Discussion
Discuss about the Realism and International Conflicts for Freedom.
As opined by Acocella, (2016), self-governing States are the principle performers in International system, and they have turned out to be the most dominant when this stage is an international one. States are mainly apprehensive about their security, expansion of the territory, edict, justice, independence, freedom and supremacy. States has a role that they perform under a particular political concept, a philosophy those asses how States should maintain the associations with other States and the morals to deal with political issues. Again a State should be aware of the functions it is going to perform and when a concern area pops up, it must follow the ever best method to resolve it. Realism is one of the hoariest models in International Relation and International Political Economy that is represented by markets where the companies want to represent themselves (Burchill et al., 2015). It is school of ideas that is based on shared ideologies about what fixes states actions towards each other. Amongst the philosophies is anarchism realists rely on the fact there is no federal worldwide expert that restricts independent states and defines their actions. This is why, nation-states are the only genuine actors in global businesses and neither multinational nor internal performers can limit them.
Under circumstances of anarchy and an irregular future, nations depend on themselves. For this reason, the principle dynamic potency in the self-help world is the national attention. The central concern of foreign dogma is survival due to the unpredictable future of the global system. Survival is dependent on power. For such a portrayal of the world, realists have been often censured as pessimists. However, consultants of realism consider it not as a base on which to set up the world mandates but as a tool of assessing history and forecasting about the future. Realism presents things as they are and not as they should be. The Realism and International conflict highlights the process of decision-making for the corporations and organizations for probing into the global markets. The main importance is put on the progression of solving the problem, which lets them to be aware of the actual characteristics of the market full of competitors (Dionisio, 2017). The process of problem solving makes the employees concerned about the choices that would perform as a mediator for attainment of awareness about the market admittance ways. Contemplation of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) can easily be correlated with the awareness towards the worldwide clashes, which the organizations and companies might encounter in the course of global market entry. For example selection of Chinese organisations widens the multiplicity, conferring value to the perception of workplace variety. As well as, it also enhances the possibility of tiffs between the countries for securing their market places. Realism can be put into the same orientation with concern disagreement, entry mode (Heywood, 2011). Sagacity in the decision-taking benefits the workers to have the consciousness regarding the truth, regarding the nature of the market that is rigidly competitive. This realism is a help towards making appropriate choices towards making proper accesses to the global markets.
Global employee attrition is an ever continuing problem for the companies nowadays and to deal with that the HR department of an organization keeps on planning several game plans to retain them or replace the lost workers. The problem can never get resolved on a permanent basis; but still to deal with this the responsible department must be aware of the problem areas in particular to know what is causing the employees to attrite. However, upon a detailed analysis about the companies irrespective of the local and the global ones, the major reasons behind huge employee turnover can be enlisted.
First of all, the lack of balance between work and life has turned out to be a one of the key factors impacting the overall environment within the organization. As the economic pressure is following an upward line in graph, hence the management is continuously pushing a single employee to meet the productivity of two or three. This becomes almost a must when the company is restructuring. Employees are expected to work on their weekends and that is the moment when they are bound to choose either of their personal life or work life. Another point of dissatisfaction from the employees’ end is the disparity between the promised works to be done said during the interview time and the task they are bound to do during their production hours. This difference generates mistrust and mistrust can never maintain a peaceful environment within the organization retaining its employees for a long time. Anyone longs for a recognition and get rewarded for a task executed by them in a well done way. This is a very common human tendency (Narang, 2014). Not necessarily the recognition must be a monetary one. Appreciation does it well in most of the cases. Recognizing the good performers is a very effective one to retain employees with a high satisfaction level. Loss of talents and expertise are caused if the employees get a feel of being trapped in dead-end points. Most often expert individuals are enforced to change job from one organization to another with a motive grow further in status and recompense. The most successful companies discover ways to assist employees ripen their expertise and responsibilities in their present posts and situations for future progression within the associations. Staffs that look for growth opportunities are more likely to leave the organization if it cannot provide them with proper growth channel (Dionisio, 2017). Governing authority’s continuous reorganization, altering tracks and shambling individuals around detaches personnel from the company’s determination. Employees are not aware of what’s going on, what priorities are set or what they should do further. This causes a negative vibe that leads to ambiguity and inadequacies.
The employee attrition and retention are the two opposite processes that go hand in hand within an organization. Realism and international conflict can be very helpful to deal with the problem of retention. Incorporation of this theory can leave a great impact on this continuous problem that is faced by the companies. When a new process is launched, that should be the time to incorporate the theory within the association. The management is the department that is responsible the most to make it effective. For example, they should keep an eye on the operational procedure. They have to make the process easy for the level of employees that they are going to hire for their company. As mentioned before the strategic management is a set of goals that an organization must enlist in its work process before starting with a plan of action. If the strategy is flawless, the future of the company is going to be smooth for a long term basis. Basically Strategic management means a company’s problem solving capability and a company’s problem is mainly triggered by the employee’s dissatisfaction. The set of regulations should not only be prepared by the employees but also for the employers. For example, the management must be aware of the way of talking, behaving, and gesture towards the staffs as this is a key factor to impact upon the productivity and productivity is probably the biggest contributor towards a company’s revenue earning. At the same time there are few more factors that should be revamped while the construction of the company itself (Robert Jackson, 2014). If the company’s strategic planning comprises of elements like ways of work life balance, proper employee alignment, a good power of decision making, adequate people skill, parity between the promised work and the work to be delivered finally, a good growth opportunity, the employee retention should not be a big challenge for the organizations. A healthy environment should be a part of the organization culture to encourage the employees to work spontaneously for the company. Once they work willingly, the work life balance which is an alarming factor now a day for the employees all over the world should not be a hindrance. All these factors once included will benefit the company to compete with the big ones in the market. As the employees are the base for any company, that should be solid to make it proceed further towards the advancement. International conflicts will be easier to handle once the inputs are well knit within the strategic management of a company.
Conclusion
It is prominent that realism is not only a theory and cannot be made out easily by the methodical elucidation of international conflicts, this theory relies on the historical and political situations, the logical criterions and the significance in making political conclusions was certainly arbitrated (Robert Jackson, 2014). It has been very beneficial for being cautionary against legalism, moralism and liberalism and other that cannot succeed to sight reality of interest and influence. Hence realism is a useful tool for states, in being defensive towards the interest of inhabitants of the city, safeguarding their security, preventing of tiffs and conflicts that is a constant threat for the global organizational peace.
Reference List
Acocella, N., 2016. the Theory of Industrial Organization’. Recent Developments in the Theory of Industrial Organization, p.232.
Burchill, Scott, et al., Theories of International Relations, London, Palgrave, third edition, 2015. East Center for Studies & Research
Dionisio, M.A., 2017. Strategic Thinking: The Role in Successful Management. Journal of Management Research, 9(4), pp.43-56.
Heywood, A., 2011. Global Politics. 1st ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ji, J., Dimitratos, P. and Huang, Q., 2016. Problem-solving dissension and international entry mode performance. International Marketing Review, 33(2), pp.219-245.
Narang, V., 2014. Nuclear strategy in the modern era: Regional powers and international conflict. Princeton University Press.
Robert Jackson, G.S.,2013 , Introduction to International Relations Theories and Approaches. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press