this is for my man Mr.ResearchPro
I just want to write for 2 pages bro .
Here what I want you use in my papeer, I want you write this in my perer step by step all of them is imprtant when you write the paper .
1- Issue
2.Rule
3- Analysis
4-Conclusion
5- What you learned
6-Content and Quality Connections
Here the explain about that i need in that paper .
This will be the rubric used to evaluate your case submissions with the one exception that is noted in the Module 5.
IRAC Grading Rubric
IRAC/Case Analysis Rubric |
|||||||||
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
||||||
Issue |
|
pts |
|
||||||
Rule |
|
pts |
|
||||||
Analysis |
|
pts |
|
||||||
Conclusion |
|
pts |
|
||||||
What you learned |
|
pts |
|
||||||
Content and Quality Connections |
|
pts |
|
||||||
Total Points: 30
______________________________________________________ Here the assigemnts for the home work : Original Post: “After reading the case, assume you are a lawyer, your client, Van Gorkom has been approached by the board of Directors. He comes to you for advice. What would you advise the Van Gorkom to do? You, as a lawyer must be objective and NOT insert your personal beliefs in the answer. Use the IRAC analytical format to respond to each separate issue you find (there are more issues than listed)” You may do additional internet research, the search terms “Smith” and ” Van Gorkom” and “Delaware” will be helpful Response Posts: Respond to the posts of at least 2 other students. Note: The student response for this case is due three weeks from today. This case is very long. Students are required to read the majority opinion of this case. The concurrence and the dissent in this case is optional reading.
|