Assignment 2: Process Modeling vs. Configuration Management
-Work Must be ontime.
-Work must be original (Instructor will be using TURNITIN.com to check the papers).
-Work must be untracable and cannot be found on any website.
-Work must be done correctly and according to the requirements below.
-Please place the requirement above the section in the paper that it answers
Write a one to two (1–2) page paper in which you determine which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management. Be sure to explain your rationale.
The format of the paper is to be as follows:
Typed, double-spaced, New Times Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides. APA format.
In addition to the one to two (1–2) pages required, a title page is to be included. The title page is to contain the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date.
Note: You will be graded on the quality of your answers, the logic/organization of the report, your language skills, and your writing skills.
The assignment will be graded using the following rubric:
Outcomes Assessed | · Analyze the requirements management process in a project management context.
· Use technology and information resources to research issues in project procurement management. |
Grading Rubric for Assignment 1 — Process Modeling vs. Configuration Management |
Criteria | 0 Unacceptable |
40 Developing |
60 Competent |
80 Exemplary |
1. Determine which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management. | Did not complete the assignment or did not determine which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. Completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. | Partially determined which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management; omitted some key information. Completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. | Sufficiently determined which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management. Completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. | Fully determined which is more applicable across the widest possible range of situations: process modeling or configuration management. Completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. |
Criteria | 0 Unacceptable |
10 Developing |
15 Competent |
20 Exemplary |
2. Clarity | Did not complete the assignment, or explanations are unclear and not organized. (Major issues) |
Explanations generally unclear and not well organized. (Many issues) |
Explanations generally clear and/or organized. (Minor issues) | Explanations very clear and well organized. (Added helpful details) |
3. Writing – Grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, APA usage. | Did not complete the assignment or had 8 or more different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Major issues) | Had 6–7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Many issues) | Had 4–5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. (Minor issues) | Had 0–3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or APA usage. |