Varying Definitions of Online Communication and
Their Effects on Relationship Research
Elizabeth L. Angeli
State University
Author Note
Elizabeth L. Angeli, Department of Psychology, State University.
Elizabeth Angeli is now at Department of English, Marquette University.
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Sample Grant
Program.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Elizabeth
Angeli, Department of English, Marquette University, Madison, WI, 55555.
Contact: author@marquette.edu
The running head cannot exceed 50 characters, including spaces and punctuation. The running head’s title should be in capital letters. The running head should be flush left, and page numbers should be flush right. On the title page, the running head should include the words “Running head.” For pages following the title page, repeat the running head in all caps without the words “Running head.” “Running head.”
The title should be centered on the page and typed in 12- point Times New Roman Font. It should not be bolded, underlined, or italicized. A title should never exceed 12 words.
The author’s name and the institution where the research took place should be centered and double- spaced. Use the same name here as you use on other papers (e.g., do not use “Elizabeth L. Angeli” on one paper and “E. L. Angeli” on another.
The running head is a shortened version of the paper’s full title. It is used to help readers identify the titles of articles, especially when those articles are published in larger works. Even if your paper is not intended for publication, your paper should still have a running head.
The title should summarize the paper’s main idea and identify the variables under discussion and the relationship between
also be able to stand on its own.
Green text boxes contain explanations of APA style guidelines.
Blue boxes contain directions for writing and citing in APA style.
Running head: VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION 1
The author note should appear on printed articles. It identifies each author’s department and institution affiliation, as well as any changes in affiliation. It also contains acknowledgments and any financial support received, and provides contact information. For more information, see the APA manual, 2.03, page 24-25. Note: An author note is optional for students writing class papers, theses, and disserations.
An author note should appear as follows: First paragraph: Complete departmental and institutional affiliation Second paragraph: Changes in affiliation (if any) Third paragraph: Acknowledgments, funding sources, special circumstances Fourth paragraph: Contact information (mailing address and e-mail)
them. A good title should
VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION 2
Abstract
This paper explores four published articles that report on results from research conducted
on online (Internet) and offline (non-Internet) relationships and their relationship to
computer-mediated communication (CMC). The articles, however, vary in their
definitions and uses of CMC. Cummings, Butler and Kraut (2002) suggest that face-to-
face (FtF) interactions are more effective than CMC, defined as “email,” in creating
feelings of closeness or intimacy. Other articles define CMC differently and, therefore,
offer different results. This paper examines Cummings, Butler, and Kraut’s (2002)
research in relation to three other research articles to suggest that all forms of CMC
should be studied in order to fully understand how CMC influences online and offline
relationships.
Keywords: computer-mediated communication, face-to-face communication
The abstract should be between 150-250 words. Abbre- viations and acronyms used in the paper should be defined in the abstract.
The abstract is a brief summary of the paper, allowing readers to quickly review the main points and purpose of the paper.
The word “Abstract” should be centered and typed in 12-point Times New Roman. Do not indent the first line of the abstract paragraph. All other paragraphs in the paper should be indented.
Note that the “Running Head” label does not appear after the title page.
End your abstract with a set of keywords that will be repeated throughout your paper.
VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION 3
Varying Definitions of Online Communication and
Their Effects on Relationship Research
Numerous studies have been conducted on various facets of Internet relationships,
focusing on the levels of intimacy, closeness, different communication modalities, and
the frequency of use of computer-mediated communication (CMC). However,
contradictory results are suggested within this research because only certain aspects of
CMC are investigated, for example, email only. Cummings, Butler, and Kraut (2002)
suggest that face-to-face (FtF) interactions are more effective than CMC (read: email) in
creating feelings of closeness or intimacy, while other studies suggest the opposite. To
understand how both online (Internet) and offline (non-Internet) relationships are affected
by CMC, all forms of CMC should be studied. This paper examines Cummings et al.’s
research against other CMC research to propose that additional research be conducted to
better understand how online communication affects relationships.
Literature Review
In Cummings et al.’s (2002) summary article reviewing three empirical studies on
online social relationships, it was found that CMC, especially email, was less effective
than FtF contact in creating and maintaining close social relationships. Two of the three
reviewed studies focusing on communication in non-Internet and Internet relationships
mediated by FtF, phone, or email modalities found that the frequency of each modality’s
use was significantly linked to the strength of the particular relationship (Cummings et
al., 2002). The strength of the relationship was predicted best by FtF and phone
In-text citations that are direct quotes should include the author(s’) name(s), the publication year, and page number/s. If you are para- phrasing a source, APA encourages you to include page numbers: (Smith, 2009, p. 76).
If an article has three to five authors, write out all of the authors’ names the first time they appear. Then use the first author’s last name followed by “et al.”
APA requires you to include the publication year because APA users are concerned with the date of the article (the more current the better).
The introduc- tion presents the problem that the paper addresses. See this OWL resource on the fundamental qualities of research papers: https:// owl.purdue.e du/owl/ general_writi ng/ common_wri ting_assign ments/ research_pa pers/ index.html
The title should be centered on the page and typed in 12- point Times New Roman Font. It should not be bolded, underlined, or italicized.
VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION 4
communication, as participants rated email as an inferior means of maintaining personal
relationships as compared to FtF and phone contacts (Cummings et al., 2002).
Cummings et al. (2002) reviewed an additional study conducted in 1999 by the
HomeNet project (see Appendix A for more information on the HomeNet project). In
this project, Kraut, Mukhopadhyay, Szczypula, Kiesler, and Scherlis (1999) compared
the value of using CMC and non-CMC to maintain relationships with partners. They
found that participants corresponded less frequently with their Internet partner (5.2 times
per month) than with their non-Internet partner (7.2 times per month; Cummings et al.,
2002). This difference does not seem significant, as it is only two times less per month.
However, in additional self-report surveys, participants responded feeling more distant,
or less intimate, towards their Internet partner than their non-Internet partner. This
finding may be attributed to participants’ beliefs that email is an inferior mode of
personal relationship communication.
Intimacy is necessary in the creation and maintenance of relationships, as it is
defined as the sharing of a person’s innermost being with another person, i.e., self-
disclosure (Hu, Wood, Smith, & Westbrook, 2004). Relationships are facilitated by the
reciprocal self-disclosing between partners, regardless of non-CMC or CMC. Cummings
et al.’s (2002) reviewed results contradict other studies that research the connection
between intimacy and relationships through CMC.
Hu et al. (2004) studied the relationship between the frequency of Instant
Messenger (IM) use and the degree of perceived intimacy among friends. The use of IM
instead of email as a CMC modality was studied because IM supports a non-professional
Use an appendix (located at the end of your paper) to provide
brief content that supplement s your paper but is not directly related to your text.
If you are including an appendix, refer to it in the body of your paper.
VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION 5
environment favoring intimate exchanges (Hu et al., 2004). Their results suggest that a
positive relationship exists between the frequency of IM use and intimacy, demonstrating
that participants feel closer to their Internet partner as time progresses through this CMC
modality.
Similarly, Underwood and Findlay (2004) studied the effect of Internet
relationships on primary, specifically non-Internet relationships and the perceived
intimacy of both. In this study, self-disclosure, referred to “whether [participants] shared
secrets, discussed personal problems, or had discussed sexual preferences” (p. 131).
Participants reported significantly higher self-disclosure in their Internet relationship than
in their primary relationship. In contrast, the participants’ primary relationships were
reported as highly self-disclosed in the past, but the current level of disclosure was
perceived to be lower (Underwood & Findlay, 2004). This result suggests participants
turned to the Internet in order to fulfill the need for intimacy in their lives.
In further support of this finding, Tidwell and Walther (2002) hypothesized CMC
participants employ deeper self-disclosures than FtF participants in order to overcome the
limitations of CMC, e.g., the reliance on nonverbal cues. It was found that CMC partners
engaged in more frequent intimate questions and disclosures than FtF partners in order to
overcome the barriers of CMC. In their study, Tidwell and Walther (2002) measured the
perception of a relationship’s intimacy by the partner of each participant in both the CMC
and FtF conditions. The researchers found that the participants’ partners stated their
CMC partner was more effective in employing more intimate exchanges than their FtF
VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION 6
partner, and both participants and their partners rated their CMC relationship as more
intimate than their FtF relationship.
Discussion
Cummings et al. (2002) argued that the evidence from their research conflicted
with other data examining the effectiveness of online social relationships. This statement
is supported by the aforementioned discussion of other research. There may be a few
possible theoretical explanations for these discrepancies.
Limitations of These Studies
The discrepancies identified may result from a number of limitations found in the
materials reviewed by Cummings et al. (2002). These can result from technological
constraints, demographic factors, or issues of modality. Each of these limitations will be
examined in further detail below.
Technological limitations. First, one reviewed study by Cummings et al. (2002)
examined only email correspondence for their CMC modality. Therefore, the study is
limited to only one mode of communication among other alternatives, e.g., IM as studied
by Hu et al. (2004). Because of its many personalized features, IM provides more
personal CMC. For example, it is in real time without delay, voice-chat and video
features are available for many IM programs, and text boxes can be personalized with the
user’s picture, favorite colors and text, and a wide variety of emoticons, e.g., :). These
options allow for both an increase in self-expression and the ability to overcompensate
for the barriers of CMC through customizable features, as stated in Tidwell and Walther
Because all research has its limitations, it is important to discuss the limitations of articles under examination .
A Level 2 heading should be flush with the left margin, bolded, and title case.
A Level 1 heading should be centered, bolded, and uppercase and lower case (also referred to as title case).
A Level 3 heading should indented 0.5” from the left margin, bolded, and lower case (except for the first word). Text should follow immediately after. If you use more than three levels of headings, consult section 3.03 of the APA manual (6th ed.) or the OWL resource on APA headings: https:// owl.purdue.e du/owl/ research_an d_citation/ apa_style/ apa_formatt ing_and_sty le_guide/ apa_heading s_and_seria tion.html /
7 VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION
(2002). Self-disclosure and intimacy may result from IM’s individualized features,
which are not as personalized in email correspondence.
Demographic limitations. In addition to the limitations of email, Cummings et
al. (2002) reviewed studies that focused on international bank employees and college
students (see Appendix B for demographic information). It is possible the participants’
CMC through email was used primarily for business, professional, and school matters
and not for relationship creation or maintenance. In this case, personal self-disclosure
and intimacy levels are expected to be lower for non-relationship interactions, as this
communication is primarily between boss and employee or student and professor.
Intimacy is not required, or even desired, for these professional relationships.
Modality limitations. Instead of professional correspondence, however,
Cummings et al.’s (2002) review of the HomeNet project prioritized already-established
relationships and CMC’s effect on relationship maintenance. The HomeNet
researchers’ sole dependence on email communication as CMC may have contributed to
the lower levels of intimacy and closeness among Internet relationships as compared to
non-Internet relationships (as cited in Cummings et al., 2002). The barriers of non-
personal communication in email could be a factor in this project, and this could lead to
less intimacy among these Internet partners. If alternate modalities of CMC were
studied in both already-established and professional relationships, perhaps these results
would have resembled those of the previously mentioned research.
VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION 8
Conclusions and Future Study
In order to gain a complete understanding of CMC’s true effect on both online
and offline relationships, it is necessary to conduct a study that examines all aspects of
CMC. This includes, but is not limited to, email, IM, voice-chat, video-chat, online
journals and diaries, online social groups with message boards, and chat rooms. The
effects on relationships of each modality may be different, and this is demonstrated by
the discrepancies in intimacy between email and IM correspondence. As each mode of
communication becomes more prevalent in individuals’ lives, it is important to examine
the impact of all modes of CMC on online and offline relationship formation,
maintenance, and even termination.
The conclusion restates the problem the paper addresses and can offer areas for further research. See the OWL resource on conclu- sions: https:// owl.purdue. edu/owl/ general_wri ting/ common_w riting_assig nments/ argument_ papers/ conclusions. html
9 VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION
References
Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social
relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103–108.
Hu, Y., Wood, J. F., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM:
Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 38–48.
Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on
disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one
another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317–348.
Underwood, H., & Findlay, B. (2004). Internet relationships and their impact on primary
relationships. Behaviour Change, 21(2), 127–140.
Start the reference list on a new page, center the title “References,” and alphabetize the entries. Do not underline or italicize the title. Double-space all entries. Every source mentioned in the paper should have an entry. For a more thorough breakdown of an APA References page https:// owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/ apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_basic_rules.html
VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION 10
Appendix A
The HomeNet Project
Started at Carnegie Mellon University in 1995, the HomeNet research project has
involved a number of studies intended to look at home Internet usage. Researchers
began this project because the Internet was originally designed as a tool for scientific
and corporate use. Home usage of the Internet was an unexpected phenomenon worthy
of extended study.
Each of HomeNet’s studies has explored a different facet of home Internet usage,
such as chatting, playing games, or reading the news. Within the past few years, the
explosion of social networking has also proven to be an area deserving of additional
research. Refer to Table A1 for a more detailed description of HomeNet studies.
Table A1
Description of HomeNet Studies by Year Year of Study Contents of Study 1995-‐1996 93 families in Pittsburgh involved in school
or community organizations 1997-‐1999 25 families with home businesses 1998-‐1999 151 Pittsburgh households 2000-‐2002 National survey
Begin each appendix on a new page, with the word appendix in the top center. Use an identifying capital letter (e.g., Appendix A, Appendix B, etc.) if you have more than one appendix. If you are referring to more than one appendix in your text, use the plural appendices (APA only).
The first paragraph of the appendix should flush with the left margin. Additional paragraphs should be indented.
Label tables and figures in the appendix as you would in the text of your manuscript, using the letter A before the number to clarify that the table or figure belongs to the appendix.
VARYING DEFINITIONS OF ONLINE COMMUNICATION 11
Appendix B Demographic Information for Cummings et al. (2002)’s Review
If an appendix consists entirely of a table or figure, the title of the table or figure should serve as the title of the appendix.