Regulations and Government Intervention
Discuss about the Leveraging Nonprofit and Voluntary Action.
The relationship that connects business and government remain to be two fundamental institutions in Australian society as it is inherently complex. Every business is always design in a manner to e capable of generating revenue for its workers, employers, together with shareholders. In the submission to maintain increasing profits, business operations throughout history have focus on conducting their operations using unsafe, dubious, as well as exploitive techniques (Alizadeh 2015, p. 26). In the tender to stem organizations conducting business activities in the unsafe and unethical techniques, Australian government has employed several approaches to regulate such issues. In modern democracy of industry such as Australia, the interests along with operations of authorities and business inevitably intersect. There is no authority, state, or federal that can afford to ignore vital needs of business activities (Bray 2016, p. 262). Business regulations in the region has been highly debated in the past years as in most cases both adverse and advantages, but benefits regulation massively out way its charges. Australia government uses diverse techniques of regulations that comprise of protection of environment, advertisement, as well as privacy.
Government has presently been capable of certain expectations of business in Australia. The government has ensure that business operations to serve various expectations that aim at improving the well-being of employees, shareholders, employers, as well as improving the revenue that the country earns. Government has ensured that all business operation within Australian borders pays taxes that serve to be the major revenue for the authority (Schlemper et al., 2014, p. 2198). Therefore, it has become responsibility of every business operator to pay regular taxes on sales, income, and inputs. It has become the responsibility of every business operator, as the manager to focus on deducting the income tax from the wages of the workers for the major purpose of making remittance of the same to treasury of Australian government. The government in Australia has also created room for development of voluntary programmers that they expect every business to corporate with their agencies in connection with different plans. Some of these voluntary programmers that the government need business operations to focus on include cultural progress, sponsoring of social welfare plans, promoting education in the region, preserving environment, putting control measures for populations, and assisting in connection with drought relief among other programs. Business operations also have responsibilities of offering feedback data to the authority to the decisions taken by different leaders of political class (Hogan et al., 2011, p. 39). Business has important understanding as well as experience in improving their wellbeing with authorities. They can thus place before these expertise before the decision makers on facts and problems and argue for the changes or modifications of operations. The changes can be attained by business either individually or collectively.
Taxation and Corporate Social Responsibility
In most cases, Australia government focuses on regulation of business operations regarding advertising of services and products that they deal with in different markets. Different laws have been set in place by fair trading with the aim of protecting different consumers and keeping businesses truthful pertaining their products and services (Thakur 2013, p. 955). The good instance of when the business does advertisement false dated back in the early days of 1990 when the authority in the region investigations of GNB limited, Pacific Dunlop secondary had falsely been able to mislead the public population through process of adverts that their batteries were manufactured within Australia. However, these batteries produced by these companies were coming from places outside Australia specifically from New Zealand as well as from Asia. Through involvement of government in business in Australia, intervention by the authority made GNB limited to be capable of confessing that they had actually been utilizing inappropriate sins, flyers, along with brands (Remington 2016, p. 69). Additionally, Pacific Dunlop has action in early days of February in 1991 that included the obligation with the target of improving its compliance program of advertising during duration of five years. During such period, major activities in the program comprise of marketing, advertising, different techniques of marketing of batteries, as well as remedial marketing. However other relations between government and business in Australia include need of government to execute contracts by different private business sectors. Several business sectors are able to submit their tenders. It is clear that it remain responsibility of the business sector to conduct the projects according to needed specifications as well as standards. In other cases, some influential along with competent operators of business are included in the advisory boards constituted by the Australian authority (Skinner et al., 2015, p. 5562). Some business operators are always appointed as members of the delegates who tend to go to foreign places for major purpose of exploring programs to improve trade and manufacturing processes.
Different business operations can always lead to leaving different carbon footprints when operating that remains to be environmental hazard. The government involves in such case by forming an agency that deals with environmental protection (Barker 2015, p. 482). In Australia, this agency of environmental protection has been a vital element in operations of different businesses as it helps in regulating the aspect of business trading that lead to production and poor management of carbon to atmosphere. Government deals with regulation of different regulations concerning protection of surrounding through idea of offering effective education. The government in the region has been able to enforce such laws by enforcing it via imposing final, and they have remained to do so when enforcing different penalties among business owners when they fail to tell workers on effects of disposal of wastes in poor manner (Carney 2016, p. 154). Additionally, in operations of businesses, privacy remains to be the ethical as well as potentially unlawful concern among Australian government. The government always focuses on taking different data from employees and consumers in the process of leasing and whilst on how business transactions are attained. Several laws exist that aim at stopping businesses from providing different operational data as individuals can indict organizations for misuse of their private facts. Those regulations in place remain to be a special approach why Australian government needs to regulate business operations (Salamon et al., 2015, p. 2201). Therefore, without regulations by government of the vital sectors of operations of businesses such as marketing and advertising, corporations could focus on taking their unfair benefit of clients. The issue of environmental pollution that is the moral concern would have no point of stand if not for regulations b Australian government. Without stable government in Australia than privacy in businesses would be violated that remain to be unfair to different consumers as ethical issues will not be addressed well in all forms of operations of business (Le Hong 2013, p. 342). Hence, authority regulation in business activity is required to keep fair of trade as well as balanced for the appropriate economy.
Environmental Protection and Sustainability
Involvement of government in business leads to more benefits in operations. For instance, Australian government, as well as state and territory authority legislation exists to protect different consumers, community, and environments by posing appropriate laws that every business in rms has to follow. The government also promotes cases of fair trading and competition among business operations by ensuring that every worker and shareholders are treated well in every undertaking (Gilding et al., 2016, p. 129). All these laws set by Australian government provide best opportunities of how business interacts with their customers, suppliers, along with other business sectors. Therefore, government leads opportunities that are effective in improving the operations and revenue earned by business as they lead to formation of competitive regulations, user regulation laws, produce accountability directive, legislation of environment, along with decrees s of privacy among other opportunities.
Australian administration relation with business has essential opportunity in improving operations of the company. The government remains to be responsible for preparation of essential laws that makes the system of business function well. Some of the business laws that result in the opportunities of relations include the responsibility of the authority to provide for the implementation of the business regulations (Bole and Kallmyer 2016, p. 34). The relation of business and government in Australia has led to opportunities of opening different markets for the nation to supply different transportation tools, chemicals, products, types of equipment, and services. The relation help businesses to receive essential advisers that work with their operations to help them in understanding the defense marketplace facilitate linkages with other businesses along with defense. The relation also provides specialist advice on how business can improve their competitiveness as well as access markets in global community (Latten et al., 2018, p. 8). The idea of relation of these two sectors have presented the best chance that Australian authority uses different task forces as vehicles to always intervene in and adjust framework policy and to develop new policy along with advanced set of dynamics for relation of business-government and behaviors. Additionally, good business-government relations have been able to present the clients together with their interest from the wide variety of corporations. It also provides knowledge in development of legislation while offering targeted messaging to reach agencies and officials of government. Furthermore, this relation in Australia offers opportunity of conducting direct lobbying on behalf of the concerns of customers as well as creating relationships with vital officials of Australian government.
Advertising and Consumer Protection
There are various threats that result from the relation of business-government in operations of an organization in Australia. Some threats result from government involvement in business operations of an organization such as cases of the dangers of confiscation, expropriation, inconvertibility of currency, and repudiation of contract. Some laws set by Australian authority on operation of an organization such as privacy laws make it tough for management to work well as in most cases they are forced to keep on firing and hiring new employees once a worker breaks any of the set laws before the government realizes (Bushouse 2017, p. 59). The need to have new campaign for advertising in business make it tough for an organization to deal with other organizations around the global society that are originating from regions that do not relate with authority in conducting their business. Government leads to decline of business operations as they can impose tough tax regulations and carefully monitor report of tax and submission from all businesses of an organization (Lihyun and Chun-Yi 2017, p. 42). Besides, relation between business and government allows Australian securities as well as exchange commission to impose different financial reporting needs on incorporated business operations that can further protect vital investors from taking part in business operations within Australia.
Business-government relations can lead to domestic restrictions for the company to be unable to take part in exportation or importation of different products and services to support their operations. Therefore, such relations can make an organization to incur huge operational costs as they need to depend on costly and limited resources and market in attaining their vital products and services for operations (Beneria et al., 2012, p. 13). Involvement of Australian government in business activities of an organization makes operators incur greater expenses in order to be capable of staying in compliance with present regulations or alter their activities to comply with advanced regulations. Therefore, due to rising in cost of operating businesses by an organization, a company might result to charging of higher charges from their services together with products to be able to balance their cost of operating in competitive markets around Australia. Additionally, business-government relations in Australia leads to threats such as rising prices for products to be used by customer as the government guarantees their safety in every purchase that they make in daily operations (Liaw 2016, p. 456). It is also clear that this relationship leads to stagnation of economy as government aim at decreasing values of different products and services without looking at the amount that an organization put to attain their commodities to reach the end users.
Benefits and Opportunities of Government Involvement
As future business leader in Australia, there is a need to focus on an organization need to make substantial relation of business-government in order to achieve mission and vision of operations. The need to form strong relationships during management is essential since operations of an organization are always firmly influenced by policies of Australian government. Therefore, it is best interest for the management of an organization to focus on staying informed concerning public policies as well as trying to influence decisions making of authority and public policy (Burnside-Lawry and Ariemma 2015, p. 137). Once management has the understanding and knowledge of how Australian government impacts the business operations and profitability, it is necessary for the management to formulate best strategies for how best to interact with authority.
There are various responses in business operations that a manager of an organization can follow in responding to policy of government. These responses include reactive, proactive, as well as interactive. For instance, reactive response will involve the process of responding to policy of Australian government after it occurs (Gurran and Phibs 2015, p. 717). The interactive response will consist of engaging with policymakers of Australian government and actors to aim at impacting public policy to provide active interest of operating business. Furthermore, proactive response approach will entail process of acting to impact policies, anticipating alterations in common policy, as well as focusing on improving competitive positioning through appropriately anticipating shifts in making policy (Alizadeh 2015, p. 37). Therefore, appropriate approach that can be used by any leader of an organization in Australia to manage their relations with authority.
Managing business relation with an Australian company with government needs to form good relations with different suppliers, producers, distributors, workers, employers, and shareholders. The focus on providing quality products as required by government guidelines will make the company to have smooth operations in the Australian markets (Gurran and Phibbs 2015, p. 721). Some of the guidelines that business operations of a company need to concentrate on in order to manage their relations include the need to communicate with government regularly. There is need to pay taxes as required by the government, build appropriate relations with representatives of governments, and being ready to review and negotiate the terms of conducting business with supporting records.
From above illustrations, it is evident that business should concentrate on having complete faith in the ideologies of the Australia government. Consequently, Australian government should have no inherent distrust against operations of business in the industrial sectors both public as well as private. The need of current times is that the existing gap among the Australian authority and business should be eliminated. There is a need to be the spirit of partnership not one of reluctant connection. Therefore, business-government relations in Australia in several ways are interdependent along with interrelated on each other.
Threats and Challenges of Business-Government Relations
List of References
Alizadeh, T. 2015. ‘Local Government Planning and High-Speed Broadband in Australia’, Journal of Urban Technology, 22(4), pp. 23-43. Available from: 10.1080/10630732.2015.1073976. [25 May 2018].
Barker, K. 2015. ‘The challenging Australian policy context for university engagement’, Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 37(5), pp. 477-489. Available from: 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1079384. [25 May 2018].
Benería, L, Diana Deere, C, & Kabeer, N. 2012. ‘Gender and International Migration: Globalization, Development, and Governance’, Feminist Economics, 18(2), pp. 1-33. Available from: 10.1080/13545701.2012.688998. [25 May 2018].
Bole, R, & Kallmyer, K. 2016. ‘Combatting the Islamic State’s Digital Dominance: Revitalizing U.S. Communication Strategy’, Washington Quarterly, 39(1), pp. 29-48. Available from: 10.1080/0163660X.2016.1170478. [25 May 2018].
Bray, D. 2016. ‘The geopolitics of Antarctic governance: sovereignty and strategic denial in Australia’s Antarctic policy’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 256-274. Available from: 10.1080/10357718.2015.1135871. [25 May 2018].
Burnside-Lawry, J, & Ariemma, L. 2015. ‘Global governance and communicative action: a study of democratic participation during planning for the Lyon-Turin rail link’, Journal of Public Affairs (14723891), vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 129-142. Available from: 10.1002/pa.1528. [25 May 2018].
Bushouse, B. 2017. ‘Leveraging Nonprofit and Voluntary Action Research to Inform Public Policy’, Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), pp. 50-73. Available from: 10.1111/psj.12195. [25 May 2018].
Carney, R. 2016. ‘Varieties of hierarchical capitalism: family and state market economies in East Asia’, Pacific Review, 29(2), pp. 137-163. Available from: 10.1080/09512748.2015.1020963. [25 May 2018].
Gilding, M, Merlot, E, & Leitch, S. 2016. ‘The power of hope: the mobilisation of small and mid-tier companies in the mining industry’s campaign against the Resources Super Profits Tax’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 51(1), pp. 122-133. Available from: 10.1080/10361146.2015.1126043. [25 May 2018].
Gurran, N, & Phibbs, P. 2015. ‘Are Governments Really Interested in Fixing the Housing Problem? Policy Capture and Busy Work in Australia’, Housing Studies, 30(5), pp. 711-729. Available from: 10.1080/02673037.2015.1044948. [25 May 2018].
Hogan, J, Chari, R, & Murphy, G. 2011. ‘Regulating Australia’s lobbyists: coming full circle to promote democracy?’, Journal of Public Affairs (14723891), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35-48. Available from: 10.1002/pa.374. [25 May 2018].
Latten, T, Westra, D, Angeli, F, Paulus, A, Struss, M, & Ruwaard, D. 2018. ‘Pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers: Going beyond the gift – An explorative review’, PLoS ONE, 13(2), pp. 1-15. Available from: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191856. [25 May 2018].
Le Hong, H. 2013. ‘Vietnam’s Hedging Strategy against China since Normalization’, Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International & Strategic Affairs, 35(5), pp. 333-368. Available from: 10.1355/cs35-3b. [25 May 2018].
Liaw, B. 2016. ‘State and business in Taiwan’s economic diplomacy under the Lee Teng-hui administration and the implications for current cross-strait relations’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 444-464. Available from: 10.1080/09557571.2016.1166476. [25 May 2018].
Lihyun, L, & Chun-Yi, L. 2017. ‘When Business Met Politics: The Case of Want, a Different Type of Media Capital in Taiwan’, China Perspectives, 1(2), pp. 37-46.
Remington, T. 2016. ‘Regional Variation in Business-Government Relations in Russia and China’, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 63-74. Available from: 10.1080/10758216.2015.1084885. [25 May 2018].
Salamon, L, Benevolenski, V, & Jakobson, L. 2015. ‘Penetrating the Dual Realities of Government-Nonprofit Relations in Russia’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), pp. 2178-2214. Available from: 10.1007/s11266-015-9652-5. [25 May 2018].
Schlemper, M, Adams, J, & Solem, M. 2014. ‘Geographers in Business, Government, and Nonprofit Organizations: Skills, Challenges, and Professional Identities’, Professional Geographer, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 480-492. Available from: 10.1080/00330124.2013.802580. [25 May 2018].
Skinner, TC, Peetz, D, Strachan, G, Whitehouse, G, Bailey, J, & Broadbent, K. 2015.’Self-reported harassment and bullying in Australian universities: explaining differences between regional, metropolitan and elite institutions’, Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 37(5), pp. 558-571. Available from: 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1079400. [25 May 2018].
Thakur, R. 2013. ‘Follow the yellowcake road: balancing Australia’s national interests against international anti-nuclear interests’, International Affairs, 89(4), pp. 943-961. Available from: 10.1111/1468-2346.12053. [25 May 2018].
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
