. To make ERP implementation successful, organizations should make sure all customer requirements are captured. System requirements analysis and specification is one of the important stages that helps project manager to avoid system failure by making sure all system requirements are captured. According to Ghosh (2012), implementation tools and technology that facilitates successful ERP development are areas of concern that should be factored. There are varying factors that have been noted to contribute to ERP failures. These factors are predominant in some cases than others such that, some prominent factors in developed countries are different when compared to developing countries. ERP implementation failure would be evaluated in regard to its types, failure contributing factors and the applicable solutions. Important to note is that, project failure results to project creep and increase in implementation costs or total waste of time and resources if it fails completely (Molla & Loukis, 2005).
Interaction concept is the capability of the system to offer suitable, appealing and reusable interface (Saqib, Arif, Rehman, Arshad & Ullah, 2012). System development team should factor out how interaction between users and the system would take place. Small Business Enterprises (SME) have been found to be prone to ERP failure because project management team did not consider required aspects when designing interface. System interface is very important because it determines the ease at which users would be able to enter as well as retrieve data. Designing system interface should follow design principles. These design principles are; usability which states that ERP interface should facilitate its initial functionality. Reusability is the next principle which focuses on the need to make use of the system for several functions without need to change the design structure. Additionally, ease of use and simplicity is one of the important factors that have attributed to failure of many great systems (Maditinos, Chatzoudes & Tsairidis, 2011). ERP interface should be simple without use of complicated features. To have successful ERP implementation, system development team should consider and enforce all these principles in order to come up with quality interface. If ERP fails to meet either of the recommended design interaction principles, the system is said to have failed and cannot be adopted for production (Kronbichler, Ostermann & Staudinger, 2010). Therefore, interface design turns to be one of the prominent aspect that should be taken with desirable weight if SME are to benefit from successful actualization of ERP’s. In this case, color should be attractive, clear and visible texts and appropriate images.
Correspondence Failure
Design of every system is usually required to meet some set objectives. Once development team does not achieve customer’s requirements and specifications, it is obvious that customer would decline to adopt it for production purpose. In developing countries, most of the ERP’s have failed because they did not meet customer’s expectations (Hawari & Heeks, 2010). Development team fails to achieve the set goals because during requirement analysis and specification stage, customer’s needs were not captured appropriately (Saeed et al., 2017). Requirements analysis and specifications cannot be captured if customer does not present ERP requirements accurately. The next reason that makes development team fail to achieve project set goals is the lack of ERP development skills and experiences. System development is a project and inadequate skills in system development as well as project management have been one of the greatest challenges in development of ERP systems. To minimize ERP or any other system correspondence failure, it is important for system developers to be certain with all requirements from the start. Similarly, project team leader should mobilize resourceful and experienced programmers, system testers and analysts. Finally, to avoid system failure, it is important to deliver ERP in modules. This can only be achieved by applying suitable development methodology such as waterfall model (Bar, Basili, Jedaibi & Chaudhry, 2013). In this case, suitable development methodology should allow for modular software development. Modular approach allows developers to test and correct some defects once detected during development of specific module.
System development is a process that should be run and managed by skilled project managers. Failure to have the right development team and project manager may result to unsuccessful system development and implementation. If ERP project leader does not have required project management skills, there are high chances of project failure. IT projects have proved to be complex and lack of skilled personnel to manage them have resulted to total collapse (Hustad & Olsen, 2014). In project management, skills and experience are the most important factors that cannot be underscored at all cost. In this regard, before an ERP development project can be started, project leader in collaboration with other stakeholders should agree on timeline required to deliver the solution. Next, the amount of capital should be evaluated from the start of the project with possible alternatives to lower implementation costs. Additionally, to manage the cost of implementation, project leader should be able to plan for the number of personnel required to sustain project (Cyrus, Aloini & Karimzadeh, 2018). Team work is another skills that a project leader should have in order to be able to engage several stakeholders. ERP project undertaking involves number of people such as developers, system analysts, testers, users and organizational executive. To make all these project components work smoothly, project management skills are quite essential (Aldammas & Al-Mudimigh, 2011). Therefore, most of the ERP implementation in developing world have failed as a result of poor IT project management skills.
Identify Critical Failure Factors
Communication is an important aspect in system development and implementation. Without clear communication strategies, it would be very challenging to implement ERP system successfully. In order to make project implementation successful, it is important for an organization to establish appropriate communication channels (Garg, 2010). ERP implementation requires project management skills and collaboration tools such as GitHub which makes development process very easy. With suitable tools, developers can work on similar project from anywhere. With such important tools, ERP developers are able to view all the updates made as well as get notifications when updates are made on project. On the same note, organizational executive require suitable communication tools such as mails, Gmail hangouts and GoToMeeting in order to be able to share and express project management skills that would make its actualization successful. If project management does not adopt desirable collaboration tools, it would be very challenging to pass messages on time and in appropriate manner. At some instances, it would be important for both development and management team to check on the progress of the project actualization. This makes it possible for developers and management to discuss on possible improvements that can be made as well as give a chance to customer to ascertain project is on the right track. Abu-Shanab, Abu-Shehab & Khairallah (2015) argues that in developing countries, project team and project leaders have not been considering the importance of communication during ERP implementation. This have contributed to most of the ERP system implementation failure which resulting to waste of resources.
Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) involves business process analysis, coming up with new workflows and processes with an organization with main aim of streamlining business operations. To come up with appropriate business processes and workflows, new decisions and radical redesigning of business operations would be of great importance (Hustad & Olsen, 2014). With ERP system development and actualization, Small Business Enterprises (SME) many be faced by ineffective business process re-engineering which in turn result to ERP failure. Since ERP adoption would require new infrastructural implementation, most of the businesses are not aware neither are they ready for such business requirements. BPR problem is usually caused by project leaders and other relevant consultants failing to conduct business mapping processes. Mapping business processes helps system developers and organizational management compare prospective software functionalities and operational business requirements (Aldammas & Al-Mudimigh, 2011). Most of SME trying to adopt ERP systems into their daily operations have failed because they have not been conducting software functionalities and business process match. Therefore, with clear defined business process, organizations SME’s and organizations from developing countries should be able to design new work flows with disrupting normal operations.
Poor Communication Strategies
Most of the organizations have been adopting ERP systems without providing required skills to its employees. Since use of ERP system has been advancing with time from management to entire organization operational tool, conducting appropriate and effective training has been a great challenge (Abu-Shanab, Abu-Shehab & Khairallah, 2015). Important to note is that ERP user training helps organization employees have operational competency which builds positive impression. If organizations are ready to adopt ERP systems, training of users should be given highest priority in order to have qualified staff to run it effectively. User training has been a great challenge to many developing countries as well as SME due to financial constraints. Organizations that fail to train users forget such training would be used as a competitive advantage. A good example can be deduced from service industry. Experienced user training would make service delivery faster and efficient (Hustad & Olsen, 2014). Quality service delivery offer subject organization a competitive advantage compared to others. In this regard, ERP system training cannot be underscored as it one of the success factors once development and implementation has been completed.
From the two case studies, it has been observed that some of the ERP system failure are common while at some instances they are diverse. Some of the common failure factors in both case studies are; financial constraints which tends to limit required operational procedures (Hawari & Heeks, 2010). Both SME and organizations from developing countries are not willing to use resources in ERP implementation but they expect to reap maximum benefits. This makes implementation of the ERP system quite difficult resulting to failure at any stage. Similarly, user training is one of the ERP failure which is common in all scenarios as most organizations have not been considering it as one of the success factors. Further, in both scenarios, planning before actualization of ERP has been emphasized as it helps organization evaluate prospective software functionalities and business operational work flows and processes in advance. Besides, lack of quality project management skills has been observed to be a unique factor contributing to ERP implementation failure in developing countries (Al-Dhafari & Li, 2014). It is obvious that developing countries lack effective project management skills and experience. As a result, it has been very difficult to implement big IT projects such as ERP. Finally, from both cases, ERP failure classification remains the same.
ERP system failure can be avoided by taking appropriate actions during implementation stage. In the case of the developing countries where IT project management skills are inadequate, outsourcing of qualified personnel would be of great important. With skilled and experienced project leader, there are higher chances of having a successful ERP project actualization. It is through outsourcing of personnel that organizations would be able to implement ERP successfully. Similarly, organization would be able to get required training from experienced ERP experts and project leaders (Aldammas & Al-Mudimigh, 2011). Once implementation has been done and required skills impacted on local personnel, organizations from developing countries would be able to sustain themselves on similar needs. On the same note, for SME from developed countries where ERP implementation is still a problem due to lack of operational skills, user training would be the solution. It is advisable for an organization to train all employees on the use of the new technology in order to facilitate smooth adoption of ERP. User training improves morale and operational competency which in turn offers subject organization competitive advantage in the market. User training would help organization avoid ERP failure after deployment has been done (Ghosh, 2012).
Conclusion
The number of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) implementation failure has been on rise over years from both developing and SME in developed countries. ERP failure can be attributed to many factors depending on the nature of the organization. System actualization failure is a disastrous occurrence in an organization because it means waste of resources and time by the firm. In this regard, it is very important for organizations to understand causes of ERP failure and possible measures that can be taken to avoid such occurrences. Some of these failures can be avoided at early stages but project managers and relevant stakeholders try to oversee them. Later, organizational ERP implementation turns futile because of mistakes which could have been eliminated with minimal costs. When implementing ERP, organizational management, project team and project leader should understand factors that can hinder their implementation. Important aspect to note in any project management is proper planning which is the only basis of a successful project actualization. Planning helps all stakeholders to identify required timeline, resources as well as available skills and experiences to actualize projects implementation. It has been noted that large organizations have enough resources to fund ERP implementation. This means it is quite rare to have projects fail due to lack of enough resources because planning is usually done adequately.
References
Abu-Shanab, E., Abu-Shehab, R., & Khairallah, M. (2015). Critical success factors for ERP implementation: The case of Jordan. The International Arab Journal of e-Technology, 4(1), 1-7.
Aldammas, A., & Al-Mudimigh, A. S. (2011). Critical success and failure factors of erp implementations: two cases from kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 28(2).
Al-Dhafari, Z. M. H., & Li, M. (2014). Exploring Factors Causing Disparity between Desired and Experienced Effects of Campus ERP Systems.
Bar, A. A., Basili, V., Jedaibi, W. A., & Chaudhry, A. J. (2013). An experience based evaluation process for ERP bids. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.2968.
Cyrus, K. M., Aloini, D., & Karimzadeh, S. (2018). How to Disable Mortal Loops of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation: A System Dynamics Analysis. Systems, 6(1), 3.
Garg, P. (2010). Critical failure factors for enterprise resource planning implementations in Indian retail organizations: An exploratory study. Journal of Information Technology Impact, 10(1), 35-44.
Ghosh, R. (2012). A comprehensive study on ERP failures stressing on reluctance to change as a cause of failure. Journal of Marketing and Management, 3(1), 123.
Hawari, A. A., & Heeks, R. (2010). Explaining ERP failure in a developing country: a Jordanian case study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 23(2), 135-160.
Hustad, E., & Olsen, D. H. (2014). ERP implementation in an SME: A failure case information systems for small and medium-sized enterprises (pp. 213–228).
Kronbichler, S. A., Ostermann, H., & Staudinger, R. (2010). A comparison of erp-success measurement approaches. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 7(2), 281-310.
Maditinos, D., Chatzoudes, D., & Tsairidis, C. (2011). Factors affecting ERP system implementation effectiveness. Journal of Enterprise information management, 25(1), 60- 78.
Molla, A., & Loukis, I. (2005). Success and failure of ERP technology transfer: A framework for analysing congruence of host and system cultures. Institute for Development Policy and Management.
Saeed, S., Shaikh, A., Memon, M. A., Memon, M. H., Abassi, F. A., & Naqvi, S. M. R. (2017). Implementation of Failure Enterprise Systems in Organizational Perspective Framework. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(5), 54-63.
Saqib, M., Arif, M., ur Rehman, N., Arshad, M., & Ullah, F. (2012). Enterprise Resource Planning- Critical Failure Factors (CFFs) and Its Remedies towards Effective and Efficient Implementation of an Enterprise Resource Planning. City University Research Journal, 3(1).