you will find in the attached two files the first one I list 10 references so you should find 5 references, the second one will describe my project idea (about why most of the University use hybrid classes rather than of face-to-face or online classes)
The most basic way to do this is an annotated bibliography: a list of sources, properly cited in APA format, that includes an annotation summarizing the text and its potential utility for your project. For this assignment, generate a list of at least 15 sources from scholarly, peer-reviewed journals that are relevant to justifying your proposed course of research. This is a working document, but it needs to be legible to both of us, so avoid shorthand or references that an outside observer couldn’t understand.
Your list should be sorted alphabetically by the last name of the first author.
Each entry should be cited in APA format. If you don’t know how to do that, buy an APA style manual or use https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/purdue_owl.html
Template:
Each entry should be in the format below; use that as a template and repeat for each source. Write 1-2 sentences for each item in the annotation.
Last, First Initial. (Year) Title of article. Title of Journal, volume #, pages. doi:
Summary of Argument:
Methodology of Study:
Evaluation of Conclusion:
Potential Usefulness for You:
Example:
Nelson, D. (2002) Pursuing Privacy in Cold War America. New York: Columbia University Press.
Summary: Nelson argues that the discussions of privacy that emerged in both American poetry and jurisprudence throughout the 1950s and 1960s can be traced to an anxiety about the potential intrusions of the national security state in light of the perceived Soviet threat. At the same time that privacy was most threatened by governmental intrusion, it was being asserted as a new juridical right, a phenomenon that manifests itself equally in Supreme Court decisions and the confessional poetry of authors like Robert Lowell, Sylvia Plath, and Adrienne Rich.
Method: Interpretive and historical, traces contemporaneous developments in literature and law.
Evaluation: Nelson is nonetheless able to do little more than correlate these two phenomena, which largely appear coincidental rather than intrinsically linked.
Use: I intend to use this text as a touchstone for my argument about nuclear anxiety and confessional poetry; while Nelson pursues a similar literary trajectory as I do and coordinates it along similar axes, I attempt to adjust her terms to address the fear of imminent destruction rather than questions of ideological paranoia.