Proper Governance and the Goals of the Program
Question:
Discuss About The Theories Of Democratic Network Governance?
The program governance boards mainly consists of executive level stakeholders which include project manager, team members, administrative officer, supervisor, contractor, sub contractor, technical expert as well as developer (Alizadeh, Sipe & Dodson, 2014). It is identified that the members of program governance board are generally selected on the basis of their technical knowledge, operating accountabilities, functional responsibilities as well as responsibilities for managing the portfolio.
Proper governance and the goals of the program: The program board is responsible of ensuring that any program within its area of authority mainly defining the goals for effectively supporting the program.
Program endorsement, approval and initiation: It is undertaken by the governance board for approving the program approach (Alizadeh& Shearer, 2017)
Program funding: Program governance board helps in funding the program for supporting it in order to make the program successful.
Establishmentof programgovernance plan: It is needed as it helps in ensuring that strategic alignment is optimized so that the target value as well as benefits of program is delivered properly.
It is quite important to establish proper relationship between program governance as well as project management as it is mainly required for the success of the program that generally assists in delivering the desired goal of the program (Sugiyama & Hunter, 2013). The relationship is found to be quite critical for the success of the project. It is identified that program management mainly depends on program governances for establishing proper organizational conditions that helps in enabling effective pursuit of programs.
There are number of common individual roles which are mainly related to program governance:-
Program sponsor: The individual who mainly takes the responsibility of championing the National broadband program.
Program governance board members: They are the people who are mainly responsible of authoring a program (Beltran, 2014).
Program team members: Programs are generally comprised of individuals who are mainly responsible for different aspects of the program.
Program manager: The person who is mainly responsible of managing the oversight of the program interactions.
It is identified that the program “National Broadband Network” will generally pursue proper benefit with the help of authorization as well as initiation of project components as well as subprograms (Kruger & Gilroy, 2013). The programs generally help in functioning as a governance board. It is found that the program utilizes some of the factors that help in influencing the decisions which is provided by the programs.
Establishment of Program Governance Plan
It is identified that the program governance mainly assumes their responsibility that they are very much responsible of managing capabilities of organization that helps in supporting the efficient as well as effective programs of National Broadband Network. The supporting capabilities that are created include program management, knowledge management, program management training and support.
It is identified that communication management is quite necessary for the program of National Broadband Network as the communication management facility mainly assists in managing the activities for giving appropriate generation, distribution, collection about the program (Kerzner, 2013). These activities are quite helpful in creating proper link between people as well as information which are quite necessary for decision making as well as communication. For managing the communication facility properly about the program it is quite necessary to make proper planning and then distributes the information about the program which is undertaken for facilitating the pen data access. In addition to this, performance reporting is done in order to analyzing the communication facility provided for making the program successful.
Programfinancial management is undertaken in order to identify the financial sources and for integrating the budget of components that are associated with the program in order to create the overall budget of the project. It is identified that proper estimation about the initial budget of the program is done in order to analyze the feasibility of the program. It also helps in providing proper idea to the decision makers for funding the program (Chang, 2016). It is found that the government creates proper financial framework in order to analyze the available funding as well as for determining different constraints of the program. The Australian government also undertakes component cost estimation as well as program cost budgeting for creating program budget baseline payment schedule as well as component of payment schedule. In addition to this, the Australian government arranges financial monitoring as well as control in order to identify the factors that help in creating changes to the budget baseline.
Program integration management is undertaken by the program of National Broadband Network for identifying, defining, combining, unifying as well as coordinating within the program. It generally helps in co-coordinating various management activities across the life cycle of program management (Bangerter et al., 2014).The program integration management is completed with the help of various activities which include initiation, sponsor selection and financing, estimation of scope, resources as well as cost. Information about scope, resources helps in assessing the ability of executing the program of National Broadband Network.
Relationship Between Program Governance and Project Management
Program procurement management is considered as one of the tool that assits in procuring the services of open data network for providing proper benefits to the program. It is identified that program procurement that addresses the activities helps in acquiring various services as well as products. In the program procurement planning, the program manager understands the resources which are generally required for the delivery of benefits. The outputs that the program procurement includes are request for proposal, quote, proposal as well as invitation for bid.
Program quality management is mainly undertaken in order to determine various quality policies, objectives as well as responsibilities so that the entire program of National Broadband Network will be successful (Abdelwahab et al., 2016). The various quality management policy are generally utilized for improving different activities of the program continuously. Program quality planning as well as assurance program are arranged in order to evaluate the overall quality of the program for providing proper assurance about the program.
Resource management program is mainly undertaken at the program level as resource management is generally needed for balancing the need of the various components. The resources that are required include data centers, laboratories, equipments and many more are analyzed in order to manage the expenses of the program. Firstly the resource manager plans the resources that are required for the project and then prioritizes the critical resources which are available in abundance for optimizing the resources within the program.
Program risk management is defined as one of the event that is required to be undertaken in order to make the program of National Broadband Network successful. Risk tracking mainly involves in identifying various types of risks that can arise during execution of the program. It is identified that risk control is utilized in order to minimize or mitigate the risks associated with the project (Gelvanovska, Rogy&Rossotto, 2014). Risks of the program are analyzed with the help of either qualitative or quantitative risk analysis techniques for supporting the various decisions of the program management. Proper risk monitoring processes is mainly undertaken in order to determine that the assumptions of the program are valid and the program is following proper risk management procedures as well as policies.
The program schedule is utilized in order to determine both the order as well as timing of the various components that are required for producing the benefits the benefit within the program of National Broadband Network. The schedule of the program is mainly developed interactively with the help of various components so that it can determine the orders in which various activities are implemented properly (Vange et al., 2017). The dependencies are provided that creates significant impact on the project. The project manager generally concentrates on managing the different deliverables of the program for Nursing that the program will be executed on time.
Common Individual Roles Related to Program Governance
Scope management is required in this program for delivering proper benefits at the program level. The activities that are used for undertaking the scope management generally include planning as well as managing the scope of the program (Sun et al., 2015). It generally aligns with the objectives as well as goals of the program. It generally helps in elaborating expected benefits of the program so that it can be achieved successfully.
The various types of risks that are encountered by the program “National Broadband Network (NBN): are elaborated below:
Mission Creep: NBN generally promised for remaining neutral but the pressure to act commercially generally creeps the mission. It is analyzed that in order to act longer within the long term program, managing new revenues is considered as one of the important step (Sorensen &Torfing, 2016). In addition to this, it is identified that government requires demonstration of commercial server.
Pricing related issue: TheNational Broadband Network (NBN) generally assists in suggesting that it mainly earns an EBITDA of 79% and return around 19.5%. It is identified that this figures are quite higher as compared to other practices for different regulated industries. It is found that both the government as well as federal government generally faces political pressure for reassigning monopoly profits in spite of the impact on the entire return on the overall project.
Long term strategy issue: The management team does not undertake the responsibility to analyze the objectives as well as risk potential for returning to the options which are generally present to them (Chang, 2016). They also do not quantify the impact that will be created by the decision taken by the team. This create number of problems due to presence of proper management facility.
Lack of properequipments: Due to lack of equipment, the program faces lot of difficulty in stretching the network of data access properly to different cities of Australia. The facility of open access network program will be obstructed due to the absence of proper equipments (Dahlgren & Whitehead, 2017).
Knock on effects on the network layer competition: It is identified that in the opening up non-contested residential fixed access, the NBN generally undermine different varieties of contested network sectors. It is identified that both the regulatory as well as commercial arrangements around NBN generally helps in seeking to displace directly in HFC networks and for imposing levis by various potential fibers to access the different competitors.
National Broadband Network Program
Security risk: It is identified that the facility of open access network that is provided by the Australian government to the citizens of Australia can be proved dangerous as the open nature of the network helps in allowing snooping (Agyapong et al., 2014). Due to this, unencrypted network traffic is then clearly visible to everyone which creates number of risks and the chances of losing personal information is quite high.
After the implementation of the program “National Broadband Network”, proper information about the benefits that are provided by the program to the people of Australia has been achieved. It is identified that proper lesson about the importance of program stakeholders as well as alignment of program strategy is achieved. The importance of program governance for implementing the program of National Broadband Network is identified. The report also provides proper lesson about the significance of program management supporting procedure. In addition to this, the program also helps in learning about the issues as well as challenges that are faced by the government in implementing National Broadband Network Program.
It is quite important to resolve the issues that are encountered in the program with appropriate methods or strategies. The methods include:
Presence of appropriate equipments: Appropriate equipments must be present so that the program managers does not face problem in executing the program.
Proper encryption facility: Proper encryption facility must be provided in order to reduce security issues in open access network.
Minimize mission creep: The program activities must be completed as per the scope of the program so that the issue of mission creep can be resolved easily.
References
Abdelwahab, S., Hamdaoui, B., Guizani, M., &Znati, T. (2016).Network function virtualization in 5G. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(4), 84-91.
Agyapong, P. K., Iwamura, M., Staehle, D., Kiess, W., &Benjebbour, A. (2014). Design considerations for a 5G network architecture. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(11), 65-75.
Alizadeh, T., Sipe, N. and Dodson, J., 2014. Spatial Planning and High-Speed Broadband: Australia’s National Broadband Network and Metropolitan Planning. International planning studies, 19(3-4), pp.359-378.
Alizadeh, T., & Shearer, H. (2017). Australian local governments and the early national broadband network roll-out: an online survey. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 40-57.
Bangerter, B., Talwar, S., Arefi, R., & Stewart, K. (2014).Networks and devices for the 5G era. IEEE Communications management, 52(2), 90-96.
Beltraan, F. (2014).Fibre-to-the-home, high-speed and national broadband plans: Tales from Down Under. Telecommunications Policy, 38(8), 715-729.
Chang, J. F. (2016). Business process management systems: strategy and implementation. CRC Press.
Dahlgren, D., & Whitehead, M. (2017). European Strategies for tackling social inequalities in health: levelling up part 2. Health.
Gelvanovska, N., Rogy, M., &Rossotto, C. M. (2014). Broadband networks in the Middle East and North Africa: Accelerating high-speed internet access. World Bank Publications.
Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Kruger, L. G., & Gilroy, A. A. (2013). Broadband internet access and the digital divide: Federal assistance programs. Broadband internet: Access, regulation and policy, 51.
Sørensen, E., &Torfing, J. (Eds.).(2016). Theories of democratic network governance.Springer.
Sugiyama, N. B., & Hunter, W. (2013). Whither Clientelism? Good Governance and Brazil’s BolsaFamília Program. Comparative Politics, 46(1), 43-62.
Sun, S., Kadoch, M., Gong, L., &Rong, B. (2015). Integrating network function virtualization with SDR and SDN for 4G/5G networks. IEEE Network, 29(3), 54-59.
Vange, M., Plumb, M., Kouts, M., & Wilson, G. S. (2017). U.S. Patent No.business,105. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
