.1em;”>PO326 Final AssignmentHow should a liberal democracy respond to the vulnerability of irregular migrants? Should it expel irregular migrants whenever it finds them? Should it accept them as members of the community, at least after they have been present for an extended period, and grant them legal authorization to stay? Should it pursue some other alternative, with a path to permanent residence mixed with penalties and restrictions?. (Carens 2010: 5)5-7 PAGES DOUBLE SPACEDThe thesis could be something like: let’s grant the refugees amnesty in certain circumstances—- we should deter the irregular migrants from settling in countries illegally, but we should grant them amnesty given certain factors.1em;”>Human Displacement & Refugees PO 326Final Discussion and Reflection Paper Due April 18 4pm:Can and should states control migration? Debating amnesty and the right to stay.Grade: Worth 20%:thDue April 18 (uploaded to dropbox by 4:00 pm. Hardcopy submitted to my mailbox). Please note youththcan upload your paper anytime before April 18 but the dropbox will be closed April 18 at 4:00pm andno papers (either electronic or hard copy) will be accepted after this date and time. This is in lieu of afinal exam.Length: 5-7 pages, plus title page and separate bibliography, 12 point Times New Roman, written inproper essay format with an introduction with a thesis, body and a conclusion.Essay Question:How should a liberal democracy respond to the vulnerability of irregular migrants?Should it expel irregular migrants whenever it finds them? Should it accept them asmembers of the community, at least after they have been present for an extendedperiod, and grant them legal authorization to stay? Should it pursue some otheralternative, with a path to permanent residence mixed with penalties andrestrictions?. (Carens 2010: 5)The above question forms the basis of Caren’s essay “The Case for Amnesty,” in which he argues that“[i[rregular migrants should be granted amnesty –allowed to remain with legal status as residents – ifthey have been settled for a long time” (2010:6). In explaining his argument he notes: “[t]he moral rightof states to apprehend and deport irregular migrants erodes with the passage of time” (2010: 18). Doyou agree with Caren’s argument? Why/why not? How should a liberal democracy respond to thevulnerability of irregular migrants?In preparing to answer this question please read Carens, J. (2010) Immigrants and the Right to StayCambridge: MIT Press. pp. 1-50 (Caren’s essay entitled “The Case for Amnesty”) and responses byDouglas Massey (pp. 73-79) and Linda Bosniak (pp. 80-92).In answering this question your essay must provide the following information:1. SUMMARY OF CARENS’ THE ARGUMENT: Please ensure you provide a detailed summary ofCaren’s main argument and of his supporting points: What does Caren argue? Provide a detailedsummary of at least 3 points or sub-arguments that he gives to support and justify his argumentthat irregular migrants be granted amnesty. Evaluate the pros and cons of his arguments.2. DEBATE: Massey and Bosniak engage with Carens’ arguments providing critical reflection,support and critique. On what points do Massey and Bosniak agree with Carens? What criticismsdo they raise about his argument? Please be specific and detailed and outline in your own wordsthe points of agreement and disagreement that both respondents raise regarding his argument.3. YOUR ASSESSMENT: Do you agree with Caren’s argument? Why/why not? Please support yourargument with well-reasoned arguments, outlining them in a manner similar to Carens, Masseyand Bosniak. In providing an assessment you are free to also use points made by Massey andBosniak with which you agree along with any of the readings or discussion from class to helpsupport your arguments as well.4. NOTE: Mechanics: papers will be marked down substantially if any of the followingmechanics are found: spelling and grammar mistakes, no title page, failure to number pages,failure to provide a bibliography, failure to follow the style guidelines for in-text referencing usingthe author-date system (e.g. Weber and Pickering 2011, or Weber and Pickering 2011:page#) andbibliographic referencing as outlined in the provided guidelines.1STYLE GUIDELINES1. Referencing: Use proper referencing. List any sources that you cite (including proper references forJohnson, Malkki and Rajaram) alphabetically in the bibliography.Underline or italicize titles of books and journals.Article “titles” should be in quotation marks.You need a complete reference for every source used, every time you use it. Failing to do so isplagiarism. For citation style please use author-date system (see end of page or summary or summaryof Chicago Manual of Style online http://library.williams.edu/citing/styles/chicago2.php2. Title page: All essays should have a title page. On this page put the title of the paper in the center.In the left-hand, lower corner type your name, student #, course title, Professor’s name and date.3. Formatting: All papers should be double- spaced and typed and not more than 5 pages. Number allpages and put the bibliography at the end as a separate page (not included as 1 of the 5 pages).4. Proof Read: Proof read what you have written. Even better, agree to exchange essays with a friendand proof read for each other. Watch for typos your computer can’t catch e.g. from and form – theseyou need to catch by reading over your paper before handing it in. Marks will be deducted for grammarand spelling mistakes.5. Plagiarism: Plagiarism is defined as the passing off of anyone else’s work as one’s own. Plagiarismincludes: a) Directly copying more than one or two sentences of another’s written work withoutacknowledgement. b) Closely paraphrasing the equivalent of a short paragraph or more withoutacknowledgement. c) Borrowing, without acknowledgement, any ideas in a clear and recognizableform in such a way as to present them as your own thought, where if such ideas were your own, theywould contribute to the merit of your paper. d) Copying, without citation, any clearly recognizablephrase which another author has coined. e) Copying another student’s essay f) Buying or borrowingsomeone else’s essay and submitting it as your own g) Submitting an essay for one course that youhave submitted or intend to submit for another course. Plagiarism is a serious offence and can get you removed from the University