The Norway attacks and their impact
Discuss about the Anders Breivik and Norway Attacks for Islamophobia.
The Norway attacks were one of the largest mass attacks in the modern society killing as many as 78 people and caused a mass havoc in the society (The Independent 2018). The terrorist attack shook the world due to the massive atrocity that it created. The perpetrator of the attack Anders Breivik conspired the largest attacks that the country had seen in the modern times. One of the most important aspect of the problems that the people face in the concepts relating to the various scenarios that led to the formations of the attitude in the person. Rightwing extremism has been a problem in Norway for a long time and with cases like the Norway bombing they highlight their presence and their venture to have a say in the dominion. The mindset of Anders when he was planning and thinking of an attack to kill a large number of people is field of study in this context. The psychological issues that caused Anders Breivik to change from a compassionate person to a rightwing extremist bent on killing people for the sake of establishing the supremacy of the rightwing mindset in the society (Beaumont 2012). The ideology that affected the actions of Anders Breivik is mainly in his deep seated thinking of the desire of an equal society that is not biased on religion and thinking based on the sociocultural context. The social context of the overall attacks focus on the social acculturation issues that leads to the formation of the terrorist mindset among the different individuals.
The psychiatrists who analysed Breivik during the court proceedings went on to confirm his psychotic tendencies. It came into light in the various meetings that he was deeply influenced by the psychology of the knights Templars ideology where he held himself responsible as judge jury and the executioner in the society of the mishappenings that he sees as oppression in the society. He thought he was a pioneer in an European common war, and contrasted his circumstance with that of Tsar Nicolas of Russia and Queen Isabella of Spain (Faccini and Allely 2016). He trusted that it was likely that he could be the new official in Norway following an overthrow which was a strong example of his delusions which leads to his actions. He said he chose who should live and who should bite the dust in Norway. He felt this as a genuinely trusted and burdening duty he had towards the Norwegian society. He trusted that an extensive extent of the Norwegian populace (a few hundred thousands) bolstered his deeds. He even wanted a different ideology in giving the power to a crusader to establish the supremacy of the Norwegian strength in the society. He guaranteed that he had given 5 million NOK to the battle. He figured he would be given the duty regarding expelling a few hundred a huge number of Muslims to North Africa. He accepted there was a progressing ethnic purifying in Norway and dreaded for his life. He thought the occasions he was a piece of could begin an atomic third world war. He worked with answers for enhance the Norwegian ethnic hereditary pool, make sicknesses wiped out, and diminish the separation rate. He researched about the Norwegian gene pool in an attempt to create a number of pure bred children in the Norwegian society making it more authentic (Meloy, Habermeyer and Guldimann 2015). He trusted that the place of Glucksburg (current Norwegian imperial house) would be expelled through upheaval in 2020. In his fanatical thinking he also intended to use the DNA of the Viking king Olav and use it to decide the next ruler of the country by finding the maximum resemblance to the DNA of a person in the population to the DNA of the king Olav.
Right-wing extremism and its presence in Norway
The psychiatrist saw these hallucinatory behaviour that he had felt as a result of the over strengthened islamophobia he had ingrained in his life due to the fear of Islamic supremacy in Norway due to its accepting society. Along these lines, they didn’t think of him as insane by mixing up his fanatic, supremacist, conservative perspectives as hallucinating, but since they thought he had self-important daydreams with respect to his own particular part in this radical universe. In spite of the fact that his political sentiments lamentably are shared by others, he is the only one who took upon himself to carry out the works of the knights Templars with such a strong approach, or even in the cases of this current association’s presence (Gill 2015). Moreover, Breivik asserted he had outstanding individual capacities, for example comprehending what other individuals — including his evaluators — thought, without completely clarifying them how.
The two specialists saw his dialect as stilted and specialized, utilizing basic words in new settings blended with abnormal words, which he said he had made himself and that the therapists saw as neologisms. There were generally no indications of horribly complicated discourse or activities. In his analysis Breivik showed a divergent behaviour from the accepted norms in his belief of the justifications of his actions being that the was cleansing the society of the people who would be a threat to society. He showed great enthusiasm in the discussing of the ideas that guided his actions and the philosophies he believed in. The psychiatrist thin thse to be the primal causes of his actions that make him do the things that he does. There were no outward indications of melancholy, lunacy, sound-related fantasies or thoughts of reference, impact marvels or thoughts of thought inclusion. He had taken anabolic steroids in a few periods up to July 22, joined with expansive measurements of ephedrine, caffeine, and headache medicine on the real day. Blood tests taken at his capture demonstrated these substances in sums that in all likelihood could worsen, yet not specifically cause, mental side effects (Pantucci 2011). Taking into account the different symptoms of Breivik it was seen that he had a certain case of schizophrenia and paranoia guiding his extreme behaviour and actions.
The very idea that dwelled in the mind of Breivik that he was a part of the knight Templar taking part in a crusade for the ethnic cleansing in the society helping in the development of the society by killing the people who will be an ethnic threat to the society one of the important issues that can be seen in the ideas were that he was extreme right winged ethnic activist fuelled by the idea that the ethnic and the racial diversity of the country and the tolerance towards it will harm the people of his own ethnicity (Billing and Stålne 2011). It is seen that in these cases the subject feel a strong sense of ethnic and the racial identity leading to radical behaviour. In the ideals of Breivik that the Christian of Norway have to take a stand against the radical Islam that is on the rise in Europe. He was of the belief that if he could not take a stand for his beliefs in the modern world it would gradually become tough in the society to sustain himself leading to a number of different issues in the society and the gradual win of the religion in the society (Leonard et al. 2014). From the unapologetic attitude of Anders and the different behavioural patterns that he showed in the proceedings it was evident that he was extremely influenced by the radical ideologies and focussed on taking the control in his hands about the changes he sought in the society and the ways in which it would influence the people in the society.
Anders Breivik and his transformation into an extremist
The change in the behavioral patterns of Breivik was one of the deciding factors which shows how the radical ideology had affected his social behavior. It was evident that he had spent the time of seclusion from the society while living with his mother and amazing ideas related to right wing extremism during that period (Berntzen and Sandberg 2014). According to his friends he greatly change during those years and from a compassionate person became a radical ideologist who believe in the purification of the society my flight number of radical groups. The only difference between him and political groups were that he did not have the backing or the understanding of how to go about his actions. In the due time he was becoming concerned with the ideas of his role and importance in the society about the Crusade he was supposed to fight. It was this Paranoia and schizophrenic tendency that allowed him to believe that he was bestowed with much greater responsibility towards his country then being an ordinary citizen (Bangstad 2014). According to him it was on to his actions to save the country from the difficulties it was about to face due to the Rise of the multicultural society. He also had strict ideas related to the socio cultural life and restricted himself in Planning and thinking about the future ideologies and how to Dishonored ideology from the various other medications that were published. It should be noted that before his seclusion and losing his job he was quite a compassionate individual who used to help people. It can also be heard that reading a certain kind of literature on aligning insect with certain ideologies have led him to the belief that was his future.
He has a certain level of genius and planning abilities while intricately designing the plan for the attacks. In his planning repeat attention to a lot of details so that he would not have been caught before the attacks. He bought a huge from outside Oslo because of which the large amount of fertilizers he got raised no suspicion among the people around him. The fertilizers for further used to make bomb that was donated killing a number of people. His complete ideal was based on racial and ethnic purification of the country. Is ideal so basically guided as a result of a constant price in the Islamic terrorism and insurgency of a number of refugees from various countries in to Europe. According to him there was a constant fear of the Islamic powers taking over the world which was against his ideas as a member of Knights Templar (Wessely 2012). This very ideology force him to plan an attack and race a strong voice against the insurgency and fight for the racial Supremacy in his country. In his schizophrenic state he also thought that an atomic Warfare was eminent and in future the royal family would be disband and he would be given a place of power in the country. According to him he would have made high official who would look into the matter of well being of his motherland.
The psychology behind Breivik’s actions
These ideas show a strong resemblance to ethnic superiority among the different people in the society but the very. That he chose to act upon it made him a veritable terrorist. The bombing in the central Oslo district which was a business place full of people killed 8 and his own actions of mass shooting massacre on a youth summer camp killed 69 others. These actions for a result of an extreme ideology which she had posted on his social accounts as his own Manifesto coating a number of leaders ranging from George W Bush to Hitler. In his various tests He shot himself as a member of Knights Templar and the Crusader who was at war against the Islamic Supremacy in Europe. According to him the ethnic cleansing was extremely necessary in the society to maintain the balance and restore the freedom for the people in the country (Melle 2013). He also thought that the present government should give me to the old Viking rulers who ruled the land so that the ethnicity may be intact. Ethnic fanaticism in his behavior can be very well adjust through this thought process which takes into account the matching of DNA from earlier Viking Kings to the modern people so that they can choose the rulers from the earliest reigning dynasty.
During the course of the court trial such was his behavior and attitude that he showed no remorse or empathy towards the people who suffered for his actions. It was very evident from his behavior that the ideals of ethnic purification were to ingredient in his mind. Through various interviews that the psychologists conducted on Breivik it was evident that he sincerely believed in the ideals of the actions I was committed. His date of schizophrenia and the Paranoia towards religion was evident from the statements that showed that he thought he had been assigned the task of religious purification and ethnic cleansing from others who belong to higher posts in the Knights Templar. His own representation of his self so that he was completely delusional in his approach towards the different aspects of his actions. It was also very evident in his actions that he did not only want to kill the ethnic minorities but also the people of Norway who were fighting to support the people who had died at his hands. The case of acute schizophrenia is also evident went through his various interviews he keeps a leading to a number of the secret societies which made him do the actions he had committed and the crimes of killing a number of people (Richards 2014). The overall behavior of Breivik in the different contexts can only be said to be a mental illness of acute schizophrenia resulting from the Paranoia of being ruled by an Islamic society resulting in his actions which tends to cleanse the Norwegian community of any ethnic minorities.
The ideological underpinnings of Breivik’s actions
It can also be seen that he is mental state was a result of losing his job and is blaming if it on a number of ethnic groups that has led to the society being multicultural the year sub seclusion and the life we lead also allowed him to sell the ideas of radical behavior in his mind leading to a complete situation of distraught leading to an extremely violent behavior that caused the life of a number of people in the society (Tietze 2014). Some slack of remorse it is also evident that he is mentally ill and does not believe that his actions in any way from and hurtful towards the people that he killed. He had complete faith in his actions and was unaffected by the results of it. The very lack of humus and their delusional state of him pointing out at the number of different factors that lead to HIV attacks on the people and the Oslo business center clarify that his mental state was not sane.
Conclusion
Therefore from the above scenario it can be concluded that Anders Breivik was the youth who was delusional and completely LED array by his right wing extremist ideas in two conducting actions of which the conclusion she did not understand. His attack was the largest attack in Europe after the Madrid problems claiming the lives of 78 people in the name of ethnic purification. District location television and Paranoia can be said to be the reason with left to schizophrenic behavior in him that caused the terrorist activities. However, these reasons are not enough to justify his actions that caused the life of a number of innocent people in the society. This case however is an example of what horrors may result if the right wing extremist ideology is given space in the society.
References
Bangstad, S., 2014. Anders Breivik and the rise of Islamophobia. Zed Books Ltd..
Beaumont, P. 2012. Anders Breivik and the trouble with defining sanity | Peter Beaumont. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jun/18/anders-breivik-defining-sanity
Berntzen, L.E. and Sandberg, S., 2014. The collective nature of lone wolf terrorism: Anders Behring Breivik and the anti-Islamic social movement. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(5), pp.759-779.
Billing, P. and Stålne, K., 2011. Learning From the Unfathomable: An Analysis of Anders Behring Breivik. Integral Review: A Transdisciplinary & Transcultural Journal for New Thought, Research, & Praxis, 7(2).
Faccini, L. and Allely, C.S., 2016. Mass violence in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Narcissistic Personality Disorder: A case analysis of Anders Breivik using the “Path to Intended and Terroristic Violence” model. Aggression and violent behavior, 31, pp.229-236.
Gill, P., 2015. Lone-actor terrorists: A behavioural analysis. Routledge.
Leonard, C.H., Annas, G.D., Knoll IV, J.L. and Tørrissen, T., 2014. The case of Anders Behring Breivik–Language of a lone terrorist. Behavioral sciences & the law, 32(3), pp.408-422.
Melle, I., 2013. The Breivik case and what psychiatrists can learn from it. World Psychiatry, 12(1), pp.16-21.
Meloy, J.R., Habermeyer, E. and Guldimann, A., 2015. The warning behaviors of Anders Breivik. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2(3-4), p.164.
Pantucci, R., 2011. What have we learned about lone wolves from Anders Behring Breivik?. Perspectives on Terrorism, 5(5/6), pp.27-42.
Richards, B., 2014. what drove anders breivik?. Contexts, 13(4), pp.42-47.
The Independent. 2018. Anders Breivik. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/topic/anders-breivik
Tietze, T., 2014. The Breivik controversy: politics, terrorism and psychiatry. Australasian psychiatry, 22(4), pp.383-385.
Wessely, S., 2012. Anders Breivik, the public, and psychiatry. The Lancet, 379(9826), pp.1563-1564.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
