the primary tools and methods used in the development of valid, reliable psychological tests and assessments

PSY 550: Final Project Guidelines and Grading Guide

Overview The final project for this course is the creation of an evaluative, comprehensive literature review. You will select a psychological measure or test. Ideally, the test should be one you see yourself using in the future, that has been used to assess a diagnosis of interest, or that has been used in a population on which you plan to focus. You will evaluate the test using research in peer-reviewed psychology journals to substantiate claims about its validity, reliability, applications, and implications. The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Four and Seven. The final product will be submitted in Module Ten. This assessment will assess your mastery with respect to the following course outcomes:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
the primary tools and methods used in the development of valid, reliable psychological tests and assessments
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

 Analyze the primary tools and methods used in the development of valid, reliable psychological tests and assessments

 Evaluate the appropriateness of the psychometric methods used to develop, validate, administer, and interpret the results of psychological measurement instruments in published research studies

 Apply psychometric principles to the evaluation of the methods employed and results of published research studies

 Evaluate the influence of cultural and environmental factors on the effectiveness of psychological testing and assessment

 Assess the ethical issues involved in test administration and interpretation of testing and assessment results

Prompt Your literature review should answer the following prompt: What is the overall appropriateness and practical value of your selected psychological assessment measure? Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Background of the test a. What is the purpose of the test? b. What type of test is it? What type of information does it yield? c. How is it administered and scored? Who publishes the results? d. For whom is this test intended? Who else has utilized this test?

II. Assessment of the test a. To what extent does the test employ appropriate psychometric principles? b. To what extent has the reliability and validity of the test been demonstrated for varying populations? c. What are the cut scores for “normal” versus “at-risk” and/or “clinically significant”? Is the method for interpreting and

communicating the results (e.g., scaled scores, percentile ranks, z-scores, t-scores) appropriate? d. Are there any specific cultural concerns that should be attended to? To what extent do cultural and environmental factors for

minorities or special populations impact the effectiveness of the measure?

e. To what extent are there ethical issues related to the use, administration, and interpretation of this measure? III. Practical applications of the test

a. Under what circumstances would you give this test? Provide example scenarios in which the test would be helpful to another mental health professional, parent, teacher, student, individual, court, business, or other profession?

b. For what purposes and with what clients would you not consider it useful? What are the limitations of this test? c. What issues must you attend to carefully in order to present the test results accurately (e.g., not over- or under-interpret their

significance) and ethically? d. What strategies would you use to help you or your client make decisions resulting from an assessment (e.g., pairing results with

other kinds of information)?

Instructions Milestone One: Topic Selection In task 4-3, you will a description of the general topic you intend to pursue as well as a rationale for your selection. Psychological assessment measures are reviewed in the Buros Mental Measurements Yearbook (a reference book that can be requested from the library or https://marketplace.unl.edu/buros/). This can be very helpful, but it should not be used solely as a means to identify potential psychological assessment measures. This will be submitted for feedback; you will be awarded full points for the submission or 0 points for no submission. Milestone Two: Annotated Bibliography In task 7-3, you will submit an annotated bibliography that categorizes all resources located in the topic area of interest. You should use at least seven scholarly resources, including peer-reviewed research articles or academic texts, to write this review. An example of an appropriate text would be Psychological Testing by Anne Anastasi and Susana Urbina. This document should include full bibliographic information (title, author, and other reference information), the abstract, and your notes about how the resource informs your understanding of the topic. Use APA format for this document, as with all work submitted in this course. This milestone is graded using the Annotated Bibliography Rubric. Final Product: Comprehensive Literature Review In task 10-1, you will submit your final literature review. This should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the main elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. You should comprehensively review and integrate (at a minimum) seven scholarly resources, including peer-reviewed research articles and/or well-respected texts. This milestone is graded using the Final Project Rubric (below).

https://marketplace.unl.edu/buros/
Final Project Rubric Requirements of submission: Written components of project must follow these formatting guidelines when applicable: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and APA format for all elements. The literature review should be a minimum of eight pages, not including references and a cover page (which are required). Instructor feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Background

Meets “Proficient” and cites specific, relevant examples to establish a robust context for the literature review

The purpose, type, intended populations, and uses of the test are sufficiently analyzed to establish an appropriate context for the literature review

The purpose, type, intended populations, or uses of the test are not sufficiently analyzed to establish an appropriate context for the literature review

Either the purpose, type, intended populations, or uses of the test are not discussed

5

Assessment: Psychometric

Principles

Meets “Proficient” and claims are qualified and nuanced in their assessment

Makes accurate claims about the extent to which the test employs appropriate psychometric principles based on the available evidence

Not all claims about the extent to which the test employs appropriate psychometric principles are accurate given the available evidence

Does not make claims about the extent to which the test employs appropriate psychometric principles

10

Assessment: Reliability and Validity

Meets “Proficient” and qualifies claims specific to different population groups

Makes accurate claims about the extent to which the test’s reliability and validity have been demonstrated by the research

Not all claims about the reliability and validity of the test are accurate based on the research

Does not make claims about the reliability and validity of the test

10

Assessment: Results

Meets “Proficient” and substantiates claims with scholarly research

Makes and justifies claims about the appropriateness of the methods for interpreting and communicating the results based on psychometric best practices

Not all claims about the methods for interpreting and communicating the results are justifiable based on psychometric best practices

Does not make claims about the methods for interpreting and communicating the results

10

Assessment: Special Populations

Meets “Proficient” and substantiates claims with scholarly research

Makes and justifies claims about the impacts of cultural and environmental factors on the effectiveness of the test for special populations

Not all claims about the impacts of cultural and environmental factors are justifiable

Does not make claims about the impacts of cultural and environmental factors on the effectiveness of the test

10

http://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/production_documentation/formatting/rubric_feedback_instructions_student.pdf
Assessment: Ethical Issues

Meets “Proficient” and substantiates claims with scholarly research

Makes and justifies claims about the ethical issues related to the use, administration, and interpretation of the measure

Not all claims about the ethical issues related to the use, administration, and interpretation of the measure are justifiable

Does not make claims about the ethical issues related to the use, administration, and interpretation of the measure

10

Applications: Uses

Meets “Proficient” and proposals represent insightful or creative ways for promoting psychological well-being

Proposes multiple, specific scenarios in which the test would be appropriate for use based on the evidence

Proposed scenarios are limited in number or lack sufficient detail to confirm their appropriateness

Does not propose scenarios in which the test would be appropriate for use

10

Applications: Limitations

Meets “Proficient” and the limitations of the test are nuanced and well qualified

Proposes multiple, specific scenarios in which the test would not be appropriate for use based on the evidence

Proposed scenarios are limited in number, lack sufficient detail or are not based on the evidence

Does not propose scenarios in which the test would be appropriate for use

10

Applications: Presentation of

Results

Meets “Proficient” and the solutions represent insightful or creative ways for promoting psychological well-being

Proposes solutions for accurately and ethically presenting the results of the test based on the research

Proposes solutions for accurately and ethically presenting the results of the test that are not based on the research

Does not propose solutions for accurately and ethically presenting the results of the test

10

Applications: Decision Making

Meets “Proficient” and the proposals represent insightful or creative ways for promoting psychological well-being

Proposes appropriate strategies for making informed decisions based on the results of the measurement

Not all proposed strategies for decision making are appropriate

Does not propose strategies for making informed decisions based on the results of the measurement

10

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

5

Total 100%

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: Content is protected !!
Live Chat 1 763 309 4299EmailWhatsApp

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code GINGER