The written component is a bit different. It should show that you have done research, and one way it does that is by tellling how you thought about what you wanted your exhibit to do: entertain? educate? persuade? Who is its audience–their ages, their ethnic backgrounds, their interests? What kinds of objects will meet your goals? What sources informed you? Go back to the description of the Museum Visit Assignment in the syllabus, and consider how your exhibit meets or relates to the various things that assignment asks you to notice when visiting an exhibit. It should be 500-750 words. You do not need to do in-text citations, as you would in a formal research paper. You do need to talk about sources; consider using signal phrases, like this:
“The NYT article about the recent discoveries of underground structures at Stonehenge encouraged me to put a mockup of those structures in my exhibit.” (Ordinarily, in a research paper, a sentence like that would require an in-text citation leading the reader to the NYT article citation in the Works Cited list. You don’t need to do that part, but you are still telling your reader how you reached conclusions. and the NYT article will be in your Works Cited list, just the same.)
The other way you show your research, of course, is a Works Cited list in MLA format.
( ALL THE RESOURCES THAT I WANT YOU TO WRITE FROM IT I ATTACHED IT)