Challenges with EMR in Maintaining Patient-Centeredness and Rapport
Discuss About The Usability Safety Electronic Medical Records.
He did use a computer. He looked at the computer screen when he was discussing with the patient. With the use of the EMR there is loss of the intimacy with the patient (Barnett, Chow, Flores, Sherman & Duffy, 2017). When comparing to the olden days the Doctor could look directly at the patient, they would drop their eyes and jot done a note on the page and then they would look directly again at the patient to continue with the conversation (Barnett, Chow, Flores, Sherman & Duffy, 2017). Both gaze and body language could remain oriented towards the patient. In the currently time as much as EMR are offering advantages to the hospitals they have some disadvantages and these are highlighted as follows;
When it comes to the era of the digital technology, the doctor and the patients encounters the challenge of centeredness and patient rapport. The doctor focuses their attention on the computer screen rather than focusing on the patient (Barnett, Chow, Flores, Sherman & Duffy, 2017). This style is regarded as the technology centered since the doctor focused more on the computer screen rather than then patient. The EMR technology might be crucial since it allows helpful exchange of the information such as viewing of the lab and the imaging results through the online patient portals (Bhargava & Mishra, 2014). The portals could offer the patients with the method to ask the health care team questions when they visit the hospital. management, the portal could also allow the patients to make their own appointments, eliminate on the phone calls such as mammography, and lipid tests. Moreover, it could remind the health care professional about the harmful drug to drug interactions. Additionally, many of the patients could appreciate on the actual view of their record which is under the construction during the visit. As much as it offers these advantages it has led to the difficulty to conduct the in-depth conversation with the patients while the doctors are working with the EMR (Bhargava & Mishra, 2014). The workstations in the exam room more often face the door, which is away from the patient and this could further complicate on the interaction with the doctor. It is important for the doctor to move their chairs beside the patient and the computer for easy interaction. The hybrid to complete EMR tasks particularly during the visit as well as other allows a continued high quality interaction with the patient. The doctor could highlight to the patient that let them enter their order prescription electronically to the pharmacy (Bowton, Field, Wang, Schildcrout, Van Driest, Delaney & Karnes, 2014). I would advocate on the use of the EMR use than the paper. Nonetheless, the encounter between the health care provider and the patients, in the examination room is different compared to the pre-EMR.
EMRs Aid in Emergency Situations
There are many projects that have been done to develop EMR system which could be carried out and used in different states (Perer, Wang & Hu, 2015). The usage of an open source EMR system in different state could be used to help in this case. Today due to the vast development in the technology in the world they could respond to the variables and the complex needs to interchanged clinical data among the health care services institutions (Perer, Wang & Hu, 2015). The medical interventions are usually dependent on the trust worthy as well as the integrated history of the personal medical and health status (Perer, Wang & Hu, 2015). EMR is one such response which could cover on the need to engage the parties which include the patients, doctors, insurance organization, clinical staff, health care providers and the makers of the policy. It can offer a platform that individuals health data could be stored and at the same time accessed only by the individuals who are authorized. EMR usually stores data and process the health information (Singer, Halas, Styles, Froese & Paige, 2016). When it comes to the health sector, open products they have been designed in order to improve on the health care while at the same time reducing on the cost of the similar property products. With the open source EMR system there would be a health care connect which would be an initiative to revolve paper based health records to the EMR for the benefits of the consumers and the health care providers. In the case of this situation through the use of the EMR system it would be easy for the healthcare providers taken to access personal history of health record. The health information would be quickly accessed upon request from the health institution in Vermont (Dobrzykowski & Tarafdar, 2017). The health information would be transferred among the healthcare professionals under more secure conditions to the health institution in Colorado. The significance of the EMR system is for accessibility of the life saving information when it comes to the emergencies situations and at the same time improve on the safety and the quality of the health data through the shared Electronic Medical record (Dobrzykowski & Tarafdar, 2017). The healthcare institution that am taken in Colorado to through SEMR the healthcare professionals will access on my health data and can address the problem am suffering from more efficiently with the access of the data given. This has been attributed to the EMR system where health information could be shared more securely about the history of the patient.
Benefits of Shared Health Data through EMR
Through the open EMR system in the USA the hospitals across the states could move their Electronic Medical records from one institution to another, as opposed to integrating the relevant subsets of the data such as the clinical notes, lab tests as well as the other patient data (Williamson, Miyagishima, Derochie & Drummond, 2017). This is in a manner which would allow the clinicians to learn easily what they should know without reading through all the patient record.
It can also be noted that through the EMR system they could create their own personal Health record online where they could store, manage and at the same time share their health data all in a single particular location (Finlay, Rothman & Smith, 2014). There are many healthcare providers and hospitals which are offering the patients with the access to the online portals which contains all their lab work, health stories along with the test results which were performed by the providers where they go for treatment.
This could be also an efficient ways also for my leg situation in case I had all my personal data on the online portal of the Electronic Medical record system and had banked them. They could be able accessed at any location in the world and this might be a better effective way.
1b. Compare what your country is doing with EMRs with the situations in any other country at approximately the same economic level. Is your country ahead of the other in its adoption or behind? Why is this so? In your opinion, is that a problem?
Australia healthcare systems have been ranked among the best in the globe almost in every quality indicator. However, the costs which have been rising at the rates and inflation has put the country to a significant pressure on the providers in finding new and better ways in keeping the Australian healthy (Florman, 2015). As much as quality is high in the health care, Australia they have lagged and fallen behind in their adoption of the new technologies such as EMR system and the processes which promise not just the improvement in the outcomes of the patients as well as the gains in efficiency delivery in the healthcare (Van Driest, Wells, Stallings, Bush, Gordon, Nickerson & Ralston, 2016). The Australia healthcare could have been more efficient as well as effective in case they had taken international trend to the digital transformation which has been adopted by countries such as USA and UK. To achieve success the fundamental as well as necessary changes which are associated to the digital transformation to adopt EMR system policy makers and stakeholders should consider incentive to the healthcare adoption through the implementation of meaningful use regime such as those which are used in US (Van Driest, Wells, Stallings, Bush, Gordon, Nickerson & Ralston, J. D. (2016. A meaningful use entails that providers need to show they are utilizing Certified Electronic Medical record technology in manner which could be objectively be demonstrated in order to improve quality, safety, efficiency along with reducing on the disparities in the healthcare (Florman, 2015). Additionally, it is important to utilize compliance which would result to better clinical, population health outcomes and increase in the transparency and better data and empowered patients.
Comparison of EMR Adoption in Australia and Other Countries
EMR is the primary and the community care which is fundamental to the digital transformation, since it is the building block to any of the digital healthcare system. The usage of this system is the leading indicator to the digital health maturity. Globally over the past 5 years the adoption of the EMRs has risen (Florman, 2015). However, in Australia they have lagged behind to adopt on this system to their healthcare systems. Nonetheless, well positioned Australia meaningful use policy will help in the delivering of the benefits for the State, Territory as well as Commonwealth governments through the great co-ordination of the health care of the patient across private, public, community and primary care sectors. The digital healthcare would play a central role when it comes to enabling these kinds of changes (Van Driest, Wells, Stallings, Bush, Gordon, Nickerson & Ralston, 2016). The recent experiences in Australia have highlighted that the technological shifts to the healthcare sector should be supported to a substantial planning and change on management efforts (Zahabi, Kaber & Swangnetr, 2015). Further, there should be collaborative frameworks across organizations and the healthcare providers.
Meaningful use of EMRs refers to use a certified Electronic Medical record (EMR) technology in order to improve on the health quality, safety, efficiency and at the same time reduce the disparities in health outcomes (Williams, Spencer, Sanders, Lund, Whitley, Kaye & Dixon, 2015). The meaningful use is usually implemented in 3 stages. Stage one entails promoting of the basic EMR adoption as well as gathering of the data. In the second stage involves emphasizing on the care coordination along with the exchange of the information of the patient. On the last stage entails improvement of the healthcare outcomes (Zhou, Wang, Hu & 2014).
The well positioned meaningful use policy would deliver benefits to the patients. It is a stepping stone when it comes to the increase in EMR uptake as well as benefits which could be attained. The successful implementation meaningful use scheme could have positive outcomes when it comes to patients and the clinicians (Perer, Wang & Hu, 2015). The patients can receive greater standards of the care which could comprise of the reduced clinical incidents, interventions which are appropriate and integrated care pathway into community (Wood, Esko, Yang, Vedantam, Pers, Gustafsson & Amin, 2014). Through the decrease in the overall length of stay of the patient, the healthcare providers could reduce on the Weighted Activity Units which could result to a much lower cost per each admission.
In my view I think the meaningful use standard for the psychology forces them to move first due to the requirements which are contained in the stages. A comprehensive and integrated digital health system enables a number of the highly beneficial improvements. This could comprise of the patients centric care, service improvements, more sustainable healthcare along with the flow of the information. These are aspects which are contained in the meaningful use stages which make the physicians to move fast as they want to sustain a beneficial healthcare to the patients.
References
Barnett, P. G., Chow, A., Flores, N. E., Sherman, S. E., & Duffy, S. A. (2017). Changes in Veteran Tobacco Use Identified in Electronic Medical Records. American journal of preventive medicine, 53(1), e9-e18.
Bhargava, H. K., & Mishra, A. N. (2014). Electronic medical records and physician productivity: Evidence from panel data analysis. Management Science, 60(10), 2543-2562.
Bowton, E., Field, J. R., Wang, S., Schildcrout, J. S., Van Driest, S. L., Delaney, J. T., … & Karnes, J. H. (2014). Biobanks and electronic medical records: enabling cost-effective research. Science translational medicine, 6(234), 234cm3-234cm3.
Dobrzykowski, D. D., & Tarafdar, M. (2017). Linking electronic medical records use to physicians’ performance: a contextual analysis. Decision Sciences, 48(1), 7-38.
Florman, L. D. (2015). Electronic Medical Record. In The Portable Medical Mentor (pp. 153-155). Springer, Cham.
Finlay, G.D., Rothman, M.J. & Smith, R.A. (2014). Measuring the modified early warning score and the Rothman index: advantages of utilizing the electronic medical record in an early warning system. Journal of hospital medicine, 9(2), pp.116-119.
Perer, A., Wang, F., & Hu, J. (2015). Mining and exploring care pathways from electronic medical records with visual analytics. Journal of biomedical informatics, 56, 369-378.
Singer, A., Halas, G., Styles, C., Froese, S., & Paige, A. (2016). Exploring the Use of Electronic Medical Records on Teaching and Supervising Residents in Family Medicine. Medical Education, 50, 110.
Van Driest, S. L., Wells, Q. S., Stallings, S., Bush, W. S., Gordon, A., Nickerson, D. A., … & Ralston, J. D. (2016). Association of arrhythmia-related genetic variants with phenotypes documented in electronic medical records. Jama, 315(1), 47-57.
Williams, H., Spencer, K., Sanders, C., Lund, D., Whitley, E. A., Kaye, J., & Dixon, W. G. (2015). Dynamic consent: a possible solution to improve patient confidence and trust in how electronic patient records are used in medical research. JMIR medical informatics, 3(1).
Williamson, T., Miyagishima, R. C., Derochie, J. D., & Drummond, N. (2017). Manual review of electronic medical records as a reference standard for case definition development: a validation study. CMAJ open, 5(4), E830.
Wood, A. R., Esko, T., Yang, J., Vedantam, S., Pers, T. H., Gustafsson, S., … & Amin, N. (2014). Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMEMERGEGE) Consortium; MIGen Consortium; PAGEGE Consortium; LifeLines Cohort Study. Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height. Nat Genet, 46(11), 1173-1186
Zahabi, M., Kaber, D. B., & Swangnetr, M. (2015). Usability and safety in electronic medicalrecords interface design: a review of recent literature and guideline formulation. Human factors, 57(5), 805-834.
Zhou, J., Wang, F., Hu, J., & Ye, J. (2014, August). From micro to economics: data driven phenotyping by densification of longitudinal electronic medical records. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 135-144). ACM.