Program: BS in Computing Technology
ILO: #5 – Integrated Learning
Course #/ Title: CSCU-315 Organizational Information Systems
Assignment Title Final Paper
Week Assessment Occurs: Week 8
Total Points for Assignment: 75
Name in GradeMark: CSCU_315_Final_Paper
Learning
Outcome
Criteria EXEMPLARY PROFICIENT DEVELOPING EMERGING
ILO Connections Connections to Experience or Among Disciplines
4 Synthesizes relationships among experiences outside of the formal classroom to deepen understanding of multiplefields of study and to broaden own points of view. Or Synthesizes hypothetical examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective in a clear easy to understand manner to deepen understanding of multiple fields of study and to broaden
3 Analyzes examples of life experiences, drawn from a variety of contexts , to illuminate concepts/theories/ frameworks of fields of study. Or Analyzes hypothetical examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective in a clear easy to understand manner.
2 Applies life experiences and academic knowledge to infer differences, as well as similarities, and acknowledge perspectives other than own. Or Describes hypothetical examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective that is somewhat unclear or confusing.
1 Explains connections between life experiences and those academic texts and ideas perceived as similar and related to own interests. Or Identifies hypothetical examples, facts, or theories from one field of study or perspective.
own points of view.
ILO Transfer
4 Synthesizes and applies skills, abilities, theories, or methodologies gained in one situation to explore complex issues and problem solve in an innovative way in a new situation.
3 Analyzes skills, abilities, theories, or methodologies gained in one situation to problem solve or make revisions in a new situation.
2 Applies skills, abilities, theories, or methodologies gained in one situation to contribute to the understanding of problems or issues in a new situation.
1 Explains skills, abilities, theories, or methodologies gained in one situation that can be used in a new situation.
ILO Reflection Reflection and Self- Assessment
4 Synthesizes, envisions and designs a “future” self that builds on experiences and continued learning that occurs across multiple and diverse contexts.
3 Analyzes changes in own learning over time, including strengths and challenges, recognizing complex contextual factors that include, but not limited to working with ambiguity and risk, dealing with frustration and considering ethical frameworks with increasing self- awareness.
2 Apply strengths and challenges in learning experiences, recognizing contextual factors that include, but not limited to working with ambiguity and risk, dealing with frustration and considering ethical frameworks with increasing self- awareness.
1 Explains own learning experiences with general descriptors of strengths and challenges.
CLO Intro
Introduction and
Research Topic
10
Clearly describes the
research topic,
provides background
data. Clearly and
9
Describes the research
topic, provides
background data.
Clearly and concisely
8
Somewhat clearly
describes the research
topic, provides
background data.
7
Description of the
topic, provides
background data may
be confusing. Topic is
concisely identifies the
Final Project and
related issues and
scope for this project.
The importance of
value of the project is
evident.
identifies the Final
Project and related
issues and scope for
this project. The
importance of value of
the project is clear.
Clearly and concisely
identifies the Final
Project and related
issues and scope for
this project. The
importance and value
of the project is
somewhat clear.
not succinct, may be
overlapping in content,
and/or may not result
in a clear purpose for
this project. The
importance and value
of the project may not
unclear.
Lit Review
Literature Review
12
Clearly and concisely
defines key terms and
fully answers research
questions; uses 3+
respected sources.
10
Defines most key terms
and fairly fully answers
research questions;
uses 2 respected
sources.
9
Somewhat clearly
defines key terms and
answers research
questions; 1+ mostly
respected sources.
8
Does not clearly define
key terms and/or
answer research
questions; 1 or less
non – respected
sources.
Conclusions
Conclusions and
Recommendations
15
Clearly and concisely
analyzes Final Project
findings drawing valid
conclusions supported
by expert citations.
Presents
recommendations and
specific future plans
supported by findings
and conclusions.
14
Mostly analyzes Final
Project findings
drawing valid
conclusions mostly
supported by expert
citations. Presents
many
recommendations and
a general future plan
supported by the
findings and
conclusions
12
Somewhat clearly
analyzes Final Project
findings to draw
conclusions somewhat
supported by expert
citations. Offers some
recommendations and
a general future plan
somewhat supported
by the findings and
conclusions.
11
Limited if any analysis
of Final Project
findings and/or
conclusions not
supported findings or
expert citations. Offers
few if any
recommendations
and/or a limited future
plan which may not be
directly supported by
the findings
Crit Think
16
Consistently employs
15
Often employs critical
13
Somewhat employs
12
Limited use of critical
Critical Thinking critical thinking to
research and analyze
the issue; effectively
synthesizes data to
draw strong
conclusions and
recommendations
thinking to research
and analyze the issue;
synthesizes data to
draw strong reasonable
conclusions and
recommendations
critical thinking to
research and analyze
the issue; somewhat
synthesizes data to
draw conclusions and
recommendations
thinking to research
and analyze the issue;
limited if any synthesis
of data to draw
conclusions and
recommendations
Writing/APA
Writing Mechanics
and APA
10
The paper is logical,
well-written, and is the
required length.
Spelling, grammar and
punctuation are
accurate. APA
standards are followed;
the work of others is
appropriately cited.
9
The paper is logical,
well-written, and is the
required length. Minor
errors in spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation. APA
standards are followed,
and the work of others
is appropriately cited
with a few minor
errors.
8
The paper is somewhat
logical and well-
written; may be 10%
too long or short.
Some errors in spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation. APA
standards are
somewhat followed
and the work of others
cited but with
numerous errors.
7
The paper lacks clarity
and may be confusing;
may be 15% too long or
short. Numerous
errors in spelling,
grammar and/or
punctuation. The work
of others is not
acknowledged or is
done with multiple APA
errors.